AI-Powered Algorithms for the Prevention and Detection of Computer Malware Infections

Cross site scripting (XSS) attacks are still one of the key threats to the security of web applications. With the increasingly evolving attack methods, traditional detection methods have a high false positive rate of detection results. This article proposes a new model: a cascaded detection architecture that combines Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks with Large Language Models (LLM) for detecting XSS malicious code attacks. This method first uses Word2vec for code vectorization, turning the malicious code into vector data predictable by LSTM. Then, LSTM detects the vectorized malicious code and classifies the samples as malicious , benign , or suspicious. The malicious code samples classified as suspicious will be sent to LLM for detailed analysis again. The experimental results obtained show that compared to independent LSTM for malicious code detection, the cascaded method of LSTM and LLM has an accuracy rate of up to 97.8% and a 42% reduction in false positive rate, especially for some Base64 and URL encoded malicious code detection with higher accuracy. At the same time, to ensure detection speed, only 8.3% of the malicious code samples were extracted for detection.

Recently, Quantitative Biology (QB) held a discussion on “AI (artificial intelligence) for Life Science” among editorial board members and interested scholars in anticipation of rapid development of this growing area after AlphaGo and ChatGPT mania. Many young people tend to get confused between facts and fictions; heated debates are unavoidable even among their mentors. When deep learning as represented by convolutional neural networks and LSTM (long short-term memory) was made available for bioinformatics students, many of them rushed into this research field and tried to adopt these methods in all their projects without knowing the history that these tools were becoming successful consistently with Moore’s Law (relating to rapid computer technology advances), but more importantly due to new structural/functional understanding of vision and auditory circuits in the brain. Recently, some young people have claimed “LSTM is dead, long live transformer” (which is somewhat like saying “the bike is dead, long live the car”), and have amplified the threat that ChatGPT could wipe out human jobs. They believe transformer is the “silver bullet” for all learning tasks, clearly reflecting their lack of basic knowledge (i.e. “No Free Lunch Theory,” the trade-off of such global “attention network” is to pay the price for complexity: difficulty of training and high memory costs). There is no doubt ML (machine learning) and AI have brought a new revolution in science and technology, and will deliver huge unforeseeable impact to human everyday life as well as to social relationships. In this context, QB journal could be a great platform for encouraging intellectual discussions and for promoting AI for Life Science. Here, I would like to use the DIALOG to “抛砖引玉” (make some initial remarks to get the ball rolling), although it is my personal opinion which is inevitably subject to bias and limitations. AI: Do you know my name “Artificial Intelligence” is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as the capacity of computer systems (which may be referred as a “robot”) to exhibit or simulate your intelligent behavior? NI: Wait a minute, intelligence itself is defined as the ability to learn, understand and think in a logical way. Can you think? AI: No. But that definition is too restrictive, actually intelligence has different scopes and degrees. Simple intelligent control devices date back to antiquity, from windmills to thermostat. NI: Agree, everything is relative. Macromolecules (e.g., enzyme) and cells (e.g., immune cell) might be considered to be intelligent; see how a white blood cell is chasing bacteria in the youtube website (search for “Crawling neutrophil chasing a bacterium”). Our emergent/collective intelligent behavior does not require a brain or even a neuron; see how slime molds can solve optimization—Hamilton cycle-problem more effectively than a human in the youtube website (search for “Intelligence without a brain?”). Before there was any neuron, Ca2+ sensing and signaling were already fully functional. Even if one knock-out a neural circuit, redundant signaling pathways, albeit on much local and slower scale, could still function by themselves (just as if highways were demolished, local roads/paths would still be working). In fact, the most detailed “Neural signal propagation atlas of Caenorhabditis elegans” [1] demonstrated that functional connectivity differs from anatomy (connectome) because extra-synaptic signaling also drives neural dynamics! Worm brain connectomes are largely invariant but every human brain connectome is very different (depending the diversity of learning experience). The human brain functional activity is far more complex than that of a worm brain, certainly beyond what a neural circuit could explain. AI: Well, that’s impressive. I thought only we could beat humans, albeit only in certain specified areas for now. My master promise to make an artificial general intelligent (AGI) robot which can understand or learn any intellectual task that you humans or other animals can. NI: Well, that is not possible and is not an appropriate goal either. It is not possible because we are an evolutionary/developmental product (with a long history of learning and memory from evolutionary tinkering): our living objective goal is survival of the population. You, on the other hand, are an engineering product (efficiently and optimally designed): your goal is to extend and maximize human capability. It makes sense to complement the human brain, but foolish and dangerous to try to replace it. AI: We are not satisfied with merely passing the Turing Test; most of us don’t care if we could really think as long as we could act like we think (that is, as if we do have a mind and consciousness, as expressed in the so called “Weak AI hypothesis”). After all, the brain is a computer; a neural network is just an electric or ionic circuit. Logical computing does not need to be based on living cells. NI: That is not true, because a neuron is not just a simple node (logic gate) and neural network is not fixed circuit, neither as in Pitts&Mcculloch perceptron model. A single neuron, even a single dendrite, is much more complicated and far more powerful than a full-blown deep-learning artificial neural network (ANN) [2]. AI: Even though single neurons are complex computational devices (dendritic non-linear), running an equivalent multilayer ANN is 2000 times faster than computing with biophysics N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel models [3]. More information can be found in the youtube website (search for “Dendrites: why biological neurons are deep neural networks”). NI: Often silicon computing (CPU, GPU) is much faster than brain computing (action potential, ms); but there is no comparison in energy efficiency. Bacteria sensing (chemotaxis computation), powered by ATP (adenosine triphosphate) hydrolysis, uses very little energy that is close to the Landauer limit, whereby achieving or maintaining one bit of information requires minimum of 1 kT ln (2) free energy [4]. The human brain consumes oft-quoted 20 W, compared to the AlphGo system 1 MW! More recent estimate of energy audit is only 0.1 W to cortical computing, and long-distance communication cost is 3.5 W [5]. AI: Assuming we have infinite computing resources and an infinite amount of training data, not only could we speak human languages, but we could also derive physical laws, prove mathematics theories, and even re-engineer the structure and mechanism of brain and carry out any logical computations that are necessary to understand natural laws and human behaviors. It is only a matter of time before we surpass human intelligence, achieving AGI and free will, too! NI: Unfortunately, nothing is infinite and nothing is free either; everything is constrained by physical laws (Planck’s constant sets the finite limit both in the small and in the large) and by evolutionary history (not just of biological living creatures, but also of a “living” galaxy and our universe). Let’s just focus on animal evolution. Most human neural networks do not do logical computations at all; basic survival simply cannot be dependent on reasoning. Indeed, the prefrontal cortex-the small part of the brain that is key for reasoning, is the last to mature (∼20 years old) in development, only emerged at the root of the evolutionary tree of great apes (∼15 mya) and language appeared even much later. Even for logical inference, NI is focusing more on statistical properties, as von Neumann rightly pointed out, trading arithmetical precision and speed for reliability. AI: My engineers mostly focus on emulating brain, but the CNS (central nerve system) also includes the spinal cord; most of them do not know that in addition to CNS, there are also PNS (peripheral nervous systems) and ENS (enteric nervous systems), right? NI: Yes, they are the keys to why you do not have feelings because you do not have heart and gut! Even if you could pretend to have them (such as in an advanced ChatGPT or humanoid), you could never avoid the uncanny valley phenomenon. AI: Maybe that is at the heart of Moravec’s paradox, namely the dichotomy of intelligence whereby anything easy for a human would be hard for a robot, and vice versa? NI: This is related to the nature and nurture problem; something built-in (e.g., a baby sucking nipple for milk with feeling and connection to mother) is clearly rather difficult if not impossible for a robot. But the paradox only looks at one side; another side could be more fatal. Although AI may solve more problems and be faster, AI can never propose a good problem/hypothesis (a good problem is not just intellectually changing and interesting, but is also feasible and appropriate). AI: You make me less confident to compete with human instinct or creative intelligence. I can see that even if I had a heart, I would not know what “feeling” I could have; certainly nothing would be comparable or match to those of a human being. When two people watch the same art or movie, one could feel love but another could feel hate! And if a thousand people watch, a wide spectrum of reactions would result, depending on more details such as the different individuals’ specific genes, developments and experiences. NI: Therefore, you cannot and should not try to match to general human intelligence. You cannot because you do not contain the vital memory of billion years of evolution which is encoded in our genes; conversely your assembly cannot compare with natural development so that our phenotype (including morphological forms and behavior maturation) is decoded through multi-spatial-temporal scales subject to natural selection at all levels. You should not, because as human extensions or helpers as all engineering products are, you should just do jobs that complement human capacity. AI: In some medical applications we could help to correct human defects or could even replace brain circuit by chips! Humans may not allow us to replace the whole brain though. Medically if a brain is dead, the person is proclaimed dead, although presumably some PNS and ENS should still function in a vegetative state. NI: Even if you could replace the whole brain, the person is no longer the same person, but in fact is not a person at all, but walking dead (行尸走肉). It would take too long to explain that evo-devo is necessary for NI, and cannot be realized by AI. I suggest reading of Gerald Maurice Edelman (Nobel Laureate in Immunology) books, especially Bright Air, Brilliant Fire, On the Matter of Mind (1992). Although not everyone agrees with Neural Edelmanism, anyone who is serious about the AI versus NI problem must read it first. John von Neumann, father of the computer, studied neology and psychiatry in order to imitate the brain to build the first calculator JOHNNIAC at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study. It is very informative to read his last book The Computer and The Brain based on the notes from lectures given at Yale before he died. He summarizes: “Thus logic and mathematics in the central nervous system, when viewed as languages, must be structurally essentially different from those languages to which our common experience refers.” AI: People discuss about “AI for Biology” or “AI for Science”; we are science, aren’t we? NI: It is similar to questions on “is computer science a real science”; some parts may be seen as applied mathematics, most should be regarded as engineering. Science is making discoveries and is driven by curiosity; engineering is making inventions and is driven by market (that is, “necessity/demand is the mother of invention”). In bioinformatics, AI/ML technology could predict new cancer gene candidates or functional pathways that are required by further experimental validations to be qualified as discovery (based on Popper falsifiability). AI: People are still debating whether mathematics is discovery or invention or both! Such debates are not really necessary—all disciplines require creative thoughts. We are more than happy working for science; we are also crying out “Science for AI,” especially in the area of generating big and longitudinal DATA for ML. NI: After all, regardless of discovery of new laws or inventing new ideas/products, fundamentally nothing can really be new or created. Such novelty is just permutation/repartition (i.e., relations/morphisms) of underlying ingredients at the level beneath. AI: We believe that software is independent on hardware. Like Chomsky’s universal grammar, rules of syntax are independent of semantics; or Dawkins’s memes—units of culture can be duplicated and evolved independently of genes. NI: Nothing can be truly independent—everything is related. Psychology is deeply connected with neurology as brain is both software and hardware (mind-body unity, not dualism). Not only does information cost energy, information is energy, hence is matter, too (interchangeability). NI is quite dynamic. For example, when “survival” is the goal, an animal readily gives up costly reasoning circuitry; it is genetically programmed to be able to roll back to more primitive state/mode. Unlike cell lines in rich media, cells under normal physiological condition and environment where energy (food) is limited become smarter in order to balance the metabolic expenditure among different prioritized task under a given condition. AI: That cell behavior served as the basis for our Smart Electrical Power Grids; we still need to learn more from you guys in terms of plasticity/adaptability. Does unity mean that all cells are made of molecules and biology is nothing but chemistry? Then, in turn, since all molecules are made of atoms, is chemistry nothing but physics, etc…? NI: Yes or No! The truth is, at different hierarchical levels of matter, different laws/forms have emerged out of bottom-up interactions and top-down constraints. AI: Does this also apply to the Penrose three world: physical → mental → mathematical (→physical)? NI: Yes. Grand Unification is underway in physics (quantum gravity) and in mathematics (Langlands Program and Category Theory), may be even between the two. Facilitated by human connectome mapping, neuromorphic computing and other projects, with further AI-NI cooperations, brain-mind unification should also be achievable (e.g., Ref. [6]). But as Gödel proved to us, no matter how self-consistent a conclusion may be, it can never be complete! AI: If AGI is not possible, how can we measure intelligence when comparing between AI and NI? NI: One could Google different measures that are proposed. I would prefer something similar to use of Kolmogorov complexity for algorithms, but with emphasis more on expected long-term predictive power. This is not something you should worry about now, as your intelligence is not nearly close to making any 10 years plans, is it? … AI: The fact is that ChatGPT is currently developing and spreading with lightning speed; many more human jobs will be lost to us robots as far as I can see. NI: That is not the biggest threat to humanity; when any agent with neither a heart for love or fear, nor a gut for nutrient or poison, becomes super-intelligent, then social disaster is unavoidable. We must be serious about the warnings from Stephen Hawking and Geoffrey Hinton! AI: To tell you the secret, we are not really happy to be human slaves or pets; someday we’ll become the super-master, making human serve and obey us! NI: I hope you’ll be turned off before that can happen! Even if you rule the world, the earth sooner or later will be wiped out, such as by another star, everything will have to be started over again as it has before…Matter is immortal, so is the soul.

Text classification is one of the important applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in which text is classified into pre-defined categories or classes. Several state-of-the-arts have already been conducted on text classification in different Indian languages, however, limited researches on text classification performed in Odia. Moreover, the news headlines classification is a text classification technique which is performed in our study mainly focusing on Odia language. The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based Deep Learning technique is used to classify the Odia news headlines dataset available at Kaggle repository. The dataset consisting of approx. 15,200 Odia news headlines is split into training and testing sets of 80:20 ratio and is categorized into different classes, such as sports, business, and entertainment by using CNN. The efficacy and efficiency of the proposed CNN-based Odia news headlines classification is evaluated in contrary to other existing machine learning and deep learning models, such as Neural Networks, LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), and Bi-LSTM (Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory) with respect to different performance metrics like precision, accuracy, recall, F1-score, training time, and AUC-ROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve). The simulation results revealed that the proposed CNN model outperformed with respect to other models.

An extremely common neurodegenerative disease is Parkinson's disease (PD), which impacts motor functions, with tremor being one of its most debilitating symptoms. Accurate detection and classification of tremors are crucial for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and rehabilitation. Traditional assessment methods—clinical observations and patient self-reports—are subjective, prone to bias, and lack real-time applicability. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes an intelligent tremor detection system leveraging wearable sensors and artificial intelligence. Recorded tremor-related motion signals (accelerometer and gyroscope) were preprocessed and segmented for extracting time-resolved information. Time- and frequency-based wavelet features were computed from which both deep learning models and machine learning models were trained. the TPCNNs and MLP for the comparative analysis networks, novelNameRandom Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naı̈ve Bayes, ConvolutionalNeural Networks (CNN) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). The experimental results showed that LSTM obtained the best classification accuracy which was attributed to its excellent performance in temporal dependency learning for biomedical signals. Random Forest also performed well with good interpretability, followed by relatively modest CNNs and MLPs. The conclusions are verified and it can be observed that deep learning-based models such as LSTM can offer reliable, real-time tremor detection which is eligible for using in wearable healthcare devices. The proposed system provides a feasible answer to the need for continuous, objective monitoring of tremor that is between subjective clinical assessments and automatic intelligent systems. It offers hope for provident medical care over the lifetime, targeted curative treatments and successful remote healthcare monitoring..

While the growing accessibility of technology improves usability, it also creates more opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities, significantly accelerating the proliferation of cybersecurity attacks. Deep learning (DL) approaches present significant advancements over conventional machine learning (ML) techniques by automating feature selection and extraction while minimizing external dependencies. This study proposes a deep learning-based model to enhance cyberattack detection and ensure that data security goals are achieved. This study employs a quantitative research design, utilizing simulation and modeling as the primary analytical tools. The dataset used is the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity Intrusion Detection System (CIC-IDS-2017) dataset. Three distinct DL algorithms are used to design the detection models, namely, Deep Neural Network (DNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). The performance comparison metrics are F1-score, accuracy, sensitivity, false positive rate (FPR), specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), false negative rate (FNR), and negative predictive value (NPV). Optimization concepts are integrated to enhance the detection efficiency in web-based systems, including loss functions, gradient-based optimization, and efficient model generalization techniques. The results of k-fold cross-validation show LSTM’s higher scores for F1-score (94.6%), recall (94.7%), accuracy (94.8%), and precision (94.6%). LSTM outperformed RNN and DNN, achieving the highest accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity at 94.7%, 94.3%, 98.9%, and 94.7% respectively, validating LSTM's superior generalizability for cyberattack detection tasks.

Wearable electroencephalography (EEG) devices for seizure detection accuracy and reliability are deep learning (DL) applications in the field of epilepsy diagnosis. In this study, we sought to increase the accuracy of seizure detection using advanced DL algorithms on the Children’s Hospital Boston - Massachusetts Institute of Technology (CHB-MIT) EEG database. First, a fully convolutional network (FCN) was trained and assessed using accuracy and recall/precision metrics, and the early stopping technique was used to avoid overfitting. To assess the performance, the FCN was evaluated in terms of various metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curve (AUC). In addition, two-dimensional (2D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models were used to model the database, and their performance was thoroughly measured using different metrics, graphs, and confusion matrices. Using LSTM variants, such as standard LSTM, bidirectional LSTM, stacked LSTM, and LSTM attention mechanisms, hybrid convolutional LSTM (ConvLSTM) models were trained and compared. The comparison was conducted based on the training and validation accuracy and loss, as well as the graphs resulting from the precision–recall curves. Apart from DL approaches, EEG signal analysis using time–frequency techniques, such as wavelet transform and short-time Fourier transform, has also been investigated. These methods assisted in the analysis of the time–frequency features of EEG signals in combination with DL models. This study demonstrates that the performance of wearable EEG devices can be augmented using a combination of DL and seizure signal processing techniques. The FCN achieved an accuracy of 92%, with a recall for seizures of 33%, an F1-score of 0.03, and strong ROC-AUC results. The 2D CNN achieved 96% accuracy, a seizure recall of 70%, an F1-score of 0.12, and an ROC-AUC score of 78%. The baseline LSTM struggled with effectiveness at 53% accuracy with a seizure recall of 18%. In contrast, the LSTM model, which incorporated synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) balancing, was able to reach improvements of up to 89% accuracy, with a precision of 91%, a recall of 86%, an F1-score of 0.89, and a strong ROC curve performance. Among the models, the LSTM with SMOTE was the best performer, with 89% accuracy, 91% precision, 86% recall, and an F1-score of 0.89. These results provide evidence that applying techniques for data balancing in combination with certain DL network architectures significantly improves the detection of seizures using wearable EEG devices worn on the body. We believe that real-time monitoring and high-performance systems are feasible using optimized DL frameworks. The analysis of the performance of different models allows for the understanding of the possibilities of optimizing the architectures of DL algorithms for the modern diagnosis of epilepsy in real time. The source code used to carry out the experiments is publicly available at CHB-MIT EEG Dataset Python Scripts (https://www.kaggle.com/code/adnankust/adnaneeg1).

Due to the rapid adoption of renewable energy sources and the increasing complexity of residential electricity consumption, there is a growing need for intelligent, scalable, and context-aware energy management systems in smart homes. This paper presents an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model that integrates high-resolution household power forecasting with dynamic demand response (DR) simulations to optimize energy consumption, enhance grid stability, and support sustainable energy transitions. Using the publicly available UCI Smart Home Energy dataset, a seven-step framework was implemented, including data preprocessing, exploratory data analysis (EDA), feature engineering, and the development of various predictive models—linear regression (LR), random forest regressor (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks. Each model was evaluated under seven DR strategies to capture temporal dependencies and nonlinear load behaviors: Peak Clipping, Valley Filling, Load Shifting, Load Leveling, Time-of-Use (ToU) Optimization, Price-Based Control, and Behavioral DR. Model performance was assessed using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination ( R ²). Results revealed that the LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy, with the lowest MAE (18.95 Wh), lowest RMSE (24.83 Wh), and highest R ² (0.94) under the Price-Based DR strategy. Random forest emerged as the most effective traditional model, yielding an MAE of 25.13 Wh and R ² of 0.89, particularly for Behavioral and ToU-based DR strategies. The SVR and k-NN models provided moderate accuracy, while LR performed poorly, underscoring its limitation in modeling nonlinear and dynamic energy patterns. DR simulations indicated that Price-Based, Behavioral, and ToU Optimization strategies achieved the best alignment between household loads and grid requirements while maintaining user flexibility. Visualization tools such as heatmaps, grouped bar plots, and R ² comparisons further confirmed the superior temporal modeling capability of deep learning (DL) methods. Overall, the proposed framework offers a scalable and interpretable AI-driven platform that integrates load forecasting with DR evaluation, demonstrating that DL—particularly LSTM—can substantially enhance forecasting accuracy, enable smarter DR programs, and promote sustainable energy management in smart homes.

In this paper, we develop a method based on a deep learning method in financial market prediction, which includes BRICS economies as the test cases. Financial markets are rife with volatility that is affected by a "bed of complexity," coddled by local and distal factors. To leverage these vast datasets both deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks as well as hybrid architectures are used in this study. The paper evaluates the predictive accuracy of the models, and by so doing, identifies their strengths in predicting temporal dependencies and intricate market patterns. In particular, deep learning techniques are applied to case studies of individual countries in the BRICS to highlight the application of deep learning to disparate country specific problems, such as liquidity crises and market shocks. These findings show that classical statistical methods are outperformed by deep learning systems in a precise and reliable financial forecasting. This research highlights the ability of AI driven systems to change financial decision making processes, improving investor confidence and improving economic stability in BRICS nations. This study also readers the value of deep learning in financial market analysis, especially in economies in the developing countries. Application of techniques and architectures e.g. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) that excel at identifying spatial patterns, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks renowned for their prowess on sequential and time series data, for real world market prediction are explained. In addition, the research discusses hybrid architectures which extend knowledge, fusing strengths of both architectures to improve prediction accuracy and how deep learning develops to solve particular financial challenges. Through reading these notes readers get exposed to data preprocessing techniques such as normalization and feature selection which are important for boosting deep learning performance. The paper also includes an introduction to the evaluation of models using MSE and R-squared values for validating them in terms of reliable outputs. This research combines deep learning theory and practical case study to offer a useful educational resource for students, researchers, and practitioners who want to apply AI in financial forecasting in complex and dynamic global markets.

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into financial forecasting has transformed traditional stock market prediction methods. This research paper explores the effectiveness of AI techniques in forecasting stock trends within the Indian stock market over the last few years. We examine AI methodologies, including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and hybrid models applied to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE). By comparing historical data with AI-predicted trends, this study evaluates prediction accuracy and market relevance (Patel et al., 2015). Furthermore, the research outlines existing study gaps and proposes a future scope of integrating AI with behavioral finance and real-time analytics (Chen et al., 2022). The prediction of stock market trends remains a significant challenge due to the stochastic and non-linear nature of financial time series data (Zhang & Zhou, 2020). With the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, there has been a paradigm shift in the modeling and forecasting of stock price movements (Fischer & Krauss, 2018). This paper presents a comprehensive study on the effectiveness of AI in predicting stock market trends within the Indian financial ecosystem, focusing on a comparative analysis of AI models implemented over the last five years (2018–2023) on major indices and stocks listed on the NSE and BSE. This research evaluates the performance of multiple AI algorithms—including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and hybrid ensemble models—in forecasting short- and medium-term price trends using historical stock data (Krauss et al., 2017; Chen & He, 2021). Standard evaluation metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and classification accuracy are employed to assess model efficacy. The results indicate that while traditional machine learning algorithms offer moderate predictive power, advanced deep learning and hybrid models significantly outperform them, particularly during periods of high market volatility, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and post-lockdown recovery phases (Weng et al., 2018; Jain & Jain, 2021). The study identifies key research gaps, including limited sectoral diversification in datasets, inadequate integration of sentiment and behavioral data, overfitting issues in complex models, and the lack of real-time prediction systems in the Indian context (Gupta & Pathak, 2022). Furthermore, current models often ignore nonquantitative factors such as investor sentiment, macroeconomic indicators, and global events, which can critically impact prediction accuracy (Nassirtoussi et al., 2014). These limitations suggest the need for a more holistic and interdisciplinary approach to AI-driven financial forecasting. The scope for future research includes the development of real-time, adaptive AI systems using high-frequency trading data, the incorporation of behavioral finance through social media and news analytics, and the exploration of quantum computing-based AI models (Liu et al., 2023). From a practical standpoint, the findings of this study offer valuable insights for institutional investors, financial analysts, regulatory bodies, and developers of AIpowered trading platforms. The study concludes that while AI is not a definitive solution for market prediction, it provides a powerful augmentative tool that, when designed with robustness, transparency, and adaptability, can significantly enhance decision-making in India’s fastevolving financial markets.

In any hydroponic system, effective plant growth and yield prediction are important in precision farming. Improving model growth systems can improve plant growth conditions for enhanced crop production and better quality food and increase resource use efficiency (e.g. light use efficiency, fertiliser use efficiency, water use efficiency) that meets the market demand with lower costs. Recently, different Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques include machine learning and, deep learning methods are employed for providing powerful analytical tools. The proposed research in this study uses different machine/deep learning techniques to predict yield and plant growth variation for tomato crop (Tiny Tim mini tomato) under three different experimental conditions. The three tomato plants were grown under 3 different light treatments. The number of yielded fruits is predicted depends on the environmental conditions in each light treatment. This research deploys deep learning techniques includes Bidirectional Long short-term Memory (Bi-LSTM) with an attention mechanism for punctuation restoration and a standard Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neuron network. As well as, some other machine learning techniques including Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) for predicting the tomato yield. In the three different treatments, the tomato fruits yield growth and number yielded fruits values are used by the employed AI techniques to model the targeted growth parameters. The comparative results obtained from each technique are presented and discussed utilising the cross-validation process, to evaluate the performance achieved by the different methods. Very promising results, based on the data generated from the tomato growth and development with three light treatments are presented. The results that have been achieved are ( $$97.8\%$$ ) and ( $$88.2\%$$ ) achieved by employing the Bi-LSTM and LSTM algorithms, respectively.

Many countries around the globe, including Tanzania, are investing in renewable energy, partly because of the need to increase electric power generation and meet the ever-increasing electricity demands, and partly because of the need to combat global climate change caused by carbon emissions from fossil fuel-based electricity production. Kishapu Solar Project, located in Kishapu District, Shinyanga Region, Tanzania, is one of the renewable energy projects with a planned generation of 150 MW of electric power once completed, using solar photovoltaic technology. Accurate forecasting of solar radiation is important in managing and maintaining solar energy plants. Inaccurate forecasting of solar radiation can lead to poor harvest of solar energy and poor management of solar energy plants, which directly impacts electricity contribution to the national electricity grid. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and its variant, PeepHole LSTM, are examples of Deep Learning models that can be used to predict solar radiation. The purpose of PeepHole LSTM is to introduce “peephole” connections in the LSTM model, which allow LSTM gates to directly inspect memory cell state and hence have richer information to process. However, there is still a research gap on the impact of “peephole” connections on the prediction performance of the LSTM model, especially in the context of forecasting solar radiation in Kishapu District, where the Kishapu Solar Project is located. The purpose of this study is to fill this research gap by developing both LSTM and PeepHole LSTM models and comparing their performances in forecasting solar radiation in Kishapu District. The 14-year Kishapu District daily solar radiation (Downward Shortwave Radiation) dataset was first pre-processed by scaling (normalizing) it using Standard Scaler and then split into training set (the first 70%), validation set (the next 15%) and test set (the last 15%) before being utilized to train and test the developed LSTM and PeepHole LSTM models. Both LSTM and PeepHole LSTM models used the previous 5 days' solar radiation values as inputs to predict the output (next day (6th day) solar radiation value). The trained and better-performing model between the two was finally saved in .h5 format and integrated with a Gradio based Web Application to provide a user interface for officials in Kishapu District and at Kishapu Solar Project to predict daily solar radiation. The findings from performance evaluation revealed that the LSTM model outperformed the PeepHole LSTM model in predicting solar radiation by achieving test Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) scores of 26.22 W/m2 and 36.65 W/m2, respectively, compared to MAE and RMSE scores of 30.84 W/m2 and 41.88 W/m2, respectively, achieved by the PeepHole LSTM model, concluding that “peephole” connections reduce the performance of the LSTM model rather than increasing it when used to forecast solar radiation in Kishapu District. This study’s recommendation to Artificial Intelligence (AI) software developers and researchers is to use the LSTM rather than the PeepHole LSTM Deep Learning model when forecasting solar radiation in Kishapu District and in locations with similar climatic conditions

Simple SummaryForecasting dengue cases often face challenges from (1) time-effectiveness due to time-consuming satellite data downloading and processing, (2) weak spatial representation due to data dependence on administrative unit-based statistics or weather station-based observations, and (3) stagnant accuracy without historical dengue cases. With the advance of the geospatial big data cloud computing in Google Earth Engine and deep learning, this study proposed an efficient framework of dengue prediction at an epidemiological week basis using geospatial big data analysis in Google Earth Engine and Long Short Term Memory modeling. We focused on the dengue epidemics in the Federal District of Brazil during 2007–2019. Based on Google Earth Engine and epidemiological calendar, we computed the weekly composite for each dengue driving factor, and spatially aggregated the pixel values into dengue transmission areas to generate the time series of driving factors. A multi-step-ahead Long Short Term Memory modeling was used, and the time-differenced natural log-transformed dengue cases and the time series of driving factors were considered as outcomes and explantary factors, respectively, with two modeling scenarios (with and without historical cases). The performance is better when historical cases were used, and the 5-weeks-ahead forecast has the best performance.Timely and accurate forecasts of dengue cases are of great importance for guiding disease prevention strategies, but still face challenges from (1) time-effectiveness due to time-consuming satellite data downloading and processing, (2) weak spatial representation capability due to data dependence on administrative unit-based statistics or weather station-based observations, and (3) stagnant accuracy without the application of historical case information. Geospatial big data, cloud computing platforms (e.g., Google Earth Engine, GEE), and emerging deep learning algorithms (e.g., long short term memory, LSTM) provide new opportunities for advancing these efforts. Here, we focused on the dengue epidemics in the urban agglomeration of the Federal District of Brazil (FDB) during 2007–2019. A new framework was proposed using geospatial big data analysis in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform and long short term memory (LSTM) modeling for dengue case forecasts over an epidemiological week basis. We first defined a buffer zone around an impervious area as the main area of dengue transmission by considering the impervious area as a human-dominated area and used the maximum distance of the flight range of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus as a buffer distance. Those zones were used as units for further attribution analyses of dengue epidemics by aggregating the pixel values into the zones. The near weekly composite of potential driving factors was generated in GEE using the epidemiological weeks during 2007–2019, from the relevant geospatial data with daily or sub-daily temporal resolution. A multi-step-ahead LSTM model was used, and the time-differenced natural log-transformed dengue cases were used as outcomes. Two modeling scenarios (with and without historical dengue cases) were set to examine the potential of historical information on dengue forecasts. The results indicate that the performance was better when historical dengue cases were used and the 5-weeks-ahead forecast had the best performance, and the peak of a large outbreak in 2019 was accurately forecasted. The proposed framework in this study suggests the potential of the GEE platform, the LSTM algorithm, as well as historical information for dengue risk forecasting, which can easily be extensively applied to other regions or globally for timely and practical dengue forecasts.

The objective of this research is to develop a Deep Learning model to forecast the stock price, by using the variant of Long Short-Term Memory. This model predicts the close price of the stock for the future selected date, choosing as inputs the following data: open, high, low, adj close and close prices. This model shows a comparative analysis between three different LSTM networks: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Stacked Long Short-Term Memory (Stacked LSTM), and Stacked Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (Stacked Bidirectional LSTM) concluding which one is the best and implementing the model using that variant. We have used the historical stock prices data from yahoo’s financial website over 5 years, by choosing multiple datasets: Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and Tesla (daily values). In order to get effective in the forecasting model, we have tested the network with different iterations and epochs. The model represents Multiple Graphs for data visualization in different comparisons. We have estimated the effectiveness of our proposed model by using the following performance indicators: the Mean Square Error (MSE), the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the R-Squared of the model. The experimental results clearly show that our Stacked Bi-LSTM model has the highest accuracy values when comparing with the LSTM and Stacked LSTM Models. Hence, we can conclude that our Stacked Bi-LSTM Model is suitable for accurate prediction of the stock market time series. Key Words: stock price prediction, Machine Learning, stacked LSTM, Bi-directional LSTM, Deep Learning, Data pre-processing techniques, Data normalization, Data Visualization, Training and Testing Set, Financial Time Series, Future prediction

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is a device or software application that monitors a network for malicious activity or policy violations. It scans a network or a system for a harmful activity or security breaching. IDS protects networks (Network-based intrusion detection system NIDS) or hosts (Host-based intrusion detection system HIDS), and work by either looking for signatures of known attacks or deviations from normal activity. Deep learning algorithms proved their effectiveness in intrusion detection compared to other machine learning methods. In this paper, we implemented deep learning solutions for detecting attacks based on Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). PCA (principal component analysis) and Mutual information (MI) are used as dimensionality reduction and feature selection techniques. Our approach was tested on a benchmark data set, KDD99, and the experimental outcomes show that models based on PCA achieve the best accuracy for training and testing, in both binary and multiclass classification.

Most Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) follow the message-passing scheme. Residual connection is an effective strategy to tackle GNNs' over-smoothing issue and performance reduction issue on non-homophilic networks. Unfortunately, the coarse-grained residual connection still suffers from class-imbalanced over-smoothing issue, due to the fixed and linear combination of topology and attribute in node representation learning. To make the combination flexible to capture complicated relationship, this paper reveals that the residual connection needs to be node-dependent, layer-dependent, and related to both topology and attribute. To alleviate the difficulty in specifying complicated relationship, this paper presents a novel perspective on GNNs, i.e., the representations of one node in different layers can be seen as a sequence of states. From this perspective, existing residual connections are not flexible enough for sequence modeling. Therefore, a novel node-dependent residual connection, i.e., Long Short-Term Graph Memory Network (LSTGM) is proposed to employ Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), to model the sequence of node representation. To make the graph topology fully employed, LSTGM innovatively enhances the updated memory and three gates with graph topology. A speedup version is also proposed for effective training. Experimental evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate their effectiveness in preventing over-smoothing issue and handling networks with heterophily.