• Home
  • Search
  • Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Facial Expression Recognition
  • Cite Icon12
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96040-7_55Copy DOI Icon

Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Facial Expression Recognition

  • Jan 1, 2022
  • Akhilesh Kumar +1 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract People can identify emotion from facial expressions easily, but it is more difficult to do it with a computer. It is now feasible to identify feelings from images because of recent advances in computational intelligence. Emotional responses are those mental states of thoughts that develop without conscious effort and are naturally associated with facial muscles, resulting in different facial expressions such as happy, sad, angry, contempt, fear, surprise etc. Emotions play an important role in nonverbal cues that represent a person’s interior thoughts. Intimate robots are expanding in every domain, whether it is completing requirements of elderly people, addressing psychiatric patients, child rehabilitation, or even childcare, as the human–robot interface is grabbing on every day with the increased demand for automation in every industry. We evaluate and test machine learning algorithms on the FER 2013 data set to recognize human emotion from facial expressions, with some of them achieving the highest accuracy and the others failing to detect emotions. Many researchers have used various machine learning methods to identify human emotions during the last few years. In this research article, we analyze eight frequently used machine learning techniques on the FER 2013 dataset to determine which method performs best at categorizing human facial expression. After analyzing the results, it is found that the accuracy of some of the algorithms is quite satisfactory, with 37% for Logistic Regression, 33% for K-neighbors classifier, 100% for Decision Tree Classifier, 78% for Random Forests, 57% for Ada-Boost, 100% for Gaussian NB, 33% for LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis), and 99% for QDA (Quadratic Discriminant Analysis). Furthermore, the experimental results show that the Decision Tree and Gaussian NB Classifier can correctly identify all of the emotions in the FER 2013 dataset with 100% classification accuracy, while Quadratic Discriminant Analysis can do so with 99% accuracy.KeywordsFacial expressionEmotionMachine learningKNNQDADecision treeGaussian NBRandom Forest

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Sex prediction using machine learning algorithms with parameters obtained from CT images of the Canaliculi pterygoidei

  • Apr 24, 2026
  • Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Yusuf Secgin +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations111

Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for prediction of smart grid stability †

  • Feb 04, 2021
  • International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
  • Ali Kashif Bashir +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations39

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of PCOS

  • Jun 25, 2021
  • Preeti Chauhan +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

Feature extraction from MRI ADC images for brain tumor classification using machine learning techniques

  • Aug 01, 2022
  • BioMedical Engineering OnLine
  • Sahan M Vijithananda +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Harvesting wind damaged trees: a study of prediction of windthrow damage in mixed-broadleaf stands via a machine learning model

  • Jan 30, 2023
  • International Journal of Forest Engineering
  • Vasiliki Dimou +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Comparison and Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Classification of Hand Gestures Captured by Inertial Sensors

  • Sep 14, 2022
  • Computation
  • Ivo Stančić +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

An integrated machine learning: Utility theory framework for real-time predictive maintenance in pumping systems

  • Nov 13, 2020
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
  • Raghad M Khorsheed +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Hand Movement-Based Diabetes Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques

  • Jul 31, 2021
  • International Journal on Engineering Applications (IREA)
  • Mutaz Al-Tarawneh +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations16

Mobile Phone Price Class Prediction Using Different Classification Algorithms with Feature Selection and Parameter Optimization

  • Oct 21, 2021
  • 2021 5th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT)
  • Mustafa Çetın +1
  • Research Article

Age-Specific Comparative Analysis of ML Algorithms for Colon Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data

  • Apr 22, 2025
  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
  • Ch.Harini Devi
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Predicting and identifying factors associated with undernutrition among children under five years in Ghana using machine learning algorithms.

  • Feb 13, 2024
  • PLOS ONE
  • Eric Komla Anku +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations12

Improving Human Activity Recognition using ML and Wearable Sensors

  • May 16, 2022
  • Gael S Mubibya +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations144

Advances in Machine Learning Algorithms for Hate Speech Detection in Social Media: A Review

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • IEEE Access
  • Nanlir Sallau Mullah +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Facial Affect Recognition Using Regularized Discriminant Analysis-Based Algorithms

  • Apr 15, 2010
  • EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
  • Chien-Cheng Lee +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques and Variables for Groundwater Dissolved Organic Nitrogen Prediction in an Urban Area

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Procedia Engineering
  • Benya Wang +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.