Ambiently fostering solid electrolyte interphase for low-temperature lithium metal batteries

Electrochemical energy conversion and storage is critical for advancing vehicle electrification and sustainability of essential commodity chemicals. In pursuit of these goals, I delved progressively deeper into the foundational research of batteries and beyond: (1) pioneering novel methodologies to fundamentally understand reactive metal deposition, (2) regulating electrolyte to enhance lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) performance, and (3) expanding the technology’s applicability to make impact beyond batteries.I have revealed the intrinsic morphology of electrodeposited Li metal to be a non-dendritic rhombic dodecahedron (Yuan et al. Nature 620, 86-91, 2023), which is surprisingly independent of electrolyte chemistry and current collector substrate. Li deposition is a process in which Li-ions are reduced to metallic form at the electrode, which plays a crucial role for LMBs, because the reversibility of deposition morphology directly determines the cycling performance and safety of the battery. However, the simultaneous formation of a surface corrosion film termed the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) complicates the deposition process, which underpins our poor understanding of Li metal electrodeposition. I creatively integrated the classical electrochemical method, ultramicroelectrode geometry, and an emerging electron microscopy technique, cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), to decouple Li deposition from the SEI growth and capture the corresponding nanostructure of Li. This discovery has significant implications for LMBs, as it suggests SEI influence can be effectively mitigated to achieve desired deposition morphologies. Besides enhancing our understanding of Li deposition, I extended this finding to other reactive alkali metal, such as sodium metal that was found to exhibit the same polyhedral structure when outpacing the SEI influence. This emphasizes the applicability of my findings and opens new opportunities to explore how reactive metal deposition fundamentally proceeds without the influence of corrosion film, thereby regulating reversibility of metal deposition to optimize the performance of metal batteries.In addition to deposition morphology, the properties of the SEI also influence the performance of LMBs, as the SEI governs the transportation of Li-ion during cycling. Since the SEI formation results from electrolyte decomposition influenced by electric fields, I systematically examined effects of both electrolyte decomposition and electric fields on SEI formation, progressing from the bulk electrolyte to the electrode surface (Yuan et al. Joule 8, 3038-3053, 2024). I worked with colleagues to quantify reactions driving SEI formation and determine decomposition rates of individual components within the electrolyte, guiding us design and prioritize the decomposition of electrolyte components. Furthermore, I emphasized the importance of electric field to further fine-tune the formation of favorable SEI to improve battery performance.Looking beyond applications of Li metal in batteries, I leveraged the wealth of battery knowledge and established strategies to investigate fundamental aspects of Li metal as electrocatalyst in electrifying ammonia synthesis to help decarbonize the traditional chemical industry (Steinberg, Yuan (co-first) et al. Nature Energy 8, 138-148, 2023). I revealed key driver behind surface phenomena is the rupture of the SEI, enabling nitrogen and electrolyte to penetrate and react with Li metal to make ammonia. The insights from this work expanded our perspective of how Li metal electrodeposition can decarbonize chemical synthesis and inform our future efforts in designing better LMBs as well.

The practical application of lithium (Li) metal battery is impeded by the Li dendrite growth and unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. Herein, an ultra‐stretchable and ionic conducting chemically crosslinked pressure‐sensitive adhesive (cPSA) synthesized via the copolymerization of 2‐ethylhexyl acrylate and acrylic acid with poly(ethyleneglycol)dimethacrylate as crosslinker (short for 70cPSA), is developed as both artificial SEI layer and solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) for stable Li‐metal electrode, enabling all‐solid‐state Li metal batteries with excellent cycling performance. As an artificial SEI layer, the 70cPSA‐modified electrodes exhibit excellent electrochemical performance in Li|70cPSA@Cu half cells and 70cPSA@Li|70cPSA@Li symmetric cells. In full cells with LiFePO4 (LFP) as cathode, the 70cPSA@Li|LFP cell exhibits stable cycling performance over 250 cycles. Utilized as SPE, the all‐solid‐state Li|SPE|LFP cell delivers excellent cycling stability with a capacity retention of 86% over 500 cycles. With high‐voltage LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) as cathode, the Li|SPE|NMC811 cell exhibits a discharge capacity of 124.3 mAh g−1 with a capacity retention of 71% after 200 cycles. The rational design of PSAs and investigation of their dual role for stable and safe Li‐metal batteries may shed a light on adhesive polymers for battery applications.

Lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) are promising candidates for accelerating the implementation of electric vehicles in our society. LMBs comprise of a lithium-metal anode that possesses the highest theoretical specific capacity (3860 mAh/g) and the lowest redox potential (-3.04V vs standard hydrogen electrode).1 LMBs undergo repeated plating and stripping of lithium ions on the anode surface. The non-homogenous stripping process leads to the isolation of metallic lithium from the anode surface, forming dead-lithium.2 The parasitic reaction between the lithium-metal anode and the electrolyte leads to the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. These phenomena lead to the reduction of available lithium and a rise in cell impedance, causing a rapid reduction of lifetime for these batteries.3 , 4 In this talk, we present a diverse dataset collected from different LMBs of different capacities and voltage ranges, that includes features from the initial formation cycle, rest voltages and CV charging during cycling. A data-driven model from the LMB cycling data is presented to predict the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of these cells. Insights from the model can be used to determine the bad cells in a batch, improve the designs of the cells and derive optimal charging protocols for their implementation in the BMS. References Lin, D., Liu, Y. & Cui, Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 194 (2017).Xu, S., Chen, K.-H., Dasgupta, N. P., Siegel, J. B. & Stefanopoulou, A. G. Evolution of Dead Lithium Growth in Lithium Metal Batteries: Experimentally Validated Model of the Apparent Capacity Loss. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A3456–A3463 (2019).Liu, G. & Lu, W. A Model of Concurrent Lithium Dendrite Growth, SEI Growth, SEI Penetration and Regrowth. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1826–A1833 (2017).Gao, N. et al. Fast Diagnosis of Failure Mechanisms and Lifetime Prediction of Li Metal Batteries. Small Methods 5, 1–11 (2021).

(Oxalato)borate: The key ingredient for polyethylene oxide based composite electrolyte to achieve ultra-stable performance of high voltage solid-state LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2/lithium metal battery

Lithium metal anodes are promising alternatives to graphite for use in next-generation lithium-ion batteries due to their higher capacity (3,860 mAh/g vs. 372 mAh/g). However, Li anodes still display excessive capacity loss over cycling, leading to underwhelming Coulombic efficiency (CE, <99.9%) compared to graphite (>99.95%).1 These losses can derive from: (1) the formation of electronically isolated Li0 (often referred to as ‘dead’ or inactive’); and (2) the parasitic reactions between Li and the electrolyte that form the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Characterization of the Li anode has historically relied on surface characterization techniques such as XPS and FTIR, which cannot quantitatively reveal the total amounts of specific SEI phases. More precise quantification has recently become possible due to advances in chemical titration, which notably revealed that inactive Li0 is the dominant loss mechanism at low-to-moderate CE (<90%).2 At high CE (>90%), SEI losses are increasingly dominant and become the loss mode to minimize. Despite its importance, titration of SEI losses have thus far largely focused on LiH,3-5 with precise quantification of other accompanying phases still lacking.To bridge this gap, here we apply quantitative titration based on GC, ICP-AES and NMR to track an extended array of key SEI phases: semicarbonates (ROCO2Li), lithium carbide (Li2C2), olefins (RLi), LiF, P-containing phases, and total Li loss with, which teach new insights beyond inactive Li0. In 1 M LiPF6 EC/DEC, we demonstrate chemical resolution up to 71% of Li loss and 33% of SEI loss inventory. The analysis was also expanded to additional carbonate electrolytes of varying CEs (from <10% to >96%). Soluble SEI phases were particularly important at ultra-low CE (<10%), and their formation was suppressed higher CEs. Among the quantifiable SEI phases, ROCO2Li was consistently the major phase, but its proportions were invariant with CE. Instead, Li2C2, a minor phase, exhibited clear inverse correlation with CE. These results add further nuance beyond inactive Li0 to the current understanding of capacity loss, and demonstrate that, while minor phases often receive less focus and are harder to characterize, they can play governing roles in SEI function, particularly at high CE when formation of inactive Li0 is minimized. Hobold, G. M.; Lopez, J.; Guo, R.; Minafra, N.; Banerjee, A.; Shirley Meng, Y.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Gallant, B. M., Moving Beyond 99.9% Coulombic Efficiency for Lithium Anodes in Liquid Electrolytes. Nat. Energy 2021, 6 (10), 951-960. Fang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, F.; Lee, J. Z.; Lee, M. H.; Alvarado, J.; Schroeder, M. A.; Yang, Y.; Lu, B.; Williams, N.; Ceja, M.; Yang, L.; Cai, M.; Gu, J.; Xu, K.; Wang, X.; Meng, Y. S., Quantifying Inactive Lithium in Lithium Metal Batteries. Nature 2019, 572 (7770), 511-515. Tao, M.; Xiang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Shan, P.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y., Quantifying the Evolution of Inactive Li/Lithium Hydride and Their Correlations in Rechargeable Anode-Free Li Batteries. Nano Lett. 2022. Xu, G.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Du, X.; Lu, D.; Xie, B.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Liu, H.; Dong, S.; Cui, G.; Chen, L., The Formation/Decomposition Equilibrium of LiH and Its Contribution on Anode Failure in Practical Lithium Metal Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60 (14), 7770-7776. Xiang, Y.; Tao, M.; Zhong, G.; Liang, Z.; Zheng, G.; Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Jin, Y.; Xu, N.; Armand, M.; Zhang, J. G.; Xu, K.; Fu, R.; Yang, Y., Quantitatively Analyzing the Failure Processes of Rechargeable Li Metal Batteries. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7 (46), eabj3423.

Understanding the nucleation and growth process during electroplating of lithium metal is essential for enabling long cycle life in lithium metal batteries. The morphology of electrochemically plated lithium is strongly correlated with Coulombic efficiency and cycle life, and the nucleation and growth of lithium is dictated by the nature of the substrate, the characteristics of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), and temperature. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how these factors affect fundamental nucleation and growth processes, especially at temperatures other than room temperature. In this work, we investigate the nucleation, growth, and morphology evolution of lithium metal under different temperature conditions. Stainless steel and antimony metal are used as substrates to compare growth surfaces that are inert with those that form alloys with lithium. Ex situ SEM is used to explore the morphology evolution at temperatures ranging from -20 °C to 20 °C. In order to better track the particle size evolution over time, we use an electrolyte solution tailored to cause Li to deposit as spherical particles (a 1:1 (v/v) 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and 1,2 dimethoxyethane (DME) mixture with 1M LiTFSI and 0.8M LiNO3). We find that as temperature increases, the particle size also increases. Furthermore, growth on lithiated antimony films results in larger average particle sizes than on stainless steel. Our experiments also show that the extent and nature of the initial SEI growth on the substrate plays a controlling role in determining the Li morphology and uniformity of growth, and prolonged growth of the SEI was found to increase the Coulombic efficiency during the first few cycles. These results highlight the sensitivity of Li to cycling conditions and temperature, and they indicate that careful control is necessary to attain high-efficiency cycling in Li metal batteries.

As renewable energy and battery-powered technologies become more widespread, high energy-density and high-performing batteries are required to meet society’s needs. While lithium-ion batteries have been the staple, their energy density development has been slow, and at gravimetric energy densities of around 250 Wh/kg, they are approaching their theoretical limit.1 The lithium-metal battery (LMB) is considered a next-generation battery due to high theoretical energy densities (ex: Lithium-Sulfur, 2600 Wh/kg), and lithium metal’s high gravimetric capacity (3860 mAh/g) and low reduction potential (-3.04 V vs S.H.E.). However, commercialization of LMBs has been limited due to various issues.Two properties that dictate the performance of the LMBs are: 1. The composition of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), an electronically conducting, yet passivating, layer at the anode-electrolyte interface, and 2. The morphology of the lithium deposited at the anode. Morphological studies focus on creating dense, low surface area, deposits that limit SEI fracturing and the formation of electronically disconnected lithium. SEI quality is improved by incorporating inorganic or anion-rich SEIs, formed from the electrolyte salt, to promote SEIs that are mechanically robust, ionically conducting, and homogeneous. Our group’s previous work aimed to improve LMB performance via both routes by growing resistive Al2O3 coatings on the copper (Cu) current collector using atomic layer deposition (ALD). Defects in the thin film create areas of low resistance that behave like ultramicroelectrodes which encourage radial diffusion of lithium ions to the nuclei promoting lateral growth and producing low surface area, dense, planar lithium deposits. Simultaneously, the Al2O3 coating’s Lewis acidic properties promote the decomposition and subsequent incorporation of inorganic electrolyte species into the SEI.We present a study of how the different interfaces present at the anode in LMBs impact SEI composition and battery performance. To hold the Li nucleation morphology at the anode constant, we deposit metal oxide films of a fixed resistance onto the Cu current collector, generating planar, low surface area, lithium deposits. This experimental design allows us to decouple the effect of the metal oxide thin film-electrolyte interface on SEI quality and battery performance from that of the lithium morphology. First, as shown in Fig. 1a, different metal oxide films of equal resistance, but different thicknesses, are grown via ALD, confirmed by measuring the first-cycle nucleation overpotential. The resistive metal oxides investigated are Al2O3, HfO2, AlHfxOy, and ZrO2. Scanning electron microscopy results indicate that all cells modified with equal resistance metal oxide films exhibit the same low surface area, dense, planar Li nucleation morphology. However, long-term cycling tests show differences in cell performance and life cycle. Subsequently, the composition of the SEI is investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Through XPS, an elemental atomic ratio analysis is conducted to investigate the relative number of species derived from the anion of the electrolyte versus the solvent of the electrolyte to reflect the anion-derived nature of the SEI. Additionally, high-resolution peaks are used to determine the relative abundance of high-quality SEI species such as lithium fluoride. This analysis confirms that the metal oxide thin film tunes the SEI composition. Additionally, we identify trends present between the SEI quality of the ALD-modified cell and its performance.To further investigate the thin film-electrolyte interface, a set of cells modified with binary stacked metal oxide thin films with two different stack orders were created, as shown in Fig. 1b. Investigating SEI composition and LMB performance, with the morphology fixed by the nucleation overpotential, allowed for deconvolution of the impact of the Cu-thin film interface and thin film-electrolyte interface. Both interfaces can in principle impact the battery’s function because 1. The Cu-thin film interface controls the electron transport to form Lio from Li+ ion during electrodeposition, and 2. The thin film-electrolyte interface can modulate the SEI. Our results indicated that the SEI and performance were both primarily regulated by the thin film-electrolyte interface. Based on our fixed-resistance and binary stack experimental design, we propose that modulation of the SEI composition by the metal oxide coating controls LMB performance when the Li nucleation morphology is fixed. This result suggests the potential for tuning LMB performance by careful selection of the metal oxide interfacial coating. References (1) Cheng, X.-B., et al. Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (15), 10403–10473. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115.(2) Oyakhire, S. T., et al. Electrical Resistance of the Current Collector Controls Lithium Morphology. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1), 3986. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31507-w. Figure 1

Rechargeable Li metal batteries offer high energy density due to the high capacity and low reduction potential of Li metal anodes, but their practical application is hindered by dendritic growth that induces significant volume expansion, low Coulombic efficiency (CE), and safety risks. To address these challenges, we rationally designed an electrolyte based on a systematic investigation of the effect of anion‐rich environments on interfacial stability. To specifically probe the role of anions, we employed a concentrated electrolyte system. Lithium bis(fluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) was selected as the lithium salt in combination with diethyl ether (DEE), a monodentate ether that reduces steric hindrance and promotes simplified solvation behavior. The optimized 6 m LiFSI‐DEE electrolyte enabled Li symmetric and Li/Cu cells to cycle stably for over 1200 h at 0.5 mA c m −2 and 1 mAh cm −2 , demonstrating superior interfacial stability, a benefit that extended to Li/LFP full cells and Cu/LFP anode‐less cells, both of which showed significantly improved cycling performance. The 6 m electrolyte promotes anion decomposition, forming a LiF‐rich solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) that stabilizes the interface. In addition, the interfacial morphological evolution was directly visualized by operando optical microscopy and SEM, confirming a more uniform and compact Li deposition. These results highlight that anion concentration effectively modulates the Li + solvation environment and SEI chemistry, providing a robust design strategy for next‐generation Li metal battery electrolytes.

Electronic devices have been advanced rapidly over the last few decades with improved performance through high-level integration. Lithium ion batteries (LIB), which is representative rechargeable energy storage system, is increasingly demanding to high-energy-density storage system for the stable operation of high performance devices like mobile, laptop, etc. In addition, a recent quantum leap in electronic vehicles (EVs) require to energy storage system with long cycling stability incomparable to previous electronic devices. To achieve high performances and long lifetime, the use of lithium metal is one of attractive anode for as LIBs, because Li metal has high theoretical specific capacity of 3860 mAh/g, low redox potential of -3.04V (verse the standard hydrogen electrode) and low gravimetric density of 0.59 g/cm3. Nevertheless, since Li metal anode has the lithiation-delithiation mechanism of the ‘hostless’ electrochemical plating/stripping unlike the conventional graphite anode, it is confronted with serious problems occurred from uncontrollable interfacial reaction between surface of lithium metal anode and electrolyte applying to traditional LIB system; that is (1) the uncontrollable formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer limitless volume expansion of Li metal anode (2) the dendritic growth and isolation of Li interface derived from inhomogeneous deposition of Li+ ion flux (3) the Li surface fracture induced by heterogeneously plated Li+ ion. Through these process, repetitive formation of undesirable SEI layer at surface of Li anode make fresh electrolyte dissipation and concurrently the anode surface becomes more distorted. These side-phenomena strongly correlate with low coulombic efficiency and decreasing lifetime of lithium metal battery (LMB) system where lithium metal is used as anode. In this works, in a dimensional aspect, to solve such problem mentioned above through stabilizing of surface of lithium metal anode, we introduce Janus-faced protective layer (JPL) as gel polymer electrolyte. JPL was composed with dual layer of Ni (3~7μm) embedded poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVdF-HFP) and bare PVdF-HFP through simple casting method. The process of preparing JPL membrane is so simple to instantly bring in existing roll-to-roll process, and it is also possible to make a low cost process considered relatively low nickel price. In terms of mechanical property, it is based on flexible polymer and shows the merit of being foldable enough to able origami. In addition, JPL play a role of protection of Li metal anode. JPL has two functionalities. The metal part of JPL directly contacted with anode, and this layer was frameworks for preventing irregular SEI layer formation through inward plating of Li ion, the polymer part is stable state enough to be used as a gel polymer electrolyte. When lithium metal anode is subjected to cycle-test while keeping in contact with the nickel side of JPL membrane, Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image showed that the surface of lithium metal anode was very clean without any fluctuation compared to the case where only polypropylene (PP) separator was used. (Figure. 1) Moreover, as shown in Figure 2., the LMB system applied JPL show high stability of tolerable overvoltage within 5mV, 15mV even at high-current of 10mA/cm2, 20mA/cm2, respectively, in Li//JPL/JPL//Li symmetric cell. These results are attributable to effective function of each layer as mentioned earlier. JPL consists of two layer, the tough and adhesive nature of PVdF-HFP prevents the polymer part from being damaged or torn by dendritic growth and simultaneously ensure that metal part functions as robust framework for SEI layer formation without escaped particle from the membrane. This frameworks induce the SEI layer, which can act as a resistive element, to grown in the metal part while surface of Li metal anode become get out of main subject from the SEI layer formation. By virtue of that property, JPL has not allow forming resistive elements on the surface of Li metal anode, preventing the voltage rising up due to the formation of resistive elements at surface, so tolerability of overvoltage with clean surface of anode is maintained. In conclusion, the model study of nickel micro-particle/PVdF-HFP composite suggests the straightforward direction of protective layer to apply lithium metal as anode in LIB system with alleviating the problem caused by the ‘hostless’ property of lithium metal anode. Thus, when JPL is introduced to a LIB system, it shows a fairly positive possibility for high performance Lithium metal battery. Figure 1

Lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) are among the most promising candidates for future battery technology due to their high theoretical capacity and energy density. However, the formation of dendritic Li, characterized by needle-like structures, poses serious safety issues. To address this, numerous methods are developed to prevent Li dendrite formation. Another significant challenge in LMBs is the formation of inactive Li, known as dead Li, which significantly impacts their Coulombic efficiency and overall performance. This review explores the issues surrounding dead Li in LMBs, specifically focusing on electrically isolated Li metal and the repeatedly generated solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Advanced techniques for characterizing inactive Li are discussed, alongside various strategies designed to activate or suppress dead Li, thus restoring battery capacity. The review summarizes recent advancements in research related to the activation, reuse, and prevention of dead Li, offering valuable insights for enhancing the efficiency and safety of LMBs. This comprehensive overview provides fundamental guidance for the practical application of Li metal anodes and similar metal batteries.

This study investigated the influence of variations in the mixing ratio of ethylene carbonate (EC) to ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) on the composition and effectiveness of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in lithium-metal batteries. The SEI is crucial for battery performance, as it prevents continuous electrolyte decomposition and inhibits the growth of lithium dendrites, which can cause internal short circuits leading to battery failure. Although the properties of the SEI largely depend on the electrolyte solvent, the influence of the EC:EMC ratio on SEI properties has not yet been elucidated. Through electrochemical testing, ionic conductivity measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the formation of Li2CO3, LiF, and organolithium compounds on lithium surfaces was systematically analyzed. This study demonstrated that the EC:EMC ratio significantly affected the SEI structure, primarily owing to the promotion of the formation of a denser SEI layer. Specifically, the ratios of 1:1 and 1:3 facilitated a uniform distribution and prevalence of Li2CO3 and LiF throughout the SEI, thereby affecting cell performance. Thus, precise control of the EC:EMC ratio is essential for enhancing the mechanical robustness and electrochemical stability of the SEI, thereby providing valuable insights into the factors that either enhance or impede effective SEI formation.

Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are promising ionic conductors for developing high‐specific‐energy solid‐state lithium metal batteries. However, developing SPEs with both high ionic conductivity and interfacial compatibility remains a challenge. Here, we propose a design concept of an anion‐modulated polymer electrolyte (termed AMPE) for high‐voltage Li metal batteries. Specifically, we design the AMPE by incorporating high‐voltage‐resistant and high charge density units with an anion receptor unit. The high‐voltage‐resistant and high charge density segments contribute to achieving a decent voltage tolerance of the polymer chains and ensure sufficient carrier ions. The anion receptor, represented by a boron‐containing molecule, promotes the generation of free Li+ by dissociating anion‐cation pairs. More importantly, the strong interaction between the electron‐deficient B and the TFSI− in the matrix promotes the anion reduction to form a stable anion‐derived mosaic‐like solid electrolyte interphase on the Li‐metal anode. As a result, the AMPE exhibits a high ionic conductivity of 3.80×10−4 S cm−1 and effectively suppresses lithium dendrites, enabling an all‐solid‐state Li|AMPE|LiCoO2 cell to achieve a cycle life of 700 cycles at an operating voltage of 4.40 V. This design concept would inspire efforts to develop high‐performance SPEs for high‐specific‐energy solid‐state lithium metal batteries.

The use of ultrathin lithium (Li) metal anode in Li metal batteries (LMBs) has the potential to significantly improve the energy density in comparison to the conventional LMBs. However, they possess several challenges such as intrinsic dendrite growth and dead Li, leading to poor cyclability and coulombic efficiency (CE). In addition, the ultrathin Li metal can cause much faster degradation of performances than thicker one owing to the exhaustion of Li resource with less compensation. To address these problems, silver trifluoromethanesulfonate (AgCF 3 SO 3 , AgTFMS) is proposed as a functional electrolyte additive in carbonate‐based electrolyte to buffer the dendritic Li growth and to provide enhanced cyclability. Interestingly, Ag metal derived from the AgTFMS exhibits lithiophilic properties through an alloying reaction with Li. Furthermore, the CF 3 functional group of AgTFMS generates a physically stable LiF‐rich solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI), which further suppresses the Li dendrite growth. An LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) full‐cell comprising the ultrathin Li metal anode (20 µm) with AgTFMS additive reveals an excellent capacity retention of up to 88.2% over 200 cycles, as well as outstanding rate capability under harsh practical condition. As a result, the AgTFMS additive can pave a new dimension for the design of high energy density LMBs using the ultrathin Li metal anode.

Alkali and alkaline earth metal anodes are gaining increasing research attention because they could provide high energy densities and theoretical specific capacities. Among them, lithium metal is the most investigated anode candidate for next generation batteries. However, due to some challenges, the commercialization of lithium metal anodes is still delayed. Reactions between lithium metal and the electrolyte lead to the formation of an inhomogeneous solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Consequently, electrodissolution/-deposition of lithium is favored where the SEI is less resistive or cracked, resulting in high surface area lithium and dendrite growth. This does not only lower the coulombic efficiency (CE) and cell specific capacity but also causes safety issues due to an increased risk of short-circuits and thermal runaway.1,2 To enable increased safety in high energy batteries with lithium metal anodes an effective SEI is required to limit lithium dendrite growth. There is a variety of approaches to grow an effective SEI, such as the use of electrolyte additives, mechanical methods and chemical modification.3-5 Recently, alkaline earth metal anodes, such as magnesium or calcium, are also of considerable interest for next generation anodes. Their main advantage is the significantly lower susceptibility to dendrite formation, while still offering high theoretical specific capacities. However, their oxide passivation layer does not allow significant mobility for their divalent ions, leading to large overvoltage and slow reaction kinetics which hinders the cycling. Therefore, electrolytes which enable a non-passivating SEI have to be applied and additives are investigated on their ability to remove the oxide layers.6,7 Herein, we present a novel mechanochemical approach to form an effective SEI on the lithium metal surface by combining mechanical and chemical modification utilizing ionic liquids (ILs) prior to cell assembly. This method suppresses dendrite growth even at high current densities of 10 mA cm-2 in lithium metal batteries with liquid electrolytes. To further highlight the importance of surface treatment and SEI formation, we investigate electrolytes for calcium metal batteries as well as mechanical modification of calcium metal anodes. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the European Union through the Horizon 2020 framework program for research and innovation within the project “VIDICAT” (829145).

Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) hold great promise for next-generation energy storage due to the ultrahigh theoretical capacity of lithium metal. However, an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) remains a critical challenge as these interfaces govern lithium diffusion during plating and stripping and prevent electrolyte degradation during cycling. Understanding the SEI's chemical composition and evolution is crucial for improving LMB performance.This study investigates the impact of different lithium salts on SEI formation in ether-based electrolytes using in-operando Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Three electrolytes were studied: 1M LiTFSI, 1M LiClO4, and 1M LiDFOB in DME: DOL. In-operando FTIR measurements were conducted on Li ||Li symmetric cells during plating and stripping at a current density of 3 mA/cm2. The results reveal distinct differences in SEI kinetics, composition, formation, and evolution depending on the salt used. In-operando FTIR in tandem with post-mortem X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) reveals different compounds forming on the lithium surface. LiTFSI-based electrolytes showed an instantaneous interaction with the Li surface forming both organic and inorganic SEI components. In contrast, LiClO4 showed a delayed Li-salt interaction started after minutes into plating. The LiDFOB electrolyte resulted in an organic dominated SEI with limited inorganic compounds leading to an unstable SEI. These differences in SEI chemistry correlate with electrochemical performance, with LiTFSI exhibiting superior performance.This study provides direct spectroscopic evidence of SEI formation and evolution in LMBs, highlighting the critical role of electrolyte salt chemistry in determining interfacial properties and battery performance.