• Home
  • Search
  • Cable Damage Detection System and Algorithms Using Time Domain Reflectometry
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.2172/971773Copy DOI Icon

Cable Damage Detection System and Algorithms Using Time Domain Reflectometry

  • Mar 24, 2009
  • G Clark +3 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

This report describes the hardware system and the set of algorithms we have developed for detecting damage in cables for the Advanced Development and Process Technologies (ADAPT) Program. This program is part of the W80 Life Extension Program (LEP). The system could be generalized for application to other systems in the future. Critical cables can undergo various types of damage (e.g. short circuits, open circuits, punctures, compression) that manifest as changes in the dielectric/impedance properties of the cables. For our specific problem, only one end of the cable is accessible, and no exemplars of actual damage are available. This work addresses the detection of dielectric/impedance anomalies in transient time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurements on the cables. The approach is to interrogate the cable using time domain reflectometry (TDR) techniques, in which a known pulse is inserted into the cable, and reflections from the cable are measured. The key operating principle is that any important cable damage will manifest itself as an electrical impedance discontinuity that can be measured in the TDR response signal. Machine learning classification algorithms are effectively eliminated from consideration, because only a small number of cables is available for testing; so a sufficient sample size is not attainable. Nonetheless, a key requirement is to achieve very high probability of detection and very low probability of false alarm. The approach is to compare TDR signals from possibly damaged cables to signals or an empirical model derived from reference cables that are known to be undamaged. This requires that the TDR signals are reasonably repeatable from test to test on the same cable, and from cable to cable. Empirical studies show that the repeatability issue is the 'long pole in the tent' for damage detection, because it is has been difficult to achieve reasonable repeatability. This one factor dominated the project. The two-step model-based approach is summarized as follows: Step 1, Cable Modeling: Given input-output TDR signals s(n) and x{sub U}(n) for a cable known to be free of damage, system identification algorithms are used to compute a dynamic prediction-error cable model that has output {cflx x}{sub U}(n). The model is declared valid when the innovations e{sub U}(n) = x{sub U}(n) {cflx x}{sub U}(n) satisfy a statistical zero-mean whiteness test. This validated model output is then used as a known reference to which other cables can be compared. Step 2, Cable Testing: The TDR output signal x{sub D}(n) from a cable under test is compared with the model output {cflx x}{sub U}(n) by computing the innovations e{sub D}(n) = x{sub D}(n) {cflx x}{sub U}(n). The innovations are tested using a short-term whiteness test statistic, which employs a statistical confidence interval. If the cable passes the test, this implies that the model is valid and the cable is declared undamaged. If the cable fails the test, this indicates a model mismatch, which means that the cable's dielectric properties have changed; and this implies that the cable is damaged. The test threshold is adjusted to maximize probability of detection and minimize probability of false alarm according to an empirically determined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An associated confidence interval on the probability of correct classification is also provided. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated using measured TDR signals for undamaged and damaged cables. Experimental and algorithmic methods for coping with repeatability issues are presented. The model-based damage detection algorithms have been shown to perform well for some representative examples of real TDR signals acquired using the two-dimensional (2D) mockup fixture. If the damage causes a short circuit, then damage detection performance is generally good to excellent. Examples include the cases demonstrated in this report for cuts and pinholes. If the damage does not cause a short circuit, then damage detection performance is generally poor to fair. Examples include the cases demonstrated in this report for crushes and partial cuts.

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter

Research on Multi Satellite Failure Detection and Recognition Method of Satellite Navigation RAIM

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Zhixin Deng +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

Analysis of early late phase in single-and dual-frequency GPS receivers for multipath detection

  • Feb 19, 2010
  • GPS Solutions
  • Omer Mohsin Mubarak +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Clutter Suppression for OTHR Based on Joint Low Rank and Group Sparse Representation

  • Feb 01, 2025
  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
  • Zirui Chen +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations106

A Novel Jamming Attacks Detection Approach Based on Machine Learning for Wireless Communication

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Youness Arjoune +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations68

Response surface methodology for damage detection using frequency and mode shape

  • Oct 26, 2017
  • Measurement
  • Sarehati Umar +2
  • Conference Article

Assessing the capability of advanced geophysical classification techniques to inform minimum separation distances for UXO remediation

  • Jun 11, 2021
  • Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2021
  • Katherine Fisher* +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

A performance analysis of a new periodogram for spectrum sensing

  • Nov 01, 2016
  • Emad Hmood Salman +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

An Analysis of Periodogram Based on a Discrete Cosine Transform for Spectrum Sensing

  • Apr 13, 2018
  • Wireless Personal Communications
  • Emad H Salman +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Maximizing Throughput with Wireless Spectrum Sensing Network Assisted Cognitive Radios

  • Jun 01, 2015
  • International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
  • Arbab Waheed Ahmad +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Overhead-Throughput Tradeoff Under a Novel Frame Structure in Centralized Cooperative Cognitive Networks

  • Nov 09, 2013
  • Wireless Personal Communications
  • Ying Wang +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Compressive Sampling for Recognition of Frequency-Hopping Spread Spectrum Signals

  • Oct 21, 2020
  • Hongbin Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Multiscale hysteresis threshold detection algorithm for a small infrared target in a complex background

  • Mar 18, 2019
  • Optical and Quantum Electronics
  • Yuan Wei +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Uncertainty quantification of a guided wave structural health monitoring system for composite bolted joints

  • Apr 17, 2013
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Colin Haynes +1
  • Research Article

Weak Coding Signal Detection under the Background of Sea Clutter

  • Nov 22, 2011
  • Advanced Materials Research
  • Shi Hua Liu +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Statistics based localized damage detection using vibration response

  • Aug 25, 2014
  • Smart Structures and Systems
  • Siavash Dorvash +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.