Audit Partner Trait Skepticism and Going-Concern Reporting Decisions

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a model for assessing the audit evidence of the going-concern (GC) assumptions underlying the preparation of financial statements. Design/methodology/approach This research analyses 678 audit opinions of Italian listed firms from 2007 to 2016 and uses a multiple linear discriminant analysis to create a GC score, which includes variables suggested by the international standards on auditing (ISA) 570 and by literature on GC. Findings The model provides three cut-off scores which can orient auditors towards issuing the most appropriate GC audit opinions (unmodified opinion, unmodified opinion, which includes emphases of matter, qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion). Research limitations/implications The development of the model is mainly based on public data and does not assess confidential information that is not disclosed in audit opinions. Practical implications This model can enable auditors to identify the most appropriate GC opinion and align auditor’s opinions in similar circumstances, thereby reducing their reliance on discretion and increasing the reliability of their judgement with a higher degree of accuracy. Moreover, this research lists additional events or conditions that may individually or collectively cast significant doubt on GC assumptions. Originality/value This study goes beyond the traditional decision-making process, apparently binary in nature, between “continuity” and “failure” or between “unmodified” and “modified” opinions. It is conceived to detect the different degrees of uncertainty that affect GC evaluations to orient auditors’ professional judgements.

Although regulators have identified ethical lapses as a key factor contributing to auditors’ failure to detect their clients’ fraudulent financial reporting (fraud), research using ethical theory to examine auditors’ fraud detection remains limited. We provide evidence on the joint effect of ethical idealism and trait skepticism on auditors’ fraud judgments. Ethical idealism reflects an individual’s concern for the welfare of others while trait skepticism reflects an individual’s disposition to validating a proposition. Forsyth (J Pers Soc Psychol 39:175–184, 1980) theorizes that there is an association between ethical idealism and tolerance for deception. Drawing on that insight, we posit that ethical idealism and trait skepticism have a complementary effect on auditors’ fraud planning performance. This is because the former determines an auditor’s tolerance for allowing a client to get away with an ethically questionable act while the latter is important in determining how evidence is generally sought and evaluated. We used the Forsyth (1980) ethical position questionnaire to measure ethical idealism and the Hurtt (Auditing: A J Pract Theory 29(1):149–171, 2010) scale to measure trait skepticism. Our results indicate that there is a significant positive association between trait skepticism and the number of effective audit procedures but only for auditors who have high ethical idealism. The results highlight the importance of measuring and controlling for the effects of these traits when evaluating fraud detection performance. The paper also contributes by showing that an ethics theory can generate additional understanding of and insights into an important accounting phenomenon.

Theory predicts that auditor reporting behaviour may be influenced by the perceived consequences of disclosing going-concern uncertainty in the audit report (DeAngelo 1981, Watts and Zimmerman 1986). Krishnan and Krishnan (1996) and Louwers (1998) have addressed this issue empirically in a US context. The results of Krishnan and Krishnan (1996) suggested that one of the important factors in the auditor's opinion decision is the risk of litigation. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between auditor economic incentives and the propensity to issue going-concern opinions in a limited litigious business environment, Belgium. In spite of the low risk of litigation and the fact that most Belgian companies are privately held, various regulations have been put into effect to safeguard audit quality in Belgium. However, the results suggest that the auditor's going-concern opinion decision in Belgium is associated with factors relating to the perceived consequences of disclosing a going-concern opinion. Specifically, the results suggest that auditors in Belgium are significantly less likely to issue going-concern opinions to clients that pay higher audit fees, and when the audit firm has lost a relatively high proportion of its clients in the preceding year. The auditor's going-concern opinion does not appear to be significantly influenced by the length of the auditor-client relationship, year of the auditor engagement period, and auditor type. The results of this study are to some extent different from the study by Louwers (1998), in which none of the incentive variables related to the auditor's loss function was significant.

SUMMARY The recent growth in non-audit services (NAS) at the major audit firms has the attention of auditing regulators. On several occasions recently, board members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) have indicated that the rise in NAS may place auditor independence at risk (Harris 2014; Tysiac 2014). Impaired independence can result in audit failure, which includes situations when auditors fail to issue going-concern (GC) audit opinions to soon-to-be bankrupt companies. In this paper, I examine the association between the propensity of auditors to issue GC opinions and NAS fees (and audit fees) to 203 bankrupt companies during 2002–2013. In analysis, I find no significant relation between GC decisions and NAS fees and audit fees. My results may interest U.S. regulators, who recently expressed concerns about the threat to auditor independence from the spike in NAS at the major firms. Data Availability: Publicly available from sources identified in the paper.

The audit of the financial statement income tax accounts is ultimately the responsibility of the audit engagement team; however, tax professionals are often involved because of their knowledge of the tax functional area. Auditors are expected to exercise professional skepticism and independence when performing audits, while tax professionals are expected to be advocates for their tax clients. This study investigates whether the auditor and/or tax professionals' typical role influences how they evaluate evidence on an audit engagement, especially when provided evidence by individuals with whom they are closely affiliated. Results of an experiment with experienced auditors and tax professionals suggest that despite differing in their trait skepticism and client advocacy attitudes, tax professionals and auditors make similar judgments when in the role of an audit engagement team member. We also find evidence that both auditors and tax professionals are more persuaded by individuals with whom they have a closer affiliation. Data Availability: Data are available from the corresponding author.

We use multiple methods to examine how depletion and auditors' skeptical dispositions interact to affect auditors' challenging of managers in negotiations over financial statement amounts. We expect auditors are likely depleted from effortfully exercising self‐regulation during the busy times when these negotiations occur. Individuals in a depleted state tilt toward natural, less effortful behaviors. Thus, we posit that the effects of depletion will diverge depending on the auditor's skeptical disposition—a determinant of how natural or effortful they will find the skeptical behaviors (e.g., challenging) versus client service behaviors (e.g., maintaining the client relationship and audit efficiency) required for negotiations. We predict that client service auditors (i.e., low skeptics) will challenge managers less in negotiations when depleted versus non‐depleted, while high skeptic auditors will challenge more when depleted. We test this interactive prediction in an abstract experiment where we manipulate depletion and measure auditors' skeptical dispositions using trait skepticism. Findings support our predictions. We also develop a new measure of auditors' client service–skeptic disposition based on the skepticism literature that adds nuance to the traditional lower versus higher skeptic labels. In a second study, interviews with audit partners validate the realism of our depletion and client service–skeptic constructs and corroborate our experimental findings. Our study sheds light on depletion effects in auditors' negotiations with their clients and how the effects differ based on auditor personalities.

Motivated by the need to better understand the trait–state skepticism relationship, and also building upon prior literature syntheses, this study examines the literature that empirically investigates the trait–state skepticism relationship using experimental methodology. A meta‐regression analysis is conducted on Pearson correlations between trait skepticism and state skepticism to identify the overall effect and key drivers of this relationship. On average, there is no noticeable effect size for the relation between trait and state skepticisim across the studies; however, there are three key determinants of the correlation across studies mainly (1) the use of the Inverse Rotter trait measure compared to other measures reduces the correlation, (2) the use of graduate auditor samples compared to seasoned professionals intensifies the correlation and (3) the use of a low risk environment in the research design reduces correlation. The review and analysis are timely as the literature re‐examines how professional skepticism is conceptualized and operationalized moving forward.

Audit partner rotation has been a major concern in the United States since the audit failures in the early 2000s. While several international studies have examined the impact of audit partner rotation on audit quality, research in the world’s largest audit market has been limited due to the availability of partner data. However, with the passage of Rule 3211 (commonly referred to as Form AP), partner-level data for the U.S. market has recently become available. In my dissertation, I examine how audit partner rotation affects financial reporting quality in the U.S. and how office-level industry specialization impacts the transition from one audit partner to the next. My overall findings are that audit partner rotation does not have a significant impact on measures of audit quality. Furthermore, office-level industry specialization does not improve audit quality when there is a change in partner. In addition, there is some evidence that when companies change audit office locations, the change is driven by the desire for the audit office with industry-specific knowledge. Overall, this gives an alternative perspective, based on publicly available data, on the impact of audit partner change and auditor office-level industry specialists.

We explore the association between the number of critical audit matters and auditing opinion based on the Chinese capital market data. In addition, we investigate the effect of audit risk on the relationship between the number of critical audit matters and auditing opinion. Using 6,662 firm-year observations listed in the Chinese capital market from 2017-2019, we find that the number of critical audit matters has significantly positive association with clear audit opinion. Specially, the greater the number of critical audit matters, the more likely getting clear audit opinion. We also find that the audit risk restricts the effect of the critical audit matters on the audit opinion. Lastly, we find that Big4 accounting firms are less likely to be influenced by the number of critical audit matters; the audit complexity restricts the effect of the critical audit matters on the audit opinion; the more board members, the less effect of the number of critical audit matters on the audit opinion. We also use several robustness tests to strengthen the conclusion. Our research may contribute to the understanding of the new audit standard.

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether audit opinions of listed firms in China vary systematically with the political connections of the firm’s chief executive officer (CEO). Prior literature only shows the importance of political influence to auditor choice and audit quality.Design/methodology/approachA politically connected firm is defined as a firm in which the CEO has a political background. The authors use a “difference-in-difference” model to control for self-selection problems.FindingsThe authors find that the likelihood of receiving a favourable opinion in the subsequent period is positively associated with a CEO’s political connections. This positive association is stronger with CEOs connected to local government within the same region. The authors further find that the CEO’s political connections have more influence on favourable audit opinions in non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) in a less developed and lower investor protection region. The influence is also less significant in the regions where there are more non-state-owned or foreign banks and where there are greater penalties for political corruption and relationship-based contracting.Originality/valueThe study complements and extends the existing literature on the role of political connections in the economy by providing evidence on the effect of a CEO’s political connections on audit opinions. The authors extend the research on auditing in emerging markets by explicitly accounting for unique institutional and market factors in China. They explore audit quality by observing how audit opinions are directly shaped by political and institutional factors.

Local governments (LGs) have an important role in providing services to the community. Nevertheless, some local governments still show relatively low performance. Scores of e-government implementation and audit opinions obtained by some local governments are also relatively low. This study examines whether there are relationships between e-government, the dimensions of e-government, and audit opinion and the performance of the local government administration. There are five dimensions of the e-government i.e. policy, institutions, infrastructure, applications, and planning. The sample used in this study includes 246 local governments from 2012 to 2014. Using regression analysis, the results of this study show that e-government has a positive association with the performance of the local government administration. This is supported by the positive association of e-government’s dimensions with performance. The audit opinion is also positively associated with performance as expected. These results suggest that e-government and audit opinion can be used as indicators of the performance of local government administration.

Previous research on whether the market responds to auditors’ opinions has provided mixed results. We revisit this issue in China, where individual investors who are more likely to neglect value-relevant information dominate the stock market. In addition to going concern opinions (GCOs), China permits modified audit opinions (MAOs) on violations of accounting standards or disclosure rules (GAAP/DISC MAOs), providing an opportunity not available in the literature to enrich the study of audit-opinion pricing. We find that, ceteris paribus, MAO recipients underperform in the future and have a higher incidence of adverse outcomes such as misreporting and stock delisting, and the market reacts negatively to MAOs during the short window around MAO disclosure. Importantly, MAO disclosure is not followed by negative long-term stock returns, suggesting stock price adjustments to MAOs are speedy and unbiased. These findings hold for both GCOs and GAAP/DISC MAOs. Together, our findings support the informativeness of audit opinions and cast doubt on the argument that investors inefficiently price audit opinions due to information-processing bias.

SUMMARY In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, remote and hybrid audits have become institutionalized in the external audit profession. However, the impact of remote/hybrid audits on audit success (i.e., audit quality, audit efficiency, and auditor job satisfaction) is not clearly understood. Recruiting external auditors (including audit associates, audit seniors, audit managers, and audit partners) with an average of three to five years of auditing experience, Li, Goel, and Williams (2023) found that working remotely is associated with high audit efficiency. They also found that in comparison to on-site audits, remote audits show increases in technology reliance, professional skepticism, workload, fatigue and frustration, risk-seeking attitudes, and team monitoring rigidity and decreases in auditor–client communication and cooperation efficiency. Furthermore, Li et al. (2023) identified situational and dispositional factors that become critical in remote/hybrid audits. We summarize the key findings of their paper and provide actionable suggestions for audit practitioners. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M42.

PurposeThis study aims to examine the effect of real activities manipulation (RAM) on auditors’ decision of issuing going concern (GC) opinions for distressed companies.Design/methodology/approachThis study estimates and examines three types of RAM: reduction of discretionary expenses, sales manipulation and overproduction. It investigates the effect of RAM on auditor reporting conservatism by including the three measures of RAM methods in logistic regressions that explain the issuance of going concern opinions. The authors perform the analysis specifically on distressed firms for 2004-2013 period.FindingsThis study finds a significant and positive association between RAM and the likelihood of receiving going concern opinion in the financial distressed firm sample, suggesting that client’s abnormal business activity affects the auditor reporting conservatism.Practical implicationsThis study provides evidence that auditors make going concern reporting decisions in consideration of the client’s abnormal operating decisions and management’s opportunism.Originality/valueRecent literature argues that auditors have little recourse other than to resign if a client uses RAM to impact earnings or the financial statements, and hence the enhanced audit quality in the post-SOX period is due to the shift from using accruals management to RAM (Cohen et al., 2008; Chi et al., 2011; Kim and Park, 2014). The evidence provided in this study indicates that auditors report more conservatively (rather than simply resign) in response to the aggressive RAM.

This chapter details a unique research design. The action research orientation and actionable knowledge outcomes that arose from this research methodology, design and process were quite distinctive and allowed the research to proceed with respondents feeling like participants in a process, rather than objects of a study. The main objective, to improve the human condition (action research exists to promote liberating social change), involved learning and engagement by both researcher and respondent. I used a multi-method design, including the philosophical perspectives of Heideggerian phenomenology and naturalistic inquiry (Vickers, 2005e).