Best practices consensus protocol for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by interventional radiologists.

Advanced Image-Guided Percutaneous Technique Versus Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Technique for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

Experiences with minimally invasive techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement are being increasingly described. Percutaneous placement of catheters using ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance has reduced the risk of complications and has led to successful long-term catheter function. An interventional radiology catheter placement capability was established at our facility and it serves as the basis for this report.We performed a retrospective analysis of patients in a tertiary care center in Northern California who required PD between July 2005 and October 2008. Patients underwent PD catheter placement in an interventional radiology suite by the radiologist using a percutaneous Seldinger technique that was guided by fluoroscopy.Sixty-four patients between the ages of 25 and 90 were referred for fluoroscopic PD catheter placement by an interventional radiologist. If clinically indicated, PD was initiated within days of catheter placement. Minor complications were noted: four with minor bleeding, three with catheter migration, and one with temporary exit-site leakage. No bowel or bladder perforations were encountered.Fluoroscopically guided PD catheter placement by interventional radiologists can be a safe and cost-effective strategy to initiate acute or chronic PD. This approach could reduce the need for temporary vascular access and expedite the initiation of PD therapy by eliminating the delays in catheter placement often associated with surgical consultation and operating room scheduling.

Percutaneous Radiologic Placement of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: Long-term Results

Update on Peritoneal Dialysis: Core Curriculum 2016

Immune response in dialysis patients is suppressed and these patients are susceptible to bacterial infections. Therefore, minimal use of antibiotics in dialysis patients is recommended to avoid generating drug-resistant bacteria. However, minor surgeries including vascular access surgery, tendon sheath incision and peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement are inevitable in dialysis patients and evidence-based recommendations on the judicious use of antibiotics are not currently available for these procedures. In this study, the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis for minor surgeries was evaluated. This is a retrospective study. In dialysis patients at Kawashima Hospital, a three-step reduction of antibiotic use was performed in 651 cases of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and tendon sheath incision surgeries from July 2009 through October 2012. Moreover, general surgical guidelines-recommended dose of preoperative antibiotics only were used in 532 cases of arteriovenous graft (AVG) and PD catheter placement from January 2010 through October 2012. The surgical site was observed for 2 weeks after the surgery. In only one case of AVF surgery, redness of the skin around the stitches was noticed 5 days after the surgery, which was healed with antibiotics taken orally for 3 days. Neither AVG nor PD catheter placement demonstrated any infection at the surgical site during the 2-week observation period. Even in dialysis patients, neither pre- nor postoperative antibiotics are necessary for AVF and tendon sheath incision surgeries. AVG and PD catheter placement surgeries require only a small amount of antibiotics preoperatively.

Background and Objectives:Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an accepted renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Managing inguinal hernia in patients with PD is not standardized. Thus, this study reported the outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia.Methods:Thirteen patients with chronic renal disease and inguinal hernia attending a tertiary hospital between May 1, 2016 and June 30, 2021 were evaluated for laparoscopic PDC placement. Concurrent laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic PDC placement were performed. Dialysate fluid was measured intraoperatively to the level below the incised peritoneum by 1 inch. The inflow and outflow was smooth without leakage. The amount was increased gradually in the two weeks after regular PD was obtained.Results:Laparoscopic PDC was inserted for 13 patients. Ten patients had unilateral hernia and two had bilateral inguinal hernia. Associated paraumbilical hernia was discovered in two patients. The median follow-up was 30 months. The measured safe amount of dialysate fluid intraoperatively was 400 – 600 mL. There was no death, intraoperative complication, or dialysate leakage. Three PDCs were removed owing to noncompliance. No hernia recurrence was observed.Conclusion:Simultaneous laparoscopic PDC placement and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia with immediate dialysis is a safe and feasible surgical technique. Utilizing minimally invasive surgery affords PDC placement and inguinal hernia repair simultaneously.

Children with hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) frequently develop acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is commonly used. Despite high rates of thrombocytopenia, there is concern that platelet transfusions may worsen HUS by exacerbating microthrombi formation. We evaluated bleeding risk for PD catheter placement with or without central venous catheter (CVC) placement in children with HUS. Records from 1998 to 2007 were searched. Data regarding patient demographics, PD catheter placement, CVC placement, occurrence of procedure-associated bleeding, and time from insertion to removal of PD catheter were collected. Patients were stratified according to those who received and those who did not receive platelet transfusions. Seventy-three patients were identified. Twenty-two (30%) patients received platelet transfusion while 51 (70%) did not. Mean preoperative platelet counts were 37,600+/-21,900/mm(3) in patients receiving transfusions and 64,800 +/- 38,800/mm(3) in patients not receiving transfusions. Sixty-seven children (92%) also underwent CVC placement. There were no bleeding complications related to these procedures in either group. No differences in time to removal of the PD catheter were detected. Although caution and sound clinical judgment must be exercised, our findings suggest that PD catheter and CVC placement can be accomplished safely in most children with HUS, without need for platelet transfusion in spite of the associated thrombocytopenia.

Synchronous laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and peritoneal dialysis catheter placement is a valid alternative to open surgery

Background:The objective of this study was to compare the complications of low-site peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement and traditional open surgery in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.Methods:The following databases were searched from inception to September 6, 2019: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang. Eligible studies comparing low-site PD catheter placement and traditional open surgery in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion were included. The data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.Results:Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 504 patients were included in the low-site PD catheter placement group, and 325 patients were included in the traditional open surgery group. Compared with traditional open surgery, low-site PD catheter placement had a lower incidence rate of catheter displacement (odds ratios [OR] 0.11, 95% CI 0.05–0.22, P < .01) and noncatheter displacement dysfunction (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04–0.31, P < .01). However, there was no difference between the 2 catheter insertion methods concerning bleeding (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23–1.22, P = .13), PD fluid leakage (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15–1.10, P = .07), hypogastralgia (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.80, P = .93), peritonitis (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.32–1.54, P = .38), or exit-site and tunnel infections (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14–1.03, P = .06).Conclusion:Low-site PD catheter placement reduced the risk of catheter displacement and noncatheter displacement dysfunction and did not increase the risk of bleeding, PD fluid leakage, hypogastralgia, peritonitis, or exit site and tunnel infections. Additional large multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Mechanical catheter dysfunction caused by omentum entrapment remains a major complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of omentum folding at the time of primary open catheter insertion. From March 2008 to December 2012, a total of 67 PD subjects were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to receive either regular open insertion (ROI group, n = 33) or open insertion with omentum folding (OIOF group, n = 34). The primary outcome was defined as PD catheter tip migration with dysfunction. A systematic review was performed to analyze the outcomes of omentum management in PD catheter implantation, based on published data from 1990 to 2013. There was no statistical difference in baseline patient characteristics between the ROI and OIOF groups. Nine (27.3%) patients in the ROI group presented with catheter malposition in the late stage (>60 days) of the study, significantly more than in the OIOF group (two; 5.9%) (P = 0.049). Significant differences in catheter survival rate between the two groups were observed in the late stage (P = 0.030) and over the entire study period (P = 0.028). A higher incidence of irreversible catheter dysfunction was shown in the ROI group (15.2%), whereas none occurred in the OIOF group (P = 0.031). No statistical difference was determined in other catheter-related complications or patient survival rate. There were no statistical differences in peritoneal transport characteristics or dialysis adequacy between the two groups upon evaluation at 3, 6 and 12 months. Systemic review of current publications suggested that PD catheter placement with omentum management could lead to less irreversible catheter dysfunction and improved outcome of catheter survival. Our data suggest that omentum folding at the initial time of open catheter placement can significantly reduce the risk of catheter tip migration with dysfunction and improve the outcome of the PD technique.

Background Laparoscopic technique is widely used in peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement. We developed a modified minimally invasive laparoscopic PD catheter (PDC) insertion with internal fixation and evaluated the early results by observing the intraoperative and postoperative conditions of the novel technique with those of conventional open surgery. Methods Retrospective research was performed on 59 patients who underwent PDC insertion from June 2019 to January 2022, including 23 patients who received open surgery and 36 patients who received modified minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. Information such as preoperative conditions, operation time, incision length, incidence of intraoperative complications, time from operation to starting PD, time from operation to discharge, and incidence of catheter-related complications were collected and analyzed. Results The incision length, intraoperative blood loss, catheter migration rates and the total incidence of complications 6 months after operation in the laparoscopic group were lower than those in the conventional group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time, time from operation to starting PD, time from operation to discharge and the incidence of catheter blockage, leakage, exit-site infection, peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis and hernia. Conclusions Modified minimally invasive laparoscopic PDC insertion and internal fixation method achieved direct vision and reliable fixation of the catheter, significantly reduced incision length and blood loss. The incidence of catheter migration was significantly lower than that of open surgery. Our primary findings reveal that modified minimally invasive laparoscopic PDC insertion with internal fixation is safe, effective and beneficial for PD patients.

Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a kind of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While PD has many advantages, various complications may arise.Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the complications of ESRD patients who received PD catheter implantation in a single medical center within 15 years.Results: This study collected 707 patients. In the first 14 days after PD implantation, 54 patients experienced bleeding complications, while 47 patients experienced wound infection. Among all complications, catheter-related infections were the most common complication 14 days after PD implantation (incidence: 38.8%). A total of 323 patients experienced PD catheter removal, of which 162 patients were due to infection, while 96 were intentional due to kidney transplantation. Excluding those whose catheters were removed due to transplantation, the median survival of the PD catheter was 4.1 years; among them, patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) were 7.4 years and patients with DM were 2.5 years (p < 0.001). Further, 50% probability of surviving was beyond 3.5 years in DM patients with HbA1CC < 7 and 1.6 years in DM patients with HbA1C <7 (p ≥ 0.001).Conclusions: Catheter-related infections were the most common complications following PD catheter implantation. DM, especially with HbA1C ≥7, significantly impacted on the catheter-related infection and the survival probability of the PD catheter.

BACKGROUNDPeritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter migration impedes the efficacy of dialysis. Therefore, several techniques involving additional sutures or incisions have been proposed to maintain catheter position in the pelvis.AIMTo evaluate the efficacy of creating a short musculofascial tunnel beneath the anterior sheath of the rectus abdominis during PD catheter implantation.METHODSPatients who underwent PD catheter implantation between 2015 and 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the procedure performed: Patients who underwent catheter implantation without a musculofascial tunnel before 2017 and those who underwent the procedure with a tunnel after 2017. We recorded patient characteristics and catheter complications over a two-year follow-up period. In addition, postoperative plain abdominal radiographs were reviewed to determine the catheter angle in the event of migration.RESULTSThe no-tunnel and tunnel groups included 115 and 107 patients, respectively. Compared to the no-tunnel group, the tunnel group showed lesser catheter angle deviation toward the pelvis (15.51 ± 11.30 vs 25.00 ± 23.08, P = 0.0002) immediately after the operation, and a smaller range of migration within 2 years postoperatively (13.48 ± 10.71 vs 44.34 ± 41.29, P < 0.0001). Four events of catheter dysfunction due to migration were observed in the no-tunnel group, and none occurred in the tunnel group. There was no difference in the two-year catheter function survival rate between the two groups (88.90% vs 84.79%, P = 0.3799).CONCLUSIONThe musculofascial tunnel helps maintain catheter position in the pelvis and reduces migration, thus preventing catheter dysfunction.

Background: The central paradigm of effective peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an appropriate standard of PD catheter function. Aim: The aim of the project was to develop an effective national PD access audit which would identify an ‘appropriate standard' of PD catheter function. Methods: The UK Renal Registry collected centre specific information on various PD access outcome measures including catheter functionality and post-insertion complications. The first PD access audit covering England, Northern Ireland and Wales was conducted during April to June 2012 looking at incident dialysis patients in 2011. Results: Forty three data collection spreadsheets were returned from a total of 65 centres describing 917 PD catheter placements. The median age of PD patients was 61 years and 61.5% were male. The proportion of patients initiated on PD in comparison to HD was lower in socially deprived areas. There was a relationship between the timing of nephrology referral and the likelihood of surgical assessment regarding PD catheter placement. Patients with diabetes did not have higher rates of PD catheter failure or of early peritonitis. Conclusions: A comparative PD catheter audit has the potential to provide valuable information on an important patient related outcome measure and lead to an improvement in patient experience. There was wide variation between centres of PD catheter use for late presenting patients. Overall patients were more likely to get a PD catheter if they had been known to the service for more than 1 year. The percutaneous insertion technique was associated with a higher early (less than 2 week) peritonitis rate and more catheter flow problems.

Peritonitis is a common complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Our root cause analysis allowed to attribute some cases to leakage of the PD catheter. Accordingly, a clinically based stress test study on potential material damage issues of PD catheters was performed, focusing on material damage caused by cleaning, de- and attachment procedures during dialysate changes and on the individual storage methods of PD catheters between dialysate changes. PD catheters were exposed to both chemical stress by repeating dialysate-flow and physical stress simulating de- and connecting, fixation, pressure, flexing, folding etc.—simulating standard clinical daily routine of 8–10 years PD catheter usage. Potentially by normal usage caused damages should be then detected by intraluminal pressure, light- and electron microscopy. The multi-step visual control showed no obvious damages on PD catheters nor any leakage or barrier indulgence. Our tests simulating daily routine usage of PD catheters for several years could not detect any material defects under chemical or physical stress. Hence, we presume that most PD catheter damages, as identified cause for peritonitis in some of our patients, may be due to accidental, unnoticed external damage (e.g. through scissors, while changing dressings) or neglecting PD catheter handling specifications.