• Home
  • Search
  • An Electrical Impedance Tomography Based Interface for Human–Robot Collaboration
  • Cite Icon27
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2020.3039017Copy DOI Icon

An Electrical Impedance Tomography Based Interface for Human–Robot Collaboration

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Adaptation to the operator's intents and the external physical uncertainties is critical to the performances of the human–robot collaboration. In this study, we proposed a control interface that combined the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) based sensing approach with the robotic controllers to produce proper assistance with external uncertainties in the collaborative task. The interface first estimates the continuous forearm muscle contractions (represented by the grasp forces) by the optimized EIT features with an easily worn fabric band. The recognition decisions then serve as the control inputs to adjust the state transitions and the desired interaction forces in real time. We evaluated the interface in the tasks of grasp force estimation and human–robot sawing by recruiting more than 20 subjects in total. For grasp force estimation, the interface produced an average of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}\geq 0.9$</tex-math></inline-formula> in both offline and online validations with the feature optimization procedure and a sigmoid regression function. The interface was robust to external disturbances without retraining or manual calibrations. The average <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}=0.86$</tex-math></inline-formula> with the untrained dynamic postures, and the average <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> values ranged from 0.85 to 0.88 in the tests with redonning the front-end in interday and intraday uses. For human–robot sawing, the interface accomplished the tasks with a high success rate in controlling the states ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$&gt;$</tex-math></inline-formula> 96%) and intuitive adjusting of the sawing forces, being combined with the designed hybrid admittance/position controller. It was also adaptive to the sawing frequency changes and the sawing directions according to the operator's intents. The interface's performances are comparable, if not better, to the state of the art on both biological signal based grasp force estimation and human–robot sawing. Future efforts are worth being paid in this new direction to get more promising outcomes.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Perception–Intention–Action Cycle in Human–Robot Collaborative Tasks: The Collaborative Lightweight Object Transportation Use-Case

  • Mar 25, 2024
  • International Journal of Social Robotics
  • J E Domínguez-Vidal +2
  • Research Article

Force Sensing Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction: A Transformer-Based Action Chunking Approach

  • Feb 23, 2026
  • Machines
  • Zhenyu Pan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

A Two-Stage MLP-LSTM Network-Based Task Planning Method for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly Scenarios

  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Applied Sciences
  • Zhenyu Pan +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Exploring human-robot interaction in remanufacturing: bibliometric insights

  • Mar 12, 2025
  • International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
  • Valentina De Simone +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Virtual Potential Field-Based Motion Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration via Kinesthetically Guided Teleoperation

  • Jan 05, 2023
  • Yunze Shi +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations94

Balancing collaborative human–robot assembly lines to optimise cycle time and ergonomic risk

  • Oct 21, 2021
  • International Journal of Production Research
  • Kathryn E Stecke +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Industry perception of competencies for human—robot collaboration in the construction industry: A Delphi study

  • Jun 05, 2025
  • Frontiers of Engineering Management
  • Ebenezer Olukanni +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Evaluation of Biomechanical and Mental Workload During Human-Robot Collaborative Pollination Task.

  • May 28, 2024
  • Human factors
  • Mustafa Ozkan Yerebakan +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations44

Cognitive Interaction Analysis in Human–Robot Collaboration Using an Assembly Task

  • May 31, 2021
  • Electronics
  • Alejandro Chacón +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

CAD-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Safe Scheduling of HRC Operations for Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Fabio Pini +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Deep Learning Framework for Controlling Work Sequence in Collaborative Human–Robot Assembly Processes

  • Jan 03, 2023
  • Sensors
  • Pedro P Garcia +3
  • Research Article

Applications of Neuromorphic/Event Camera in Robotics With Human in Loop: A Systematic Review, Datasets, and Challenges

  • Dec 03, 2025
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • Muhammad Hamza Zafar +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Mutual-cognition for proactive human–robot collaboration: A mixed reality-enabled visual reasoning-based method

  • Feb 07, 2024
  • IISE Transactions
  • Shufei Li +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations19

Task-based Potential Analysis for Human-Robot Collaboration within Assembly Systems

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Matthias Linsinger +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations180

Vision-based holistic scene understanding towards proactive human–robot collaboration

  • Jun 01, 2022
  • Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
  • Junming Fan +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.