- Conference Article
3
- 10.21437/interspeech.2004-570
Coping with disfluencies in spontaneous speech recognition
- Oct 04, 2004
- Frederik Stouten + 1 more +1
Nowadays, automatic speech recognizers have become quite goodin recognizing well prepared fluent speech (e.g. news readings).However, the recognition of spontaneous speech is still problem-atic. Some important reasons for this are that spontaneous speechis usually less articulated and contains a lot of disfluencies. In thispaper, a new methodology for coping with disfluencies is presentedand evaluated. The basic idea is to detect disfluencies and to deter-mine the nature of these disfluencies prior to the recognition, and touse that information to control/modify the search. At present, themethodology has been elaborated for filled pauses (FP) and wordrepetitions (WR). It enables us to eliminate about one associated normal word error per disfluency without introducing a significantaugmentation of the computational load. 1. Introduction The most frequently occurring disfluencies in spontaneous speechare filled pauses (FPs). If one has a sufficiently large spontaneousspeech corpus with FP transcriptions available, one can create ded-icated acoustic FP models to supplement the traditional triphonemodel set. One can also introduce lexical FP models (pronuncia-tion variants in the lexicon). In [7], a combination of acoustic andlexical FP models yielded a reduction of the word error rate (WER)of 7.8 % relative for medical dictation (with respect to a baselinesystem with one FP model in the lexicon).Even when good FP models are available, FPs may still con-fuse the recognizer because they lead to word sequences (-grams)that are not observed in the kind of written material that is normallyused for language model (LM) development. Extending this mate-rialwithspontaneous speech transcriptionswould beanother meansof improving a spontaneous speech recognizer. However, the nec-essary resources to accomplish this for a general task are usuallynot available (and certainly not for Dutch). For a limited domainlike medical dictation, the situation is different, and experiments byPakhomov [4]showed thatthetechnique can work : the WERcouldbe reduced from 32.2 to 28.5 %.A simple way of dealing with FPs at the level of the LM is toignore the FP in the LM context of the next word. However, Stol-cke and Shriberg [8] come to the surprising conclusion that discard-ing FPs from the trigram context actually increases the perplexity.However, they looked at the speech stretches that were supplied totherecognizer and thatweredelimitedonthebasisofacoustic crite-ria. The FPs occurring at sentence boundaries often appeared in themiddle of such stretches. By only discarding sentence internal FPsthe perplexity did decrease, as expected. In [5] the speech stretchescorresponded to sentences and all FPs were sentence internal. Forthis material, the discarding strategy resulted in a 4 % decrease ofthe overall perplexity and a 30 % decrease of the perplexity of theword after an FP.The problems with the discarding of FPs in the LM are that thenotion of a sentence is not always clear in spontaneous speech, andthat even when it is, the sentence boundaries only become availableafter the recognition (with FPs) has been accomplished.Apart from FPs, there are other important disfluency types inspontaneous speech, such as the word repetition (WR). It is definedas an event consisting of a completed (not interrupted) word (W)and a repetition (R) of that word. Clearly, WRs do not require anynew acoustic or lexical models. However, just like FPs, they maydisturb the recognizer at the level of the language model.In this paper we investigate adaptive search methodologies thataim at improving the recognition of spontaneous speech in thevicinity of FPsand WRs without affecting the performance in otherregions. In section 2 we briefly outline the basic principles of thenew adaptive approach and we further elaborate and evaluate it insections 3 and 4.
Read more