• Home
  • Search
  • Accuracy assessment of GPS precise point positioning (PPP) technique using different web-based online services in a forest environment
  • Cite Icon11
  • https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.140.7-8.4Copy DOI Icon

Accuracy assessment of GPS precise point positioning (PPP) technique using different web-based online services in a forest environment

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Since Global Positioning System (GPS) has been routinely conducted in many engineering projects, it is also effectively applied to the assessment and preventing of forest and natural resources. Depending on the GPS survey method preferred in the applications performed around the forest environments, different level point positioning accuracy can be achieved. Traditionally, for many precise positioning applications, relative static positioning has been used. The data obtained have been analyzed with high-cost scientific and commercial software, which are required a good knowledge of processing procedures. However, in recent years, web based online services that use Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technique, developed as a special type of relative positioning, that enables to process and analyze the static data easily, have become a significant alternative for users. These developments on GPS based surveyings that significantly make contributions to the studies applied around the forest environment, in terms of time, cost, accuracy and labour are preferred in many engineering facilities. In this study, it is aimed to research performance of GPS PPP technique and web based online services in positioning applications especially performed around the forest environments. For this purpose, two test stations have been established in different locations around the forest area, located in Campus of Davutpasa, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, and stations have been observed repeatedly in static GPS surveying mode for 3 days and per day with 3-hours observation duration. The observations have been computed by commercial software as using final GPS ephemerides products so called TopconTools v8.2 and also by web based online services namely OPUS, AUSPOS, CSRS-PPP, GAPS and APPS. From the results, when 3D positioning differences have been examined, it is seen that the positional accuracy is range from 0.024 m to 0.251 m for TP01 and from 0.078 m to 1.033 m for TP02 with respect to both relative solution and PPP solution, which is used by web based online services. When the results have been examined for only CSRS-PPP, APPS and GAPS services, which are used PPP solution, it is seen that the positional accuracy for 3D positioning differences is range from 0.024 m to 0.251 m for TP01 and from 0.078 m to 0.859 m for TP02. The results show that since the static GPS data is collected for duration of 3-hours and more, PPP technique and the web based online services using this technique for precise positioning applications around the forest environment give effective solutions to the users and at the same time decrease the survey cost with respect to equipment and software.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Evaluation of the GPS Precise Point Positioning technique during the 21 July 2017 Kos-Bodrum (East Aegean Sea) Mw 6.6 earthquake

  • Dec 01, 2018
  • Arabian Journal of Geosciences
  • Ali Hasan Dogan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Subsidence is determined in the heart of the Central Valley using Post Processed Static and Precise Point Positioning techniques

  • Dec 07, 2019
  • Journal of Applied Geodesy
  • Y Facio +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Analysis of GNSS Data Using Precise Point Positioning Technique for the Determination of Permanent Station in Romania

  • Sep 01, 2015
  • Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering
  • Sorin Nistor +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations37

Carrier phase-based ionospheric observables using PPP models

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Geodesy and Geodynamics
  • Yan Xiang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Performance Evaluation of Precise Point Positioning Using Dual Frequency Multi-GNSS Observations

  • Dec 01, 2020
  • Artificial Satellites
  • Jabir Shabbir Malik
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Better thresholds and weights to improve GNSS PPP under ionospheric scintillation activity at low latitudes

  • Nov 25, 2019
  • GPS Solutions
  • Xiaomin Luo +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations134

Uncovering common misconceptions in GNSS Precise Point Positioning and its future prospect

  • May 21, 2016
  • GPS Solutions
  • Suelynn Choy +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

An investigation into the performance of real-time GPS+GLONASS Precise Point Positioning (PPP) in New Zealand

  • May 12, 2017
  • Journal of Applied Geodesy
  • Ken Harima +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

GLONASS-based precise point positioning and performance analysis

  • Aug 21, 2012
  • Advances in Space Research
  • Changsheng Cai +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations75

Experimental assessment of post-processed kinematic Precise Point Positioning method for structural health monitoring

  • May 16, 2014
  • Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
  • Cemal Ozer Yigit
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

GPS Based Reduced-Dynamic Orbit Determination for Low Earth Orbiters with Ambiguity Fixing

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
  • Yang Yang +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Mitigation of Unmodeled Error to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-GNSS PPP for Crustal Deformation Monitoring

  • Sep 25, 2019
  • Remote Sensing
  • Kai Zheng +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

Real-Time Retrieval of Precipitable Water Vapor From Galileo Observations by Using the MGEX Network

  • Feb 07, 2020
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Cuixian Lu +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations9

Precise GNSS Positioning in Arctic Regions

  • Feb 10, 2014
  • Kees De Jong +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Modeling and Assessment of GPS/BDS Combined Precise Point Positioning

  • Jul 22, 2016
  • Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
  • Junping Chen +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.