Alpine altitude climate treatment for severe and uncontrolled asthma: An EAACI position paper

Severe asthma in the US population and eligibility for mAb therapy

Introduction and ObjectivesOmalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E humanized monoclonal antibody, was the first biologic approved for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin...

The Editors' Choice

Advances in pediatric asthma in 2009: Gaining control of childhood asthma

The Editors’ Choice

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo assess the agreement among asthma control measures and functional exercise capacity in children and adolescents with uncontrolled and controlled asthma.MethodsChildren and adolescents with asthma from 7-17 years old were selected, and they were attended in the “Pediatric Pulmonology Outpatient Clinic of State University of Campinas”, in Brazil. All patients had asthma control level assessed by Global Initiative for Asthma questionnaire (GINAq), Asthma Control Test (ACT), spirometry and six-minute-walk-test (6MWT). Patients were classified as uncontrolled or controlled asthma in each test and agreement among measures was assessed by kappa statistics. The ROC curve was calculated for the 6MWT. The spirometric index obtained from spirometry was composed by FEV1, FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75%. Spirometry and 6MWT results were compared between uncontrolled and controlled asthma group by GINAq.ResultsOf the 138 subjects included, 78 (56.5%) were male with median age of 11 (7-17) years old. GINAq detected 68.8% of patients with uncontrolled asthma. Moderate agreement (p < 0.001; k = 0.56) and high specificity (100%) was observed between GINAq and ACT. In 6MWT, the cut-off point of 82.03% of predicted distance was able to distinguish patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma. Spirometric index presented 73.4% of sensitivity according to GINAq. The results for 6MWT in patients with uncontrolled asthma were the worst of all.ConclusionThis study highlights the importance of assessing more than one measure to differentiate asthma control level. GINAq identified more patients with uncontrolled asthma and presented moderate agreement with ACT. Spirometric index was associated with uncontrolled asthma according to GINAq. 6MWT was a suitable measure to distinguish patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma.

The Editors' Choice

RationaleAsthma, obesity and physical activity (PA) are interrelated. However, longitudinal data with objective PA measures and direct assessment of body composition are still lacking.ObjectiveTo study the impact of symptom control on PA and body composition.MethodsIn a longitudinal cohort study of the German Center for Lung Research, we assessed the body composition of 233 asthma patients and 84 healthy controls using bioelectrical impedance analysis. PA (ie average daily steps and time of at least moderate activity, steps/min) was measured by accelerometry for one week. Asthma control was assessed by ACT score, ACQ-5 score and history of severe exacerbations. After two years of follow-up, we studied changes in physical activity and body composition in relation to asthma control.ResultsPatients with uncontrolled asthma had increased fat mass and decreased muscle mass compared to patients with controlled asthma or healthy controls. Both fat mass and muscle mass correlated better with asthma control than the body mass index (BMI). In multivariate regressions adjusted for age and sex, asthma control and physical activity were independent predictors of body composition (R2 = 0.61, p < 0.001). Persistent uncontrolled asthma patients (n=64) had lower physical activity at both baseline (6614 steps/118 min) and follow-up (6195/115). Despite having stable BMI, they also had significant muscle loss (−1.2%, −0.88 kg, p<0.01) and fat accumulation (+1%, +1.1 kg, p<0.01). By contrast, temporarily uncontrolled or controlled asthma patients had higher physical activity at baseline (8670/156) and follow -up (9058/153) with almost unchanged body composition.ConclusionPersistent uncontrolled asthma is associated with sustained physical inactivity and adverse changes in body composition that might be overlooked by relying solely on BMI. Physical activity is an independent predictor of body composition and reliable long-term marker of symptom control.

The SOURCE phase 3 oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing study of tezepelumab indicated an OCS-sparing effect with tezepelumab versus placebo in patients with OCS-dependent asthma and baseline blood eosinophil counts (BECs) of at least 150 cells per μL. The WAYFINDER study aimed to further evaluate the ability of tezepelumab to reduce or discontinue OCS use in a larger cohort of patients with OCS-dependent severe, uncontrolled asthma. WAYFINDER was a phase 3b, multicentre, single-arm, open-label, OCS-sparing study. Adults (aged 18-80 years) with severe, uncontrolled asthma receiving a maintenance OCS dose of 5-40 mg per day (or equivalent) of prednisone or prednisolone were recruited from 68 clinical centres across 11 countries (Argentina, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Latvia, Mexico, Poland, Spain, UK, and USA). Participants received tezepelumab 210 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks for up to 52 weeks. The co-primary endpoints, assessed at weeks 28 and 52, were the proportion of participants who reduced their prescribed maintenance OCS dose to 5 mg per day or less without loss of asthma control and the proportion of participants who discontinued OCS without loss of asthma control. OCS dose reductions to below 5 mg per day were contingent on participants demonstrating preserved adrenal function. This completed study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05274815). WAYFINDER was conducted between May 17, 2022, and Sept 9, 2024. Overall, 382 participants were enrolled and 298 participants (206 female [69·1%]) received tezepelumab and were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. The mean baseline maintenance OCS dose was 10·8 (SD 6·5) mg per day. The proportion of participants who had a maintenance OCS dose of 5 mg per day or less without loss of asthma control was 265 of 298 (88·9% [95% CI 84·8-92·3]) at week 28 and 268 of 298 (89·9% [85·9-93·1]) at week 52. The proportion of participants who discontinued OCS without loss of asthma control was 96 of 298 (32·2% [26·9-37·8]) at week 28 and 150 of 298 (50·3% [44·5-56·2]) at week 52. OCS reduction and discontinuation were achieved across pre-specified subgroups based on baseline BEC, fractional exhaled nitric oxide level, or allergy status. Serious adverse events were reported in 28 (9·4%) of 298 participants (asthma [13 participants] and pneumonia [three participants] were the most common), and four participants (1·3%) had adverse events leading to tezepelumab discontinuation. Two participants died during the study but neither death was considered to be causally related to tezepelumab treatment. After 52 weeks of open-label tezepelumab treatment, nearly 90% of patients with OCS-dependent severe, uncontrolled asthma had a maintenance OCS dose of 5 mg per day or less and more than 50% completely discontinued OCS, while maintaining asthma control. These findings indicate that tezepelumab treatment can help enable patients with severe asthma to reduce their OCS use and its associated burden, with broad applicability across patient phenotypes. AstraZeneca and Amgen.

Objective To review the evidence for the use of open-inhaler (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] plus long-acting β2-agonist [LABA] with separate add-on long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA]) versus single-inhaler triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA combination) and the merits of add-on LAMA to ICS/LABA in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Data Sources Original research articles were identified from PubMed using the search term “triple therapy asthma.” Information was also retrieved from the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Study Selections Articles detailing the use of add-on LAMA to ICS plus LABA (open-inhaler triple therapy), and closed triple therapy compared with ICS plus LABA dual therapy, addressing patient symptoms, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life. Results Open-inhaler triple therapy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of hospitalizations and emergency department visits and a decrease in ICS dose, oral corticosteroids use, and antibiotics use. Exacerbations and acute respiratory events were also reduced. Single-inhaler triple therapy showed a greater improvement in lung function, asthma control, and health status and was noninferior to open-inhaler triple therapy for Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores. Single-inhaler triple therapy may also lead to improved therapy adherence. Conclusion Add-on LAMA to ICS plus LABA (open- or single-inhaler triple therapy) improves the response in patients who remain symptomatic and provides a reasonable alternative to ICS dose escalation in treatment-refractory patients.

The Editors' Choice

Ciclesonide is a nonhalogenated synthetic inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of all severities of persistent asthma. It is available as a hydrofluroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in two strengths, 80 mcg/activation and 160 mcg/activation, with the recommenced dosage being two inhalations twice-daily. It is a prodrug that is converted in the lung to its active form, which possesses 100-fold greater glucocorticoid-receptor-binding affinity than the parent compound. Its relative receptor affinity is similar to budesonide. In clinical studies, ciclesonide was effective in improving pulmonary function, reducing asthma symptoms, and reducing or eliminating the need for oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Patients with severe asthma dependent on OCSs and high doses of ICSs were able to achieve greater asthma control and reduce or even eliminate the use of OCSs when switched to ciclesonide. In comparison with fluticasone propionate and budesonide, ciclesonide was demonstrated to be at least as effective in maintaining pulmonary function and asthma control. In clinical trials, ciclesonide was well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events considered mild or moderate in intensity. It had low systemic bioavailability and no clinically significant hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression at therapeutic doses. Its safety profile establishes ciclesonide as an important addition to the currently available ICSs.

Topicality. Severe asthma is a heterogeneous and cost-effective disease that requires a personalized treatment approach with inclusion of targeted therapy involving the phenotyping of asthma. Objective. Determine the dynamics of asthma prevalence in the Middle Ural, including severe asthma, and phenotype patients with severe asthma for the selection of targeted therapy. Materials and methods. Population studies of bronchial asthma prevalence were conducted in the Middle Ural from 2000 to 2012 using the standard ECRHS questionnaire. Also registers of patients with asthma were created. An analysis of outpatient records of patients with asthma was conducted in Ekaterinburg in 2018. The phenotyping of bronchial asthma was carried out by an allergist-immunologist. Results. The number of patients with bronchial asthma increased by 2.7 times over 17 years in the Middle Ural. Patients with mild asthma prevail in the population. The atopic asthma phenotype predominates in 70.8-81% of cases regardless of the population category. Severe uncontrolled bronchial asthma occurs in 10.2% of cases among all patients seeking medical care. Every second patient with severe uncontrolled asthma has an atopic phenotype, which is 5% of the total number of analyzed patients with bronchial asthma. Every fourth patient with severe uncontrolled bronchial asthma has an eosinophilic phenotype, which is 2.3% of all analyzed patients with bronchial asthma (n=216). Conclusion. Phenotyping of asthma has important practical significance for planning effective targeted therapy in a population of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Objective: This study aimed to estimate asthma control at specialist treatment centers in four Latin American countries and assess factors influencing poor asthma control.Methods: Patients aged ≥12 years with an asthma diagnosis and asthma medication prescription, followed at outpatient specialist centers in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico, were included. The study received all applicable ethical approvals. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to classify patients as having controlled (ACT 20–25) or uncontrolled (ACT ≤19) asthma. Frequency and statistical tests were used to assess the association between hospital admissions/exacerbations/emergency department (ED) visits and uncontrolled asthma; multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of uncontrolled asthma with clinical/demographic variables.Results: A total of 594 patients were included. Overall controlled-asthma prevalence was 43.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.0, 47.4). Patients with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to be women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.85; p = 0.003), non-white (aOR: 2.14; p < 0.001), obese (aOR: 1.71; p = 0.036), to have a low monthly family income (aOR: 1.75; p = 0.004), to have severe asthma (aOR:1.59; p = 0.26), and, compared with patients with controlled asthma, to have a higher likelihood of asthma exacerbations (34.5% vs. 15.9%; p < 0.001), hospital admissions (6.9% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.042), and ED visits (34.5% vs. 15.9%; p < 0.001) due to asthma.Conclusions: Even in specialist ambulatory services, fewer than half of patients were classified as having controlled asthma. The proportion of uncontrolled patients varied according to clinical and demographic variables.

House dust mites induce asthmatic smooth muscle cell proliferation through epithelium- and leukotrienes-dependent pathways