ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENHANCED OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANALYSIS FOR DETECTING INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE REMOVAL IN EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY.

To investigate morphological variations in the macular area with optical coherence tomography (OCT) after vitrectomy for diabetic fibrovascular proliferation. We reviewed 108 cases using OCT 7-15 months after vitrectomy. Of these, 32 received OCT within 3 months postoperatively. Morphological variations were categorized and correlated with visual outcome. Only 24 cases (21.4%) had no obvious abnormalities. The most frequent findings were epiretinal membrane (52.8%), macular thickening (37.0%) and macular cysts (28.7%). Multivariate regression showed that diffuse macular thickening, loss of foveal depression and diffuse retinal thinning were significantly associated with poor visual acuity. Sequential OCT (< 3 and >or= 7 months) revealed that epiretinal membrane and oedema outside of fovea changed significantly between two examinations. OCT may identify diverse morphological changes in the macular area after diabetic vitrectomy for fibrovascular proliferation. Macular appearance may change over time, and certain types of morphological changes may be associated with poor visual function.

The purpose was to investigate the paravascular abnormalities (PVA) around the retinal vascular arcades and their post-operative evolution in eyes with epiretinal membranes (ERM). This is an observational case series. Fifty-seven eyes of 55 patients with concurrent PVA and ERM were studied (study group). Forty-one eyes in 41 patients with ERM but no PVA served as controls. Multiple optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were made along the upper and lower arcades and across the fovea in each patient. Serial fundus photography and OCT scans were performed in eyes receiving an operation. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. The incidence and location of paravascular retinal cysts, deep cystic spaces underneath the vessels, and paravascular retinal defects, as well as vitreoretinal interface changes, were determined and correlated with macular thickness. In the study group, paravascular retinal cysts were detected in 57 eyes (100%), deep cystic spaces in nine eyes (15.8%), and paravascular lamellar holes in 31 eyes (54.4%). No case had a full-thickness hole. ERM adhesion to the PVA was noted in 16 eyes (28.1%) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) changes over the PVA in 22 eyes (38.6%). Compared with the control, the study group had significantly increased macular thickness. PVA, except lamellar holes, disappeared or decrease in severity after ERM and ILM removal surgery. Different types of PVA are relatively common in eyes with ERM. Our findings suggest that PVA may develop secondary to ERM-induced macular thickening. Except for lamellar holes, most lesions decrease following an operation.

To examine the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal on epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery by comparing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography central macular thickness (CMT) changes, ERM recurrence, and need for repeat surgery. Retrospective study of 251 consecutive patients (251 eyes) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM by a single surgeon with over 1 year of follow-up data. Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and at the last visit. The ILM was not specifically removed in the earlier group of patients and was removed after staining of the ILM in the later group. One hundred and forty eyes (55.8%) did not have an ILM peel (non-ILM group), and 111 eyes (44.2%) did have an ILM peel (ILM group). There were no significant differences between groups in age, gender, preoperative BCVA, preoperative intraocular pressure, preoperative CMT on optical coherence tomography, and cataract status. Total follow-up time for the ILM group was 32.1 months and 45.4 months for the non-ILM group (P = 0.002). Both groups had improvement in BCVA. The ILM group improved by 12 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and the non-ILM group improved by 10.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. There was no significant difference in the final BCVA (P = 0.18) or total change of BCVA (P = 0.48). Cataract status preoperatively did not affect the total change of BCVA, but being phakic at the most recent visit was associated with a slight loss of visual acuity. Both groups had improvement in optical coherence tomography appearance, for the CMT in the ILM group decreased by 83 μm and the CMT in the non-ILM group decreased by 110 μm. There was no significant difference in the final CMT (P = 0.07); however, the non-ILM group tended to have a lower final CMT. Some degree of ERM recurrence was detected by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in 2 eyes (1.8%) of the ILM group and in 32 eyes (22.9%) of the non-ILM group (P ≤ 0.0001). None of the eyes with ILM removal required repeat vitrectomy, whereas 17 eyes (12.1%) of the non-ILM group did require vitrectomy, showing that ILM removal had a significant effect on the need for repeat vitrectomy (P < 0.0001) between non-ILM versus ILM peel groups. The rate of recurrent ERM and need for repeat ERM surgery is lower in eyes where the ILM is removed with the ERM, whereas BCVA and CMT were similar with or without ILM removal. Complete ILM removal around the macula should be considered for the treatment of eyes with idiopathic ERMs to reduce the incidence of ERM recurrences.

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term visual results of vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal for idiopathic ERM in eyes with a preoperative visual acuity (VA) of 20/50 or better. Methods: This retrospective review of a consecutive case series comprised 337 patients. Of these, 36 eyes of 36 patients had ERM and ILM removal from 2017 to 2018. Inclusion criteria included a subjective decrease in VA, a preoperative VA of 20/50 or better, vitrectomy with ERM and ILM removal for ERM, and a minimum 6-month follow-up. Paired t tests were used to determine the statistical significance (P < .05) of VA changes postoperatively. Results: The mean (±SD) best-corrected logMAR VA improved to a maximum of 0.125 ± 0.09 (Snellen equivalent 20/26.4) at a mean of 11.1 months postoperatively (P < .001). The VA continued to significantly improve over the long term (mean, 41.6 months; range, 6-63; P < .001). Overall long-term data trended heavily toward VA improvement (25/36 patients [69.4%]) and stability (10/36 patients [27.7%)] after ERM and ILM removal, with only 1 patient (2.8%) having worse VA. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications related to ERM and ILM removal. Conclusions: Surgery to remove idiopathic ERM and ILM for patients with significant symptoms and good preoperative VA may result in excellent long-term visual results.

Retinal Adherence and Fibrillary Surface Changes Correlate With Surgical Difficulty of Epiretinal Membrane Removal

AimsTo investigate macular vascular integrity using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients undergoing vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal and to determine its association with structural and visual...

Spontaneous Peeling of the Internal Limiting Membrane during Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: Lessons from the PEELING Clinical Trial.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery for patients with ERM and glaucoma. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 20 consecutive ERM patients with glaucoma, who underwent 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery (27GMIVS) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. The preoperative and 6-month postoperative visual field was tested with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 program. Changes in threshold sensitivity in the HFA test points were analyzed point-by-point, with points classified into groups based on sensitivity as abnormal (less than 5th percentile in pattern deviation) or normal (all other points) and based on location as central (12 central points) or peripheral (all other points) with a linear mixed-effects model. Results Visual acuity and mean deviation improved postoperatively (P < 0.001 for both) in all patients. Threshold sensitivity in central or peripheral points that were abnormal preoperatively improved postoperatively (P=0.006 or P < 0.001, respectively). Threshold sensitivity also improved in the central normal test points (P=0.03), but not in the peripheral normal points (P=0.12). Conclusion Visual acuity improved, and there was no visual field progression, after ERM surgery in glaucomatous eyes during a 6-month postoperative follow-up, suggesting that ERM and ILM removal using 27GMIVS may be effective even in glaucomatous eyes.

Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery has undergone significant investigation over the last 2 years including assessment of novel surgical techniques and regarding the necessity of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. This review seeks to highlight the latest literature in regards to ERM surgery from unique ERM profiles to clinical trials of surgical approach. The summative literature highlight that peeling of ILM may reduce recurrence compared to solely peeling ERM; however, these recurrences tend to be mild and nonvisually significant. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been leveraged preoperatively, intra-operatively, and postoperatively to enrich knowledge regarding risk factors for worse visual outcomes and deep learning models that are able to predict the anatomic outcome of ERM surgery after review of the preoperative OCT. There is no significant difference in outcomes between sequential and concurrent ERM surgery with cataract surgery. In uveitis evaluations related to ERM, posterior and intermediate uveitis were most associated with ERM, while in pediatric ERM, extent of diffuseness of central ERM correlated with surgical visual improvements. The latest ERM research has richly expanded the literature, allowing surgeons to better predict visual improvements postoperatively. This includes using OCT imaging biomarkers, but there remains a litany of unresolved questions about best surgical practices that are actively undergoing assessment.

Assessment of Artifacts and Reproducibility across Spectral- and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices

Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Using Intraoperative OCT-Guided Membrane Removal in the DISCOVER Study versus Conventional Membrane Removal

To evaluate the recently described optical coherence tomography (OCT) based classification of epiretinal membrane (ERM) and its usefulness in predicting the functional outcome. A retrospective observational review of OCT scans of patients with the diagnosis of idiopathic ERM was carried out from January 2016 to June 2021. All consecutive images diagnosed with any stage of idiopathic ERM and fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. ERM was identified on OCT scans as a thin hyperreflective layer over the inner layers of retina. OCT scans of patients with ERM who underwent vitrectomy, were independently staged as per the new classification by two independent retinal surgeons to form a consensus on stage. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR scale and central subfield thickness (CST) on pre- and post-operative spectral domain OCT scans were the variables noted for all patients at the time of diagnosis and at 6 and 12mo follow up visit after undergoing intervention. Partial correlation coefficient was computed between BCVA (logMAR) and CST by ERM stage adjusting by baseline measures. Clinical charts of 74 patients with idiopathic ERM were assessed. Clinically significant improvement in BCVA overtime was observed with significant difference in median visual acuity of patients with Stage II-IV ERM with P<0.001. The median CST of all patients with stage II-IV ERM showed similar consistent improvement with P<0.001 from baseline to 12th month. Our results showed not only gain in visual acuity but also shift from baseline to anatomical normalization of CST in stage II. We found a decrease in CST with difference of 166 µm and 151 µm in stage III and stage IV respectively. Our results remained consistent with the hypothesis of improved visual outcomes with all stages of ERM with adjusted moderate linear correlation between visual acuity and CST in stage II-IV (r>0.3). Equally significant visual outcomes of patients with ERM staged II-IV and therefore can be counselled for improved visual acuity after surgical removal of ERM with improvement up to 5 lines on Snellen's chart from the baseline.

Visual Outcomes and Complications of Epiretinal Membrane Removal Secondary to Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Purpose: To identify the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) dehiscence on surgical outcomes in eyes that have undergone epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal. Methods: Consecutive eyes with performed vitrectomy for ERM removal were included. Subjects were divided into two groups: patients with ILM dehiscence (group 1) and without ILM dehiscence (group 2). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal layer thickness before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 86 eyes were enrolled. Forty-six eyes (53.5%) showed ILM dehiscence before surgery. The baseline BCVAs were 0.46 ± 0.29 and 0.45 ± 0.25 in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.801). The BCVAs at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery differed significantly between the two groups. The subfoveal thickness and inner retinal layer thickness (IRLT) of group 1 vs. 2 were 507.4 ± 80.0 vs. 417.6 ± 63.6 μm, and 270.2 ± 74.3 vs. 182.6 ± 60.4 μm, respectively (both p < 0.001). These differences between the groups remained significant until 12 months after surgery. In multivariate analyses, the location of ILM dehiscence (B = −0.105, p = 0.034) and final IRLT (B = 0.001, p = 0.046) were significant factors affecting the final BCVA. Conclusions: ILM dehiscence is a relatively common finding and associated with preoperative and postoperative increased IRLT, which results in worse surgical outcomes compared to the absence of ILM dehiscence in patients with ERM. Additionally, the final BCVA was significantly affected by its location and final IRLT in patients with ILM dehiscence.