• Home
  • Search
  • Acoustic detection and classification of microchiroptera using machine learning: Lessons learned from automatic speech recognition
  • Cite Icon80
  • https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2166948Copy DOI Icon

Acoustic detection and classification of microchiroptera using machine learning: Lessons learned from automatic speech recognition

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Current automatic acoustic detection and classification of microchiroptera utilize global features of individual calls (i.e., duration, bandwidth, frequency extrema), an approach that stems from expert knowledge of call sonograms. This approach parallels the acoustic phonetic paradigm of human automatic speech recognition (ASR), which relied on expert knowledge to account for variations in canonical linguistic units. ASR research eventually shifted from acoustic phonetics to machine learning, primarily because of the superior ability of machine learning to account for signal variation. To compare machine learning with conventional methods of detection and classification, nearly 3000 search-phase calls were hand labeled from recordings of five species: Pipistrellus bodenheimeri, Molossus molossus, Lasiurus borealis, L. cinereus semotus, and Tadarida brasiliensis. The hand labels were used to train two machine learning models: a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for detection and classification and a hidden Markov model (HMM) for classification. The GMM detector produced 4% error compared to 32% error for a baseline broadband energy detector, while the GMM and HMM classifiers produced errors of 0.6 +/- 0.2% compared to 16.9 +/- 1.1% error for a baseline discriminant function analysis classifier. The experiments showed that machine learning algorithms produced errors an order of magnitude smaller than those for conventional methods.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Value of genomics- and radiomics-based machine learning models in the identification of breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Dec 01, 2022
  • Annals of Translational Medicine
  • Yiwen Zhang +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Automated speech recognition bias in personnel selection: The case of automatically scored job interviews.

  • Jun 01, 2025
  • The Journal of applied psychology
  • Louis Hickman +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Machine Learning for Intensive Care Unit Length-of-Stay Prediction: A Simulation-Based Approach to Bed Capacity Management.

  • Dec 26, 2025
  • Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
  • Sara Garber +1
  • Dissertation

Integrate template matching and statistical modeling for continuous speech recognition

  • Dec 01, 2011
  • Xie Sun
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations40

Machine Learning Models for Blood Glucose Level Prediction in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

  • Nov 20, 2023
  • JMIR Medical Informatics
  • Kui Liu +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

Optimisation and interpretation of machine and deep learning models for improved water quality management in Lake Loktak

  • Dec 25, 2023
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Swapan Talukdar +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations527

Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models

  • Sep 16, 2011
  • Information and Software Technology
  • Jianfeng Wen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations475

Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey

  • Jan 31, 2022
  • ACM Computing Surveys
  • Hongsheng Hu +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Prediction of shear behavior of glass FRP bars-reinforced ultra-highperformance concrete I-shaped beams using machine learning

  • Aug 30, 2023
  • International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
  • Asif Ahmed +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Development of Monthly Reference Evapotranspiration Machine Learning Models and Mapping of Pakistan—A Comparative Study

  • May 23, 2022
  • Water
  • Jizhang Wang +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Do You Consent to the Use of Your Biological Data for Training ML and AI Models? Online Survey Targeting Clinicians and Researchers.

  • Jan 27, 2024
  • Web3 Journal: ML in Health Science
  • Yury Rusinovich +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Application of Machine Learning to Interpret Steady-State Drainage Relative Permeability Experiments

  • Mar 22, 2023
  • SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
  • Eric Sonny Mathew +4
  • Research Article

Machine learning models to predict skeletal-related events in bone metastasis from advanced cancer.

  • Jun 01, 2025
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Hirotaka Miyashita +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations37

Computed Tomography Perfusion-Based Machine Learning Model Better Predicts Follow-Up Infarction in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Stroke
  • Hulin Kuang +22
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Comment on acp-2021-634

  • Nov 12, 2021
  • Sing‐Chun Wang +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.