A safe reinforcement learning algorithm for supervisory control of power plants

To behave adaptively, we must learn from the consequences of our actions. Doing so is difficult when the consequences of an action follow a delay. This introduces the problem of temporal credit assignment. When feedback follows a sequence of decisions, how should the individual assign credit to the intermediate actions that comprise the sequence? Research in reinforcement learning provides 2 general solutions to this problem: model-free reinforcement learning and model-based reinforcement learning. In this review, we examine connections between stimulus-response and cognitive learning theories, habitual and goal-directed control, and model-free and model-based reinforcement learning. We then consider a range of problems related to temporal credit assignment. These include second-order conditioning and secondary reinforcers, latent learning and detour behavior, partially observable Markov decision processes, actions with distributed outcomes, and hierarchical learning. We ask whether humans and animals, when faced with these problems, behave in a manner consistent with reinforcement learning techniques. Throughout, we seek to identify neural substrates of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning. The former class of techniques is understood in terms of the neurotransmitter dopamine and its effects in the basal ganglia. The latter is understood in terms of a distributed network of regions including the prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobes, cerebellum, and basal ganglia. Not only do reinforcement learning techniques have a natural interpretation in terms of human and animal behavior but they also provide a useful framework for understanding neural reward valuation and action selection.

Fuzzy-based predictive deep reinforcement learning for robust and constrained optimal control of industrial solar thermal plants

Animals integrate knowledge about how the state of the environment evolves to choose actions that maximise reward. Such goal-directed behaviour - or model-based (MB) reinforcement learning (RL) - can flexibly adapt choice to changes, being thus distinct from simpler habitual - or model-free (MF) RL - strategies. Previous inactivation and neuroimaging work implicates prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the caudate striatal region in MB-RL; however, details are scarce about its implementation at the single-neuron level. Here, we recorded from two PFC regions – the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC), and two striatal regions, caudate and putamen – while two rhesus macaques performed a sequential decision-making (two-step) task in which MB-RL involves knowledge about the statistics of reward and state transitions. All four regions, but particularly the ACC, encoded the rewards received and tracked the probabilistic state transitions that occurred. However, ACC (and to a lesser extent caudate) encoded the key variables of the task - namely the interaction between reward, transition and choice – which underlies MB decision-making. ACC and caudate neurons also encoded MB-derived estimates of choice values. Moreover, caudate value estimates of the choice options flipped when a rare transition occurred, demonstrating value update based on structural knowledge of the task. The striatal regions were unique (relative to PFC) in encoding the current and previous rewards with opposing polarities, reminiscent of dopaminergic neurons, and indicative of a MF prediction error. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of selective and temporally dissociable neural mechanisms underlying goal-directed behaviour.

Reinforcement learning (RL) is one of the popular methods for intelligent control and decision making in the field of robotics recently. The goal of RL is to learn an optimal policy of the agent by interacting with the environment via trail and error. There are two main algorithms for RL problems, including model-free and model-based methods. Model-free RL is driven by historical trajectories and empirical data of the agent to optimize the policy, which needs to take actions in the environment to collect the trajectory data and may cause the damage of the robot during training in the real environment. The main different between model-based and model-free RL is that a model of the transition probability in the interaction environment is employed. Thus the agent can search the optimal policy through internal simulation. However, the model of the transition probability is usually estimated from historical data in a single environment with statistical errors. Therefore, an issue is faced by the agent is that the optimal policy is sensitive to perturbations in the model of the environment which can lead to serious degradation in performance. Robust RL aims to learn a robust optimal policy that accounts for model uncertainty of the transition probability to systematically mitigate the sensitivity of the optimal policy in perturbed environments. In this overview, we begin with an introduction to the algorithms in RL, then focus on the model uncertainty of the transition probability in robust RL. In parallel, we highlight the current research and challenges of robust RL for robot control. To conclude, we describe some research areas in robust RL and look ahead to the future work about robot control in complex environments.

Flooding mitigation through safe & trustworthy reinforcement learning

Recent evidence in neuroscience and psychology suggests that a single reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm only accounts for less than 60% of the variance of human choice behavior in an uncertain and dynamic environment, where the amount of uncertainty in state-action-state transitions drift over time. The prediction performance further decreases when the size of the state space increases. We proposed a hierarchical context-dependent RL control framework that dynamically exerted control weights on model-based (MB) and multiple model-free (MF) RL strategies associated with different task goals. To properly assess the validity of the proposed method, we considered a two-stage Markov decision task (MDT) in which the three different types of context changed over time. We trained 57 different RL control models on a Caltech MDT data set; then, we assessed their prediction performance using a Bayesian model comparison. This large-scale computer simulation analysis revealed that the model providing the most accurate prediction was the version that implemented the competition between the MB and multiple goal-dependent MF RL strategies. The present study demonstrates the applicability of the goal-driven RL control to a variety of real-world human-robot interaction scenarios.

Reinforcement learning and human behavior

In this paper, an intelligent multi-microgrid (MMG) energy management method is proposed based on deep neural network (DNN) and model-free reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. In the studied problem, multiple microgrids are connected to a main distribution system and they purchase power from the distribution system to maintain local consumption. From the perspective of the distribution system operator (DSO), the target is to decrease the demand-side peak-to-average ratio (PAR), and to maximize the profit from selling energy. To protect user privacy, DSO learns the MMG response by implementing a DNN without direct access to user's information. Further, the DSO selects its retail pricing strategy via a Monte Carlo method from RL, which optimizes the decision based on prediction. The simulation results from the proposed data-driven deep learning method, as well as comparisons with conventional model-based methods, substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in solving power system problems with partial or uncertain information.

It is now widely accepted that instrumental actions can be either goal-directed or habitual; whereas the former are rapidly acquired and regulated by their outcome, the latter are reflexive, elicited by antecedent stimuli rather than their consequences. Model-based reinforcement learning (RL) provides an elegant description of goal-directed action. Through exposure to states, actions and rewards, the agent rapidly constructs a model of the world and can choose an appropriate action based on quite abstract changes in environmental and evaluative demands. This model is powerful but has a problem explaining the development of habitual actions. To account for habits, theorists have argued that another action controller is required, called model-free RL, that does not form a model of the world but rather caches action values within states allowing a state to select an action based on its reward history rather than its consequences. Nevertheless, there are persistent problems with important predictions from the model; most notably the failure of model-free RL correctly to predict the insensitivity of habitual actions to changes in the action-reward contingency. Here, we suggest that introducing model-free RL in instrumental conditioning is unnecessary, and demonstrate that reconceptualizing habits as action sequences allows model-based RL to be applied to both goal-directed and habitual actions in a manner consistent with what real animals do. This approach has significant implications for the way habits are currently investigated and generates new experimental predictions.

Model-free episodic reinforcement learning problems define the environment reward with functions that often provide only sparse information throughout the task. Consequently, agents are not given enough feedback about the fitness of their actions until the task ends with success or failure. Previous work addresses this problem with reward shaping. In this paper we introduce a novel approach to improve model-free reinforcement learning agents' performance with a three step approach. Specifically, we collect demonstration data, use the data to recover a linear function using inverse reinforcement learning and we use the recovered function for potential-based reward shaping. Our approach is model-free and scalable to high dimensional domains. To show the scalability of our approach we present two sets of experiments in a two dimensional Maze domain, and the 27 dimensional Mario AI domain. We compare the performance of our algorithm to previously introduced reinforcement learning from demonstration algorithms. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art in cumulative reward, learning rate and asymptotic performance.

We propose a computationally efficient approach to safe reinforcement learning (RL) for frequency regulation in power systems with high levels of variable renewable energy resources. The approach draws on set-theoretic control techniques to craft a neural network-based control policy that is guaranteed to satisfy safety-critical state constraints, without needing to solve a model predictive control or projection problem in real time. By exploiting the properties of robust controlled-invariant polytopes, we construct a novel, closed-form "safety-filter" that enables end-to-end safe learning using any policy gradient-based RL algorithm. We then apply the safety filter in conjunction with the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm to regulate frequency in a modified 9-bus power system, and show that the learned policy is more cost-effective than robust linear feedback control techniques while maintaining the same safety guarantee. We also show that the proposed paradigm outperforms DDPG augmented with constraint violation penalties.

Arbitration between model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) reinforcement learning (RL) is key feature of human reinforcement learning. The computational model of arbitration control has been demonstrated to outperform conventional reinforcement learning algorithm, in terms of not only behavioral data but also neural signals. However, this arbitration process does not take full account of contextual changes in environment during learning. By incorporating a Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture model into the arbitration process, we propose a meta-controller for RL that quickly adapts to contextual changes of environment. The proposed model performs better than a conventional model-free RL, model-based RL, and arbitration model.

Sampled-data control through model-free reinforcement learning with effective experience replay

Distributed Coding of Actual and Hypothetical Outcomes in the Orbital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

As a powerful tool for solving nonlinear complex system control problems, the model-free reinforcement learning hardly guarantees system stability in the early stage of learning, especially with high complicity learning components applied. In this paper, a reinforcement learning framework imitating many cognitive mechanisms of brain such as attention, competition, and integration is proposed to realize sample-efficient self-stabilized online learning control. Inspired by the generation of consciousness in human brain, multiple actors that work either competitively for best interaction results or cooperatively for more accurate modeling and predictions were applied. A deep reinforcement learning implementation for challenging control tasks and a real-time control implementation of the proposed framework are respectively given to demonstrate the high sample efficiency and the capability of maintaining system stability in the online learning process without requiring an initial admissible control.