Cellular interactions in the pituitary stem cell niche

Epithelial and Mesenchymal Contribution to the Niche: A Safeguard for Intestinal Stem Cell Homeostasis

Regenerative medicine for male infertility: A focus on stem cell niche injury models

Quiescence regulators for hematopoietic stem cell

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant hematopoietic stem cell disorders that have the capacity to progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Accumulating evidence suggests that the altered bone marrow (BM) microenvironment in general, and in particular the components of the stem cell niche, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their progeny, play a pivotal role in the evolution and propagation of MDS. We here present an overview of the role of MSCs in the pathogenesis of MDS, with emphasis on cellular interactions in the BM microenvironment and related stem cell niche concepts. MSCs have potent immunomodulatory capacities and communicate with diverse immune cells, but also interact with various other cellular components of the microenvironment as well as with normal and leukemic stem and progenitor cells. Moreover, compared to normal MSCs, MSCs in MDS and AML often exhibit altered gene expression profiles, an aberrant phenotype, and abnormal functional properties. These alterations supposedly contribute to the “reprogramming” of the stem cell niche into a disease-permissive microenvironment where an altered immune system, abnormal stem cell niche interactions, and an impaired growth control lead to disease progression. The current article also reviews molecular targets that play a role in such cellular interactions and possibilities to interfere with abnormal stem cell niche interactions by using specific targeted drugs.

ABSTRACTStem cell niches act as signaling platforms that regulate stem cell self-renewal and sustain stem cells throughout life; however, the specific developmental events controlling their assembly are not well understood. Here, we show that during Drosophila ovarian germline stem cell niche formation, the status of Notch signaling in the cell can be reprogrammed. This is controlled via steroid-induced miR-125, which targets a negative regulator of Notch signaling, Tom. Thus, miR-125 acts as a spatiotemporal coordinator between paracrine Notch and endocrine steroid signaling. Moreover, a dual security mechanism for Notch signaling activation exists to ensure the robustness of niche assembly. Particularly, stem cell niche cells can be specified either via lateral inhibition, in which a niche cell precursor acquires Notch signal-sending status randomly, or via peripheral induction, whereby Delta is produced by a specific cell. When one mechanism is perturbed due to mutations, developmental defects or environmental stress, the remaining mechanism ensures that the niche is formed, perhaps abnormally, but still functional. This guarantees that the germline stem cells will have their residence, thereby securing progressive oogenesis and, thus, organism reproduction.

The multipotentiality and self-renewal ability of stem cells are controlled by intrinsic genetic pathways that are subject to regulation by extrinsic signals emanating from the stem cell niche. The stem cell niche provides a microenvironment composed of cellular structures or extracellular matrix in which stem cells are maintained as undifferentiated (1Li L. Xie T. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 605-631Crossref PubMed Scopus (942) Google Scholar, 2Lin H. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002; 3: 931-940Crossref PubMed Scopus (305) Google Scholar, 3Scadden D.T. Nature. 2006; 441: 1075-1079Crossref PubMed Scopus (1508) Google Scholar, 4Spradling A. Drummond-Barbosa D. Kai T. Nature. 2001; 414: 98-104Crossref PubMed Scopus (1215) Google Scholar, 5Watt F.M. Hogan B.L. Science. 2000; 287: 1427-1430Crossref PubMed Scopus (1474) Google Scholar, 6Fuchs E. Tumbar T. Guasch G. Cell. 2004; 116: 769-778Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1481) Google Scholar). The concept of "the stem cell niche" was first proposed in studies of the HSC 2The abbreviations used are:HSChematopoietic stem cellGSCgerm line stem cellBMbone marrowCARCXCL12-abundant reticularCBscystoblastsESCescort stem cellCPscyst progenitorsAng-1angiopoietin-1.2The abbreviations used are:HSChematopoietic stem cellGSCgerm line stem cellBMbone marrowCARCXCL12-abundant reticularCBscystoblastsESCescort stem cellCPscyst progenitorsAng-1angiopoietin-1. (7Schofield R. Blood Cells. 1978; 4: 7-25PubMed Google Scholar); however, in vivo evidence of its existence was first shown in the Drosophila GSC (8Cox D.N. Chao A. Baker J. Chang L. Qiao D. Lin H. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3715-3727Crossref PubMed Scopus (802) Google Scholar, 9King F.J. Lin H. Development (Camb.). 1999; 126: 1833-1844PubMed Google Scholar, 10Xie T. Spradling A.C. Science. 2000; 290: 328-330Crossref PubMed Scopus (620) Google Scholar). Over the past several years, there has been much progress made in identifying stem cell niches in different mammal tissues, including nerves, hair follicles, intestines, teeth, and BM (11Tumbar T. Guasch G. Greco V. Blanpain C. Lowry W.E. Rendl M. Fuchs E. Science. 2004; 303: 359-363Crossref PubMed Scopus (1631) Google Scholar, 12Yen T.H. Wright N.A. Stem Cell Rev. 2006; 2: 203-212Crossref PubMed Scopus (227) Google Scholar, 13Conover J.C. Notti R.Q. Cell Tissue Res. 2008; 331: 211-224Crossref PubMed Scopus (123) Google Scholar, 14Doetsch F. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2003; 13: 543-550Crossref PubMed Scopus (529) Google Scholar, 15Ohshima H. Nakasone N. Hashimoto E. Sakai H. Nakakura-Ohshima K. Harada H. Arch. Oral Biol. 2005; 50: 153-157Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar, 16Wilson A. Trumpp A. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006; 6: 93-106Crossref PubMed Scopus (1050) Google Scholar). In this review, our focus is on comparing Drosophila GSC niches and mouse HSC niches (two of the best characterized niches). By such comparison, we hope to provide some common principles of stem cell niches that will be useful in other tissue stem cell niche studies. hematopoietic stem cell germ line stem cell bone marrow CXCL12-abundant reticular cystoblasts escort stem cell cyst progenitors angiopoietin-1. hematopoietic stem cell germ line stem cell bone marrow CXCL12-abundant reticular cystoblasts escort stem cell cyst progenitors angiopoietin-1. In recent years, remarkable progress has been made in the identification and characterization of the stem cell niches in invertebrate systems (10Xie T. Spradling A.C. Science. 2000; 290: 328-330Crossref PubMed Scopus (620) Google Scholar, 17Tulina N. Matunis E. Science. 2001; 294: 2546-2549Crossref PubMed Scopus (506) Google Scholar, 18Kiger A.A. Jones D.L. Schulz C. Rogers M.B. Fuller M.T. Science. 2001; 294: 2542-2545Crossref PubMed Scopus (538) Google Scholar, 19Lin H. Spradling A.C. Dev. Genet. 1995; 16: 6-12Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar, 20Crittenden S.L. Bernstein D.S. Bachorik J.L. Thompson B.E. Gallegos M. Petcherski A.G. Moulder G. Barstead R. Wickens M. Kimble J. Nature. 2002; 417: 660-663Crossref PubMed Scopus (337) Google Scholar, 21Mandal L. Martinez-Agosto J.A. Evans C.J. Hartenstein V. Banerjee U. Nature. 2007; 446: 320-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar, 22Krzemien J. Dubois L. Makki R. Meister M. Vincent A. Crozatier M. Nature. 2007; 446: 325-328Crossref PubMed Scopus (246) Google Scholar). In studies of GSCs in Drosophila, the ovary and testis provide relatively simple but elegant anatomic structures with few cell types and unique stem cell markers. These advantages facilitated identification of the cellular components of the stem cell niche and definition of the molecular basis of physical interaction between stem cells and their niches (23Song X. Xie T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 14813-14818Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar, 24Yamashita Y.M. Jones D.L. Fuller M.T. Science. 2003; 301: 1547-1550Crossref PubMed Scopus (595) Google Scholar) and revealed key niche signals involved in stem cell regulation (18Kiger A.A. Jones D.L. Schulz C. Rogers M.B. Fuller M.T. Science. 2001; 294: 2542-2545Crossref PubMed Scopus (538) Google Scholar, 25LaFever L. Drummond-Barbosa D. Science. 2005; 309: 1071-1073Crossref PubMed Scopus (248) Google Scholar, 26Szakmary A. Cox D.N. Wang Z. Lin H. Curr. Biol. 2005; 15: 171-178Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (124) Google Scholar, 27Xie T. Spradling A.C. Cell. 1998; 94: 251-260Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (530) Google Scholar, 28Yamashita Y.M. Fuller M.T. Jones D.L. J. Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 665-672Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar, 29Parisi M.J. Lin H. Cell Res. 1998; 8: 15-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 30King F.J. Szakmary A. Cox D.N. Lin H. Mol. Cell. 2001; 7: 497-508Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar, 31Wang Z. Lin H. Science. 2004; 303: 2016-2019Crossref PubMed Scopus (197) Google Scholar). In the murine hematopoietic system, HSCs have been well defined (32Spangrude G.J. Heimfeld S. Weissman I.L. Science. 1988; 241: 58-62Crossref PubMed Scopus (2226) Google Scholar, 33Weissman I.L. Science. 2000; 287: 1442-1446Crossref PubMed Scopus (713) Google Scholar), but identification of the HSC niches is just beginning. This search has been hampered by the complexity of the BM structure and cellular components and by the lack of unique HSC markers or distinctive characteristics of BM stromal cells. Two HSC niches have been proposed in murine BM, an osteoblastic niche and a vascular niche, in which osteoblasts and vascular endothelial cells have been demonstrated as major components, respectively (34Zhang J. Niu C. Ye L. Huang H. He X. Tong W.G. Ross J. Haug J. Johnson T. Feng J.Q. Harris S. Wiedemann L.M. Mishina Y. Li L. Nature. 2003; 425: 836-841Crossref PubMed Scopus (2385) Google Scholar, 35Calvi L.M. Adams G.B. Weibrecht K.W. Weber J.M. Olson D.P. Knight M.C. Martin R.P. Schipani E. Divieti P. Bringhurst F.R. Milner L.A. Kronenberg H.M. Scadden D.T. Nature. 2003; 425: 841-846Crossref PubMed Scopus (2799) Google Scholar, 36Arai F. Hirao A. Ohmura M. Sato H. Matsuoka S. Takubo K. Ito K. Koh G.Y. Suda T. Cell. 2004; 118: 149-161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1540) Google Scholar, 37Nilsson S.K. Johnston H.M. Whitty G.A. Williams B. Webb R.J. Denhardt D.T. Bertoncello I. Bendall L.J. Simmons P.J. Haylock D.N. Blood. 2005; 106: 1232-1239Crossref PubMed Scopus (605) Google Scholar, 38Heissig B. Rafii S. Akiyama H. Ohki Y. Sato Y. Rafael T. Zhu Z. Hicklin D.J. Okumura K. Ogawa H. Werb Z. Hattori K. J. Exp. Med. 2005; 202: 739-750Crossref PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar, 39Moore K.A. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2004; 11: 107-111Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar, 40Taichman R.S. Blood. 2005; 105: 2631-2639Crossref PubMed Scopus (469) Google Scholar, 41Kiel M.J. Yilmaz O.H. Iwashita T. Terhorst C. Morrison S.J. Cell. 2005; 121: 1109-1121Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2414) Google Scholar). A recent study suggested that a population of reticular cells named CAR cells, which express a high level of CXCL12 (also known as stromal cell-derived factor-1 or pre-B cell growth-stimulating factor), are in contact with HSCs in both osteoblastic and vascular niches (42Sugiyama T. Kohara H. Noda M. Nagasawa T. Immunity. 2006; 25: 977-988Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1693) Google Scholar). Drosophila ovary and testis provide attractive models for stem cell niche studies. In Drosophila ovary, cap cells, a specific type of somatic cell located at the tip of the germarium in the ovary, function as the niche for GSCs. An E-cadherin/β-catenin-formed cell-cell adhesion junction mediates the physical interaction between GSCs and their niche cells (23Song X. Xie T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 14813-14818Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar, 46Song X. Zhu C.H. Doan C. Xie T. Science. 2002; 296: 1855-1857Crossref PubMed Scopus (389) Google Scholar), ensuring stem cell control by niche signals. Normally, asymmetric division of stem cells results in two daughter cells with different fates: one daughter cell attaches to the niche and is maintained as a stem cell (self-renewal), whereas the other daughter cell leaves the niche and develops into a cystoblast (1Li L. Xie T. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 605-631Crossref PubMed Scopus (942) Google Scholar, 4Spradling A. Drummond-Barbosa D. Kai T. Nature. 2001; 414: 98-104Crossref PubMed Scopus (1215) Google Scholar). CBs undergo four incomplete cell divisions to form an interconnected 2–16-cell germ line cyst. In addition to the GSC, another type of cell called the ESC also attaches to cap cells interspersed between the GSCs. Together with cap cells, ESCs encapsulate GSCs to separate GSCs from their differentiated daughter cells. When the GSCs divide and detach from the niche to produce CBs and cyst cells, the ESCs also proliferate and differentiate to produce more escort cells. The escort cells expand and continue to encapsulate CBs and cysts during the process of cyst formation and are finally replaced by follicle cells after the 16-cell germ line cyst stage (Fig. 1a). Interestingly, the newly formed cysts (prior to the eight-cell cyst stage, while still encapsulated by the escort cell) can revert to the stem cell state under certain circumstances, suggesting that they may still retain (albeit limited) stem cell properties (47Kai T. Spradling A. Nature. 2004; 428: 564-569Crossref PubMed Scopus (267) Google Scholar). A similar niche is also found in Drosophila testis and is composed of hub cells located at the end of the testis (48Le Bras S. Van Doren M. Dev. Biol. 2006; 294: 92-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar). Male GSCs surrounding the hub cells are interspersed with CPs (which are counterparts of ESCs in the ovary). Both GSCs and CPs are attached to the hub cells through an adhesion junction. Similar to ESCs in the ovary, proliferation and differentiation of CPs always accompany proliferation and differentiation of GSCs. CPs in the testis produce cyst cells, which encapsulate the gonialblasts (the immediate daughters of male GSCs) during spermatogonium formation (Fig. 1b). The newly formed gonialblasts can also revert to stem cells under certain circumstances, resembling their counterpart cells (CBs and cysts) in the ovary (49Brawley C. Matunis E. Science. 2004; 304: 1331-1334Crossref PubMed Scopus (326) Google Scholar). The role of cap and hub cells in GSC regulation has been well studied, but the contribution of ESCs and their offspring in the ovary and CPs and their progeny in the testis to GSC self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation is largely unknown. However, it is known that a dialogue between the two types of cells is required for the coordination during organogenesis (30King F.J. Szakmary A. Cox D.N. Lin H. Mol. Cell. 2001; 7: 497-508Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar). Cap and hub cells provide an attachment point for anchoring GSCs to the niche; they also produce signals that inhibit differentiation but promote self-renewal of stem cells (17Tulina N. Matunis E. Science. 2001; 294: 2546-2549Crossref PubMed Scopus (506) Google Scholar). The stem cell niches in mammals are very complicated because of the complexity of cellular components of mammalian tissues, even though the mechanism for niche regulation is conserved from invertebrate to vertebrate. In mammals, BM tissue is composed of more than eight different hematopoietic cell lineages supported by a network of mesenchymal stromal cells and vascular endothelial cells. The two HSC niches, osteoblastic (34Zhang J. Niu C. Ye L. Huang H. He X. Tong W.G. Ross J. Haug J. Johnson T. Feng J.Q. Harris S. Wiedemann L.M. Mishina Y. Li L. Nature. 2003; 425: 836-841Crossref PubMed Scopus (2385) Google Scholar, 35Calvi L.M. Adams G.B. Weibrecht K.W. Weber J.M. Olson D.P. Knight M.C. Martin R.P. Schipani E. Divieti P. Bringhurst F.R. Milner L.A. Kronenberg H.M. Scadden D.T. Nature. 2003; 425: 841-846Crossref PubMed Scopus (2799) Google Scholar, 36Arai F. Hirao A. Ohmura M. Sato H. Matsuoka S. Takubo K. Ito K. Koh G.Y. Suda T. Cell. 2004; 118: 149-161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1540) Google Scholar, 37Nilsson S.K. Johnston H.M. Whitty G.A. Williams B. Webb R.J. Denhardt D.T. Bertoncello I. Bendall L.J. Simmons P.J. Haylock D.N. Blood. 2005; 106: 1232-1239Crossref PubMed Scopus (605) Google Scholar, 38Heissig B. Rafii S. Akiyama H. Ohki Y. Sato Y. Rafael T. Zhu Z. Hicklin D.J. Okumura K. Ogawa H. Werb Z. Hattori K. J. Exp. Med. 2005; 202: 739-750Crossref PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar, 39Moore K.A. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2004; 11: 107-111Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar, 40Taichman R.S. Blood. 2005; 105: 2631-2639Crossref PubMed Scopus (469) Google Scholar, 41Kiel M.J. Yilmaz O.H. Iwashita T. Terhorst C. Morrison S.J. Cell. 2005; 121: 1109-1121Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2414) Google Scholar, 50Balduino A. Hurtado S.P. Frazao P. Takiya C.M. Alves L.M. Nasciutti L.E. El-Cheikh M.C. Borojevic R. Cell Tissue Res. 2005; 319: 255-266Crossref PubMed Scopus (90) Google Scholar, 51Arai F. Hirao A. Suda T. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2005; 15: 75-79Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar, 52Adams G.B. Chabner K.T. Alley I.R. Olson D.P. Szczepiorkowski Z.M. Poznansky M.C. Kos C.H. Pollak M.R. Brown E.M. Scadden D.T. Nature. 2006; 439: 599-603Crossref PubMed Scopus (600) Google Scholar) and vascular (41Kiel M.J. Yilmaz O.H. Iwashita T. Terhorst C. Morrison S.J. Cell. 2005; 121: 1109-1121Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2414) Google Scholar, 53Kopp H.G. Avecilla S.T. Hooper A.T. Rafii S. Physiology. 2005; 20: 349-356Crossref PubMed Scopus (414) Google Scholar), are found in adult BM tissue. The vascular niche might also exist in fetal hematopoietic tissues such as yolk sac, aorta-gonad-mesonephros region, placenta, liver, and spleen (54Tavian M. Peault B. Exp. Hematol. 2005; 33: 1062-1069Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar, 55Basto D. Trovisco V. Lopes J.M. Martins A. Pardal F. Soares P. Reis R.M. Acta Neuropathol. 2005; 109: 207-210Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 56Gekas C. Dieterlen-Lièvre F. Orkin S.H. Millola H.K.A. Dev. Cell. 2005; 8: 365-375Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (504) Google Scholar) as well as in adult spleen and liver. Both niches may be critical for HSC self-renewal. Cooperation between these two niches might be required for maintaining normal hematopoietic homeostasis and re-establishing hematopoiesis after injury. Accumulated evidence supports the existence of an osteoblastic niche in BM. The concurrence of hematopoiesis and osteogenesis in BM suggests a close relationship between bone-forming cells and hematopoietic cells (57Patt H.M. Maloney M.A. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1972; 140: 205-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 58Maloney M.A. Patt H.M. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1975; 149: 94-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar). Early studies demonstrated that endosteal BM is more highly enriched with HSCs/progenitors compared with central BM (59Lord B.I. Testa N.G. Hendry J.H. Blood. 1975; 46: 65-72Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 60Gong J.K. Science. 1978; 199: 1443-1445Crossref PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar). The facts that hematopoiesis recovery after myeloablative injury occurs on the endosteal bone surface (45Heissig B. Hattori K. Dias S. Friedrich M. Ferris B. Hackett N.R. Crystal R.G. Besmer P. Lyden D. Moore M.A. Werb Z. Rafii S. Cell. 2002; 109: 625-637Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1510) Google Scholar) and that the majority of HSCs/progenitors are distributed in the endosteal region after transplantation (61Nilsson S.K. Johnston H.M. Coverdale J.A. Blood. 2001; 97: 2293-2299Crossref PubMed Scopus (473) Google Scholar) support the importance of the endosteal BM microenvironment in HSC maintenance and regulation. Several genetically modulated mutant mouse models exhibit defects in hematopoiesis as a consequence of abnormal bone formation or remodeling, indicating the important role of osteoblasts in supporting HSCs in BM (62Deguchi K. Yagi H. Inada M. Yoshizaki K. Kishimoto T. Komori T. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999; 255: 352-359Crossref PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar, 63Ducy P. Zhang R. Geoffroy V. Ridall A.L. Karsenty G. Cell. 1997; 89: 747-754Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3630) Google Scholar, 64Gerber H.P. Vu T.H. Ryan A.M. Kowalski J. Werb Z. Ferrara N. Nat. Med. 1999; 5: 623-628Crossref PubMed Scopus (1707) Google Scholar, 65Nilsson S.K. Bertoncello I. Exp. Hematol. 1994; 22: 377-383PubMed Google Scholar, 66Begg S.K. Radley J.M. Pollard J.W. Chisholm O.T. Stanley E.R. Bertoncello I. J. Exp. Med. 1993; 177: 237-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar, 67Wang S. Wang Q. Crute B.E. Melnikova I.N. Keller S.R. Speck N.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993; 13: 3324-3339Crossref PubMed Scopus (394) Google Scholar). Significant reduction in the number or functional disruption of osteoblasts leads to significant reduction in BM HSCs, and this often results in extramedullary hematopoiesis in the spleen (68Visnjic D. Kalajzic Z. Rowe D.W. Katavic V. Lorenzo J. Aguila H.L. Blood. 2004; 103: 3258-3264Crossref PubMed Scopus (598) Google Scholar). Additional trabecular bone formation and a corresponding increase in the number of osteoblasts in mice correlate with an increase in the number of BM HSCs (34Zhang J. Niu C. Ye L. Huang H. He X. Tong W.G. Ross J. Haug J. Johnson T. Feng J.Q. Harris S. Wiedemann L.M. Mishina Y. Li L. Nature. 2003; 425: 836-841Crossref PubMed Scopus (2385) Google Scholar, 35Calvi L.M. Adams G.B. Weibrecht K.W. Weber J.M. Olson D.P. Knight M.C. Martin R.P. Schipani E. Divieti P. Bringhurst F.R. Milner L.A. Kronenberg H.M. Scadden D.T. Nature. 2003; 425: 841-846Crossref PubMed Scopus (2799) Google Scholar). Moreover, osteoblastic cells support HSC self-renewal in in vitro culture (40Taichman R.S. Blood. 2005; 105: 2631-2639Crossref PubMed Scopus (469) Google Scholar) and enhance BM engraftment of HSCs in vivo when they are co-transplanted (69El-Badri N.S. Wang B.Y. Cherry Good R.A. Exp. Hematol. 1998; 26: 110-116PubMed Google Scholar) into recipient mice. Direct evidence of osteoblasts as the HSC niche has been provided in studies of several genetically modulated mouse models (35Calvi L.M. Adams G.B. Weibrecht K.W. Weber J.M. Olson D.P. Knight M.C. Martin R.P. Schipani E. Divieti P. Bringhurst F.R. Milner L.A. Kronenberg H.M. Scadden D.T. Nature. 2003; 425: 841-846Crossref PubMed Scopus (2799) Google Scholar, 36Arai F. Hirao A. Ohmura M. Sato H. Matsuoka S. Takubo K. Ito K. Koh G.Y. Suda T. Cell. 2004; 118: 149-161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1540) Google Scholar, 68Visnjic D. Kalajzic Z. Rowe D.W. Katavic V. Lorenzo J. Aguila H.L. Blood. 2004; 103: 3258-3264Crossref PubMed Scopus (598) Google Scholar, 70Wilson A. Murphy M.J. Oskarsson T. Kaloulis K. Bettess M.D. Oser G.M. Pasche A.C. Knabenhans C. MacDonald H.R. Trumpp A. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2747-2763Crossref PubMed Scopus (587) Google Scholar, 71Katayama Y. Battista M. Kao W.M. Hidalgo A. Cell. 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is that osteoblasts function as the HSC niche; we found that a of osteoblasts that express a high level of function as a key of the osteoblastic niche (34Zhang J. Niu C. Ye L. Huang H. He X. Tong W.G. Ross J. Haug J. Johnson T. Feng J.Q. Harris S. Wiedemann L.M. Mishina Y. Li L. Nature. 2003; 425: 836-841Crossref PubMed Scopus (2385) Google Scholar). This is supported by in vitro functional studies that an increase in in cells BM stromal cell by or the ability of cells to support HSCs F. Hirao A. Ohmura M. Sato H. Matsuoka S. Takubo K. Ito K. Koh G.Y. Suda T. Cell. 2004; 118: 149-161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1540) Google Scholar). The existence of an osteoblastic niche has also been in several other studies. and A. Murphy M.J. Oskarsson T. Kaloulis K. Bettess M.D. Oser G.M. Pasche A.C. Knabenhans C. MacDonald H.R. Trumpp A. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2747-2763Crossref PubMed Scopus (587) Google Scholar) found that the majority of HSCs/progenitors in the and to osteoblastic cells By they demonstrated that HSCs with have and adhesion to osteoblastic niche cells and to from the osteoblastic niche for proliferation, and differentiation A. Murphy M.J. Oskarsson T. Kaloulis K. Bettess M.D. Oser G.M. Pasche A.C. Knabenhans C. MacDonald H.R. Trumpp A. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2747-2763Crossref PubMed Scopus (587) Google Scholar). HSCs in the osteoblastic niche are relatively during normal homeostasis but can be as a of bone A. S. A. K. Y. M. R.M. P. A. A. T. Nat. Med. 2006; 12: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) or Y. Battista M. Kao W.M. Hidalgo A. Cell. 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). M.J. Morrison S.J. Cell Stem Cell. 2007; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) that HSCs lack however, that is by HSCs, its is when HSCs are in different found that HSCs to of can the hematopoietic in mice but with the more X. J. J. K. Cell Stem in In which function in bone remodeling, have also been shown to HSC and maintenance by osteoblasts A. S. A. K. Y. M. R.M. P. A. A. T. Nat. Med. 2006; 12: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). However, on the of the a reduction in the number of osteoblasts may HSC function that HSCs in a for osteoblastic mouse models such as mice and mice Y. Battista M. Kao W.M. Hidalgo A. Cell. 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. J. G.A. P. Scadden D.T. L.E. Cell. 2007; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J.M. N.A. L.E. Orkin S.H. Cell. 2007; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) have demonstrated that reduction in trabecular bone or number HSC in a number of HSCs in BM and and extramedullary hematopoiesis in the the vascular niche is and the stage for into and In BM, some of the in the matrix of the osteoblastic niche may also be important for HSC and a matrix by is a of the HSC osteoblastic niche that the of the stem cell and may provide a mechanism for stem cell under of niche S. Y. R. C. T. E. T. D. L.M. S.R. Scadden D.T. J. Exp. Med. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In the high of in the BM endosteal region mediates HSC and in the osteoblastic niche by HSCs through a that is highly in HSCs G.B. Chabner K.T. Alley I.R. Olson D.P. Szczepiorkowski Z.M. Poznansky M.C. Kos C.H. Pollak M.R. Brown E.M. Scadden D.T. Nature. 2006; 439: 599-603Crossref PubMed Scopus (600) Google Scholar). endothelial cells from hematopoietic tissue more support hematopoiesis compared with endothelial cells from other H.G. Avecilla S.T. Hooper A.T. Rafii S. Physiology. 2005; 20: 349-356Crossref PubMed Scopus (414) Google Scholar, C. Z. C. H. R. B. L.A. Blood. 1998; PubMed Google Scholar, M.A. A.M. C. P. L.E. T. Mol. Cell. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, P. J.K. 2004; 126: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). (41Kiel M.J. Yilmaz O.H. Iwashita T. Terhorst C. Morrison S.J. Cell. 2005; 121: 1109-1121Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2414) Google Scholar) have demonstrated that HSCs to the of in BM and spleen in mice after HSC and also to BM during The of a number of HSCs in the vascular niche that the BM and spleen provides a specific niche for proliferation, and differentiation under both and The that HSCs detach from the osteoblastic niche and the of BM to the vascular region, they hematopoiesis during hematopoietic after S.T. Hattori K. B. R. F. K. Dias S. Zhang F. Hackett N.R. Crystal R.G. L. Hicklin D.J. P. D. Lyden D. F. Rafii S. Nat. Med. 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, 53Kopp H.G. Avecilla S.T. Hooper A.T. Rafii S. Physiology. 2005; 20: 349-356Crossref PubMed Scopus (414) Google Scholar, S. R. F. Moore M.A. 1997; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), also suggests the existence of a vascular BM HSC niche. However, the that of osteoblasts results in a reduction of HSCs in BM and extramedullary hematopoiesis (68Visnjic D. Kalajzic Z. Rowe D.W. Katavic V. Lorenzo J. Aguila H.L. Blood. 2004; 103: 3258-3264Crossref PubMed Scopus (598) Google Scholar) suggests that the vascular niche may provide a J.M. Li L. Cell. 2007; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). CXCL12 is a that cell through interaction with its which is by the cells. in including HSC in BM during the of hematopoiesis from fetal to BM, cell and cell and as demonstrated by mutant mice with disruption T. K. T. T. K. Nagasawa T. Immunity. 2003; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). important in HSC and HSC of mice (the into the that CXCL12 is by a population of stromal cells BM (42Sugiyama T. Kohara H. Noda M. Nagasawa T. Immunity. 2006; 25: 977-988Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1693) Google Scholar, K. T. T. B.I. Nagasawa T. Immunity. 2004; 20: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar,

The best known cases of cell autotomy are the formation of erythrocytes and thrombocytes (platelets) from progenitor cells that reside in special niches. Recently, autotomy of stem cells and its enigmatic interaction with the niche has been reported from male germline stem cells (GSCs) in several insect species. First described in lepidopterans, the silkmoth, followed by the gipsy moth and consecutively in hemipterans, foremost the milkweed bug. In both, moths and the milkweed bug, GSCs form finger-like projections toward the niche, the apical cells (homologs of the hub cells in Drosophila). Whereas in the milkweed bug the projection terminals remain at the surface of the niche cells, in the gipsy moth they protrude deeply into the singular niche cell. In both cases, the projections undergo serial retrograde fragmentation with progressing signs of autophagy. In the gipsy moth, the autotomized vesicles are phagocytized and digested by the niche cell. In the milkweed bug the autotomized vesicles accumulate at the niche surface and disintegrate. Autotomy and sprouting of new projections appears to occur continuously. The significance of the GSC-niche interactions, however, remains enigmatic. Our concept on the signaling relationship between stem cell-niche in general and GSC and niche (hub cells and cyst stem cells) in particular has been greatly shaped by Drosophila melanogaster. In comparing the interactions of GSCs with their niche in Drosophila with those in species exhibiting GSC autotomy it is obvious that additional or alternative modes of stem cell-niche communication exist. Thus, essential signaling pathways, including niche-stem cell adhesion (E-cadherin) and the direction of asymmetrical GSC division - as they were found in Drosophila - can hardly be translated into the systems where GSC autotomy was reported. It is shown here that the serial autotomy of GSC projections shows remarkable similarities with Wallerian axonal destruction, developmental axon pruning and dying-back degeneration in neurodegenerative diseases. Especially the hypothesis of an existing evolutionary conserved "autodestruction program" in axons that might also be active in GSC projections appears attractive. Investigations on the underlying signaling pathways have to be carried out. There are two other well known cases of programmed cell autotomy: the enucleation of erythroblasts in the process of erythrocyte maturation and the segregation of thousands of thrombocytes (platelets) from one megakaryocyte. Both progenitor cell types - erythroblasts and megakaryocytes - are associated with a niche in the bone marrow, erythroblasts with a macrophage, which they surround, and the megakaryocytes with the endothelial cells of sinusoids and their extracellular matrix. Although the regulatory mechanisms may be specific in each case, there is one aspect that connects all described processes of programmed cell autotomy and neuronal autodestruction: apoptotic pathways play always a prominent role. Studies on the role of male GSC autotomy in stem cell-niche interaction have just started but are expected to reveal hitherto unknown ways of signal exchange. Spermatogenesis in mammals advance our understanding of insect spermatogenesis. Mammal and insect spermatogenesis share some broad principles, but a comparison of the signaling pathways is difficult. We have intimate knowledge from Drosophila, but of almost no other insect, and we have only limited knowledge from mammals. The discovery of stem cell autotomy as part of the interaction with the niche promises new general insights into the complicated stem cell-niche interdependence.

Stem cells reside in a highly specialized, complex microenvironment that is known as the stem cell niche. The stem cell niche can be described as an anatomically defined space where the stem cell is localized and nourished and stem cell quiescence, proliferation and differentiation are maintained. Tissue engineering aims to imitate the stem cell niche to (I) induce a directed differentiation, (II) maintain the self-renewal capacity or (III) find a regulated balance between self-renewal and differentiation. Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSC) can differentiate in three-dimensional collagen gels into functional osteoblasts when subjected to a phosphate-rich cultivation medium. Furthermore, they acquire a prosynthetic, matrix remodeling, contractile phenotype. Medial artery calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease also proceeds through intramembranous ossification resulting from osteoblast-induced calcification of the collagen extracellular matrix. Thus, the influence of uremic cultivation conditions as a pathophysiological stimulus on MSC and endothelial cells was analyzed with special regards to matrix remodeling, vascularization and calcification. The results showed that BMP-2/4 mediated MSC (mal)differentiation into osteoblasts with acquired matrix remodeling phenotype and loss of proangiogenic capacity. These studies have led to the conclusion that uremia has detrimental effects on the stem cell niche and promotes the continuous calcification by osteogenic (mal)differentiation. In summary, recent studies have shown the conducting and regulating effect of the stem cell niche under physiological conditions that can be applied and mimicked for tissue engineering applications. However, under pathological conditions the stem cell niche can have detrimental effects on stem cell function and can promote disease progression.

The stem cell niche provides a regulatory microenvironment for cells as diverse as totipotent embryonic stem cells to cancer stem cells (CSCs) which exhibit stem cell-like characteristics and have the capability of regenerating the bulk of tumor cells while maintaining self-renewal potential. The transmembrane glycoprotein CD44 is a common component of the stem cell niche and exists as a standard isoform (CD44s) and a range of variant isoforms (CD44v) generated though alternative splicing. CD44 modulates signal transduction through post-translational modifications as well as interactions with hyaluronan, extracellular matrix molecules and growth factors and their cognate receptor tyrosine kinases. While the function of CD44 in hematopoietic stem cells has been studied in considerable detail, our knowledge of CD44 function in tissue-derived stem cell niches remains limited. Here we review CD44s and CD44v in both hematopoietic and tissue-derived stem cell niches, focusing on their roles in regulating stem cell behavior including self-renewal and differentiation in addition to cell-matrix interactions and signal transduction during cell migration and tumor progression. Determining the role of CD44 and CD44v in normal stem cell, CSC and (pre)metastatic niches and elucidating their unique functions could provide tools and therapeutic strategies for treating diseases as diverse as fibrosis during injury repair to cancer progression.

Stem cells guarantee tissue repair and regeneration throughout life. The decision between cell self-renewal and differentiation is influenced by a specialized microenvironment called the 'stem cell niche'. In the tooth, stem cell niches are formed at specific anatomic locations of the dental pulp. The microenvironment of these niches regulates how dental pulp stem cell populations participate in tissue maintenance, repair, and regeneration. Signaling molecules such as Notch proteins are important regulators of stem cell function, with various capacities to induce proliferation or differentiation. Dental injuries often lead to odontoblast apoptosis, which triggers activation of dental pulp stem cells followed by their proliferation, migration, and differentiation into odontoblast-like cells, which elaborate a reparative dentin. Better knowledge of the regulation of dental pulp stem cells within their niches in pathological conditions will aid in the development of novel treatments for dental tissue repair and regeneration.

SUMMARYPlant stem cells in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and root apical meristem (RAM) provide for postembryonic development of above-ground tissues and roots, respectively, while secondary vascular stem cells sustain vascular development1–4. WUSCHEL (WUS), a homeodomain transcription factor expressed in the rib meristem of the SAM, is a key regulatory factor controlling stem cell populations in the Arabidopsis SAM5–6 and is thought to establish the shoot stem cell niche via a feedback circuit with the CLAVATA3 (CLV3) peptide signaling pathway7. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX5 (WOX5), specifically expressed in root quiescent center (QC), defines QC identity and functions interchangeably with WUS in control of shoot and root stem cell niches8. WOX4, expressed in Arabidopsis procambial cells, defines the vascular stem cell niche9–11. WUS/WOX family proteins are evolutionarily and functionally conserved throughout the plant kingdom12 and emerge as key actors in the specification and maintenance of stem cells within all meristems13. However, the nature of the genetic regime in stem cell niches that centers on WOX gene function has been elusive, and molecular links underlying conserved WUS/WOX function in stem cell niches remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that the Arabidopsis HAIRY MERISTEM (HAM)family transcription regulators act as conserved interacting co-factors with WUS/WOX proteins. HAM and WUS share common targets in vivo and their physical interaction is important in driving downstream transcriptional programs and in promoting shoot stem cell proliferation. Differences in the overlapping expression patterns of WOX and HAM family members underlie the formation of diverse stem cell niche locations, and the HAM family is essential for all of these stem cell niches. These findings establish a new framework for the control of stem cell production during plant development.

The pituitary gland represents the endocrine core, governing the body's hormonal landscape by adapting its cellular composition to changing demands. It is assumed that stem/progenitor cells are involved in this remodeling. Recently, we uncovered a candidate stem/progenitor cell population in the anterior pituitary. Here, we scrutinized this "side population" (SP) and show that, unexpectedly, not the subset expressing high levels of "stem cell antigen-1" (Sca1(high)) but the remainder non-Sca1(high) fraction clusters the pituitary progenitor cells. Transcriptomal interrogation revealed in the non-Sca1(high) SP upregulated expression of the pituitary stem/progenitor cell markers Sox2 and Sox9, and of multiple factors critically involved in pituitary embryogenesis. The non-Sca1(high) SP encloses the cells that generate spheres and display multipotent hormone differentiation capacity. In culture conditions selecting for the non-Sca1(high) subset within the SP, stem cell growth factors that induce SP expansion, affect transcription of embryonic factors, suggesting impact on a developmental program that unfolds within this SP compartment. Non-Sca1(high) SP cells, revealed by Sox2 expression, are observed in the postulated periluminal stem/progenitor cell niche, but also in small groups scattered over the gland, thereby advocating the existence of multiple niches. In early postnatal mice undergoing a pituitary growth wave, Sox2(+) cells are more abundant than in adults, concordant with a larger SP and higher non-Sca1(high) proportion. Together, we tracked down pituitary progenitor cells by SP phenotype, and thus provide a straightforward method to isolate and scrutinize these cells from the plastic pituitary ex vivo, as well as a culture system for in-depth exploration of their regulatory network.

Editorial: unlocking the potential of stem cells in cell therapy, drug delivery and drug discovery.

Lander et al. BMC Biology 2012, 10:19 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/19 FORUM Open Access What does the concept of the stem cell niche really mean today? Arthur D Lander, Judith Kimble, Hans Clevers, Elaine Fuchs, Didier Montarras, Margaret Buckingham, Anne L Calof, Andreas Trumpp and Thordur Oskarsson The richness of niche-ness – an introduction Arthur D Lander Ideas about stem cells, and how they behave, have been undergoing a lot of change in recent years, thanks to developments in visualizing, monitoring, and manipulating cells and tissues. Curious to find out what impact these changes are having on one of the most enduring and widely accepted metaphors in stem cell biology – the idea of the stem cell niche – BMC Biology asked researchers working on a variety of systems to write about their current conception of what a stem cell niche really is. The answers presented below suggest that the detailed mechanisms underlying niche function are extremely varied. Niches may be composed of cells, or cells together with extracellular structures such as the extracellular matrix (ECM). They may be sources of secreted or cell surface factors – including members of the Notch, Wnt, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, stem cell factor (SCF), and chemokine families – that control stem cell renewal, maintenance, or survival. They may consist of just a single cell type, or a whole host of interacting cells. They may derive from cells outside the stem cell’s lineage, or they may derive primarily from the stem cell’s own descendents. In general, there seems to be much more consensus about the fact that stem cells invariably need niches than about the specific mechanisms by which niches do their jobs. Why should a stem cell need a special environment? This is a pertinent question, given that none of the elementary processes that stem cells rely upon – growing, dividing, differentiating – are unique to stem cells. We can easily imagine three classes of answers: One possibility is that there are demands placed on stem cells that necessitate special support for viability. For example, the need, imposed by cellular immortality, to minimize the accumulation of genetic damage, may drive stem cells to adopt a peculiar metabolic state that Correspondence: bmcbiologyeditorial@biomedcentral.com might force them to rely upon other cells nearby for sustenance. This ‘nutritive’ function of the niche remains a formal possibility, but in most systems few experimental data in support of it have so far emerged. A second possibility is that niches are agents of feedback control. Recent studies tell us that stem cell pools are not slavishly maintained at a constant size by fixed, asymmetric divisions, but are usually capable of expanding or contracting and, even under homeostatic conditions, may face large stochastic fluctuations. The varied growth factors and cell surface molecules produced by niche cells may share the common goal of controlling stem cell pools. If this is the case, then the niche might best be thought of not simply as an environment conducive to stem cell functioning, but as an apparatus for communicating information about the state of a tissue back to the stem cells that maintain it. An important question to address would then be how niches obtain and relay such information. A third possibility is that niches are instruments of coordination among tissue compartments. Some of the best evidence for this view comes from work on the hair follicle niche, described below by Elaine Fuchs. There, stem and progenitor cells responsible for maintenance of epidermis, pigmentation, hair, and connective and adipose tissue all interact in close proximity. A need to achieve tight coordination among these different cell populations may be the overriding reason for complex organization of this niche. The possibility that other niches may also be hubs of inter-lineage coordination is certainly an idea worth investigating. The C. elegans distal tip cell and the concept of a stem cell niche Judith Kimble Schofield originally hypothesized the existence of a microenvironment required for maintenance of stem cells and coined the term stem cell niche [1] (Figure 1a, left). The first example of such a stem cell niche was the mesenchymal ‘distal tip cell’ (DTC) in Caenorhabditis © 2012 Lander et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Basic Science.