Boosting SMT solver performance on mixed-bitwise-arithmetic expressions

In recent years, Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers have emerged as powerful tools in many formal methods applications, including verification, automated theorem proving, planning and software synthesis. The expressive power of SMT allows problems from many disciplines to be handled in a single unified approach. While SMT solvers are highly effective at handling certain classes of problems due to highly tuned implementations of efficient ground decision procedures, their ability is often limited when reasoning about universally quantified first-order formulas. Since generally this class of problems is undecidable, most SMT solvers use heuristic techniques for answering unsatisfiable when quantified formulas are present. On the other hand, when the problem is satisfiable, solvers using these techniques will either run indefinitely, or give up after some predetermined amount of effort. In a majority of formal methods applications, it is critical that the SMT solver be able to determine when such a formula is satisfiable, especially when it can return some representation of a model for the formula. This dissertation introduces new techniques for finding models for SMT formulas containing quantified first-order formulas. We will focus our attention on finding finite models, that is, models whose domain elements can be represented as a finite set. We give a procedure that is both finite model complete and refutationally complete for a fragment of first-order logic that occurs commonly in practice.

This paper describes a method for combining “off-the-shelf” SAT and constraint solvers for building an efficient Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solver for a wide range of theories. Our method follows the abstraction/refinement approach to simplify the implementation of custom SMT solvers. The expected performance penalty by not using an interweaved combination of SAT and theory solvers is reduced by generalising a Boolean solution of an SMT problem first via assigning don’t care to as many variables as possible. We then use the generalised solution to determine a thereby smaller constraint set to be handed over to the constraint solver for a background theory. We show that for many benchmarks and real-world problems, this optimisation results in considerably smaller and less complex constraint problems. The presented approach is particularly useful for assembling a practically viable SMT solver quickly, when neither a suitable SMT solver nor a corresponding incremental theory solver is available. We have implemented our approach in the ABsolver framework and applied the resulting solver successfully to an industrial case-study: the verification problems arising in verifying an electronic car steering control system impose non-linear arithmetic constraints, which do not fall into the domain of any other available solver.

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers have been successfully applied to solve many problems in formal verification such as bounded model checking (BMC) for many classes of systems from integrated circuits to cyber-physical systems. Typically, BMC is performed by checking satisfiability of a possibly long, but quantifier-free formula. However, BMC problems can naturally be encoded as quantified formulas over the number of BMC steps. In this approach, we then use decision procedures supporting quantifiers to check satisfiability of these quantified formulas. This approach has previously been applied to perform BMC using a Quantified Boolean Formula (QBF) encoding for purely discrete systems, and then discharges the QBF checks using QBF solvers. In this paper, we present a new quantified encoding of BMC for rectangular hybrid automata (RHA), which requires using more general logics due to the real (dense) time and real-valued state variables modeling continuous states. We have implemented a preliminary experimental prototype of the method using the HyST model transformation tool to generate the quantified BMC (QBMC) queries for the Z3 SMT solver. We describe experimental results on several timed and hybrid automata benchmarks, such as the Fischer and Lynch-Shavit mutual exclusion algorithms. We compare our approach to quantifier-free BMC approaches, such as those in the dReach tool that uses the dReal SMT solver, and the HyComp tool built on top of nuXmv that uses the MathSAT SMT solver. Based on our promising experimental results, QBMC may in the future be an effective and scalable analysis approach for RHA and other classes of hybrid automata as further improvements are made in quantifier handling in SMT solvers such as Z3.

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers are used in many modern program verification, analysis and testing tools. They owe their scale and efficiency thanks to advances in search algorithms underlying modern SAT solvers and first-order theorem provers. They owe their versatility in software development applications thanks to specialized algorithms supporting theories, such as numbers and algebraic data-types, of relevance for software engineering. This lecture introduces algorithmic principles of SMT solving, taking as basis modern SAT solvers and integration with specialized theory solvers and quantifier reasoning. We detail some of the algorithms used for main theories used in current SMT solvers and survey newer theories and approaches to integrating solvers. The lectures also outline some application scenarios where SMT solvers have found use, including program verification, network analysis, symbolic model checking, test-case generation, and white-box fuzzing.

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) refers to the problem of deciding the satisfiability of a formula with respect to certain background first-order theories. In this article, we focus on Satisfiablity Modulo Integer Arithmetic, which is referred to as SMT(IA), including both linear and non-linear integer arithmetic theories. Dominant approaches to SMT rely on calling a CDCL-based SAT solver, either in a lazy or eager flavour. Local search, a competitive approach to solving combinatorial problems including SAT, however, has not been well studied for SMT. We develop the first local-search algorithm for SMT(IA) by directly operating on variables, breaking through the traditional framework. We propose a local-search framework by considering the distinctions between Boolean and integer variables. Moreover, we design a novel operator and scoring functions tailored for integer arithmetic, as well as a two-level operation selection heuristic. Putting these together, we develop a local search SMT(IA) solver called LocalSMT. Experiments are carried out to evaluate LocalSMT on benchmark sets from SMT-LIB. The results show that LocalSMT is competitive and complementary with state-of-the-art SMT solvers, and performs particularly well on those formulae with only integer variables. A simple sequential portfolio with Z3 improves the state-of-the-art on satisfiable benchmark sets from SMT-LIB.

We present our extension of ACL2 with Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers using ACL2's trusted clause processor mechanism. We are particularly interested in the verification of physical systems including Analog and Mixed-Signal (AMS) designs. ACL2 offers strong induction abilities for reasoning about sequences and SMT complements deduction methods like ACL2 with fast nonlinear arithmetic solving procedures. While SAT solvers have been integrated into ACL2 in previous work, SMT methods raise new issues because of their support for a broader range of domains including real numbers and uninterpreted functions. This paper presents Smtlink, our clause processor for integrating SMT solvers into ACL2. We describe key design and implementation issues and describe our experience with its use.

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers are fundamental tools that are used widely in software engineering, verification, and security research. Precisely because of their widespread use, it is imperative we develop efficient and systematic methods to test them. To this end, we present a reinforcement-learning based fuzzing system, BanditFuzz, that learns grammatical constructs of well-formed inputs that may cause performance slowdown in SMT solvers. To the best of our knowledge, BanditFuzz is the first machine-learning based performance fuzzer for SMT solvers.

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers have proven highly scalable, efficient and suitable for integrating theory reasoning. However, for numerous applications from program analysis and verification, the ground fragment is insufficient, as proof obligations often include quantifiers. A well known approach for quantifier reasoning uses a matching algorithm that works against an E-graph to instantiate quantified variables. This paper introduces algorithms that identify matches on E-graphs incrementally and efficiently. In particular, we introduce an index that works on E-graphs, called E-matching code treesthat combine features of substitution and code trees, used in saturation based theorem provers. E-matching code trees allow performing matching against several patterns simultaneously. The code trees are combined with an additional index, called the inverted path index, which filters E-graph terms that may potentially match patterns when the E-graph is updated. Experimental results show substantial performance improvements over existing state-of-the-art SMT solvers.

The design of decision procedures for first-order theories and their combinations has been a very active research subject for thirty years; it has gained practical importance through the development of SMT (satisfiability modulo theories) solvers. Most results concentrate on combining decision procedures for data structures such as theories for arrays, bitvectors, fragments of arithmetic, and uninterpreted functions. In particular, the well-known Nelson-Oppen scheme for the combination of decision procedures requires the signatures to be disjoint and each theory to be stably infinite; every satisfiable set of literals in a stably infinite theory has an infinite model.In this paper we consider some of the best-known decidable fragments of first-order logic with equality, including the Löwenheim class (monadic FOL with equality, but without functions), Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey theories (finite sets of formulas of the form ∃ * ∀ * ϕ, where ϕ is a function-free and quantifier-free FOL formula), and the two-variable fragment of FOL. In general, these are not stably infinite, and the Nelson-Oppen scheme cannot be used to integrate them into SMT solvers. Noticing some elementary results about the cardinalities of the models of these theories, we show that they can nevertheless be combined with almost any other decidable theory.

Concise and abstract models of system-level behaviors are invaluable in design analysis, testing, and validation. In this paper, we consider the problem of inferring models from communication traces of system-on-chip (SoC) designs. The traces capture communications among different blocks of a system design in terms of messages exchanged. The extracted models characterize the system-level communication protocols governing how blocks exchange messages, and coordinate with each other to realize various system functions. In this paper, the above problem is formulated as a constraint satisfaction problem, which is then fed to a satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solver. The solutions returned by the SMT solver are used to extract the models that accept the input traces. In the experiments, we demonstrate the proposed approach with traces collected from a transaction-level simulation model of a multicore SoC design and a trace of a more detailed multicore SoC modeled in GEM5.

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) is an extension of SAT towards FOL. SMT solvers have proven highly scalable and efficient for problems based on some ground theorems. However, SMT problems involving quantifiers and combination of theorems is a long-standing challenge, which has been a major bottleneck of practical application of SMT solvers in some fields. We reveal a decidable fragment of FOL involving quantifiers, which could not be solved by SMT solvers such as Z3, CVC3, etc., and show how to convert them into model checking problems.

Real-time system is playing an important role in our society. For such a system, sensitivity to timing is the central feature of system behaviors, which means tasks in the system are required to be completed before their deadlines. Currently, almost all the practical real-time systems are equipped within multiple processors, for which the schedule synthesis to make sure that all the tasks can be completed before their deadlines is known to be an NP complete problem. In this paper, to solve the scheduling problem, we propose a scheduling method based on satisfiability modulo theories (SMT). In the method, the problem of scheduling is treated as a satisfiability problem. The key work is to formalize the satisfiability problem using first-order language. After the formalization, a SMT solver (e.g., Z3, Yices) is employed to solve such a satisfiability problem. An optimal schedule can be generated based on a solution model returned by the SMT solver. Moreover, in the SMT-based scheduling method, we define the scheduling constraints as system constraints and target constraints. Such design makes the proposed method apply more widely compared with existing methods.

State Transition Matrix (STM) is a table-based modeling language that has been frequently used in industry for specifying behavior of distributed systems. Functional correctness of a STM design (i.e., a design written in STM) could usually be expressed as invariant properties. In this paper, we first present a formalization of the static and dynamic aspects of a STM design. Consequentially, based on this formalization, we investigate a symbolic encoding approach for STM design, through which the design could be bounded model checked wrt. invariant properties by using Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solving technique. We have built a prototype implementation of the proposed encoding and the state-of-the-art SMT solver -- Yices is used in our experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach.

Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solvers received a lot of attention in the research community in the last decade, and consequently their expressiveness and performance have significantly improved. In the areas of program analysis and model checking, many of the newly developed tools rely on SMT solving. The SMT-LIB initiative defines a common format for communication with an SMT solver. However, tool developers often prefer to use the solver API instead, because many features offered by SMT solvers such as interpolation, optimization, and formula introspection are not supported by SMT-LIB directly. Additionally, using SMT-LIB for communication incurs a performance overhead, because all the queries to the solver have to be serialized to strings. Yet using the API directly creates the problem of a solver lock-in, which makes evaluating a tool with different solvers very difficult. We present JavaSMT, a library that exposes a solver-independent API layer for SMT solving. Our library aims to close the gap between API-based and SMT-LIB-based communication, by offering a large set of features with minimal performance overhead. JavaSMT has been used internally in CPAchecker since inception, and has been heavily tested in different verification algorithms. The library is available from its Github website https://github.com/sosy-lab/java-smt.

#SMT, or model counting for logical theories, is a well-known hard problem that generalizes such tasks as counting the number of satisfying assignments to a Boolean formula and computing the volume of a polytope. In the realm of satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) there is a growing need for model counting solvers, coming from several application domains (quantitative information flow, static analysis of probabilistic programs). In this paper, we show a reduction from an approximate version of #SMT to SMT. We focus on the theories of integer arithmetic and linear real arithmetic. We propose model counting algorithms that provide approximate solutions with formal bounds on the approximation error. They run in polynomial time and make a polynomial number of queries to the SMT solver for the underlying theory, exploiting “for free” the sophisticated heuristics implemented within modern SMT solvers. We have implemented the algorithms and used them to solve the value problem for a model of loop-free probabilistic programs with nondeterminism.