Autonomous Parking-lots Detection with Multi-sensor Data Fusion Using Machine Deep Learning Techniques

The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model utilizing deep learning and machine learning techniques that will inform clinical decision-making by predicting the 1-year postoperative recovery of patients with lumbar disk herniation. The clinical data of 470 inpatients who underwent tubular microdiscectomy (TMD) between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed as variables. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n = 329) and a test set (n = 141) using a 10-fold cross-validation technique. Various deep learning and machine learning algorithms including Random Forests, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, Extra Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and MLP (Artificial Neural Networks) were employed to develop predictive models for the recovery of patients with lumbar disk herniation 1 year after surgery. The cure rate score of lumbar JOA score 1 year after TMD was used as an outcome indicator. The primary evaluation metric was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with additional measures including decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and others. The heat map of the correlation matrix revealed low inter-feature correlation. The predictive model employing both machine learning and deep learning algorithms was constructed using 15 variables after feature engineering. Among the eight algorithms utilized, the MLP algorithm demonstrated the best performance. Our study findings demonstrate that the MLP algorithm provides superior predictive performance for the recovery of patients with lumbar disk herniation 1 year after surgery.

Background Machine learning (ML) algorithm support vector machine (SVM) performed better than Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score for ASIAN STEMI patients. However, Deep Learning (DL) effectiveness in the multiethnic ASIAN population has yet to be determined. DL has automatic learning of the feature from a given dataset without the need to conduct feature selection. However, the selected features by the algorithm is black box. Identifying features associated with mortality is essential to recognize characteristics of patients with high risk for better patient management. Purpose To develop a DL algorithm for in-hospital mortality in multiethnic STEMI patients using predictors identified from the SVM algorithm. To investigate DL performance constructed using predictors from SVM feature extraction and expert-recommended predictors. Methods We constructed four algorithms; a) DL and SVM algorithms with predictors identified from the SVM variable importance b) DL and SVM using predictors based on expert recommendation. We used registry data from the National Cardiovascular Disease Database of 11397 patient's. Fifty parameters including demographics, cardiovascular risk, medications and clinical variables were considered. The Area under the curve (AUC) is the performance evaluation metric. Algorithms were validated against the TIMI and tested using the same validation data. SVM variable importance with backward elimination was used to select and rank important variables. Results DL algorithms outperform SVM and TIMI on the validation dataset; i) DL with SVM selected predictors (15 predictors, AUC = 0.97), ii) DL with expert-recommended predictors (16 predictors, AUC = 0.96), iii) SVM with selected predictors (15 predictors, AUC = 0.92), iv) SVM with expert-recommended predictors (AUC = 0.89) and TIMI (AUC = 0.82). Common predictors across SVM feature selection, expert-recommendation and TIMI are: age, heart rate, Killip class, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, comorbid diseases and ST-elevation. SVM feature selection also identified diuretics, PCI and pharmacotherapy drugs as predictors that improve mortality prediction in STEMI patients. Our findings suggest that the TIMI score underestimates patients risk of mortality. DL algorithm using selected predictors classified 35% of nonsurvival patients as high risk (risk probabilities >50%) compared to only 12.7% nonsurvival patients by TIMI (score >5) (Figure below). Conclusions In the ASIAN population, patients with STEMI can be better classified using the DL algorithm compared to the ML and TIMI score. Combining ML feature selection with DL allows the identification of distinct factors in a unique ASIAN population for better mortality prediction than relying solely on an expert recommendation as it is a very subjective approach. Continuous validation on population-specific algorithms using DL and ML is needed before implementing in a real clinical setting. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Technology Development Fund 1 TIMI performance on validation setDL performance on validation set

BackgroundThe development of deep learning (DL) algorithms is a three-step process—training, tuning, and testing. Studies are inconsistent in the use of the term “validation”, with some using it to refer to tuning and others testing, which hinders accurate delivery of information and may inadvertently exaggerate the performance of DL algorithms. We investigated the extent of inconsistency in usage of the term “validation” in studies on the accuracy of DL algorithms in providing diagnosis from medical imaging.Methods and findingsWe analyzed the full texts of research papers cited in two recent systematic reviews. The papers were categorized according to whether the term “validation” was used to refer to tuning alone, both tuning and testing, or testing alone. We analyzed whether paper characteristics (i.e., journal category, field of study, year of print publication, journal impact factor [JIF], and nature of test data) were associated with the usage of the terminology using multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Of 201 papers published in 125 journals, 118 (58.7%), 9 (4.5%), and 74 (36.8%) used the term to refer to tuning alone, both tuning and testing, and testing alone, respectively. A weak association was noted between higher JIF and using the term to refer to testing (i.e., testing alone or both tuning and testing) instead of tuning alone (vs. JIF <5; JIF 5 to 10: adjusted odds ratio 2.11, P = 0.042; JIF >10: adjusted odds ratio 2.41, P = 0.089). Journal category, field of study, year of print publication, and nature of test data were not significantly associated with the terminology usage.ConclusionsExisting literature has a significant degree of inconsistency in using the term “validation” when referring to the steps in DL algorithm development. Efforts are needed to improve the accuracy and clarity in the terminology usage.

The development of deep learning (DL) algorithms is a three-step process-training, tuning, and testing. Studies are inconsistent in the use of the term "validation", with some using it to refer to tuning and others testing, which hinders accurate delivery of information and may inadvertently exaggerate the performance of DL algorithms. We investigated the extent of inconsistency in usage of the term "validation" in studies on the accuracy of DL algorithms in providing diagnosis from medical imaging. We analyzed the full texts of research papers cited in two recent systematic reviews. The papers were categorized according to whether the term "validation" was used to refer to tuning alone, both tuning and testing, or testing alone. We analyzed whether paper characteristics (i.e., journal category, field of study, year of print publication, journal impact factor [JIF], and nature of test data) were associated with the usage of the terminology using multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Of 201 papers published in 125 journals, 118 (58.7%), 9 (4.5%), and 74 (36.8%) used the term to refer to tuning alone, both tuning and testing, and testing alone, respectively. A weak association was noted between higher JIF and using the term to refer to testing (i.e., testing alone or both tuning and testing) instead of tuning alone (vs. JIF <5; JIF 5 to 10: adjusted odds ratio 2.11, P = 0.042; JIF >10: adjusted odds ratio 2.41, P = 0.089). Journal category, field of study, year of print publication, and nature of test data were not significantly associated with the terminology usage. Existing literature has a significant degree of inconsistency in using the term "validation" when referring to the steps in DL algorithm development. Efforts are needed to improve the accuracy and clarity in the terminology usage.

Agriculture has been a vital sector for the majority of people, especially in countries like India. However, the increasing need for food production has led to intensive farming practices that have resulted in the deterioration of soil quality. This deterioration in soil quality poses significant challenges to both agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. To address these challenges, advanced soil nutrient prediction systems that utilize machine learning and deep learning techniques are being developed. These advanced soil nutrient prediction systems utilize various sources of data, such as soil parameters, plant diseases, pests, fertilizer usage, and changes in weather patterns. By mapping and analyzing these data sources, machine learning algorithms can accurately predict the distribution of soil nutrients and other properties essential for precise agricultural practices. A previous study compared machine learning algorithms like SVM and Random Forest with deep learning algorithms CNN and LSTM for predicting crop yields. The most appropriate model is a significant challenge, but several studies have evaluated recommendation system models using deep machine learning techniques. Deep learning models attain accuracy above 90%, while many ML models achieve rates between 90% and 93%. Furthermore, the research seeks to propose specific crop suggestions grounded in soil nutrients for precision agriculture to enhance crop productivity.

Improving the performance of machine learning algorithms to overcome the curse of dimensionality while maintaining interpretability is still a challenging issue for researchers in artificial intelligence. Patch learning (PL), based on the improved adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and continuous local optimization for the input domain, is characterized by high accuracy. However, PL can only handle low-dimensional data set regression. Based on the parallel and serial ensembles, two deep patch learning algorithms with embedded adaptive fuzzy systems (DPLFSs) are proposed in this paper. First, using the maximum information coefficient (MIC) and Pearson's correlation coefficients for feature selection, the variables with the least relationship (linear or nonlinear) are excluded. Second, principal component analysis is used to reduce the complexity further of DPLFSs. Meanwhile, fuzzy C-means clustering is used to enhance the interpretability of DPLFSs. Then, an improved PL method is put forward for the training of each sub-fuzzy system in a fashion of bottom-up layer-by-layer, and finally, the structure optimization is performed to significantly improve the interpretability of DPLFSs. Experiments on several benchmark data sets show the advantages of a DPLFS: (1) it can handle medium-scale data sets; (2) it can overcome the curse of dimensionality faced by PL; (3) its precision and generalization are greatly improved; and (4) it can overcome the poor interpretability of deep learning networks. Compared with shallow and deep learning algorithms, DPLFSs have the advantages of interpretability, self-learning, and high precision. DPLFS1 is superior for medium-scale data; DPLFS2 is more efficient and effective for high-dimensional problems, has a faster convergence, and is more interpretable.

BackgroundMachine learning (ML) algorithm support vector machine (SVM) performed better than Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score for ASIAN STEMI patients. However, Deep Learning (DL) effectiveness in the multiethnic ASIAN population has yet to be determined. DL has automatic learning of the feature from a given dataset without the need to conduct feature selection. However, the selected features by the algorithm is black box. Identifying features associated with mortality is essential to recognize characteristics of patients with high risk for better patient management.PurposeTo develop a DL algorithm for in-hospital mortality in multiethnic STEMI patients using predictors identified from the SVM algorithm. To investigate DL performance constructed using predictors from SVM feature extraction and expert-recommended predictors.MethodsWe constructed four algorithms; a) DL and SVM algorithms with predictors identified from the SVM variable importance b) DL and SVM using predictors based on expert recommendation. We used registry data from the National Cardiovascular Disease Database of 11397 patient's. Fifty parameters including demographics, cardiovascular risk, medications and clinical variables were considered. The Area under the curve (AUC) is the performance evaluation metric. Algorithms were validated against the TIMI and tested using the same validation data. SVM variable importance with backward elimination was used to select and rank important variables.ResultsDL algorithms outperform SVM and TIMI on the validation dataset; i) DL with SVM selected predictors (15 predictors, AUC = 0.97), ii) DL with expert-recommended predictors (16 predictors, AUC = 0.96), iii) SVM with selected predictors (15 predictors, AUC = 0.92), iv) SVM with expert-recommended predictors (AUC = 0.89) and TIMI (AUC = 0.82). Common predictors across SVM feature selection, expert-recommendation and TIMI are: age, heart rate, Killip class, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, comorbid diseases and ST-elevation. SVM feature selection also identified diuretics, PCI and pharmacotherapy drugs as predictors that improve mortality prediction in STEMI patients. Our findings suggest that the TIMI score underestimates patients risk of mortality. DL algorithm using selected predictors classified 35% of nonsurvival patients as high risk (risk probabilities >50%) compared to only 12.7% nonsurvival patients by TIMI (score >5) (Figure below).ConclusionsIn the ASIAN population, patients with STEMI can be better classified using the DL algorithm compared to the ML and TIMI score. Combining ML feature selection with DL allows the identification of distinct factors in a unique ASIAN population for better mortality prediction than relying solely on an expert recommendation as it is a very subjective approach. Continuous validation on population-specific algorithms using DL and ML is needed before implementing in a real clinical setting.Funding AcknowledgementType of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Technology Development Fund 1TIMI performance on validation setDL performance on validation set

Deep learning has gained immense popularity in scientific computing, and its algorithms are widely used in complex problem-solving industries. Every deep learning algorithm use different types of neural networks to perform indented tasks. Deep learning (DL) algorithms have emerged from different machine learning and soft computing methodologies. Since then, a number of deep learning (DL) algorithms have been recently introduced in the scientific community and applied in various application fields. Today, the use of DLs has become indispensable due to their intelligence, effective learning, accuracy and reliability in model creation. However, a comprehensive list of DL algorithms has not yet been presented in the scientific literature. This article lists the most popular DL algorithms and their application areas. Deep learning uses ANN artificial neural networks to perform convoluted calculations on huge amounts of data. It is a type of machine learning based on the structure and function of the human brain. Deep learning algorithms train machines by learning from examples. Industries such as healthcare, e-commerce, entertainment and advertising often use deep learning.

In recent years, deep reinforcement learning has combined the advantages of reinforcement learning and deep learning, and has made great progress in decision-making tasks. However, the training of deep reinforcement learning requires frequent interactions between the agent and the environment and repeated experiments. Adversaries have chances to poison the sample data collected by the agent by attacking the experimental environment in the training process, thereby bringing security risks and serious consequences to the training process of reinforcement learning. This work is committed to addressing the security risks in the field of deep reinforcement learning. However, this work improves the algorithm from the perspective of sample data filtering, and improves the security performance of deep reinforcement learning algorithm. There are two contributions in this work: one is to defend against adversarial attacks against deep reinforcement learning through cluster analysis and sample value evaluation; the other is to propose a deep reinforcement learning algorithm based on sample value evaluation on the basis of deterministic strategy gradient algorithm. The algorithm uses the clustering method to classify the sample pool, and measures the contribution value and security risk of the sample to the model training through the sample value evaluation. The classic game experiments show that the proposed algorithm is safe and effective. It reduces the threat of the agent falling into the adversarial sample attack and improves the training performance of deep reinforcement learning.

Classifying images is a complex problem in the field of computer vision. The deep learning algorithm is a computerized model simulates the human brain functions and operations. Training the deep learning model is a costly process in machine resources and time. Investigating the performance of the deep learning algorithm is mostly needed. The convolutional neural network (CNN) is most commonly used to build a structure of the deep learning models. In this paper convolutional neural network (CNN) model pre-trained on Image-Net is used for classification of images of the PASCAL VOC 2007 data-set. The transfer learning approach is used to improve the performance of the deep learning CNN model where classification works fairly well with the smallest amount of computation time and fewer machine resources. The behavior of the Deep learning CNN model is studied and the performance has been measured. The obtained results are compared with the obtained test results from the Super-vector coding of local image descriptors method, SVM method, and Region Ranking SVM method, which tested with the PASCAL VOC 2007 data-set. The final results evaluate the deep learning algorithm as a state-of-the-art method for an image classification task.

The research progress in multimodal learning has grown rapidly over the last decade in several areas, especially in computer vision. The growing potential of multimodal data streams and deep learning algorithms has contributed to the increasing universality of deep multimodal learning. This involves the development of models capable of processing and analyzing the multimodal information uniformly. Unstructured real-world data can inherently take many forms, also known as modalities, often including visual and textual content. Extracting relevant patterns from this kind of data is still a motivating goal for researchers in deep learning. In this paper, we seek to improve the understanding of key concepts and algorithms of deep multimodal learning for the computer vision community by exploring how to generate deep models that consider the integration and combination of heterogeneous visual cues across sensory modalities. In particular, we summarize six perspectives from the current literature on deep multimodal learning, namely: multimodal data representation, multimodal fusion (i.e., both traditional and deep learning-based schemes), multitask learning, multimodal alignment, multimodal transfer learning, and zero-shot learning. We also survey current multimodal applications and present a collection of benchmark datasets for solving problems in various vision domains. Finally, we highlight the limitations and challenges of deep multimodal learning and provide insights and directions for future research.

The underwater environment is characterized by the vast expanses of water bodies such as seas, oceans, rivers, and lakes, together with their related ecosystems, that exist under the Earth's surface. This environment refers to unique physical properties such as pressure, buoyancy, light attenuation, and temperature, which bring about considerable adversity for observation and exploration. Object detection (OD) in the underwater environment includes the recognition and localization of different objects or entities submerged in the water. This object contains natural features like geological formations, marine life, and coral reefs, along with human-made artefacts such as debris, shipwrecks, and underwater infrastructure. Typically, object recognition in underwater environments relies on imaging technologies, namely optical cameras, SONAR, and LIDAR, which effectively operate in the complicated conditions of water. Edge detection algorithm, extracts crucial features from the surrounding aquatic landscape, fine-tuned to the unique challenges of underwater imagery, enhancing situational awareness and guiding navigation. Various techniques and algorithms are employed to detect objects in underwater imagery, as well as traditional image processing approaches, including deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) methods. These techniques analyze the data captured to detect distinct patterns and features related to the objects, enabling automated recognition and classification. Therefore, this study presents a new Dense Extreme Inception Network-based Edge Detection with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Object Localisation (DEINED-DRLOL) technique in an underwater environment. The primary focus of the DEINED-DRLOL technique is on the effective detection of edges and the classification of objects in the underwater environment. The Dense Extreme Inception Network for Edge Detection (DexiNed) method is employed to predict an edge map with a similar resolution. For OD, the DEINED-DRLOL technique employs the YOLOv5 method. Finally, the Q-Reinforcement Learning (QRL) method is implemented for classification. A wide range of experimentation with the DEINED-DRLOL approach is performed under the underwater OD dataset. The comparison study of the DEINED-DRLOL approach highlighted a superior accuracy value of 92.67% over existing models.

Predicting disease status for a complex human disease using genomic data is an important, yet challenging, step in personalized medicine. Among many challenges, the so-called curse of dimensionality problem results in unsatisfied performances of many state-of-art machine learning algorithms. A major recent advance in machine learning is the rapid development of deep learning algorithms that can efficiently extract meaningful features from high-dimensional and complex datasets through a stacked and hierarchical learning process. Deep learning has shown breakthrough performance in several areas including image recognition, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the performance of deep learning in predicting disease status using genomic datasets is still not well studied. In this article, we performed a review on the four relevant articles that we found through our thorough literature review. All four articles used auto-encoders to project high-dimensional genomic data to a low dimensional space and then applied the state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to predict disease status based on the low-dimensional representations. This deep learning approach outperformed existing prediction approaches, such as prediction based on probe-wise screening and prediction based on principal component analysis. The limitations of the current deep learning approach and possible improvements were also discussed.

Sentiment analysis is a subfield of Natural Language Processing (NLP) which tries to process a text to extract opinions or attitudes towards topics or entities. Recently, the use of deep learning methods for sentiment analysis has received noticeable attention from researchers. Generally, different deep learning methods have shown superb performance in sentiment analysis problem. However, deep learning models are different in nature and have different strengths and limitations. For example, convolutional neural networks are useful for extracting local structures from data, while recurrent models are able to learn order dependence in sequential data. In order to combine the advantages of different deep models, in this paper we have proposed a novel approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis which utilizes deep ensemble learning. In the proposed method, we first build four deep learning models, namely CNN, LSTM, BiLSTM and GRU. Then the outputs of these models are combined using stacking ensemble approach where we have used logistic regression as meta-learner. The results of applying the proposed method on the real datasets show that our method has increased the accuracy of aspect-based prediction by 5% to 20% compared to the basic deep learning methods.

Agriculture is a vital industry that adds significantly to the global economy. Researchers are currently starting to investigate the prospect of integrating deep learning techniques and machine learning into agriculture, due to recent developments in technologies for deep learning. The paper examines several deep neural network designs and machine learning techniques used in agriculture, including irrigation, weeding, pattern recognition, and crop disease identification. The primary goal of this study is to determine multiple uses of deep learning in agriculture and to summarise existing state-of-the-art approaches. The review addresses the particular deep learning algorithms utilized, the sources of data used, study achievement, the equipment used, and the possibility for immediate application as well as integration with autonomous mechanical platforms. According to the results of the chapter, the use of deep learning research outperforms typical machine learning techniques in terms of reliability. In general, the study indicates the enormous potential of deep learning and machine learning in agriculture and the necessity for additional study in this field. It may be able to improve agricultural efficiency, decrease waste, and raise the yields of crops by utilizing the potential of these methods, ultimately enhancing the worldwide availability of food