• Home
  • Search
  • Better Ways to Study Regulatory Elephants
  • Cite Icon6
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00003500Copy DOI Icon

Better Ways to Study Regulatory Elephants

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

We are grateful to the editor and reviewers for this opportunity to respond to the five essays reviewing two recent books comparing regulation in the US and Europe: The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States, and The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe. We agree with reviewer Maria Weimer and with David Vogel that both of these books help create a research agenda for comparative studies of regulation, including studies of relative precaution, by developing theoretical explanations and a systematic basis for collecting data to test them. We also agree with reviewer Susan Rose-Ackerman that comparative studies of regulation should examine not only relative precaution, but more broadly the interrelationships among precaution, proportionality, impact assessment, cost-benefit analysis, and other analytic frameworks – and the value choices embedded in them. We addressed those important issues in the concluding chapter of our book, but they certainly deserve additional inquiry. And we thank Fabrizio Cafaggi for his extensive review of our book in an earlier issue of this journal; there he emphasized our book’s contribution to the evolving understanding of transnational regulatory networks. Both books undertake a descriptive comparison of relative precaution in American and European regulation over the past several decades. The two books differ in their findings, and in the evidence on which those findings rest. We thank reviewers Susan RoseAckerman, Adam Burgess, and Jane K. Winn for acknowledging the strong empirical evidence of actual policymaking that is assembled in our book. We disagree, however, with the reviewers who allege that our book has somehow “missed the wood for the trees” or cast “empiricism” against “humanism”, ostensibly because Europe yearns to define its “identity” as precautionary or because European regulation “feels” more precautionary. In our view, it is a mistake to confuse rhetoric with reality, or feelings with actions, and it is an illusion to conflate political aspirations with actual policymaking. That is why we studied actual policies: to test whether they reflect the political rhetoric or not. To characterize the forest and see whether it has moved, one must examine a representative sample of the trees – which is what we have done. To compare regulatory policies, one must actually study the policies and avoid being seduced by aspirational rhetoric and symbolic politics which are not themselves evidence of real regulation. * Jonathan B. Wiener is Perkins Professor of Law at Duke Law School, Professor of Environmental Policy at the Nicholas School of the Environment, and Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy, at Duke University and a University Fellow of Resources for the Future (RFF). Brendon Swedlow is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science, at Northern Illinois University. James K. Hammitt is Professor of Economics and Decision Sciences at the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, and visiting professor at the Toulouse School of Economics (LERNA-INRA). Michael D. Rogers is a former member of the Bureau of European Policy Advisers, at the European Commission. Peter H. Sand is lecturer in International Environmental Law at the University of Munich.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

American College of Medical Informatics FELLOWS, 2000

  • Mar 01, 2001
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • W W Stead
  • Research Article

Focus on Authors

  • Jul 01, 2012
  • Marketing Science
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Regular colonoscopy could prevent 40% of colorectal cancers

  • Jan 07, 2014
  • Cancer
  • Carrie Printz
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Alarm Signals Used in Anesthesia and Intensive Care

  • Nov 01, 1994
  • Anesthesiology
  • John Hedley-Whyte +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

What Makes Terrorists Tick

  • Apr 01, 2009
  • International Security
  • Erica Chenoweth +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Application of decision analysis to mental health.

  • Dec 01, 1987
  • Medical care
  • John D Graham
  • Conference Article

1656 Shiftwork and cancer

  • Apr 01, 2018
  • Eugene Waclawski
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

The Determinants of Emigration to South Africa, 1950–1967

  • Dec 01, 1970
  • South African Journal of Economics
  • Gene L Chapin +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Case-Crossover Designs Compared With Dynamic Follow-up Designs

  • Mar 01, 2008
  • Epidemiology
  • Malcolm Maclure +1
  • Research Article

About the Authors

  • Sep 01, 2010
  • Decision Analysis
  • News Article
  • Citations2

WHO Director-General announces senior team

  • Mar 01, 2007
  • The Lancet
  • Hannah Brown
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION WITH CAUCHY ERRORS

  • Aug 01, 1973
  • Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
  • V Kerry Smith
  • News Article
  • Citations21

Growing knowledge: using stem cells to study developmental neurotoxicity.

  • Oct 01, 2010
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Kellyn S Betts
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Girls and Gangs: A Review of Recent Research*

  • Feb 01, 1996
  • Juvenile and Family Court Journal
  • Randall G Shelden +2
  • Book Chapter

Prelims

  • Oct 17, 2022
  • Lucy Budd +22
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.