Approximate Bayes Estimation for Log-Dagum Distribution

The Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Best Linear Unbiased (BLU) estimators of the location and scale parameters of an extreme value distribution (Lawless [1982]) are compared under conditions of small sample sizes and Type I censorship. The comparisons were made in terms of the mean square error criterion. According to this criterion, the ML estimator of σ in the case of very small sample sizes (n < 10) and heavy censorship (low censoring time) proved to be more efficient than the corresponding BLU estimator. However, the BLU estimator for σ attains parity with the corresponding ML estimator when the censoring time increases even for sample sizes as low as 10. The BLU estimator of σ attains equivalence with the ML estimator when the sample size increases above 10, particularly when the censoring time is also increased. The situation is reversed when it came to estimating the location parameter μ, as the BLU estimator was found to be consistently more efficient than the ML estimator despite the improved performance of the ML estimator when the sample size increases. However, computational ease and convenience favor the ML estimators. Keywords: maximum likelihood estimatorsbest linear unbiased estimatorslife-testingreliability

In this paper, we offer generalized exponentiated gamma distribution. We consider the maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimators of unknown parameters and propose Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to generate samples from the posterior distribution. The mean square error of estimations is computed and comparisons are made using Monte Carlo simulation. Key words: Maximum likelihood estimator, Bayesian estimator, squared error loss function, generalized exponentiated gamma distribution.

The reverberation power spectral density (PSD) is often required for dereverberation and noise reduction algorithms. In this work, we compare two maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of the reverberation PSD in a noisy environment. In the first estimator, the direct path is first blocked. Then, the ML criterion for estimating the reverberation PSD is stated according to the probability density function of the blocking matrix (BM) outputs. In the second estimator, the speech component is not blocked. Instead, the ML criterion for estimating the speech and reverberation PSD is stated according to the probability density function of the microphone signals. To compare the expected mean square error (MSE) between the two ML estimators of the reverberation PSD, the Cramer–Rao Bounds (CRBs) for the two ML estimators are derived. We show that the CRB for the joint reverberation and speech PSD estimator is lower than the CRB for estimating the reverberation PSD from the BM outputs. Experimental results show that the MSE of the two estimators indeed obeys the CRB curves. Experimental results of multimicrophone dereverberation and noise reduction algorithm show the benefits of using the ML estimators in comparison with another baseline estimators.

Examining the robustness properties of maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of parameters in exponential power and generalized t distributions has been considered together. The well-known asymptotic properties of ML estimators of location, scale and added skewness parameters in these distributions are studied. The ML estimators for location, scale and scale variant (skewness) parameters are represented as an iterative reweighting algorithm (IRA) to compute the estimates of these parameters simultaneously. The artificial data are generated to examine performance of IRA for ML estimators of parameters simultaneously. We make a comparison between these two distributions to test the fitting performance on real data sets. The goodness of fit test and information criteria approve that robustness and fitting performance should be considered together as a key for modeling issue to have the best information from real data sets.

We consider here the generalization of the Bilal distribution proposed by Abd-Elrahman (2017) by zeroing in on two measures of reliability, R(t) and P, based on type II censoring. We obtain point estimators namely, λ and θ, of the above said distribution, when both parameters of the distribution are unknown. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), Bayes estimators (BEs) and Lindley’s approximation for the Bayes estimators are proposed. By using independent noninformative type of priors for the unknown parameters Bayes estimators are derived. Although the proposed estimators cannot be expressed in closed forms, these can be easily obtained through the use of numerical procedures. The performance of these estimators is studied on the basis of their mean squared error (MSE), computed separately under LINEX loss function (LLF) and squared error loss function (SELF) through Monte-Carlo simulation technique.

The Multiple Comparison Procedures with Modeling Techniques (MCP-Mod) framework has been recently approved by the U.S. Food, Administration, and European Medicines Agency as fit-for-purpose for phase II studies. Nonetheless, this approach relies on the asymptotic properties of Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimators, which might not be reasonable for small sample sizes. In this paper, we derived improved ML estimators and correction for their covariance matrices in the censored Weibull regression model based on the corrective and preventive approaches. We performed two simulation studies to evaluate ML and improved ML estimators with their covariance matrices in (i) a regression framework (ii) the Multiple Comparison Procedures with Modeling Techniques framework. We have shown that improved ML estimators are less biased than ML estimators yielding Wald-type statistics that controls type I error without loss of power in both frameworks. Therefore, we recommend the use of improved ML estimators in the MCP-Mod approach to control type I error at nominal value for sample sizes ranging from 5 to 25 subjects per dose.

For a balanced two‐way mixed model, the maximum likelihood (ML) and restricted ML (REML) estimators of the variance components were obtained and compared under the non‐negativity requirements of the variance components by Lee and Kapadia (1984). In this note, for a mixed (random blocks) incomplete block model, explicit forms for the REML estimators of variance components are obtained. They are always non‐negative and have smaller mean squared error (MSE) than the analysis of variance (AOV) estimators. The asymptotic sampling variances of the maximum likelihood (ML) estimators and the REML estimators are compared and the balanced incomplete block design (BIBD) is considered as a special case. The ML estimators are shown to have smaller asymptotic variances than the REML estimators, but a numerical result in the randomized complete block design (RCBD) demonstrated that the performances of the REML and ML estimators are not much different in the MSE sense.

Over-the-air computation (OAC) is a promising technique to realize fast model aggregation in the uplink of federated edge learning (FEEL). OAC, however, hinges on accurate channel-gain precoding and strict synchronization among edge devices, which are challenging in practice. As such, how to design the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator in the presence of residual channel-gain mismatch and asynchronies is an open problem. To fill this gap, this paper formulates the problem of misaligned OAC for FEEL and puts forth a whitened matched filtering and sampling scheme to obtain oversampled, but independent samples from the misaligned and overlapped signals. Given the whitened samples, a sum-product ML (SP-ML) estimator and an aligned-sample estimator are devised to estimate the arithmetic sum of the transmitted symbols. In particular, the computational complexity of our SP-ML estimator is linear in the packet length, and hence is significantly lower than the conventional ML estimator. Extensive simulations on the test accuracy versus the average received energy per symbol to noise power spectral density ratio (EsN0) yield two main results: 1) In the low EsN0 regime, the aligned-sample estimator can achieve superior test accuracy provided that the phase misalignment is not severe. In contrast, the ML estimator does not work well due to the error propagation and noise enhancement in the estimation process. 2) In the high EsN0 regime, the ML estimator attains the optimal learning performance regardless of the severity of phase misalignment. On the other hand, the aligned-sample estimator suffers from a test-accuracy loss caused by phase misalignment.

Maximum likelihood estimation of time delays in multipath acoustic channel

Ordinal regression is used to model the ordinal response variable as functions of several explanatory variables. The most commonly used model for ordinal regression is the proportional odds model (POM). The classical technique for estimating the unknown parameters of this model is the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator. However, this method is not suitable for solving problems with extreme observations. A robust regression method is needed to handle the problem of extreme points in the data. This study proposes Huber M-estimator as a robust method to estimate the parameters of the POM with a logistic link function and polytomous explanatory variables. This study assesses ML estimator performance and the robust method proposed through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study conducted using statistical software, R. Measurement for comparisons are bias, RMSE, and Lipsitzs' goodness of fit test. Various sample sizes, percentages of contamination, and residual standard deviations are considered in the simulation study. Preliminary results show that Huber estimates provide the best results for parameter estimation and overall model fitting. Huber's estimator has reached a 50% breakdown point for data containing extreme points that are quite far from most points. In addition, the presence of extreme points that have only a distance of two times far from most points has no major impact on ML estimates. This means that the estimates for ML and Huber may yield the same results if the model's residual values are between -2 and 2. This situation may also occur for data with a percentage of contamination below 5%.

Latent growth models (LGMs) are an application of structural equation modeling and frequently used in developmental and clinical research to analyze change over time in longitudinal outcomes. Maximum likelihood (ML), the most common approach for estimating LGMs, can fail to converge or may produce biased estimates in complex LGMs especially in studies with modest samples. Bayesian estimation is a logical alternative to ML for LGMs, but there is a lack of research providing guidance on when Bayesian estimation may be preferable to ML or vice versa. This study compared the performance of Bayesian versus ML estimators for LGMs by evaluating their accuracy via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. For the MC study, longitudinal data sets were generated and estimated using LGM via both ML and Bayesian estimation with three different priors, and parameter recovery across the two estimators was evaluated to determine their relative performance. The findings suggest that ML estimation is a reasonable choice for most LGMs, unless it fails to converge, which can occur with limiting data situations (i.e., just a few time points, no covariate or outcome, modest sample sizes). When models do not converge using ML, we recommend Bayesian estimation with one caveat that the influence of the priors on estimation may have to be carefully examined, per recent recommendations on Bayesian modeling for applied researchers.

The problem of distributed parameter estimation from binary quantized observations is studied when the unquantized observations are corrupted by combined multiplicative and additive Gaussian noise. These results are applicable to sensor networks where the sensors observe a parameter in combined additive and nonadditive noise and to a case where dispersed receivers are employed with analog communication over fading channels where the receivers employ binary quantization before noise-free digital communications to a fusion center. We first discuss the case in which all the quantizers use an identical threshold. The parameter identifiability condition is given, and, surprisingly, it is shown that unless the common threshold is chosen properly and the parameter lies in an open interval, the parameter will not generally be identifiable, in contrast to the additive noise case. The best achievable mean square error (MSE) performance is characterized by deriving the corresponding Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB). A closed-form expression describing the corresponding maximum likelihood (ML) estimator is presented. The stability of the performance of the ML estimators is improved when a nonidentical threshold strategy is utilized to estimate the unknown parameter. The thresholds are designed by maximizing the minimum asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) between quantized and unquantized ML estimators. Although the ML estimation problem is nonconvex, it is shown that one can relax the optimization to make it convex. The solution to the relaxed problem is used as an initial solution in a gradient algorithm to solve the original problem. Next, the case where both the variances of the additive noise and multiplicative noise are unknown is studied. The corresponding CRLB is obtained, and the ML estimation problem is transformed to a convex optimization, which can be solved efficiently. Finally, numerical simulations are performed to substantiate the theoretical analysis.

Estimation under equality restrictions is an age old problem and has been considered by several researchers in the past due to practical applications and theoretical challenges involved in it. Particularly, the problem has been extensively studied from classical as well as decision theoretic point of view when the underlying distribution is normal. In this paper, we consider the problem when the underlying distribution is non-normal, say, logistic. Specifically, estimation of the common scale parameter of two logistic populations has been considered when the location parameters are unknown. It is observed that closed forms of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) for the associated parameters do not exist. Using certain numerical techniques the MLEs have been derived. The asymptotic confidence intervals have been derived numerically too, as these also depend on the MLEs. Approximate Bayes estimators are proposed using non-informative as well as conjugate priors with respect to the squared error (SE) and the LINEX loss functions. A simulation study has been conducted to evaluate the proposed estimators and compare their performances through mean squared error (MSE) and bias. Finally, two real life examples have been considered in order to show the potential applications of the proposed model and illustrate the method of estimation.

A maximum likelihood (ML) estimator is developed for determining time delay between signals received at two spatially separated sensors in the presence of uncorrelated noise. This ML estimator can be realized as a pair of receiver prefilters followed by a cross correlator. The time argument at which the correlator achieves a maximum is the delay estimate. The ML estimator is compared with several other proposed processors of similar form. Under certain conditions the ML estimator is shown to be identical to one proposed by Hannan and Thomson [10] and MacDonald and Schultheiss [21]. Qualitatively, the role of the prefilters is to accentuate the signal passed to the correlator at frequencies for which the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is highest and, simultaneously, to suppress the noise power. The same type of prefiltering is provided by the generalized Eckart filter, which maximizes the S/N ratio of the correlator output. For low S/N ratio, the ML estimator is shown to be equivalent to Eckart prefiltering.

This article is concerned with modifications of both maximum likelihood and moment estimators for parameters of the three-parameter Wei bull distribution. Modifications presented here are basically the same as those previously proposed by the authors (1980, 1981, 1982) in connection with the lognormal and the gamma distributions. Computer programs were prepared for the practical application of these estimators and an illustrative example is included. Results of a simulation study provide insight into the sampling behavior of the new estimators and include comparisons with the traditional moment and maximum likelihood estimators. For some combinations of parameter values, some of the modified estimators considered here enjoy advantages over both moment and maximum likelihood estimators with respect to bias, variance, and/or ease of calculation.