BRIDGING RULE-BASED PRECISION WITH AI INTELLIGENCE: ENHANCING NLP WITH REGULAR EXPRESSIONS AND MACHINE LEARNING

In this study, we explore the potential of machine learning (ML) models after different text representation methods on the balanced IMDB dataset, which is widely regarded as a gold standard in sentiment analysis, one of the Natural Language processing (NLP) tasks. On the open source IMDB movie reviews dataset, we first undertake data cleaning and text representation with data preprocessing steps. Then, we apply sentiment classification using different ML models. In order to evaluate the models, we used precision (P), recall (R), F1-score (F1), and area under curve (AUC), as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC). It is worth noting that text feature extraction with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) provided the highest performance in all models, with the SVM model offering particularly promising results. In this model, we observed the following results: ACC 0.9033, F1 0.9308, R 0.9015, R 0.9015, P 0.9072, AUC 0.9638, and ROC 0.96. These findings suggest that NLP techniques and, in particular, machine learning models that employ BERT may offer high levels of accuracy and reliability in text classification problems. It would be beneficial for future studies to validate these findings using BERT on different NLP tasks. This would help to evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of the models in practice.

Fake news detection is still a field of research that is in its infancy, and this is clearly evident as it has only recently gained significant attention from society. The use of machine learning algorithms and natural language processing (NLP) techniques offers valuable problem-solving opportunities to address these complex challenges. This study explores stance detection as a method to identify misinformation by examining the connection between article headlines and their corresponding body text. Utilizing the FNC-1 and FARN datasets, we apply advanced NLP methods and machine learning (ML) models, including logistic regression, XGBoost, and DistilBERT. Key preprocessing techniques such as lemmatization, named entity recognition (NER), sentiment analysis, and semantic similarity are employed to capture both linguistic and contextual features. The experimental results show that transformer-based models such as DistilBERT achieve superior performance compared to traditional approaches, particularly in accurately classifying nuanced stances. These findings highlight the crucial role of context-aware models in improving the accuracy of misinformation detection and demonstrate their potential for scalable, real-world applications.

AimsHeart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with no definitive diagnostic tests. HF registries are often based on manual reviews of medical records of hospitalized HF patients identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. However, most HF patients are not hospitalized, and manual review of big electronic health record (EHR) data is not practical. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has the largest integrated healthcare system in the nation, and an estimated 1.5 million patients have ICD codes for HF (HF ICD‐code universe) in their VA EHR. The objective of our study was to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models to phenotype HF in these patients.Methods and resultsThe model development cohort (n = 20 000: training, 16 000; validation 2000; testing, 2000) included 10 000 patients with HF and 10 000 without HF who were matched by age, sex, race, inpatient/outpatient status, hospital, and encounter date (within 60 days). HF status was ascertained by manual chart reviews in VA's External Peer Review Program for HF (EPRP‐HF) and non‐HF status was ascertained by the absence of ICD codes for HF in VA EHR. Two clinicians annotated 1000 random snippets with HF‐related keywords and labelled 436 as HF, which was then used to train and test a natural language processing (NLP) model to classify HF (positive predictive value or PPV, 0.81; sensitivity, 0.77). A machine learning (ML) model using linear support vector machine architecture was trained and tested to classify HF using EPRP‐HF as cases (PPV, 0.86; sensitivity, 0.86). From the ‘HF ICD‐code universe’, we randomly selected 200 patients (gold standard cohort) and two clinicians manually adjudicated HF (gold standard HF) in 145 of those patients by chart reviews. We calculated NLP, ML, and NLP + ML scores and used weighted F scores to derive their optimal threshold values for HF classification, which resulted in PPVs of 0.83, 0.77, and 0.85 and sensitivities of 0.86, 0.88, and 0.83, respectively. HF patients classified by the NLP + ML model were characteristically and prognostically similar to those with gold standard HF. All three models performed better than ICD code approaches: one principal hospital discharge diagnosis code for HF (PPV, 0.97; sensitivity, 0.21) or two primary outpatient encounter diagnosis codes for HF (PPV, 0.88; sensitivity, 0.54).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that NLP and ML models are efficient AI tools to phenotype HF in big EHR data to create contemporary HF registries for clinical studies of effectiveness, quality improvement, and hypothesis generation.

Integrated STEM projects and experiments promote interdisciplinary learning, enhance critical thinking, and prepare students for real-world problem-solving by bridging science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. While numerous research studies have explored the STEM education domain, few have focused on supporting educators in identifying and designing effective integrated STEM projects and experiments. This research addresses this gap by introducing a novel system that leverages machine learning (ML) and large language models (LLMs) to assist educators in classifying and creating integrated STEM projects.We created and labeled a dataset of 1,071 project descriptions in this research work, mapped to one or more STEM areas (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). The dataset was developed using manually curated records, harvesting online sources, and synthetic data generation. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques were applied to prepare project descriptions for analysis. Various ML models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression, and Naive Bayes, were used for multi-label classification. The Random Forest model achieved the best performance, with a Precision of 91.99%, Recall of 94.59%, F1 Score of 93.27%, and Hamming Loss of 6.74%.The system operates in two phases: In Phase 1, the instructor proposes a project title with a description, and in response, the ML model identifies one or more STEM areas as the most relevant. In Phase 2, ChatGPT, specifically GPT-4o, assists educators by defining experiment objectives, generating ideas, designing procedures, and suggesting tools and resources. This human-in-the-loop system enhances collaboration between educators, ML models, and LLMs, streamlining the design of effective integrated STEM projects.This work's implications extend to improving the accessibility and effectiveness of integrated STEM education by reducing the barriers educators face in designing interdisciplinary projects. It provides a scalable framework for integrating advanced AI techniques into educational practices and fostering classroom innovation.

Towards a Novel Weakly Supervised Joint Approach of Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Noisy Text

Assessment center (AC) exercises such as role‐plays have established themselves as valuable approaches for obtaining insights into interpersonal behavior, but they are often considered the “Rolls Royce” of personnel assessment due to their high costs. The observation and rating process comprises a substantial part of these costs. In an exploratory case study, we capitalize on recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) by developing NLP‐based machine learning (ML) models to investigate the possibility of automatically scoring AC exercises. First, we compared the convergent‐related validity and contamination with word count of ML scores based on models that used different NLP methods to operationalize verbal behavior. Second, for the model that maximized convergence while minimizing contamination with word count (i.e., a model that used both n‐grams and Universal Sentence Encoder embeddings as predictors), we investigated the criterion‐related validity of its scores. Third, we examined how the interrater reliability of the AC role‐play scores affects ML model convergence. To do so, we applied seven NLP methods to 96 assessees' transcriptions and trained 10 sets of ML models across 18 speeded AC role‐plays to automatically score assessee performance. Results suggest that ML scores recovered most of the original variance in the overall assessment ratings, and replacing one or more human assessors with ML scores maintained criterion‐related validity. Additionally, ML models seemed to exhibit higher convergence when assessors consistently detected and utilized observable behaviors to make ratings (i.e., when interrater reliability was higher). Finally, we provide a step‐by‐step guide for practitioners seeking to implement ML scoring in ACs.

Machine learning (ML) models provide more choices to patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) to more properly manage blood glucose (BG) levels. However, because of numerous types of ML algorithms, choosing an appropriate model is vitally important. In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the performance of ML models in predicting BG levels. In addition, we assessed ML models used to detect and predict adverse BG (hypoglycemia) events by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Explore databases were systematically searched for studies on predicting BG levels and predicting or detecting adverse BG events using ML models, from inception to November 2022. Studies that assessed the performance of different ML models in predicting or detecting BG levels or adverse BG events of patients with DM were included. Studies with no derivation or performance metrics of ML models were excluded. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was applied to assess the quality of included studies. Primary outcomes were the relative ranking of ML models for predicting BG levels in different prediction horizons (PHs) and pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of ML models in detecting or predicting adverse BG events. In total, 46 eligible studies were included for meta-analysis. Regarding ML models for predicting BG levels, the means of the absolute root mean square error (RMSE) in a PH of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes were 18.88 (SD 19.71), 21.40 (SD 12.56), 21.27 (SD 5.17), and 30.01 (SD 7.23) mg/dL, respectively. The neural network model (NNM) showed the highest relative performance in different PHs. Furthermore, the pooled estimates of the positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio of ML models were 8.3 (95% CI 5.7-12.0) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.44), respectively, for predicting hypoglycemia and 2.4 (95% CI 1.6-3.7) and 0.37 (95% CI 0.29-0.46), respectively, for detecting hypoglycemia. Statistically significant high heterogeneity was detected in all subgroups, with different sources of heterogeneity. For predicting precise BG levels, the RMSE increases with a rise in the PH, and the NNM shows the highest relative performance among all the ML models. Meanwhile, current ML models have sufficient ability to predict adverse BG events, while their ability to detect adverse BG events needs to be enhanced. PROSPERO CRD42022375250; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=375250.

Collecting information on adverse events following immunization from as many sources as possible is critical for promptly identifying potential safety concerns and taking appropriate actions. Febrile convulsions are recognized as an important potential reaction to vaccination in children aged <6 years. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of natural language processing techniques and machine learning (ML) models for the rapid detection of febrile convulsion presentations in emergency departments (EDs), especially with respect to the minimum training data requirements to obtain optimum model performance. In addition, we examined the deployment requirements for a ML model to perform real-time monitoring of ED triage notes. We developed a pattern matching approach as a baseline and evaluated ML models for the classification of febrile convulsions in ED triage notes to determine both their training requirements and their effectiveness in detecting febrile convulsions. We measured their performance during training and then compared the deployed models' result on new incoming ED data. Although the best standard neural networks had acceptable performance and were low-resource models, transformer-based models outperformed them substantially, justifying their ongoing deployment. Using natural language processing, particularly with the use of large language models, offers significant advantages in syndromic surveillance. Large language models make highly effective classifiers, and their text generation capacity can be used to enhance the quality and diversity of training data.

Background Advances in Machine learning (ML) for biomedical research have led to ground-breaking results that are evident in several healthcare settings. In the field of NLP, there are applications for text mining, named entity recognition, classification of pathology and radiology reports, and text generation. Despite these advancements, the main barrier towards the use of AI systems in a clinical setting is their lack of explainability and interpretability. Objective From the various avenues available through which to create transparent and explainable ML models, we investigated how a stable, accurate, and trusted biomedical standard, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) can be applied to retrospectively justify and explain the results of ML models. Methods We developed a novel architecture that places a UMLS-based system after the ML model, and this then acts as a verifier to confirm the accuracy, or lack thereof, of the results from an ML model, and goes on further to explain the results from the model. This architecture is intended to be model-agnostic, so we evaluated its effectiveness using two NLP tasks: classification and Named Entity Recognition (NER). For classification, the UMLS-based verifier was applied to the results from classifying the topographies in 1964 unstructured and anonymized breast cancer pathology reports by a Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network (MT-CNN). For NER, the UMLS-based verifier was applied to the results of the HunFlair model on unstructured and anonymized breast, colon, and small intestine cancer pathology reports. Results For the classification evaluation, we found that an entity's National Cancer Institute term (NCIt) code can be used to obtain a topographical range for individual entities in a pathology report. We found, further, that, whilst there are entities whose topographical range contributes positively towards a report's overall topography classification, there are also entities that contribute negatively, and that the number of these negative-contributing entities is inversely proportional to the confidence value from the ML model. For the NER evaluation, we found that the UMLS-based verifier is able to both confirm accurate model annotations, and group together the different kinds of inaccuracies found. Additionally, the grouping of an incorrectly tagged entity was found to be correlated with lower confidence values from the model. Conclusion The architecture we propose retrospectively verifies and explains the results of ML models, thus providing a level of interpretability to a model’s outputs. Our use of an industry standard healthcare knowledge repository, the UMLS, is an important contribution towards trusting the results of AI systems in healthcare. Citation Format: Joan Byamugisha, Waheeda Saib, Theodore Gaelejwe, Asad Jeewa, Maletsabisa Molapo. Towards verifying results from biomedical deep learning models using the UMLS: Cases of primary tumor site classification and cancer Named Entity Recognition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Diagnosis, and Imaging; 2021 Jan 13-14. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(5_Suppl):Abstract nr PR-12.

This study focuses on using various machine learning (ML) models to evaluate the shear behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. The main objective of the study is to predict the shear strength of UHPC beams reinforced with GFRP bars using ML models. We use four different ML models: support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (R.F.), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The experimental database used in the study is acquired from various literature sources and comprises 54 test observations with 11 input features. These input features are likely parameters related to the composition, geometry, and properties of the UHPC beams and GFRP bars. To ensure the ML models' generalizability and scalability, random search methods are utilized to tune the hyperparameters of the algorithms. This tuning process helps improve the performance of the models when predicting the shear strength. The study uses the ACI318M-14 and Eurocode 2 standard building codes to predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams. The ML models' predictions are compared to the results obtained from these building code standards. According to the findings, the XGBoost model demonstrates the highest predictive test performance among the investigated ML models. The study employs the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to assess the significance of each input parameter in the ML models' predictive capabilities. A Taylor diagram is used to statistically compare the accuracy of the ML models. This study concludes that ML models, particularly XGBoost, can effectively predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams.

Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models

BackgroundIdentifying patients at high risk of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) may permit targeting potential interventions to reduce its incidence. We aimed to explore the functionality of machine learning (ML) and natural language processing techniques on structured data and unstructured clinical text to predict SAP by comparing it to conventional risk scores.MethodsLinked data between a hospital stroke registry and a deidentified research-based database including electronic health records and administrative claims data was used. Natural language processing was applied to extract textual features from clinical notes. The random forest algorithm was used to build ML models. The predictive performance of ML models was compared with the A2DS2, ISAN, PNA, and ACDD4 scores using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAmong 5,913 acute stroke patients hospitalized between Oct 2010 and Sep 2021, 450 (7.6%) developed SAP within the first 7 days after stroke onset. The ML model based on both textual features and structured variables had the highest AUC [0.840, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.806–0.875], significantly higher than those of the ML model based on structured variables alone (0.828, 95% CI 0.793–0.863, P = 0.040), ACDD4 (0.807, 95% CI 0.766–0.849, P = 0.041), A2DS2 (0.803, 95% CI 0.762–0.845, P = 0.013), ISAN (0.795, 95% CI 0.752–0.837, P = 0.009), and PNA (0.778, 95% CI 0.735–0.822, P < 0.001). All models demonstrated adequate calibration except for the A2DS2 score.ConclusionsThe ML model based on both textural features and structured variables performed better than conventional risk scores in predicting SAP. The workflow used to generate ML prediction models can be disseminated for local adaptation by individual healthcare organizations.

Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) plays a vital role in irrigation and water resource planning. The Penman–Monteith method recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO PM56) is widely used and considered a standard to calculate ETo. However, FAO PM56 cannot be used with limited meteorological variables, so it is compulsory to choose an alternative model for ETo estimation, which requires fewer variables. This study built ten machine learning (ML) models based on multi-function, neural network, and tree-based structure against the FAO PM56 method. For this purpose, time series temperature data on a monthly scale are only used to train ML models. The developed ML models were applied to estimate ETo at different test stations and the obtained results were compared with the FAO PM56 method to verify and validate their performance in ETo estimation for the selected stations. In addition, multiple statistical indicators, including root-mean-square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and correlation coefficient (r) were calculated to compare the performance of each ML model on ETo estimation. Among the applied ML models, the ETo tree boost (TB) ML model outperformed the other ML models in estimating ETo in diverse climatic conditions based on statistical indicators (R2, NSE, r, RMSE, and MAE). Moreover, the observed R2, NSE, and r were the highest for the TB ML model, while RMSE and MAE were found to be the lowest at the study sites compared to other applied ML models. Lastly, ETo point data yielded from the TB ML model was used in an interpolation process to create monthly and annual ETo maps. Based on the ETo maps, this study suggests mainly a focus on areas with high ETo values and proper irrigation scheduling of crops to ensure water sustainability.

Aim: The majority of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are built on retrospective data, much of which is collected without explicit patient consent for use in artificial intelligence (AI) and ML applications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinicians and scientific researchers themselves consent to provide their own data for the training of ML models. Materials and Methods: This survey was conducted through an anonymous online survey, utilizing platforms such as Telegram, LinkedIn, and Viber. The target audience comprised specific international groups, primarily Russian, German, and English-speaking, of clinicians and scientific researchers. These participants ranged in their levels of expertise and experience, from beginners to veterans. The survey centered on a singular, pivotal question: “Do You Consent to the Use of Your Biological and Private Data for Training Machine Learning and AI Models?” Respondents had the option to choose from three responses: “Yes” and “No”. Results: The survey was conducted in January 2024. A total of 119 unique and verified individuals participated in the survey. The results revealed that only 50% of respondents (63 persons) expressed consent to provide their own data for the training of ML and AI models. Conclusion: In the development of ML and AI models, particularly open-source ones, it is crucial to ascertain whether participants are willing to provide their private data. While ML algorithms can transform the nature of data, it is important to remember that the primary owner of this data is the individual. Our findings show that in 50% of the cases, even participants from scientific research and clinical backgrounds – individuals typically accountable for ensuring data quality in AI and ML model development – do not consent to the use of their data in AI and ML settings. This highlights the need for more stringent consent processes and ethical considerations in the utilization of personal data in AI and ML research.

Towards a Novel Weakly Supervised Joint Approach of Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Noisy Text