Cataract Surgery in Uveitis

Bevacizumab vs. Triamcinolone

Comparison Between Intravitreal and Orbital Floor Triamcinolone Acetonide After Phacoemulsification in Patients With Endogenous Uveitis

Cataract Extraction and the Iris Configuration

Rising Cataract Surgery Rates: Demand and Supply

Resident Perspectives 56-5

The use of intravitreal corticosteroids in the management of macular oedema has recently gained widespread acceptance. New long-acting steroid preparations and methods of delivery have facilitated the use of these new modalities. This review describes the various types of macular oedema for which this therapeutic option is used and the results.

Objective: To assess difference in visual outcome, macular thickness and need for laser treatment in patients receiving intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide or bevacizumab for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Design: Open labeled prospective randomised controlled trial, evaluating 38 retinal vein occlusion patients. 19 patients each were assigned, to Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide (IVTA) and Bevacizumab (IVB) group. Methodology: Baseline ocular parameters like best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) by Applanation tonometry, fundus examination using indirect ophthalmoscope, slit lamp biomicroscopy, Ocular Coherence Tomography of the macula and Fundus Flourescein Angiography performed. Under aseptic conditions, Injection of 4 mg (0.1 ml) Triamcinolone Acetonide (Kenacort) or 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) Bevacizumab (Avastin) was injected into the vitreous. Patients were given re-injections or laser treatment according to requirement. BCVA and IOP at 15 days, 1, 3 and 6 months post injection was recorded. OCT and FFA were repeated at 3 and 6 month. Outcome: At 6 months, patients with BRVO receiving IVTA, there was significant improvement in visual acuity (p = 0.014), as well as decrease in macular edema (p ≈ 0.000), whereas patients of BRVO in the IVB group did not show significant improvement in visual acuity (p= 0.375). Visual acuity of CRVO patients in the IVTA (p = 0.178) and IVB (p = 0.109) group did not show any significant improvement. Though there was significant decrease in macular edema in both IVTA (p ≈ 0.000) and IVB (p =0.042) groups. No significant increase in IOP was noted in either IVTA (p= 0.089) or IVB (p = o.637).Results and Conclusion: The results show a favourable influence of IVTA on BCVA at 6 months.Positive effect in decreasing central macular thickness (CMT) was observed in patients receiving IVTA and IVB.FFA guided laser photocoagulation helps in stabilizing the visual acuity and prevents vision threatening complications. Changes in OCT can be used to monitor patient response to treatments for CRVO related macular oedema. Summary: IVTA injection when combined with FFA guided laser in BRVO eyes showed most favourable outcome in terms of both visual improvement and CMT during follow up period of 6 months.

Reply

Reply

Resident Cataract Surgery

Cataract Surgery Complication Rates

We found insufficient evidence from this review to inform practice for treatment of postoperative inflammation after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Based on the RCTs included in this review, we could not conclude the equivalence or superiority of NSAIDs with or without corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone. There may be some risk reduction of CME in the NSAID-alone group and the combination of NSAID plus corticosteroid group. Future RCTs on these interventions should standardize the type of medication used, dosing, and treatment regimen; data should be collected and presented using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) outcome measures so that dichotomous outcomes can be analyzed.

To compare orbital floor triamcinolone acetonide and oral prednisolone in cataract surgery in patients with chronic non-infectious uveitis with regard to visual outcome, postoperative inflammation and macular edema. Monocentric prospective randomized clinical trial with 40 eyes included. Patients underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular acrylic foldable lens (IOL) implantation. Patients were randomized either to intraoperative orbital floor triamcinolone acetonide (TA) (1 ml = 40 mg) (group 1, n = 20), or to 4-week postoperative oral prednisolone (group 2, n = 20). Laser flare photometry (LFM), cells in the anterior chamber (AC), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOL cell deposits, cystoid macular edema (CME) by means of fluorescein angiography, and central foveal thickness (OCT), posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were analysed during a 6-months period. Mean BCVA postoperatively improved (p < 0.01) from logMAR 0.74 and 0.86 to 0.23 and 0.35 in groups 1 and 2 respectively.The number of AC cells, LFM and IOL cell deposits did not differ. Macular edema stayed unchanged in most cases in both groups, and mean foveal thickness (OCT) initially increased postoperatively, but after 6 months it nearly returned to baseline thickness. Differences between the groups were not significant. Up to 12% in group 1 and 28% of group 2 developed IOP elevation over 21 mmHg. A single intraoperative orbital floor injection of triamcinolone acetonide is as effective on postoperative inflammation, macular edema, and visual outcome as a 4-week course of postoperative oral prednisolone in cataract surgery with IOL implantation in uveitis patients.

Aims:To evaluate the 1-month efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in treating macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) that was refractory to intravitreal bevacizumab.Materials and Methods:This retrospective, observational study included 23 eyes from 23 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO. Macular edema that did not respond to two or more consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab injections was treated with intravitreal TA. Central foveal thickness (CFT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared before and one month after TA injection.Results:Fifteen eyes were diagnosed with central RVO, and eight eyes were diagnosed with branch RVO. All patients were previously treated with 2.4 ± 0.6 intravitreal bevacizumab injections. The TA injection was performed, on average, 5.8 ± 1.4 weeks after the last bevacizumab injection. The CFT before TA injection was 516.6 ± 112.4 μm and significantly decreased to 402.3 ± 159.7 μm after TA therapy (P < 0.001). The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution BCVA was 0.72 ± 0.34 before TA therapy and was not significantly improved by the treatment (0.67 ± 0.35, P = 0.119), despite a decrease in CFT. However, seven eyes (30.4%) had a BCVA gain of one or more lines.Conclusions:Intravitreal TA therapy was beneficial in some patients with macular edema secondary to RVO that was refractory to intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. This study suggests that intravitreal TA should be considered as a treatment option for refractory macular edema.

Advances in pediatric asthma in 2009: Gaining control of childhood asthma