• Home
  • Search
  • A Subjective Study on User Perception Aspects in Virtual Reality
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon38
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163384Copy DOI Icon

A Subjective Study on User Perception Aspects in Virtual Reality

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Three hundred and sixty degree video is becoming more and more popular on the Internet. By using a Head-Mounted Display, 360-degree video can render a Virtual Reality (VR) environment. However, it is still a big challenge to understand Quality of Experience (QoE) of 360-degree video since user experience during watching 360-degree video is a very complex phenomenon. In this paper, we aim to investigate four QoE aspects of 360-degree video, namely, perceptual quality, presence, cybersickness, and acceptability. In addition, four key QoE-affecting factors of encoding parameters, content motion, rendering device, and rendering mode are considered in our study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that covers a large number of factors and QoE aspects of 360-degree video. In this study, a subjective experiment is conducted using 60 video versions generated from three original 360-degree videos. Based on statistical analysis of the obtained results, various findings on the impacts of the factors on the QoE aspects are provided. In particular, regarding the impacts of encoding parameters, it is found that the difference of QoE is negligible between video versions encoded at 4 K and 2.5 K resolutions. Also, it is suggested that 360-degree video should not be encoded at HD resolution or lower when watching in VR mode using Head Mounted Display. In addition, the bitrate for good QoE varies widely across different video contents. With respect to the content motion factor, its impact is statistically significant on the perceptual quality, presence, and cybersickness. In a comparison of two rendering device sets used in this study, there is no statistically significant difference found for the acceptability and cybersickness. However, the differences of the perceptual quality and presence are indicated to be statistically significant. Regarding the rendering mode, a comparison between VR and non-VR modes is also conducted. Although the non-VR mode always achieves higher perceptual quality scores and higher acceptability rates, more than a half of the viewers prefer the VR mode to the non-VR mode when watching versions encoded at the resolutions of fHD or higher. By contrast, the non-VR mode is preferred at the HD resolution.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations89

Towards subjective quality of experience assessment for omnidirectional video streaming

  • May 01, 2017
  • Raimund Schatz +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Perceptual video quality metric for compression artefacts: from two‐dimensional to omnidirectional

  • Jan 05, 2018
  • IET Image Processing
  • Wenjie Zou +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Time-Variant Visual Attention in 360-Degree Video Playback

  • Sep 01, 2018
  • Huiwen Huang +4
  • Conference Article

An Adaptive Transmission Strategy for Tiled 360-Degree VR Videos in NOMA Systems

  • Apr 08, 2024
  • Hsueh-Wen Tseng +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations168

An evaluation of Heart Rate and ElectroDermal Activity as an objective QoE evaluation method for immersive virtual reality environments

  • Jun 01, 2016
  • Darragh Egan +5
  • Research Article

Subjective and Objective Audio-Visual Quality Assessment for Omnidirectional Videos.

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
  • Xilei Zhu +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Extended-Reality Technologies: An Overview of Emerging Applications in Medical Education and Clinical Care.

  • Jul 01, 2021
  • The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences
  • Wilfredo López-Ojeda +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Temperature‐Tunable Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Optical Combiners for Extended Reality Applications

  • Oct 28, 2024
  • Advanced Intelligent Systems
  • Yuanjie Xia +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations17

Pricing and regulating Quality of Experience

  • Jun 01, 2012
  • Stefan Wahlmueller +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations23

User Profile Analysis for Enhancing QoE of 360 Panoramic Video in Virtual Reality Environment

  • Oct 01, 2018
  • Muhammad Shahid Anwar +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

The Development of Virtual Reality as a Tool to Investigate Eating Behavior

  • May 29, 2020
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • James Hollis +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations16

A Server-Side Optimized Hybrid Multicast-Unicast Strategy for Multi-User Adaptive 360-Degree Video Streaming

  • Sep 01, 2019
  • Nuowen Kan +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations10

360-degree interactive video application for Cultural Heritage Education

  • Jul 10, 2017
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University)
  • Lemonia Argyriou +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Networked telepresence system using web browsers and omni-directional video streams

  • Mar 22, 2005
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Tomoya Ishikawa +7
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile VR Interaction Methods on Performance, Preference, and Enjoyment

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Summer Lindsey +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.