BackTracker: Machine learning to identify kinematic phenotypes for personalised exercise management in non-specific low back pain.

Workshop report

Low back pain is a common health issue, and such pains are often associated with muscle tightness. Understanding the link between lower back pain and tight lower extremity muscles is essential for effective pain management and enhanced quality of life. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between lower extremity muscle tightness and pain and disability in individuals with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). A total of 52 individuals with NSLBP were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Lower extremity muscle tightness was assessed using various clinical tests, including the Active Knee Extension Test, Active Straight Leg Raise, Ober Test, and Modified Thomas Test. Pain intensity and disability were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index, respectively. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the correlation between muscle tightness, pain, and disability. The study found weak to moderate negative correlations between lower extremity muscle tightness and both pain intensity and disability in individuals with NSLBP (r: -0.287 to -0.526, p < 0.05). Dominant and non-dominant extremities exhibited differences in muscle flexibility, with the dominant extremity showing greater flexibility (p < 0.05). In individuals with NSLBP, lower extremity muscle tightness is closely related to pain severity and disability. These findings suggest that lower extremity muscle tightness plays a significant role in the severity of low back pain and disabilities. Additionally, the observed flexibility difference between dominant and non-dominant extremities warrants further investigation for more personalized treatment approaches.

Lower back pain (LBP) has been the leading cause of disability since 1990. Objectives: The main objective of this observational case-control study was to evaluate, using ultrasound, whether there were differences in the onset and ratio of core muscle contraction between subjects with non-specific chronic lower back pain and healthy subjects. Methods: A total of 60 participants (52% women), split between those with non-specific chronic lower back pain (n = 26) and healthy (n = 34) subjects, were recruited. Initial muscle contraction of the lateral abdominal wall, pelvic floor, lumbar multifidus, and respiratory diaphragm was measured using ultrasound. The abdominal drawing-in maneuver, contralateral arm elevation, the Valsalva maneuver, and voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor in seated and standing positions were performed. The muscle thickness of the lateral abdominal wall and lumbar multifidus and excursion of the pelvic floor and diaphragm at rest and during testing were also analyzed. Results: No differences were found between the groups in the initial contraction. Statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: diaphragm excursion (p = 0.032, r = 0.277) and lumbar multifidus ratio (p = 0.010, r = 0.333) in the standing-abdominal retraction maneuver; pelvic floor excursion (p = 0.012, r = 0.325) in the standing-contralateral arm raise; and transverse abdominis ratio (p = 0.033, r = 0.275) in the sitting-contralateral arm raise. A statistically significant interaction between the groups and body mass index was observed in resting diaphragm excursion (p = 0.018, partial eta squared = 0.096) during sitting-voluntary pelvic floor contraction. Conclusions: It cannot be concluded that there is a specific pattern of core activation in any of the groups. However, statistically significant differences were found in the contraction indexes of the lumbopelvic musculature.

Standardized Measurement of Recovery From Nonspecific Back Pain

Exercise therapy is widely used as an intervention in low-back pain. To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in adult non-specific acute, subacute and chronic low-back pain versus no treatment and other conservative treatments. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL databases to October 2004; citation searches and bibliographic reviews of previous systematic reviews. Randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise therapy for adult non-specific low-back pain and measuring pain, function, return-to-work/absenteeism, and/or global improvement outcomes. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-up. Sixty-one randomized controlled trials (6390 participants) met inclusion criteria: acute (11), subacute (6) and chronic (43) low-back pain (1 unclear). Evidence was found of effectiveness in chronic populations relative to comparisons at all follow-up periods; pooled mean improvement was 7.3 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.9) for pain (out of 100), 2.5 points (1.0 to 3.9) for function (out of 100) at earliest follow-up. In studies investigating patients (i.e. presenting to healthcare providers) mean improvement was 13.3 points (5.5 to 21.1) for pain, 6.9 (2.2 to 11.7) for function, representing significantly greater improvement over studies where participants included those recruited from a general population (e.g. with advertisements). There is some evidence of effectiveness of graded-activity exercise program in subacute low-back pain in occupational settings, though the evidence for other types of exercise therapy in other populations is inconsistent. There was evidence of equal effectiveness relative to comparisons in acute populations [pain: 0.03 points (95% CI, -1.3 to 1.4)]. This review largely reflects limitations of the literature, including low quality studies with heterogeneous outcome measures, inconsistent and poor reporting, and possibility of publication bias. Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain, particularly in healthcare populations. In subacute low-back pain there is some evidence that a graded activity program improves absenteeism outcomes, though evidence for other types of exercise is unclear. In acute low-back pain, exercise therapy is as effective as either no treatment or other conservative treatments.

Non-specific low back pain without identifiable causes on imaging is a common and frustrating problem for both patients and physicians. While proximal symptoms such as shoulder pain from distal upper extremity neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome are well-known, peripheral neuropathy of the foot or ankle is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis for low back pain. This study aims to highlight the potential link between chronic ankle instability (CAI) and low back pain. We present three cases: a 32-year-old woman with chronic low back pain for over 10 years, a 59-year-old woman with transient low back pain after long drives, and a 42-year-old woman with acute low back pain while gardening. All patients had normal imaging studies but exhibited CAI on examination. Diagnostic modalities included the ankle anterior drawer test, application of ankle brace, superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) blocks, and assessment of the active straight leg raise (aSLR) angle. In the first case, low back pain disappeared after SPN neurolysis and ankle ligament reconstruction. The second case showed significant improvement in aSLR and pain reduction with SPN block and ankle brace. The third case experienced substantial pain relief with the use of an ankle brace. These findings suggest that addressing ankle instability and associated traction neuropathy can significantly alleviate low back pain symptoms. CAI may be an underrecognized cause of non-specific low back pain. Interventions such as ankle brace, SPN blocks, SPN decompression, and ankle ligament reconstruction can be effective for diagnosis and treatment, potentially offering relief for patients with chronic low back pain.

Introduction. Kinesitherapy (KT) – one of the leading areas of patient care with chronic nonspecific (musculoskeletal pain) low back pain. For chronic lumbar pain, a standard KT is commonly used, that includes group sessions with a medical specialist. Often not taking into account the individual characteristics of patients, their attitude to KT, does not use a backpain education program in combination with KT (extended KT). Physical activity and hypodynamia are compared in patients with chronic nonspecificlow back pain in standard KT and extended KT.Aim of study is to assess the effectiveness of the standard and extended KT in the enhancement of physical activity.Materials and methods. 71 patients were observed (17 men and 54 women, average age 55.09 ± 13 years) with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Patients received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as painkillers. 34 patients received a standard KT, 37 patients – an extended KT. Patients were asked to complete the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) at baseline, after 7 days and 90 days.Results and discussion. In the extended KT group, physical activity increased from 11 (7–16) points to 16 (13–19) points after 7 days (p = 0.001) and up to 23 (15–26) points after 3 months (p = 0.0002). There has been a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients with hypodynamy (p = 0.0015). There is no statistically significant increase in physical activity in the standard therapy group. The use of NSAIDs in non-specific low back pain is discussed, the effectiveness of the use of dexketoprofen (Dexalgin) during lumbar pain is noted.Conclusion. In the case of nonspecific low back pain, the extended KTimprovesphysical activity and reduce hypodynamy.

Nonspecific low back pain in young adults: Associated risk factors

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that respiratory dysfunction has a potential association with low back pain (LBP). Despite the role of the diaphragm for respiration and spinal stability, knowledge of the function of both sides of the diaphragm in subjects with LBP is still limited. Objective: This study aimed to compare the structural integrity and function of the right and left hemidiaphragm by ultrasonography (USG) in subjects with and without nonspecific chronic low back pain (NS-CLBP). Methods: A total of 37 subjects with NS-CLBP and 34 healthy subjects participated in this case-control study. The thickness, thickness change, and excursion of the right and left hemidiaphragm were compared within and between the groups during quiet breathing (QB) and deep breathing (DB) through B-mode and M-mode ultrasound imaging. Results: The LBP group had a significantly smaller degree of right hemidiaphragm thickness change (P = .001) compared with the healthy control group, with a strong effect size. Nevertheless, there was no significant change for diaphragm thickness and excursion between the two groups. The result showed that, in the healthy group, the right hemidiaphragm had a significantly smaller thickness at expiration and larger thickness change compared with the left hemidiaphragm, with a moderate effect size. Based on the multivariate prediction analysis, the right hemidiaphragm thickness change might significantly predict LBP. Conclusion: We found that participants with LBP had a smaller degree of right hemidiaphragm thickness change. Also, the right hemidiaphragm thickness change might significantly predict LBP.

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and often associated with lifestyle factors. However, studies further examining the role of these lifestyle factors in non-specific low back pain in comparison with radicular pain are sparse. The aim of this cross sectional study was to investigate how diverse lifestyle factors are associated with LBP. The study population of 3385 middle aged adults with and without low back pain was drawn from a large Birth 1966 Cohort. Outcome measures were steps per day, abdominal obesity, physical activity and endurance of the back muscles. Back static muscular endurance, abdominal obesity and physical activity were measured by means of the Biering–Sørensen test, waist circumference and a wrist worn accelerometer, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate associations of back static muscular endurance, abdominal obesity and accelerometer-measured physical activity with non-specific low back pain and radicular pain. An additional 1000 steps per day were associated with 4% lower odds of having non-specific low back pain. Participants with abdominal obesity had 46% higher odds of having radicular pain, whereas increases of 10 s in back static muscular endurance and 10 min in daily vigorous physical activity were associated with 5% and 7% lower odds of having radicular pain, respectively. In this population-based study, non-specific low back pain and radicular pain were associated with different lifestyle and physical factors at midlife. Non-specific low back pain was associated only with the average daily number of steps, whereas abdominal obesity was the strongest determinant of radicular pain, followed by vigorous physical activity and back static muscular endurance. The findings of this study contribute to better understand the role of lifestyle factors in both non-specific low back pain and radicular pain. Future longitudinal studies are required to explore causality.

Background: Study on the effectiveness of new methods of low back pain treatment is very important due to its high prevalence. There is no consensus on the most effective treatment for low back pain, despite the existence of different treatments options. Objective: This study aims to assess the effect of 8 weeks of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) and core stability (CS) exercises on pain, hamstring flexibility, balance, abdominal muscle strength, and quality of life (QoL) in men with chronic low back pain. Methods: Participants were 20 men with non-specific low back pain, randomly divided into two groups of DNS (Age=47.8±9.82 years, BMI=25.8±2.9 kg/m2) and CS (Age=42.4±11.8 years, BMI=28.1±13.1 kg/m2). Subjects performed exercises for 8 weeks. Before and after exercises, their pain, hamstring flexibility, static and dynamic balances, abdominal muscle strength, and QoL were assessed. For data analysis, the paired t-test and analysis of covariance were used, considering a significance level of P&lt;0.05. Results: Both training methods improved pain, abdominal muscle strength and static balance. The CS exercise significantly improved hamstring muscle flexibility, and DNS exercise significantly improved QoL. The comparison between the two methods showed no significant difference in any study variables. Conclusion: Both CS and DNS exercises can be used in designing the interventions for patients with chronic low back pain.

Background:Non-specific low back pain is defined as low back pain not attributable to a recognizable, known specific pathology. Low back pain became one of the biggest problems for public health systems in the western world during the second half of the 20th century, and now seems to be extending worldwide. The endurance of the back extensor muscles have been reported to be related to low back. Hamstrings tightness is one of the most common findings in patients with LBP. Controversy exists regarding the degree of association between these physical characteristics and LBP.

Objective To explore the diagnostic value of nerve root sedimentation disease to symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and nonspecific low back pain(LBP).Methods One hundred and eighty lumbocrural pain patients in the People's Hospital of Binzhou from Jan.2010 to Jun.2013 were divided into LSS group and LBP group,and 90 patients in each group.The rate of nerve root sedimentation in two groups was recorded.Results There were 84 cases(93.3％) with positive nerve root sedimentation in group LSS,while 0 case in LBP group,and the difference was significant (P =0.000).The pain visual analogue score (VAS) between the two groups were no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).The Oswestry disability index (ODI) in LSS group was (60.3 ± 5.1) ％,lower than that in LBP group (66.4 ± 6.3) ％,and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.021).Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the LSS group was (68.9 ± 7.0) mm2,lower than that in LBP group ((168.2 ± 13.8) mm2),and the difference was statistically significant (t =26.173,P =0.000).There was no significant correlation between ODI and CSA (r =0.18,P =0.098).Conclusion The nerve root sedimentation disease is higher in LSS patients and positive of sedimentation disease can serve as a diagnosed marker of LSS. Key words: Nerve root sedimentation disease; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Nonspecific low back pain; Diagnostic value

BackgroundClinical guidelines for nonspecific low back pain (LBP) recommend self-management tailored to individual needs and capabilities as a first-line treatment. Mobile health solutions are a promising method for delivering tailored self-management interventions to patients with nonspecific LBP. However, it is not clear if the effectiveness of such self-management interventions depends on patients’ initial pain characteristics. High pain intensity and long-term symptoms of LBP have been associated with an unfavorable prognosis, and current best evidence indicates that long-term LBP (lasting more than 3 months) requires a more extensive treatment approach compared to more acute LBP. The artificial intelligence–based selfBACK app supports tailored and evidence-based self-management of nonspecific LBP. In a recent randomized controlled trial, we showed that individuals who received the selfBACK app in addition to usual care had lower LBP-related disability at the 3-month follow-up compared to those who received usual care only. This effect was sustained at 6 and 9 months.ObjectiveThis study aims to explore if the baseline duration and intensity of LBP influence the effectiveness of the selfBACK intervention in a secondary analysis of the selfBACK randomized controlled trial.MethodsIn the selfBACK trial, 461 adults (18 years or older) who sought care for nonspecific LBP in primary care or at an outpatient spine clinic were randomized to receive the selfBACK intervention adjunct to usual care (n=232) or usual care alone (n=229). In this secondary analysis, the participants were stratified according to the duration of the current LBP episode at baseline (≤12 weeks vs >12 weeks) or baseline LBP intensity (≤5 points vs >5 points) measured by a 0-10 numeric rating scale. The outcomes were LBP-related disability measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (0- to 24-point scale), average LBP intensity, pain self-efficacy, and global perceived effect. To assess whether the duration and intensity of LBP influenced the effect of selfBACK, we estimated the difference in treatment effect between the strata at the 3- and 9-month follow-ups with a 95% CI.ResultsOverall, there was no difference in effect for patients with different durations or intensities of LBP at either the 3- or 9-month follow-ups. However, there was suggestive evidence that the effect of the selfBACK intervention on LBP-related disability at the 3-month follow-up was largely confined to people with the highest versus the lowest LBP intensity (mean difference between the intervention and control group −1.8, 95% CI −3.0 to −0.7 vs 0.2, 95% CI −1.1 to 0.7), but this was not sustained at the 9-month follow-up.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the intensity and duration of LBP have negligible influence on the effectiveness of the selfBACK intervention on LBP-related disability, average LBP intensity, pain self-efficacy, and global perceived effect.

Recent studies have suggested a connection between low back pain (LBP) and urinary tract infections (UTI). These disturbances could be triggered via visceral-somatic pathways, and there is evidence that kidney mobility is reduced in patients suffering from nonspecific LBP. Manual treatment of the perinephric fascia could improve both kidney mobility and LBP related symptoms. To assess whether manual treatment relieves UTI and reduces pain in patients with nonspecific LBP through improvement in kidney mobility. Records from all patients treated at a single physical therapy center in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age or older, had nonspecific LBP, and experienced at least one UTI episode in the 3months before presentation. Patients were excluded if they had undergone manipulative treatment in the 6months before presentation, if they had one of several medical conditions, if they had a history of chronic pain medication use, and more. Patient records were divided into two groups for analysis: those who were treated with manipulative techniques of the fascia with thrust movement (Group A) vs those who were treated without thrust movement (Group B). Kidney Mobility Scores (KMS) were analyzed using high resolution ultrasound. Symptoms as reported at patients' 1 month follow up visits were also used to assess outcomes; these included UTI relapse, lumbar spine mobility assessed with a modified Schober test, and lumbar spine pain. Of 126 available records, 20 patients were included in this retrospective study (10 in Group A and 10 in Group B), all of whom who completed treatment and attended their 1 month follow up visit. Treatments took place in a single session for all patients and all underwent ultrasound of the right kidney before and after treatment. The mean (±standard deviation) KMS (1.9±1.1), mobility when bending (22.7±1.2), and LBP scores (1.2±2.6) of the patients in Group A improved significantly in comparison with the patients in Group B (mean KMS, 1.1±0.8; mobility when bending, 21.9±1.1; and LBP, 3.9±2.7) KMS, p<0.001; mobility when bending, p=0.003; and LBP, p=0.007). At the 1 month follow up visit, no significant statistical changes were observed in UTI recurrence (secondary outcome) in Group A (-16.5±4.3) compared with Group B (-20.4±7) (p=0.152). Manual treatments for nonspecific LBP associated with UTI resulted in improved mobility and symptoms for patients in this retrospective study, including a significant increase in kidney mobility.