• Home
  • Search
  • Can fire exclusion zones enhance postfire tree regeneration? A simulation study in subalpine conifer forests
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70121Copy DOI Icon

Can fire exclusion zones enhance postfire tree regeneration? A simulation study in subalpine conifer forests

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Climate change and novel fire regimes increasingly challenge stewardship of forests adapted to infrequent, stand‐replacing fire. Novel fire regimes may disrupt mechanisms that sustained postfire regeneration historically, and whether fire management can promote forest resilience to future fires is uncertain. We used the individual‐based forest simulation model iLand to explore how fire exclusion zones that mimic historical burn mosaics may affect postfire tree regeneration in conifer forests of Grand Teton National Park (Wyoming, USA). We asked: (1) How do the amount and configuration of potential fire exclusion zones influence postfire tree regeneration throughout the 21st century under alternative climate scenarios? (2) How do “operational” fire exclusion zones affect postfire tree regeneration within burned patches and across the landscape by the end of the 21st century? We first conducted a factorial simulation experiment with varying amounts (10%, 30%, 50% of the landscape) and configurations (dispersed vs. clumped) of fire exclusion zones. Informed by this experiment and logistical firefighting considerations, we developed an operational scenario in which we designated mature forests surrounded by defensible fuel breaks as fire exclusion zones. Simulations were conducted under four future climate scenarios (warm‐wet, hot‐wet, warm‐dry, hot‐dry), and postfire tree regeneration densities with fire exclusion zones were compared to reference scenarios without fire exclusion zones. Regeneration of fire‐avoiding conifers (subalpine fir, Abies lasiocarpa and Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii) was consistently greater with fire exclusion zones, especially with ≥30% of the landscape in dispersed configuration. Fire exclusion zones had minimal effects on regeneration of fire embracers (lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and fire resisters (Douglas‐fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca). In the operational scenario, postfire regeneration of fire‐avoiding species was greater compared to the reference scenario, especially in hot climate scenarios. Although regeneration of fire avoiders declined in operational and reference scenarios throughout the 21st century, regeneration densities were up to 10 times greater in the operational relative to the reference scenario. Our results suggest that mimicking historical burn mosaics by establishing fire exclusion zones could sustain seed sources and afford more time for subalpine conifer forests to adapt to a warmer world with more fire.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Looking beyond the mean: Drivers of variability in postfire stand development of conifers in Greater Yellowstone

  • Aug 29, 2018
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Kristin H Braziunas +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Potential productivity of three interior subalpine forest tree species in British Columbia

  • May 24, 2002
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Karel Klinka +1
  • Dissertation

Growth responses of three coexisting conifer species to climate variables across a range of climate conditions.

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Yumiko Miyamoto
  • Research Article
  • Citations133

Recent mountain pine beetle outbreaks, wildfire severity, and postfire tree regeneration in the US Northern Rockies.

  • Sep 29, 2014
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Brian J Harvey +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations265

Tree regeneration following wildfires in the western US: a review

  • May 20, 2019
  • Fire Ecology
  • Camille S Stevens-Rumann +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Rates and controls of nitrogen fixation in postfire lodgepole pine forests.

  • Feb 01, 2025
  • Ecology
  • Robert E Heumann +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations92

Forest structure and regeneration following a mountain pine beetle epidemic in southeastern Wyoming

  • Oct 21, 2011
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Lori J Kayes +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations51

A comparison of ectomycorrhiza communities from three conifer species planted on forest gap edges

  • Nov 21, 1999
  • Canadian Journal of Botany
  • J M Kranabetter +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations82

Recruitment limitation in forests: Lessons from an unprecedented mountain pine beetle epidemic

  • Sep 09, 2008
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Rasmus Astrup +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Comparative genomics of the chitinase gene family in lodgepole and jack pines: contrasting responses to biotic threats and landscape level investigation of genetic differentiation

  • Feb 18, 2021
  • Botany
  • Rhiannon M Peery +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Habitat Distribution of Small Mammal Communities in Grand Teton National Park

  • Jan 01, 1990
  • The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports
  • Nancy L Stanton +2
  • Preprint Article
  • Citations1

Recruitment at treeline in the Central Rocky Mountains shifts in favor of a drought-tolerant species as climate water deficit increases

  • Mar 09, 2024
  • Laurel Sindewald +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Black Bear Damage to Lodgepole Pine in Central Oregon

  • Jan 01, 1995
  • Northwestern Naturalist
  • Victor G Barnes +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Lethal and Nonlethal Effects of the Organic Horizons of Forested Soils on the Germination of Seeds from Several Associated Conifer Species of the Rocky Mountains

  • Sep 01, 1972
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • T W Daniel +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Influence of repeated fertilization on forage production for native mammalian herbivores in young lodgepole pine forests

  • Mar 20, 2018
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Pontus M.F Lindgren +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.