A Simple Algorithm Using Ventilator Parameters to Predict Successfully Rapid Weaning Program in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients

BackgroundWhile machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used to predict outcomes in health care, their practical effect on health care operations, such as bed capacity management, remains underexplored. There is a variety of traditionally used evaluation metrics to analyze ML models; however, decision makers in health care settings require a deeper understanding of their implications for resource management. Traditional performance measures often fail to provide this practical insight.MethodsIn this work, we conduct a simulation study to evaluate the impact of ML-driven length-of-stay (LOS) predictions on intensive care unit (ICU) bed capacity management. Two classification models differing in terms of explainability and interpretability, logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), are applied to predict ICU-LOS. We use the HiRID dataset containing high-frequency data of more than 33,000 patients. The predictions of the ML models are integrated into a simulation framework that replicates real-world ICU bed management, allowing for the assessment of the practical implications of using these algorithms in a clinical setting.ResultsThe application of both classification models results in improved capacity control regarding the key performance indicators in the simulation study, with XGB outperforming LR. While LR leads to slight overoccupancy in the ICU, slight underoccupancy can be observed when XGB is applied.ConclusionOur study bridges the gap between predictive accuracy and practical application by emphasizing the importance of evaluating ML models within the context of ICU capacity management. The simulation-based approach offers a more relevant assessment for health care practitioners, providing actionable insights that go beyond classical performance measures and directly address the needs of decision makers in clinical practice.HighlightsWe apply multiple classification models for ICU-LOS prediction using time-series data. This approach enables an update of the initial prediction resulting in the possibility of efficiently managing intensive care capacities.We present a simulation-based approach to evaluate ML algorithms and their impact on bed capacity management in real-world clinical settings.Our work provides in-depth insights into the impact of using ML techniques as decision support systems in the ICU and can lead to increased acceptance in practice.

Although the goal of rectal cancer treatment is to restore gastrointestinal continuity, some patients with rectal cancer develop a permanent stoma (PS) after sphincter-saving operations. Although many studies have identified the risk factors and causes of PS, few have precisely predicted the probability of PS formation before surgery. To validate whether an artificial intelligence model can accurately predict PS formation in patients with rectal cancer after sphincter-saving operations. Patients with rectal cancer who underwent a sphincter-saving operation at Taipei Medical University Hospital between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021, were retrospectively included in this study. A machine learning technique was used to predict whether a PS would form after a sphincter-saving operation. We included 19 routinely available preoperative variables in the artificial intelligence analysis. To evaluate the efficiency of the model, 6 performance metrics were utilized: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve. In our classification pipeline, the data were randomly divided into a training set (80% of the data) and a validation set (20% of the data). The artificial intelligence models were trained using the training dataset, and their performance was evaluated using the validation dataset. Synthetic minority oversampling was used to solve the data imbalance. A total of 428 patients were included, and the PS rate was 13.6% (58/428) in the training set. The logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Gradient Boosting (GB), random forest, decision tree and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithms were employed. The accuracies of the logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Gradient Boosting (GB), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT) and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) models were 70%, 76%, 89%, 93%, 95%, 79% and 93%, respectively. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve values were 0.79 for the LR model, 0.84 for the GNB, 0.95 for the XGB, 0.95 for the GB, 0.99 for the RF model, 0.79 for the DT model and 0.98 for the LightGBM model. The key predictors that were identified were the distance of the lesion from the anal verge, clinical N stage, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and preoperative albumin and carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Integration of artificial intelligence with available preoperative data can potentially predict stoma outcomes after sphincter-saving operations. Our model exhibited excellent predictive ability and can improve the process of obtaining informed consent.

Accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) complicated by respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains a critical challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict this risk and compare its performance with conventional scoring systems. In this retrospective study, data from 164 patients with SCAP and respiratory failure admitted to the ICU between January 2017 and January 2024 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 114) and a validation (test) set (n = 50). Forty-five clinical features collected at admission were used as candidate predictors. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was employed for feature selection. Six ML models, including Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Decision Tree(DT),Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression(LR), were constructed and evaluated.Use SHAP analysis to assess the contribution of each feature in a machine learning model. Construct a nomogram using the top six most influential features. The GBDT model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.757-0.927) in the internal validation set, significantly outperforming the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II, AUC = 0.70). Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed mortality risks, particularly across the mid-probability range. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model provided a higher net benefit than "treat-all" and "treat-none" strategies across a broad range of threshold probabilities. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified lactate, D-dimer, temperature, albumin, Prothrombin Time and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen as the six most influential predictors of in-hospital mortality. Based on these key predictors, we further developed a simplified nomogram to facilitate bedside risk estimation. The GBDT ML model, developed from routinely available clinical data, provides a highly accurate and clinically interpretable tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in SCAP patients with respiratory failure. It outperforms traditional severity scores and holds promise for assisting clinicians in risk stratification and early intervention.

This study focuses on using various machine learning (ML) models to evaluate the shear behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. The main objective of the study is to predict the shear strength of UHPC beams reinforced with GFRP bars using ML models. We use four different ML models: support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (R.F.), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The experimental database used in the study is acquired from various literature sources and comprises 54 test observations with 11 input features. These input features are likely parameters related to the composition, geometry, and properties of the UHPC beams and GFRP bars. To ensure the ML models' generalizability and scalability, random search methods are utilized to tune the hyperparameters of the algorithms. This tuning process helps improve the performance of the models when predicting the shear strength. The study uses the ACI318M-14 and Eurocode 2 standard building codes to predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams. The ML models' predictions are compared to the results obtained from these building code standards. According to the findings, the XGBoost model demonstrates the highest predictive test performance among the investigated ML models. The study employs the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to assess the significance of each input parameter in the ML models' predictive capabilities. A Taylor diagram is used to statistically compare the accuracy of the ML models. This study concludes that ML models, particularly XGBoost, can effectively predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams.

High-risk breast lesions (HRLs) are associated with future risk of breast cancer. Considering the pathological subtypes, malignancy upgrade rate differs according to each subtype and depends on various factors such as clinical and radiological features and biopsy method. Using artificial intelligence and machine learning models in breast imaging, evaluations can be made in terms of risk estimation in different research areas. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to distinguish HRL cases requiring surgical excision from lesions with a low risk of accompanying malignancy. A total of 94 patients who were diagnosed with HRL by image-guided biopsy between January 2008 and March 2020 were included in the study. A structured database was created with clinical and radiological characteristics and histopathological results. A machine learning prediction model was created to make binary classifications of lesions as malignant or benign. Random forest, decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron machine learning algorithms were used. Among these algorithms, SVM was the most successful. The estimations of malignancy for each case detected by artificial intelligence were combined and statistical analyses were performed. Considering all cases, the malignancy upgrade rate was 24.5%. A significant association was observed between malignancy upgrade rate and lesion size (P = 0.004), presence of mammography findings (P = 0.022), and breast imaging-reporting and data system category (P = 0.001). A statistically significant association was also found between the artificial intelligence prediction model and malignancy upgrade rate (P < 0.001). With the SVM model, an 84% accuracy and 0.786 area-underthe- curve score were obtained in classifying the data as benign or malignant. Our artificial intelligence model (SVM) can predict HRLs that can be followed up with a lower risk of accompanying malignancy. Unnecessary surgeries can be reduced, or second line vacuum excisions can be performed in HRLs, which are mostly benign, by evaluating on a case-by-case basis, in line with radiology-pathology compatibility and by using an artificial intelligence model.

ObjectiveInferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is associated with important long-term complications. Predictive models for filter-related complications may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict 1-year IVC filter complications using preoperative data. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent IVC filter placement between 2013 and 2024. We identified 77 preoperative demographic and clinical features from the index hospitalization when the filter was placed. The primary outcome was 1-year filter-related complications (composite of filter thrombosis, migration, angulation, fracture, and embolization or fragmentation, vein perforation, new caval or iliac vein thrombosis, new pulmonary embolism, access site thrombosis, or failed retrieval). The data were divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Six ML models were trained using preoperative features with 10-fold cross-validation (Extreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was assessed using calibration plot and Brier score. Performance was evaluated across subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, median Area Deprivation Index, planned duration of filter, landing site of filter, and presence of prior IVC filter placement. ResultsOverall, 14,476 patients underwent IVC filter placement and 584 (4.0%) experienced 1-year filter-related complications. Patients with a primary outcome were younger (59.3 ± 16.7 years vs 63.8 ± 16.0 years; P < .001) and more likely to have thrombotic risk factors including thrombophilia, prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), and family history of VTE. The best prediction model was Extreme Gradient Boosting, achieving an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.94). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.65). Calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted/observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.07. The top 10 predictors of 1-year filter-related complications were (1) thrombophilia, (2) prior VTE, (3) antiphospholipid antibodies, (4) factor V Leiden mutation, (5) family history of VTE, (6) planned duration of IVC filter (temporary), (7) unable to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation, (8) malignancy, (9) recent or active bleeding, and (10) age. Model performance remained robust across all subgroups. ConclusionsWe developed ML models that can accurately predict 1-year IVC filter complications, performing better than logistic regression. These algorithms have potential to guide patient selection for filter placement, counselling, perioperative management, and follow-up to mitigate filter-related complications and improve outcomes.

For the intensivists, accurate assessment of the ideal timing for successful weaning from the mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is very challenging. Using artificial intelligence (AI) approach to build two-stage predictive models, namely, the try-weaning stage and weaning MV stage to determine the optimal timing of weaning from MV for ICU intubated patients, and implement into practice for assisting clinical decision making. AI and machine learning (ML) technologies were used to establish the predictive models in the stages. Each stage comprised 11 prediction time points with 11 prediction models. Twenty-five features were used for the first-stage models while 20 features were used for the second-stage models. The optimal models for each time point were selected for further practical implementation in a digital dashboard style. Seven machine learning algorithms including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), lightGBM, XGBoost, and Multilayer Perception (MLP) were used. The electronic medical records of the intubated ICU patients of Chi Mei Medical Center (CMMC) from 2016 to 2019 were included for modeling. Models with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were regarded as optimal models and used to develop the prediction system accordingly. A total of 5,873 cases were included in machine learning modeling for Stage 1 with the AUCs of optimal models ranging from 0.843 to 0.953. Further, 4,172 cases were included for Stage 2 with the AUCs of optimal models ranging from 0.889 to 0.944. A prediction system (dashboard) with the optimal models of the two stages was developed and deployed in the ICU setting. Respiratory care members expressed high recognition of the AI dashboard assisting ventilator weaning decisions. Also, the impact analysis of with- and without-AI assistance revealed that our AI models could shorten the patients' intubation time by 21 hours, besides gaining the benefit of substantial consistency between these two decision-making strategies. We noticed that the two-stage AI prediction models could effectively and precisely predict the optimal timing to wean intubated patients in the ICU from ventilator use. This could reduce patient discomfort, improve medical quality, and lower medical costs. This AI-assisted prediction system is beneficial for clinicians to cope with a high demand for ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND Accurately assessing perioperative risk is critical for informed surgical planning and patient safety. However, current prediction models often rely on structured data and overlook the nuanced clinical reasoning embedded in free-text preoperative notes. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened opportunities for harnessing unstructured clinical data, yet their application in perioperative prediction remains limited by concerns about factual accuracy. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offers a promising solution—enhancing LLM performance by grounding outputs in domain-specific knowledge sources, potentially improving both predictive accuracy and clinical interpretability. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate whether integrating LLMs with RAG can improve the prediction of 30-day postoperative mortality and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification using unstructured preoperative clinical notes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 24,491 medical records from a tertiary medical center, including preoperative anesthesia assessments, discharge summaries, and surgical information. To extract clinical insights from free-text data, we used the LLaMA 3.1-8B language model with RAG, using MedEmbed for text embedding and Miller’s Anesthesia as the primary retrieval source. We evaluated model performance under various configurations, including embedding models, chunk sizes, and few-shot prompting. Machine learning (ML) models, including random forest, support vector machines (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and logistic regression, were trained on structured features as baselines. RESULTS A total of 520 (2.1%) patients experienced in-hospital 30-day postoperative mortality. The ASA physical status distribution was as follows: class I: 535 (2.2%); class II: 15,272 (62.4%); class III: 8024 (32.8%); class IV: 606 (2.5%); and class V: 54 (0.22%). For 30-day postoperative mortality prediction, the LLaMA‑RAG model achieved an &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-score of 0.4663 (95% CI 0.4654-0.4672), versus 0.2369 (95% CI 0.2341-0.2397) without few‑shot prompting, 0.0879 (95% CI 0.0717-0.1041) without RAG, and 0.0436 (95% CI 0.0292-0.0580) without either few‑shot prompting or RAG. Among ML models, XGBoost scored 0.4459 (95% CI 0.4176-0.4742); random forest, 0.3953 (95% CI 0.3791-0.4115); logistic regression, 0.2720 (95% CI 0.2647-0.2793); and SVM, 0.2474 (95% CI 0.2275-0.2673). For ASA classification, LLaMA‑RAG achieved a micro &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-score of 0.8409 (95% CI 0.8238-0.8551) versus 0.6546 (95% CI 0.6430-0.6796) without few-shot prompting, 0.6340 (95% CI 0.6157-0.6535) without RAG, and 0.4238 (95% CI 0.3952-0.4490) without either few‑shot prompting or RAG. In comparison, XGBoost achieved 0.8273 (95% CI 0.8209-0.8498); logistic regression, 0.7940 (95% CI 0.7671-0.7950); random forest, 0.7847 (95% CI 0.7637-0.7868); and SVM, 0.7697 (95% CI 0.7637-0.7697). Notably, the model demonstrated exceptional sensitivity in identifying rare but high-risk cases, such as ASA Class 5 patients and postoperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS The LLaMA-RAG model significantly improved the prediction of postoperative mortality and ASA classification, especially for rare high-risk cases. By grounding outputs in domain knowledge, retrieval-augmented generation enhanced both accuracy and prompt‑driven interpretability over ML and ablation models—highlighting its promise for real-world clinical decision support. CLINICALTRIAL

Introduction: Ventricular dysfunction contributes to shock in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. We aimed to describe the associations between ventricular dysfunction with in-hospital mortality across the spectrum of shock severity. Hypothesis: Patients with biventricular dysfunction (BVD) have higher mortality at each Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stage. Methods: We identified CICU patients from 2007 to 2015 with available echocardiography data within 1 day of admission. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40% and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD) as moderate or greater systolic dysfunction by semi-quantitative assessment; BVD included the presence of both LVSD and RVSD. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were determined after adjustment using multivariable logistic regression. Results: We included 3,158 patients with a mean age of 68.2±14.6 years; 51.8% had acute coronary syndromes. LVSD was present in 22.3%, RVSD in 11.8%, and 16.4% had BVD. Hospital mortality increased with SCAI shock stage and was incrementally higher in patients with LVSD, RVSD and BVD across SCAI shock stages (Figure); patients with BVD had higher mortality in each SCAI shock stage. After adjustment, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality for patients with LVSD or RVSD versus those without ventricular dysfunction (p &gt;0.05), but BVD was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 1.815, 95% CI 1.237-2.663, p = 0.0023). Adding ventricular dysfunction to SCAI shock stage increased discrimination for hospital mortality (AUC 0.784 vs. 0.766, p &lt;0.001). Conclusions: Among patients admitted to the CICU, BVD was independently associated with higher hospital mortality after adjustment for shock severity. Echocardiographic assessment may augment clinical risk stratification using the SCAI shock classification.

Serratia marcescens transmission in a pediatric intensive care unit: A multifactorial occurrence

This paper is concerned with various machine Learning (ML) techniques to estimate the crop yield based on various factors, followed by an averaging technique. Multiple models are utilised by this ensemble machine learning technique called Bagging, taking weak learners as the base model to make the prediction. The pertinent ML algorithms that support crop yield prediction are Support Vector machines (SVM), Random trees (RT), Linear Regression (LR), K Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Multiple Regression (MR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). Of these, in this paper, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Ridge Regression (RR), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were implemented along with Bagging as the ensemble technique. The output of the entity models was thus averaged to give a final prediction.

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy

Aim: The majority of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are built on retrospective data, much of which is collected without explicit patient consent for use in artificial intelligence (AI) and ML applications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinicians and scientific researchers themselves consent to provide their own data for the training of ML models. Materials and Methods: This survey was conducted through an anonymous online survey, utilizing platforms such as Telegram, LinkedIn, and Viber. The target audience comprised specific international groups, primarily Russian, German, and English-speaking, of clinicians and scientific researchers. These participants ranged in their levels of expertise and experience, from beginners to veterans. The survey centered on a singular, pivotal question: “Do You Consent to the Use of Your Biological and Private Data for Training Machine Learning and AI Models?” Respondents had the option to choose from three responses: “Yes” and “No”. Results: The survey was conducted in January 2024. A total of 119 unique and verified individuals participated in the survey. The results revealed that only 50% of respondents (63 persons) expressed consent to provide their own data for the training of ML and AI models. Conclusion: In the development of ML and AI models, particularly open-source ones, it is crucial to ascertain whether participants are willing to provide their private data. While ML algorithms can transform the nature of data, it is important to remember that the primary owner of this data is the individual. Our findings show that in 50% of the cases, even participants from scientific research and clinical backgrounds – individuals typically accountable for ensuring data quality in AI and ML model development – do not consent to the use of their data in AI and ML settings. This highlights the need for more stringent consent processes and ethical considerations in the utilization of personal data in AI and ML research.

A significant number of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors experience new-onset functional impairments that impede their activities of daily living (ADL). Currently, no effective assessment tools are available to identify these high-risk patients. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting the onset of functional impairment in critically ill patients. Data for this study were sourced from a comprehensive hospital in China, focusing on adult patients admitted to the ICU from August 2022 to August 2023 without prior functional impairments. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model was utilized to select predictors for inclusion in the model. Four models, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were constructed and validated. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Additionally, the DALEX package was employed to enhance the interpretability of the final models. The study ultimately included 1,380 patients, with 684 (49.6%) exhibiting new-onset functional impairment on the seventh day after leaving the ICU. Among the four models evaluated, the SVM model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.909, accuracy of 0.838, sensitivity of 0.902, specificity of 0.772, PPV of 0.802, and NPV of 0.886. ML models are reliable tools for predicting new-onset functional impairments in critically ill patients. Notably, the SVM model emerged as the most effective, enabling early identification of patients at high risk and facilitating the implementation of timely interventions to improve ADL.

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Early prediction of sepsis can reduce the overall mortality rate and cost of sepsis treatment. Some studies have predicted mortality and development of sepsis using machine learning models. However, there is a gap between the creation of different machine learning algorithms and their implementation in clinical practice.This study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III. We established and compared the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM).A total of 3937 sepsis patients were included, with 34.3% mortality in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III group. In our comparison of 5 machine learning models (GBDT, LR, KNN, RF, and SVM), the GBDT model showed the best performance with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.992), recall (94.8%), accuracy (95.4%), and F1 score (0.933). The RF, SVM, and KNN models showed better performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.980, 0.898, and 0.877, respectively) than the LR (0.876).The GBDT model showed better performance than other machine learning models (LR, KNN, RF, and SVM) in predicting the mortality of patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit. This could be used to develop a clinical decision support system in the future.