Blockchain‐Based Model to Predict Agile Software Estimation Using Machine Learning Techniques

This study proposes a Function Point Analysis (FPA) based software development effort estimation methodology integrated with Use Case Diagrams. These methods include identifying actor activities, classifying those activities into FPA categories, and calculating Unadjusted Function Points (UFP). Followed by the calculation of Technical Complexity Factors (TCF) and Adjusted Function Points (AFP), this study aims to produce more accurate man-hours estimates. Results show a UFP of 162 TCF of 11, AFP of 123.12, and an estimated effort of 1846.8 hours worked, while the actual effort is 1228 hours. Evaluation of estimates using the metrics Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMER) 0.34, Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) 0.50, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) 618.80, Mean Balanced Relative Error (MBRE) 0.50, Mean Inverse Balanced Relative Error (MIBRE) 0.34, and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) 618.80, showed sufficient precision despite the overestimation. The study suggests the need for adjustments in TCF calculations and considering development environment factors in more detail to improve estimation accuracy. These findings are essential in improving the precision of effort estimation methodologies in software development, particularly in projects that use Use Case Diagrams as the primary framework.

It is a well known fact that software effort estimation is exceptionally critical in every software industry, particular during the development of projects. It is hard to estimate the parameters involved due to ambiguity and uncertainty associated with the parameters. It is exactly here the hard limiting techniques, soft computing techniques comes to play. In this unique circumstance, this paper, presents an attempt to that compare the two paradigms for effort estimation. For this, we have considered fifty real time small visualization projects thrive by post graduate students. The prototype development involves following stages: i) Elicitation of seven novel parameters namely Lines of Code, Cumulative Grade Point Average, New and changed code, Reused code, Cyclomatic Complexity, Algorithmic Complexity and Functional Points. ii) Developing of hard limiting methods and soft computing methods for prediction of software effort involved in terms of duration in minutes.For the validation of the models error metrics namely: Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE), Mean of Magnitude of error Relative to the Estimate (MMER) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) have been used. The result showed that the models compared very well with marginal difference in terms of predict values of error matrix.

The aim of this paper is to review machine learning (ML) algorithms and techniques for hate speech detection in social media (SM). Hate speech problem is normally model as a text classification task. In this study, we examined the basic baseline components of hate speech classification using ML algorithms. There are five basic baseline components – data collection and exploration, feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, classifier selection and training, and model evaluation, were reviewed. There have been improvements in ML algorithms that were employed for hate speech detection over time. New datasets and different performance metrics have been proposed in the literature. To keep the researchers informed regarding these trends in the automatic detection of hate speech, it calls for a comprehensive and an updated state-of-the-art. The contributions of this study are three-fold. First to equip the readers with the necessary information on the critical steps involved in hate speech detection using ML algorithms. Secondly, the weaknesses and strengths of each method is critically evaluated to guide researchers in the algorithm choice dilemma. Lastly, some research gaps and open challenges were identified. The different variants of ML techniques were reviewed which include classical ML, ensemble approach and deep learning methods. Researchers and professionals alike will benefit immensely from this study.

ObjectiveEnhanced technology in computer and internet has driven scale and quality of data to be improved in various areas including healthcare sectors. Machine Learning (ML) has played a pivotal role in efficiently analyzing those big data, but a general misunderstanding of ML algorithms still exists in applying them (e.g., ML techniques can settle a problem of small sample size, or deep learning is the ML algorithm). This paper reviewed the research of diagnosing mental illness using ML algorithm and suggests how ML techniques can be employed and worked in practice.MethodsResearches about mental illness diagnostic using ML techniques were carefully reviewed. Five traditional ML algorithms-Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN)-frequently used for mental health area researches were systematically organized and summarized.ResultsBased on literature review, it turned out that Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN) were frequently employed in mental health area, but many researchers did not clarify the reason for using their ML algorithm though every ML algorithm has its own advantages. In addition, there were several studies to apply ML algorithms without fully understanding the data characteristics.ConclusionResearchers using ML algorithms should be aware of the properties of their ML algorithms and the limitation of the results they obtained under restricted data conditions. This paper provides useful information of the properties and limitation of each ML algorithm in the practice of mental health.

Learning disabilities (LD) affect a significant number of school-age children and often go undiagnosed due to the limitations of traditional evaluation methods, which are time-consuming, resource-intensive, and reliant on subjective interpretation. The early and accurate identification of LD is essential for implementing timely educational interventions that can improve the academic and social development of affected students. This research aims to develop an automated system that leverages machine learning (ML) techniques to predict learning disabilities based on a variety of input features derived from behavioral, cognitive, academic, and psychological assessments. A dataset comprising relevant indicators—such as reading and writing abilities, attention span, memory retention, logical reasoning, language skills, and classroom behavior—was collected and preprocessed for analysis. Feature selection techniques were employed to identify the most predictive attributes. Several machine learning models were implemented and compared, including Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest, k- Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), and Logistic Regression. Each model was trained and validated using standard cross-validation techniques to ensure generalization and robustness. Among the evaluated algorithms, the Random Forest classifier yielded the highest accuracy, outperforming others in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, and overall predictive performance. The results demonstrate that machine learning models, when trained on appropriate features, can effectively predict the likelihood of a learning disability in children with high accuracy and reliability. The proposed system not only aids educators, parents, and healthcare professionals in early detection but also reduces dependence on extensive manual testing. By integrating such intelligent diagnostic tools into educational institutions, it becomes possible to facilitate early intervention strategies, personalize learning plans, and ultimately enhance the learning experience and developmental trajectory of students at risk.

Air quality, both indoors and outdoors, is crucial for public health as it affects respiratory conditions and overall well-being. Machine learning (ML) techniques offer innovative solutions for monitoring and predicting air quality. However, choosing the right ML algorithms and evaluation metrics is essential for creating accurate air quality prediction models, as these choices directly impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. This study aims to explore and summarize the literature on the use of ML techniques in predicting and optimizing air quality, addressing the urgent issue of air pollution. The review analyzed papers from two electronic databases, namely Scopus and Science Direct. Information on ML techniques for predicting air quality and identifying the main sources of pollution was extracted from 26 studies. The study focuses on common ML techniques employed in air quality prediction, including classification, deep learning, regression, ensemble learning, and combinations of regression and deep learning. It also identifies the evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of these models, such as recall, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). By synthesizing existing knowledge, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the metrics researchers use to measure the overall effectiveness of ML algorithms. It serves as a benchmark for future research and guides the selection of appropriate evaluation metrics in the field of air quality prediction.

Quantum‐enhanced machine learning plays a vital role in healthcare because of its robust application concerning current research scenarios, the growth of novel medical trials, patient information and record management, procurement of chronic disease detection, and many more. Due to this reason, the healthcare industry is applying quantum computing to sustain patient‐oriented attention to healthcare patrons. The present work summarized the recent research progress in quantum‐enhanced machine learning and its significance in heart failure detection on a dataset of 14 attributes. In this paper, the number of qubits in terms of the features of heart failure data is normalized by using min‐max, PCA, and standard scalar, and further, has been optimized using the pipelining technique. The current work verifies that quantum‐enhanced machine learning algorithms such as quantum random forest (QRF), quantum K nearest neighbour (QKNN), quantum decision tree (QDT), and quantum Gaussian Naïve Bayes (QGNB) are better than traditional machine learning algorithms in heart failure detection. The best accuracy rate is (0.89), which the quantum random forest classifier attained. In addition to this, the quantum random forest classifier also incurred the best results in F1 score, recall and, precision by (0.88), (0.93), and (0.89), respectively. The computation time taken by traditional and quantum‐enhanced machine learning algorithms has also been compared where the quantum random forest has the least execution time by 150 microseconds. Hence, the work provides a way to quantify the differences between standard and quantum‐enhanced machine learning algorithms to select the optimal method for detecting heart failure.

In agile software development, product backlog items (PBI) are used to capture the user requirements prior to the product implementation. Many types of requirements can be observed within a software project. Proper classification of PBI can positively impact the software development process. PBI can be classified into three categories: user stories, foundational stories, and spikes. After the extreme literature survey, no research was held on classifying the PBI into the categories mentioned above. This paper proposed a machine learning (ML) based approach to classify the PBI into three categories. 4,721 PBI were collected from different software projects and manually labelled into the three classes mentioned above. Then the PBI were cleaned using different pre-processing techniques. Classification models were constructed using ML techniques. The performance of each ML model was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Support vector machine (SVM) outperformed other ML models by providing 88% accuracy.

ABSTRACTThis paper reviews the activity-travel behaviour literature that employs Machine Learning (ML) techniques for empirical analysis and modelling. Machine Learning algorithms, which attempt to build intelligence utilizing the availability of large amounts of data, have emerged as powerful tools in the fields of pattern recognition and big data analysis. These techniques have been applied in activity-travel behaviour studies since the early ’90s when Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were employed to model mode choice decisions. AMOS, an activity-based modelling system developed in the mid-’90s, has ANN at its core to model and predict individual responses to travel demand management measures. In the dawn of 2000, ALBATROSS, a comprehensive activity-based travel demand modelling system, was proposed by Arentze and Timmermans using Decision Trees. Since then researchers have been exploring ML techniques like Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), Neural Networks (NN), Bayes Classifiers, and more recently, Ensemble Learners to model and predict activity-travel behaviour. A large number of publications over the years and an upward trend in the number of published articles over time indicate that Machine Learning is a promising tool for activity-travel behaviour analysis and prediction. This article, first of its kind in the literature, reviews these studies and explores the trends in activity-travel behaviour research that apply ML techniques. The review finds that mode choice decisions have received wide attention in the literature on ML applications. It was observed that most of the studies identify the lack of interpretability as a serious shortcoming in ML techniques. However, very few studies have attempted to improve the interpretability of the models. Further, some studies report the importance of feature engineering in ML-based studies, but very few studies adopt feature engineering before model development. Spatiotemporal transferability of models is another issue that has received minimal attention in the literature. In the end, the paper discusses possible directions for future research in the area of activity-travel behaviour modelling using ML techniques.

Software cost estimation is a process of planning, risk analysis, and decision making for project management in software development. Cost of project development encompasses a software project’s effort and development time. One popular model of software cost estimation is constructive cost model (COCOMO) model, which is a mathematical model proposed by Boehm, used for estimate the software effort and development time. The objective of this paper is to improve the basic COCOMO model’s coefficients for modern programming languages like Python, R, C++, etc. Many techniques were presented in the past for effort and time estimation using machine learning. But all these techniques were trained and tested for older programming languages. In order to improve the accuracy of COCOMO for modern programming languages, six Python projects have been considered and genetic algorithm (GA) is applied in these projects to define new values for basic COCOMO coefficients and the development time is calculated for Python projects. The time estimated using GA coefficients is compared with the original COCOMO and actual time. Using mean magnitude relative error, the error from the original COCOMO time is 54.49% and error from GA time is 21.23%.

Background/aimsTo investigate the feasibility and accuracy of using machine learning (ML) techniques on self-reported questionnaire data to predict the 10-year risk of cataract surgery, and to identify meaningful predictors of...

This comprehensive review explores the design and applications of machine learning (ML) techniques to acoustic metamaterials (AMs) and phononic crystals (PnCs), with a particular focus on deep learning (DL). AMs and PnCs, characterized by artificially designed microstructures and geometries, offer unique acoustic properties for precise control and manipulation of sound waves. ML, including DL, in combination with traditional artificial design have promoted the design process, enabling data-driven approaches for feature identification, design optimization, and intelligent parameter search. ML algorithms process extensive AM data to discover novel structures and properties, enhancing overall acoustic performance. This review presents an in-depth exploration of applications associated with ML techniques in AMs and PnCs, highlighting specific advantages, challenges and potential solutions of applying of using ML algorithms associated with ML techniques. By bridging acoustic engineering and ML, this review paves the way for future breakthroughs in acoustic research and engineering.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent and chronic disease that affect women. To overcome this disease, effective medical treatment is required. Early detection of the disease plays an important role for suitable medication and survival of patient. To identify the breast cancer in the patients, standard imaging technique mammography is used. Due to the subtle and varied nature of cancer tissues interpreting mammogram images can be a challenge to doctors. Machine learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques offer promising solutions that provide efficient breast cancer detection from mammograms. In this review paper a comprehensive review of ML and DL algorithms and their applications in mammogram image analysis are presented. Various supervised and unsupervised learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), random forests, and other popular ML and DL models are discussed in paper. The integration of these DL methods that are efficiently used in image preprocessing techniques, feature extraction, and classification strategies. The overall survey focusses on various performance metrics, datasets, and benchmarks used in existing studies. Further the strengths and limitations of different approaches used by various researchers are identified. By understating current research trends this paper aims to contribute to the ongoing development of more accurate and reliable breast cancer detection systems using advanced ML techniques.

e17570 Background: Ovarian cancer(OC) is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy. Current challenges include lack of diagnostic tools, predictive biomarkers, and identifying appropriate surgical candidates. Machine learning(ML) is an emerging field that can make accurate projections by making inferences on data and may play a crucial role in OC.The objective of the current study was to review the literature on application of ML in OC and report the most commonly used algorithms and their performance in comparison to existing prediction tools and traditional regression models. Methods: This is a systematic review of published literature from January 1985 to March 2021 on the use of ML in OC. An extensive search of electronic library databases was conducted. Four independent reviewers screened the articles initially by title then full text. Quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. P-values were generated using the Pearson’s Chi-squared(x2) test to compare performance of ML models with traditional statistics. No p-values were reported if only one study was available. Results: Among 4,295 articles screened, 88 studies on ML in OC were included. The mean age of OC patients was 54.7 years(11-90) and the most common stages at diagnosis were:Stage III (39.9%) and IV (34%). Applications of ML were in clinical datasets(33%, n = 29), preoperative diagnostics(30.7%, n = 27), serum biomarkers (21.6%, n = 19), genomics (12.5%, n = 11), and prediction of cytoreductive outcomes (2.3%, n = 2). The most commonly applied algorithms were Support Vector Machine [SVM](28%, n = 33)and Neural Networks[NN] (25.28%). Over the past decades, the number of publications on ML in OC increased three-fold from 20(1994-2010) to 67 (2011–2021). Only 9 (10%) studies compared ML techniques with existing prediction tools, or traditional regression models. Among 29 clinical dataset studies, 4 compared ML with traditional logistic regression(LR). Two studies reported better performance with ML compared to LR but not significant(accuracy: 0.88 vs 0.84, p = 0.15), one study performed comparably(accuracy: 0.1 vs 0.1) while one study performed worse(accuracy: 0.1 vs 0.97). Only one preoperative diagnostic study compared ML techniques with LR. SVM classifiers outperformed LR in classifying ovarian masses as benign or malignant(sensitivity: 0.88 vs. 0.70). One serum biomarker study compared LR with ML algorithms; LR performed better using two biomarkers for predicting OC(accuracy: 0.97 vs. 0.94). Among five studies reporting overall survival outcomes, only one study compared survival ML techniques using NN with LR and showed that NN classifiers outperformed LR in predicting overall survival(AUC: 0.72 vs. 0.62). Conclusions: This is the first systematic review exploring the literature on ML algorithms in OC. Most ML models outperformed traditional models. However, larger datasets would be required to validate findings.

This survey paper explores the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in the domain of workplace injuries, focusing on three key areas: risk prediction, return to work (RTW) strategies, and demographic analysis. Through an extensive review of literature from January 2015 to July 2024, this paper examines the latest advancements in ML-driven approaches to workplace safety and identifies important research gaps. This paper highlights how classical ML techniques, such as ensemble models and decision trees, have become essential tools for identifying workplace injury risks, enabling more accurate interventions. It emphasizes the importance of leveraging ML in personalized RTW programs, which use data-driven insights to improve recovery outcomes and reduce economic demands. In the context of demographic analysis, this paper explores how ML algorithms can uncover disparities in injury rates across various age groups, industries, and occupations, underscoring the need for targeted safety measures. Moreover, research gaps are identified, particularly regarding the emerging potential of advanced ML techniques, such as deep learning and large language models (LLMs), for analyzing structured and unstructured safety data, methods that have not yet been widely applied in workplace injury research. As such, future research should apply recent advances in ML, integrating these approaches with comprehensive and accessible datasets to enhance the prediction and prevention of workplace injuries, provide more detailed analytics and insights, and improve safety protocols across all industries. This comprehensive survey is an invaluable resource for researchers and practitioners leveraging ML to address complex challenges in workplace safety.