• Home
  • Search
  • Absolute quantification of DNA damage response proteins
  • Cite Icon6
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-023-00295-0Copy DOI Icon

Absolute quantification of DNA damage response proteins

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

BackgroundDNA damage response (DDR) and repair are vital for safeguarding genetic information and ensuring the survival and accurate transmission of genetic material. DNA damage, such as DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), triggers a response where sensor proteins recognize DSBs. Information is transmitted to kinases, initiating a sequence resulting in the activation of the DNA damage response and recruitment of other DDR and repair proteins to the DSB site in a highly orderly sequence. Research has traditionally focused on individual protein functions and their order, with limited quantitative analysis, prompting this study’s attempt at absolute quantification of DNA damage response and repair proteins and capturing changes in protein chromatin affinity after DNA damage through biochemical fractionation methods.ResultsTo assess the intracellular levels of proteins involved in DDR and repair, multiple proteins associated with different functions were quantified in EPC2-hTERT cells. H2AX had the highest intracellular abundance (1.93 × 106 molecules/cell). The components of the MRN complex were present at the comparable levels: 6.89 × 104 (MRE11), 2.17 × 104 (RAD50), and 2.35 × 104 (NBS1) molecules/cell. MDC1 was present at 1.27 × 104 molecules/cell. The intracellular levels of ATM and ATR kinases were relatively low: 555 and 4860 molecules/cell, respectively. The levels of cellular proteins involved in NHEJ (53BP1: 3.03 × 104; XRCC5: 2.62 × 104; XRCC6: 5.05 × 105 molecules/cell) were more than an order of magnitude higher than that involved in HR (RAD51: 2500 molecules/cell). Furthermore, we analyzed the dynamics of MDC1 and γH2AX proteins in response to DNA damage induced by the unstable agent neocarzinostatin (NCS). Using cell biochemical fractionation, cells were collected and analyzed at different time points after NCS exposure. Results showed that γH2AX in chromatin fraction peaked at 1 h post-exposure and gradually decreased, while MDC1 translocated from the isotonic to the hypertonic fraction, peaking at 1 hour as well. The study suggests increased MDC1 affinity for chromatin through binding to γH2AX induced by DNA damage. The γH2AX-bound MDC1 (in the hypertonic fraction) to γH2AX ratio at 1 h post-exposure was 1:56.4, with lower MDC1 levels which may attributed to competition with other proteins.ConclusionsThe approach provided quantitative insights into protein dynamics in DNA damage response.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations95

Mammalian TIMELESS Is Required for ATM-dependent CHK2 Activation and G2/M Checkpoint Control

  • Jan 01, 2010
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Xiaoming Yang +2
  • Discussion

Stoichiometry of ubiquitin-binding proteins directs DSB repair

  • Oct 28, 2013
  • Cell Cycle
  • Christopher J Bakkenist +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Cholangiocytes' primary cilia regulate DNA damage response and repair.

  • Aug 12, 2025
  • American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology
  • Estanislao Peixoto +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations605

PARP1-dependent Kinetics of Recruitment of MRE11 and NBS1 Proteins to Multiple DNA Damage Sites

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Jean-François Haince +6
  • Abstract
  • Citations1

Fanconi Anemia and the Response of Human Hematopoietic Cells to DNA Damage

  • Nov 16, 2008
  • Blood
  • Magan Trottier +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations84

A proteomics approach for the identification of nucleophosmin and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C1/C2 as chromatin-binding proteins in response to DNA double-strand breaks

  • May 10, 2005
  • Biochemical Journal
  • Seung Yun Lee +5
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations10

Recruitment of proteins to DNA double-strand breaks: MDC1 directly recruits RAP80

  • Sep 01, 2011
  • Cell Cycle
  • Carmit Strauss +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

MTA family of proteins in DNA damage response: mechanistic insights and potential applications

  • Oct 21, 2014
  • Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
  • Da-Qiang Li +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

2-Mercaptoethanol protects against DNA double-strand breaks after kidney ischemia and reperfusion injury through GPX4 upregulation.

  • Aug 22, 2022
  • Pharmacological Reports
  • Daeun Moon +3
  • Supplementary Content

Phosphorylation events surrounding the DNA damage response in "Saccharomyces cerevisiae"

  • Jan 01, 2007
  • edoc (University of Basel)
  • Thomas Schleker
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Differential expression of TP53 associated genes in Fanconi anemia cells after mitomycin C and hydroxyurea treatment

  • Jul 05, 2008
  • Mut.Res.-Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Angélica Martinez +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Lamin A/C facilitates DNA damage response by modulating ATM signaling and homologous recombination pathways

  • Aug 20, 2024
  • Animal Cells and Systems
  • Seong-Jung Kim +3
  • Dissertation

Role of 5-FU in DNA double strand break repair for improved targets in colorectal cancer therapy

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Upadhyayula Sai Srinivas
  • News Article
  • Citations6

Melanoma and DNA damage from a distance (farstander effect).

  • Nov 25, 2010
  • Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
  • Shobhan Gaddameedhi +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations77

Peptide Production and Decay Rates Affect the Quantitative Accuracy of Protein Cleavage Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry (PC-IDMS)

  • Sep 01, 2012
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • Christopher M Shuford +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.