• Home
  • Search
  • An Integrated Multi-Agent Framework for Optimizing Time, Cost and Environmental Impact of Construction Processes
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.fi11080806Copy DOI Icon

An Integrated Multi-Agent Framework for Optimizing Time, Cost and Environmental Impact of Construction Processes

  • Aug 11, 2011
  • Gulbin Ozcan-Deniz
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Environmentally conscious construction has received a significant amount of research attention during the last decades. Even though construction literature is rich in studies that emphasize the importance of environmental impact during the construction phase, most of the previous studies failed to combine environmental analysis with other project performance criteria in construction. This is mainly because most of the studies have overlooked the multi-objective nature of construction projects. In order to achieve environmentally conscious construction, multi-objectives and their relationships need to be successfully analyzed in the complex construction environment. The complex construction system is composed of changing project conditions that have an impact on the relationship between time, cost and environmental impact (TCEI) of construction operations. Yet, this impact is still unknown by construction professionals. Studying this impact is vital to fulfill multiple project objectives and achieve environmentally conscious construction. This research proposes an analytical framework to analyze the impact of changing project conditions on the relationship of TCEI. This study includes green house gas (GHG) emissions as an environmental impact category. The methodology utilizes multi-agent systems, multi-objective optimization, analytical network process, and system dynamics tools to study the relationships of TCEI and support decision-making under the influence of project conditions. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied to the evaluation of environmental impact in terms of GHG. The mixed method approach allowed for the collection and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. Structured interviews of professionals in the highway construction field were conducted to gain their perspectives in decision-making under the influence of certain project conditions, while the quantitative data were collected from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for highway resurfacing projects. The data collected were used to test the framework. The framework yielded statistically significant results in simulating project conditions and optimizing TCEI. The results showed that the change in project conditions had a significant impact on the TCEI optimal solutions. The correlation between TCEI suggested that they affected each other positively, but in different strengths. The findings of the study will assist contractors to visualize the impact of their decision on the relationship of TCEI.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Prospective life cycle assessment framework for energy transition scenarios based on the EnergyPLAN tool

  • Mar 01, 2026
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • Lasse Krogh Poulsen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Assessing economic and environmental performance of infill materials through BIM: a life cycle approach

  • Jul 04, 2024
  • Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
  • Zeerak Waryam Sajid +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Life cycle assessment in urban territories: a case study of Dalian city, China

  • Apr 18, 2018
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • Yu Qi +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Environmental impact evaluation and improvement measure of incineration plant by life cycle assessment

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association
  • Kim Hyeong Woo +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

The environmental benefits of changing logistics structures for fresh vegetables

  • Jul 05, 2017
  • International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
  • Francesco Caracciolo +12
  • Discussion
  • Citations14

Life cycle assessment in support of sustainable transportation

  • May 30, 2013
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Matthew J Eckelman
  • Research Article
  • Citations86

Life cycle assessment of opencast coal mine production: a case study in Yimin mining area in China.

  • Jan 06, 2018
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Li Zhang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Life cycle assessment of contrasting grazing systems within a yearling stocker stage of beef cattle production

  • Dec 01, 2025
  • Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
  • Javier Portuguez-Acuña +14
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Evaluating environmental impacts of selection for residual feed intake in pigs

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Animal
  • T Soleimani +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Greenhouse gas reduction strategies for building materials: A reality check with the climate targets

  • Sep 01, 2022
  • IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
  • N Alaux +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Comparing environmental impact of air scrubbers for ammonia abatement at pig houses: A life cycle assessment

  • Jul 03, 2017
  • Biosystems Engineering
  • Jerke W De Vries +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Design for excellence

  • Jan 01, 1996
  • Journal of Manufacturing Systems
  • Geoffrey Boothroyd
  • Research Article
  • Citations47

Uncover the interdependent environmental impacts associated with the water-energy-food nexus under resource management strategies

  • May 19, 2020
  • Resources, Conservation and Recycling
  • Chi-Feng Chen +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations119

Assessment of environmental impact of biomass power plants to increase the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies

  • Jul 01, 2019
  • Heliyon
  • Alessandro Paletto +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Life cycle assessment of rice processing in Sri Lanka: Modern and conventional processing

  • Apr 01, 2016
  • S.M.W.T.P.K Ariyarathna +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.