An Analog Characterization of Elementarily Computable Functions over the Real Numbers

The modern theory of computability is based on the works of Church, Markov and Turing who, starting from quite different models of computation, arrived at the same class of computable functions. The purpose of this paper is the show how the main results of the Church-Markov-Turing theory of computable functions may quickly be derived and understood without recourse to the largely irrelevant theories of recursive functions, Markov algorithms, or Turing machines. We do this by ignoring the problem of what constitutes a computable function and concentrating on the central feature of the Church-Markov-Turing theory: that the set of computable partial functions can be effectively enumerated. In this manner we are led directly to the heart of the theory of computability without having to fuss about what a computable function is.The spirit of this approach is similar to that of [RGRS]. A major difference is that we operate in the context of constructive mathematics in the sense of Bishop [BSH1], so all functions are computable by definition, and the phrase “you can find” implies “by a finite calculation.” In particular ifPis some property, then the statement “for eachmthere isnsuch thatP(m, n)” means that we can construct a (computable) functionθsuch thatP(m, θ(m))for allm. Church's thesis has a different flavor in an environment like this where the notion of a computable function is primitive.One point of such a treatment of Church's thesis is to make available to Bishopstyle constructivists the Markovian counterexamples of Russian constructivism and recursive function theory. The lack of serious candidates for computable functions other than recursive functions makes it quite implausible that a Bishopstyle constructivist could refute Church's thesis, or any consequence of Church's thesis. Hence counterexamples such as Specker's bounded increasing sequence of rational numbers that is eventually bounded away from any given real number [SPEC] may be used, as Brouwerian counterexamples are, as evidence of the unprovability of certain assertions.

The theory of analog computation aims at modeling computational systems that evolve in a continuous space. Unlike the situation with the discrete setting there is no unified theory of analog computation. There are several proposed theories, some of them seem quite orthogonal. Some theories can be considered as generalizations of the Turing machine theory and classical recursion theory. Among such are recursive analysis and Moore’s class of recursive real functions. Recursive analysis was introduced by Turing (Proc Lond Math Soc 2(42):230–265, 1936), Grzegorczyk (Fundam Math 42:168–202, 1955), and Lacombe (Compt Rend l’Acad Sci Paris 241:151–153, 1955). Real computation in this context is viewed as effective (in the sense of Turing machine theory) convergence of sequences of rational numbers. In 1996 Moore introduced a function algebra that captures his notion of real computation; it consists of some basic functions and their closure under composition, integration and zero-finding. Though this class is inherently unphysical, much work have been directed at stratifying, restricting, and comparing it with other theories of real computation such as recursive analysis and the GPAC. In this article we give a detailed exposition of recursive analysis and Moore’s class and the relationships between them.

A model for computation over an arbitrary (ordered) ring R is presented. In this general setting, universal machines, partial recursive functions, and NP-complete problems are obtained. While the theory reflects of classical over Z (e.g. the computable functions are the recursive functions), it also reflects the special mathematical character of the underlying ring R (e.g. complements of Julia sets provide natural examples of recursively enumerable undecidable sets over the reals) and provides a natural setting for studying foundational issues concerning algorithms in numerical analysis.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

We prove that functions over the reals computable in polynomial time can be characterised using discrete ordinary differential equations (ODE), also known as finite differences. We also provide a characterisation of functions computable in polynomial space over the reals.While existing characterisations could only cover time complexity or were restricted to functions over the integers, here we deal with real numbers and also cover space complexity. Furthermore, we prove that no artificial sign or test function is needed even for time complexity.At a technical level, this is obtained by proving that Turing machines can be simulated with analytic discrete ordinary differential equations. We believe this result opens the way to many applications, as it opens the possibility of programming with ODEs, with an underlying well-understood time and space complexity.

The main thesis of this chapter is that a dynamical viewpoint allows us to better understand some important foundational issues of computation theory. Effective procedures are traditionally studied from two different but complementary points of view. The first approach is concerned with individuating those numeric functions that are effectively calculable. This approach reached its systematization with the theory of the recursive functions (Gödel, Church Kleene).This theory is not directly concerned with computing devices or computations. Rather, the effective calculability of a recursive function is guaranteed by the algorithmic nature of its definition. In contrast, the second approach focuses on a family of abstract mechanisms, which are then typically used to compute or recognize numeric functions, sets of numbers, or numbers. These devices can be divided into two broad categories: automata or machines (Turing and Post), and systems of rules for symbol manipulation (Post). The mechanisms that have been studied include: a. Automata or Machines 1. gate-nets and McCulloch-Pitts nets 2. finite automata (Mealy and Moore machines) 3. push-down automata 4. stack automata 5. Turing machines 6. register machines 7. wang machines 8. cellular automata b. Systems of Rules 9. monogenic production systems in general 10. monogenic Post canonical systems 11. monogenic Post normal systems 12. tag systems. I call any device studied by computation theory a computational system. Computation theory is traditionally interested in studying the relations between each type of computational system and the others, and in establishing what class of numeric functions each type can compute. Accordingly one proves two kinds of theorem: (1) that systems of a given type emulate systems of another type (examples: Turing machines emulate register machines and cellular automata; cellular automata emulate Turing machines, etc.), and (2) that a certain type of system is complete relative to the class of the (partial) recursive functions or, in other words, that this type of system can compute all and only the (partial) recursive functions (examples of complete systems: Turing machines, register machines, cellular automata, tag systems, etc.). All different types of computational systems have much in common. Nevertheless, it is not at all clear exactly which properties these mechanisms share.

A class of logarithmically completely monotonic functions and the best bounds in the second Kershaw's double inequality

В.Г. Николаев Новгородский государственный университет имени Ярослава Мудрого, Великий Новгород, Российская Федерация E-mail: vg14@inbox.ru. V.G. Nikolaev Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Vocational Education “Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University”, Velikiy Novgorod, Russian Federation E-mail: vg14@inbox.ru

On the inductive inference of recursive real-valued functions

We investigate interrelationships among different notions from mathematical analysis, effective topology, and classical computability theory. Our main object of study is the class of computable functions defined over an interval with the boundary being a left-c.e. real number. We investigate necessary and sufficient conditions under which such functions can be computably extended. It turns out that this depends on the behavior of the function near the boundary as well as on the class of left-c.e. real numbers to which the boundary belongs, that is, how it can be constructed. Of particular interest a class of functions is investigated: sawtooth functions constructed from computable enumerations of c.e. sets.

Finitely Bounded Effective Computability

We study the correctness of automatic differentiation (AD) in the context of a higher-order, Turing-complete language (PCF with real numbers), both in forward and reverse mode. Our main result is that, under mild hypotheses on the primitive functions included in the language, AD is almost everywhere correct, that is, it computes the derivative or gradient of the program under consideration except for a set of Lebesgue measure zero. Stated otherwise, there are inputs on which AD is incorrect, but the probability of randomly choosing one such input is zero. Our result is in fact more precise, in that the set of failure points admits a more explicit description: for example, in case the primitive functions are just constants, addition and multiplication, the set of points where AD fails is contained in a countable union of zero sets of polynomials.

The class of type-two basic feasible functionals ($\mathtt{BFF}_2$) is the analogue of $\mathtt{FP}$ (polynomial time functions) for type-2 functionals, that is, functionals that can take (first-order) functions as arguments. $\mathtt{BFF}_2$ can be defined through Oracle Turing machines with running time bounded by second-order polynomials. On the other hand, higher-order term rewriting provides an elegant formalism for expressing higher-order computation. We address the problem of characterizing $\mathtt{BFF}_2$ by higher-order term rewriting. Various kinds of interpretations for first-order term rewriting have been introduced in the literature for proving termination and characterizing first-order complexity classes. In this paper, we consider a recently introduced notion of cost-size interpretations for higher-order term rewriting and see second order rewriting as ways of computing type-2 functionals. We then prove that the class of functionals represented by higher-order terms admitting polynomially bounded cost-size interpretations exactly corresponds to $\mathtt{BFF}_2$.

In this volume we express the basic aspects of thermo-hydrodynamics in the language of variational calculus, the branch of mathematics that deals with the problem of determining the extreme values of the quantities called functionals. By a functional, we mean a rule that assigns a real number to each (scalar, vector, etc.) function belonging to a given class of admissible functions. One may distinguish such a definition from the definition of the function, the rule that associates a number to each (n-tuples of) number(s) belonging to the given set of numbers. Roughly, the functional is defined on a set of the functions, the function on a set of the numbers. More precisely, let Q will be the set of functions; q, r, s …; then a functional A defined on Q is a mapping A: Q → R1 which associates to each q ∈ Q a real number A(q). In general, the set of the functions may constitute any set of geometric objects, scalars, vectors, tensors, etc.

We present results concerning analytic machines, a model of real computation introduced by Hotz which extends the well-known Blum, Shub and Smale machines (BSS machines) by infinite converging computations. The well-known representation theorem for BSS machines elucidates the structure of the functions computable in the BSS model: the domain of such a function partitions into countably many semi-algebraic sets, and on each of those sets the function is a polynomial resp. rational function. In this paper, we study whether the representation theorem can, in the univariate case, be extended to analytic machines, i.e. whether functions computable by analytic machines can be represented by power series in some part of their domain. We show that this question can be answered in the negative over the real numbers but positive under certain restrictions for functions over the complex numbers. We then use the machine model to define computability of univariate complex analytic (i.e. holomorphic) functions and examine in particular the class of analytic functions which have analytically computable power series expansions. We show that this class is closed under the basic analytic operations composition, local inversion and analytic continuation.

Let (A, B) denote the class of certain p-valent starlike functions. Recently G. Lakshma Reddy and K.S. Padmanabhan [Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 25 (1982), 387–396] have shown that the function g defined bybelongs to the class (A, B) if f ∈ (A, B). The technique used by them fails when c is any positive real number. In this paper, by employing a more powerful technique, we improve their result to the case when c is any real number such that c ≥ −p(1+A)/(1+B).