• Home
  • Search
  • Analysis Of "Slug Test" Dst Flow Period Data With Critical Flow
  • Cite Icon6
  • https://doi.org/10.2118/7981-msCopy DOI Icon

Analysis Of "Slug Test" Dst Flow Period Data With Critical Flow

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract In field data from slug test (decreasing flow rate) DSTS, an initial period of constant flow rate can often be observed. This may be a consequence of critical flow. "Critical flow" means that flow rate is independent of the pressure drop across the flow restriction. In the case of compressible fluid flow, this implies that the flow velocity is equal to the sonic velocity in the fluid. This was suggested by Ramey et al. in 1975. However, critical (constant-rate) flow was not included in their analysis of slug test DST flow period data. A new method which does consider an initial constant flow rate for a slug test was found. Graphs for the type-curve matching method are presented and field data are shown. Introduction Often in drill stem testing, the flow periods are characterized by a pressure trace which increases with increasing time, showing the accumulation of liquid in the drill string. In the expected case, the pressure-time trace is linear, showing constant-rate pressure-time trace is linear, showing constant-rate production. In other cases, the pressure-time trace production. In other cases, the pressure-time trace curves and is concave to the time axis. This shows a decreasing flow rate. In the case that formation pressure is too low to lift a column of reservoir pressure is too low to lift a column of reservoir liquid to the surface, the well may stop flowing before the tester valve is closed. This results because the head of liquid in the drill string becomes equal to initial formation pressure. This sort of test is similar to a pressure transient test called a "slug test" by Ferris and Knowles in 1954. The word "slug" refers to the maximum volume of liquid which may be produced by the time the well becomes static. produced by the time the well becomes static. A similar test involving the cooling of a batch of hot water was reported by Beck, Jaeger, and Newstead in 1956. Cooper et al., in 1967, reported the results of a field test in a static water well from which a float was suddenly removed, giving the appearance of the sudden removal of a quantity of water equal to that displaced by the float. Maier presented an approximate analysis of the equivalent DST presented an approximate analysis of the equivalent DST problem in 1970. problem in 1970.Van Poollen et al., in 1970, and Kohlhass, in 1972, applied the Cooper et al. solution to DST flow period data analysis. Although most current studies period data analysis. Although most current studies reference a study by Jaeger in 1956 which included a sandface resistance similar to the skin effect, most recent works do not include wellbore damage effects. A solution including the skin effect was presented by Ramey and Agarwal in 1972, although use of the solutions was not demonstrated. Papadopulos et al. presented extended results for the zero skin effect presented extended results for the zero skin effect case in 1973. The most complete discussion of DST applications of the slug test was presented in 1975. Three new slug test type-curves were developed for analysis of flow period data, and three field cases were analyzed. This study was included in the Earlougher monograph in 1977, and large-scale type-curves were printed with that monograph. printed with that monograph. Finally, Fenske showed that pressure buildup data for a well produced a short time (with wellbore storage) would follow the slug test type-curves. This is a potent observation. It means that the slug test type-curves may work for the initial shut-in, as well as for flow period data. This establishes the importance of slug test type-curves for DST work whether the test would normally be classified a "slug test" or not. Although not within the scope of this study, slug test type-curves may be used to match the initial shut-in for a DST following a very short initial flow to provide permeability, skin effect, and extrapolated initial pressure. One of the most important observations made from attempts to match field data with slug test type-curves is that there is often an initial constant-rate flow period before the rate begins to decline. Reference period before the rate begins to decline. Reference 1 pointed out this phenomena was related to conventional DST results for liquid flow wherein flow rate was constant for both flow periods: "Before proceeding with the presentation of the 'slug test', it should be pointed out that the conventional DST… contains the seed of a paradox.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Wellbore Inertial and Frictional Effects on Drillstem Tests From Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

  • Oct 05, 1986
  • M A Saldana +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations25

Interference Testing With Wellbore Storage And Skin Effect At The Produced Well

  • Oct 01, 1978
  • Hugo M Sandal +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

A Novel Slug Heat Test Theoretical and Indoor Model Research for Determining Thermal Property Parameters of Aquifers and Rock-Soil Skeletons

  • Sep 26, 2022
  • Water
  • Yanrong Zhao +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Laboratory Validation of Critical Flow Choke Rate Equations for Wet Steam at Field Operating Conditions

  • Oct 08, 1989
  • M T Rubel
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

A new analysis procedure for determining aquifer properties from slug test data

  • Jul 01, 1989
  • Water Resources Research
  • Alvaro M M Peres +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Analysis of Factors Affecting Drillstem Tests in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

  • Nov 06, 1985
  • SPE Eastern Regional Meeting
  • S K Peterson +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Theory and Practice of the Closed-Chamber Drillstem Test Method

  • Dec 01, 1977
  • Journal of Petroleum Technology
  • L.G Alexander
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Analysis of two phase critical flow with a non-equilibrium model

  • Dec 16, 2020
  • Nuclear Engineering and Design
  • Hong Xu +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Flow Stability in a Miniature Centrifugal Pump under the Periodic Pulse Flow

  • Dec 10, 2021
  • Energies
  • Kunhang Li +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Damage Ratio from With Variable Drill-Stem Tests Back Pressure

  • Nov 17, 1966
  • SPE California Regional Meeting
  • Hossein Kazemi
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Well test interpretation for reservoirs with a single linear no-flow barrier

  • Aug 01, 1988
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Fikri J Kuchuk +1
  • Research Article

Modeling of critical filtration regimes of vapor-liquid flow

  • Nov 01, 2020
  • Journal of Physics: Conference Series
  • D P Khramtsov +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

SlugIn 1.0: A Free Tool for Automated Slug Test Analysis.

  • Mar 26, 2018
  • Groundwater
  • Sergio Martos‐Rosillo +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Addressing Some of the Unique Challenges of Drillstem Tests in Tight Gas Reservoirs

  • Nov 28, 2005
  • Agha Hassan Akram +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations64

Evaluation of Slug Tests in Wells Containing a Finite‐Thickness Skin

  • Apr 01, 1984
  • Water Resources Research
  • Charles R Faust +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.