• Home
  • Search
  • Bone transport for lower limb bone defects: circular versus monolateral external fixators
  • https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2015.10.008Copy DOI Icon

Bone transport for lower limb bone defects: circular versus monolateral external fixators

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Objective To compare circular and monolateral external fixators used for bone transport in the treatment of lower limb bone defects. Methods From January 2011 to April 2013, 42 patients with lower limb bone defects were treated in our department. Monolateral external fixator was used for bone transport in 20 patients. They were 14 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 31.6 years (from 20 to 53 years). Ten cases had femoral defects and 10 tibial defects. Circular external fixator was used for bone transport in the other 22 patients. They were 13 males and 9 females, with a mean age of 33.6 years (from 16 to 56 years). Five cases had femoral defects and 17 tibial defects. Time for fracture union, complications, and Paley s criteria for bony and functional recovery were documented. Results All the patients were followed up for 6 to 38 months (mean, 20.3 months). Bony union as achieved between all the bone segments. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the bone union index (1.8±0.4 m/cm versus 1.6±0.3m/cm) (P > 0.05). By the Paley's criteria for bony recovery, 17 cases were excellent and 3 fine in the monolateral fixator group while 20 were excellent and 2 fine in the circular fixator group. By Paley's criteria for functional recovery, 17 cases were excellent and 3 fine in the monolateral fixator group while 16 were excellent and 6 fine in the circular fixator group. By the Paley's criteria, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to secondary, primary and real complications (P > 0.05). Conclusions Both circular and monolateral external fixators are effective in bone transport to treat lower limb bone defects. The monolateral fixator is more tolerable for patients with femoral defects. The circular fixator is more advantageous for patients with complex long shaft defects because it allows for deformity corrections during bone transport. Key words: External fixators; Bone lengthening; Postoperative complications; Ilizarov technique

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

What's New in Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction.

  • Jun 22, 2021
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Andrew G Georgiadis +2
  • Front Matter
  • Citations8

What's New in Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction.

  • Aug 21, 2019
  • The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
  • Mark T Dahl +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Clinical Faceoff: The Complex Tibial Plafond Fracture: ORIF or Circular External Fixation?

  • Mar 11, 2021
  • Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
  • Joshua K Napora +2
  • Research Article

Clinical and Functional Outcome of Infected Non Union of the Femur Managed with Monolateral External Fixator: A Prospective Interventional Study

  • Sep 01, 2025
  • JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
  • Ishan Shevate +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

A retrospective comparative study of corrective osteotomy for tibial deformities with the multiaxial correction fixator and the circular fixator

  • May 15, 2020
  • Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
  • Masaki Matsushita +7
  • Research Article

Ilizarov technique used in treatment of bone and soft tissue defects of the tibia

  • Mar 15, 2017
  • Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • Yijun Ren +3
  • Research Article

Ilizarov bone lengthening and bone transport technique for treatment of chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis of lower-extremity long bones

  • Apr 15, 2015
  • Chinese Journal of Trauma
  • Yongliang Zhao +7
  • Research Article

Evaluation of Three Fixation Methods in Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion for Chronic Osteomyelitis Following Ankle Fracture

  • Oct 01, 2024
  • Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
  • Laura C Gaitan +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Management of complex tibial plateau fractures: A comparative study of Ilizarov external fixation method with or without minimal internal fixation

  • Feb 06, 2025
  • Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
  • Murat Korkmaz +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Motorized Internal Limb Lengthening: International Perspectives

  • Sep 01, 2020
  • Techniques in Orthopaedics
  • S Robert Rozbruch +1
  • Research Article

To determine efficiency of Ilizarov's circular external fixator in form of the bone outcome and functional outcome in treatment of femoral and tibial nonunions

  • Oct 01, 2020
  • National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
  • Dr Yash Patel +3
  • Research Article

Defects of crural composite tissues treated by acute angular shortening and delayed distraction histogenesis with an external fixator

  • Oct 15, 2015
  • Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • Qinglin Kang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Circular External Fixation for Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures: Case Report

  • May 23, 2013
  • The Journal of Hand Surgery
  • Louis Lewandowski +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Circular External Fixation as a New Offloading Standard of Treatment in Charcot Neuro-Osteoarthropathy Complicated by Midfoot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot, Prospective Case-Control Study.

  • Jul 11, 2023
  • The international journal of lower extremity wounds
  • L Dalla Paola +8
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations8

Narrative review of ring fixator management of recurrent club foot deformity

  • Jul 01, 2021
  • Annals of Translational Medicine
  • Zachery Meyer +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.