Cervical chordomas: multicenter case series and meta-analysis.

A large number of different clinically acceptable and equivalent regimens for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer have been identified. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that any one drug or regimen used for retreatment is superior to any other. In vitro chemoresponse assays have been investigated for informing effective treatment selection for recurrent ovarian cancer. The value of these assays to yield useful clinical information has been a subject of considerable debate among oncologists because of lack of information from well-controlled prospective trials and conflicting data from retrospective trials. This prospective, multicenter, clinical trial evaluated the use of a chemoresponse assay to improve clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer were enrolled at 35 sites across the United States under an institutional review board–approved protocol. Viable tumor tissue samples were collected for the chemoresponse assay. Patients received 1 of 15 protocol-designated treatments empirically chosen by oncologists blinded to the assay results. The in vitro response of each treatment was classified as sensitive (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R). The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Associations of the in vitro response for each treatment with PFS and OS were analyzed. Between 2004 and 2011, a total of 262 eligible patients were enrolled. The patients treated with an assay-sensitive regimen had significantly improved PFS and OS compared with those treated with an assay-resistant regimen; there was no difference in these outcomes between the I and R groups. With univariate analysis, the median PFS was 8.8 months for S versus 5.9 months for I + R; the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.67, P = 0.009. Multivariate analysis showed that the association with the in vitro response was consistent within platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant subpopulations (HR, 0.71 vs 0.66, respectively) and was independent of other covariates (P = 0.020). There was also a significant 14-month improvement in mean OS (37.5 months for S vs 23.9 months for I + R; HR, 0.61; P = 0.010). The findings of this prospective study show significant improvement in both PFS and OS among patients with either platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer when they are treated with assay-sensitive agents. Improvements in PFS and OS were both greater than 50%. This study is the first prospective clinical trial of this design conducted.

We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of antigen-specific immunotherapy (Belagenpumatucel-L, MAGE-A3, L-BLP25, and TG4010) in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Eligible studies were clinical trials of patients with NSCLC who received the antigenspecific immunotherapy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and the incidence of adverse events. In total, six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 4,806 patients were included. Pooled results showed that, antigen-specific immunotherapy did not significantly prolong OS (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.83, 1.01; P=0.087) and PFS (HR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.85, 1.01; P=0.088), but improved ORR (RR=1.72, 95%CI: 1.11, 2.68; P=0.016). Subgroup analysis based on treatment agents showed that, tecemotide was associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.74, 0.99; P=0.03) and PFS (HR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.49, 0.99, P=0.044); TG4010 was associated with an improvement in PFS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.75, 1.00, P=0.058). In addition, NSCLC patients who were treated with antigen-specific immunotherapy exhibited a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than those treated with other treatments (RR=1.11, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.24; P=0.046). Our study demonstrated the clinical survival benefits of tecemotide and TG4010 in the treatment of NSCLC. However, these evidence might be limited by potential biases. Therefore, further well-conducted, large-scale RCTs are needed to verify our findings.

1104 Background: HER2-Low breast cancer (BC) has been recently identified as a new therapeutic target. However, it is unclear if HER2-Low status has an independent impact on prognosis, both in metastatic and early settings. Methods: A systematic literature research of PubMed, Cochrane and conference proceedings (ASCO meetings, SABCS and ESMO congress) up to December 8, 2022 was performed to identify studies comparing survival outcomes of patients affected by HER2-Low BC vs. HER2-zero BC. HER2-Low status was defined as immunohistochemistry score 1 + or 2+ without in situ hybridization amplification. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival endpoints in the metastatic [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)] and in the early [disease free-survival (DFS) and OS] settings as well as their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using the random-effect model of Der Simonian and Laird. The above-mentioned endpoints were also assessed according to estrogen receptor (ER) status. Results: Among 1,916 identified records, 42 studies including 1,797,377 patients were eligible for this analysis. We show the pooled HRs in the overall population and specific subgroups. In the early setting, HER2-Low status was associated with significant improved DFS (HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.79-0.92, p<0.001) and OS (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.77-0.92, p<0.001) when compared to HER2-zero status. Improved OS was observed in subgroup analysis for both ER-positive and ER-negative HER2-Low populations, while DFS improvement was observed only in the ER-positive subgroup. Similarly, in the metastatic setting, patients affected by HER2-Low BC showed better OS when compared to those with HER2-zero BC (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.89-0.98, p=0.008). HER2-Low metastatic BC was associated with significant improvement in OS compared to HER2-zero BC also in ER-positive and ER-negative subgroups. No significant differences were found in terms of PFS. Conclusions: Compared with HER2-zero status, HER2-Low status appears to be associated with an increased OS both in the advanced and early settings, regardless of hormone-receptor expression. [Table: see text]

e21570 Background: Small molecule inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase (EGFR) are approved for EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Targeted therapies include agents that block tumor-specific molecular targets and thereby interfere with tumor growth and metastasis. This study focuses on a meta-analysis of therapeutic outcomes from phase II and III clinical trials for anti-EGFR monotherapy compared to anti-EGFR therapy in combination with targeted agents. Methods: A literature search was conducted using EMBASE, Pubmed, Scifinder Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane library for the following terms: “epidermal growth factor receptor kinase”, “combination therapy”, “non-small cell lung cancer”. Eligible studies included patients of advanced stage IV NSCLC and any mutation status that met the predefined inclusion criteria. Data was extracted on trial demographics and therapeutic outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), survival post progression (SPP), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE). Sub-group analysis based on patient mutation status of wild-type (wt) EGFR, mutant EGFR, wt KRAS and mutant KRAS and a correlation analysis between OS, PFS and SPP was conducted. Results: A total of 34 studies were identified that fit the inclusion criteria from 2009-2019. The pooled OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.94 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.87-1.01); the pooled PFS HR was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.74-0.87). Median OS correlated more closely with median SPP (r2 = 0.97 for monotherapy; r2 = 0.88 for combination therapy) than to median PFS (r2 = 0.90 for monotherapy; r2 = 0.82 for combination therapy), although the linear association between log-HR OS and log-HR PFS had a positive slope (β = 0.31± 0.19). A greater incidence of rash and diarrhea was observed in the combination arm compared to monotherapy. A significant improvement was observed for PFS in wt EGFR patients for combination therapy, pooled PFS HR 0.8 (95% CI: 0.67-0.95). Conclusions: A statistically significant improvement in PFS was observed for anti-EGFR combination regimens compared to anti-EGFR monotherapy. The improvement in OS was not statistically significant for anti-EGFR combination regimens compared to monotherapy.

CANCERT he TROP2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison with pemetrexed plus platinum-based therapy in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had progressed after an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) according to the results of the OptiTROP-Lung04 trial. 1 These findings, which were presented at the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress by Li Zhang, MD, an oncologist at the Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer in Guangzhou, China, and were published simultaneously in The New England Journal of Medicine, confirmed the findings from an earlier phase 2 trial of sac-TMT, which showed significant improvements in PFS and OS in comparison with docetaxel. 2 The phase 3 trial enrolled 376 patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC that had progressed after a prior EGFR TKI (94.7% of the patients had received a third-generation EGFR TKI).Patients were randomly assigned to sac-TMT or pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy.The trial enrolled only Asian patients.The final PFS analysis showed a 4-month improvement in median PFS with sac-TMT in comparison with chemotherapy (8.3 vs. 4.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62).A preplanned interim OS analysis that was conducted at a median follow-up of 18.9 months showed a 40% reduction in the risk for death with sac-TMT versus chemotherapy (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82;two-sided p = .001).The median OS was not reached for patients on sac-TMT but was 17.4 months for patients on chemotherapy.The OS rate at 18 months was 65.8% for patients on sac-TMT and 48.0% for patients on chemotherapy.The majority of the patients who discontinued the trial went on to have subsequent anticancer treatment.Approximately half of the patients in the sac-TMT arm (41.9%) and the chemotherapy arm (53.6%) had subsequent chemotherapy.Subsequent ADCs were given to 1.4% of the patients assigned to sac-TMT and to 19.6% of the patients assigned to chemotherapy.The rates of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were similar for sac-TMT (58.0%) and chemotherapy

In patients with metastatic cancer, therapeutic anticancer vaccines are rarely associated with objective antitumor responses; so, many investigators have focused on progression-free survival (PFS) as a key endpoint for clinical trials. However, it is not clear that PFS is a surrogate for overall survival (OS), and OS may be a more appropriate endpoint because of the effects on long-term memory in the adaptive immune system. Recently, reported vaccine trials were reviewed to determine their primary and secondary endpoints and results. Randomized trials testing sipuleucel-T and prostvac-vf in prostate cancer and ipilimumab and eltrapuldencel-T in melanoma were associated with low objective response rates, no improvement in PFS, but statistically significant improvement in OS. Although compared with PFS, it takes longer to get a final result when OS is the primary endpoint; there is increasing evidence that if long-term memory recognition of tumor-associated antigens is the mechanism of action of an investigational product, then OS may be the only valid clinical endpoint for efficacy.

Background Tucatinib (TUC) is a highly selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2 with minimal inhibition of EGFR. It was recently approved by the FDA for patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), including pts with brain metastases (BM) whose cancers have progressed on at least 1 prior anti-HER2 regimen in the metastatic setting. In the HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794) pivotal trial, pts with HER2+ MBC previously treated with trastuzumab (T), pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) were randomized to receive TUC or placebo in combination with T and capecitabine (C). The addition of TUC resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in HER2+ MBC pts. Primary methods and outcomes have been reported previously (Murthy, NEJM 2019). Here we present an exploratory analysis describing the outcomes in the HER2CLIMB trial based on hormone receptor (HR) status. Methods Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive TUC or placebo in combination with T and C. All pts had a baseline brain MRI and randomization was stratified by presence of BM, ECOG status, and geographic region. All pts with HER2+ MBC who were positive for either or both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (> 1%) were assigned to the HR “positive” subgroup. Pts not meeting the above criteria were assigned to the HR “negative” subgroup. For the exploratory HR+/HR- efficacy analysis presented here, PFS per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review was evaluated in the first 480 pts enrolled. OS, PFS in pts with baseline BM, and confirmed ORR in pts with measurable disease were evaluated in the total study population. P values presented for PFS are nominal. Results Overall, 612 pts were enrolled to HER2CLIMB; 370 pts (60%) had HR+ and 242 (40%) had HR- tumors. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics in HR+/HR- subgroups were generally balanced between treatment arms. In the HR+ group, there was a 42% reduction in the risk of progression or death in the TUC arm (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.80; P=0.0008); median (95% CI) PFS was 7.6 mo (7.4, 9.5) in the TUC arm vs 5.6 mo (4.3, 7.4) in the control arm. In the HR- group, there was a 46% reduction in the risk of progression or death in the TUC arm (hazard ratio: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.86; P=0.008); median (95% CI) PFS was 8.1 mo (7.0, 11.6) in the TUC arm vs 4.2 mo (3.1, 8.6) in the control arm. In the total population, median OS was 21.7 mo vs 18.2 mo in HR+ in the TUC arm vs control arm, respectively; median OS in HR- was 31.1 mo in the TUC arm vs 14.1 mo in the control arm. In pts with BM in the HR+ group (n=166 [45%]), there was a 52% reduction in the risk of progression or death (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.75; P=0.0008); median (95% CI) PFS was 7.5 mo (5.6, 9.5) in the TUC arm vs 5.1 mo (4.1, 5.7) in the control arm, and median OS was 18.1 mo vs 12.8 mo, respectively. In pts with BM in the HR- group (n=125 [52%]), there was a 50% reduction in the risk of progression or death (hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.95; P=0.03); median (95% CI) PFS was 7.8 mo (6.1, 11.6) in the TUC arm vs 5.4 mo (2.9, 8.6) in the control arm, and median OS was 18.5 mo vs 11.5 mo, respectively. In the total population, ORR was numerically higher in the TUC arm vs the control arm regardless of HR status (HR+: 37.4% [95% CI: 30.8, 44.5] vs 27.1% [95% CI: 19.0, 36.6], respectively and HR-: 45.3% [95% CI: 36.7, 54.0] vs 15.6% [95% CI: 7.8, 26.9], respectively). Conclusions Among pts with HER2+ MBC previously treated with T, pertuzumab, and T-DM1, the addition of TUC to T and C showed clinically meaningful improvements of PFS, OS, and ORR independent of HR status. Furthermore, pts with HR+ and HR- MBC with BM derived similar benefit from the addition of TUC to T and C. Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Mattea Reinisch, Sherene Loi, Alicia Okines, Paula R. Pohlmann, Eva Harder Brix, Hugues Bourgeois, Belinda Yeo, Cheryl Aylesworth, Melody Cobleigh, Anthony Goncalves, Rebecca Moroose, Katherine H.R. Tkaczuk, Michaela Tsai, Christine Simmons, Michael Andersson, Hatem Soliman, Michelina Cairo, Lisa A. Carey, David Cameron, Jorge Ramos, Wentao Feng, Mafalda Oliveira. Tucatinib vs placebo in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with locally advanced unresectable or HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2CLIMB): Outcomes by hormone receptor status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-08.

3502 Background: Regorafenib (REG) is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor. The CORRECT trial was conducted to evaluate REG in patients (pts) with mCRC who had progressed after all approved standard therapies. Methods: Enrollment criteria included documented mCRC and progression during or ≤3 months after last standard therapy. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive best supportive care plus either REG (160 mg od po, 3 wks on/1 wk off) or placebo (PL). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, disease control rate, safety and quality of life (QoL). Efficacy analyses across prespecified subgroups were evaluated using univariate Cox regression. Results: 760 pts were randomized (REG: 505; PL: 255). The OS primary endpoint was met at a preplanned interim analysis. OS and PFS were significantly improved in REG arm compared to PL arm: hazard ratio (HR) for OS 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.94, 1-sided p=0.0052), median OS 6.4 vs 5.0 mos; HR for PFS 0.49 (95% CI 0.42-0.58, 1-sided p<0.000001), median PFS 1.9 vs 1.7 mos. Comparable OS and PFS benefits were observed in exploratory subgroup analyses by region, age, time from diagnosis of mCRC to randomization, prior lines of treatment, and KRAS status (shown in table). The most common grade 3+ AEs related to REG were hand-foot skin reaction (16.6%), fatigue (9.6%), hypertension (7.2%), diarrhea (7.2%) and rash/desquamation (5.8%). QoL data will be presented. Conclusions: REG demonstrated statistically significant improvement in OS and PFS over PL, as well as comparable efficacy benefits across pt subgroups analyzed. [Table: see text]

The role of sidedness in second-line therapy for RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis (NMA)

Lenalidomide Compared to Ixazomib Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The incorporation of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has redefined therapeutic strategies for advanced ovarian cancer. This study evaluates the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes with a historical cohort of patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 71 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at the University Clinical Center in Niš, Serbia, from April 2017 to March 2023. All patients received standard chemotherapy paired with bevacizumab and were monitored for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ECOG performance status, presence of metastases, and pleural effusion. Additionally, a historical cohort of 30 patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone was used for comparison, and Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing treatment outcomes. Results: The study findings indicate significant improvements in median PFS (20 months vs. 15 months) and OS (58 months vs. an undetermined upper limit) compared to the historical cohort. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-treated group revealed that younger patients (<65 years) and those without metastases or pleural effusion exhibited notably better survival outcomes. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients younger than 65 was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45-0.93), suggesting a substantial reduction in disease progression risk compared to older patients. Conclusion: Bevacizumab, when used alongside standard chemotherapy, significantly extends both PFS and OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. These benefits are particularly pronounced in younger patients. The results underscore the necessity of integrating bevacizumab into the treatment regimen for advanced ovarian cancer, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual risk profiles and clinical characteristics. This study reinforces the pivotal role of bevacizumab in enhancing the current ovarian cancer treatment landscape and highlights the potential for further personalizing oncological care.

LBA65 The Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA.7 trial: Results of a randomized phase II study of gemcitabine (GEM) and nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) vs GEM, nab-P, durvalumab (D) and tremelimumab (T) as first line therapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEUterine papillary serous cancer (UPSC) represents only 10% of all uterine cancers and is associated with a significantly worse prognosis compared with other histological types of endometrial cancers. It closely resembles the behavior of ovarian carcinoma.DESIGN AND SETTINGRetrospective study in a referral center covering period from February 1989 to January 2009.PATIENTS AND METHODSEighteen patients who underwent definitive surgery followed by adjuvant therapy—platinum-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both—were reviewed. Median age was 62 years (range, 52–76 years). All patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. Positive lymph nodes were found in 4 of 7 patients who underwent lymph node sampling/dissection. Seven patients had stage I/II disease, whereas 11 patients had stage III disease. Six patients received chemotherapy, 5 patients received radiation therapy, while 7 patients received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy.RESULTMedian follow-up was 27 months. The median survival and relapse-free survival were 33 and 23 months, respectively. Eight patients were alive and free of disease, of whom 5 patients were stage I/II and 4 patients were stage III. Distant metastasis was the most common site of relapse. Early stage (I/II) was associated with significant improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (P=.004 and P=.05, respectively). The combined-modality treatment including chemotherapy-radiotherapy showed statistically significant improvement in RFS (P=.012), while the improvement in OS did not reach statistical significance (P=.12).CONCLUSIONThis study indicates that postoperative combined treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy plays a role in the management of UPSC by improving RFS. Distant metastasis remains the major site of relapse. Future studies using combined-modality therapy are needed to improve the outcome in patients with UPSC.

Introduction. Based on the subgroup analysis of the TRIBE study FOLFOXIRI with bevacizumab is the recommended option for patients (pts) with mBRAF metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the 1st line. However, subgroup analysis of other studies showed conflicting results. Therefore, we performed systemic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacy FOLFOXIRI and doublets with targeted therapy in pts with mBRAF mCRC in terms of progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS).Methods. We performed a search of all prospective randomizes studies in PubMed, ASCO and ESMO congresses for all years before May, 2020, compared FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibodies and FOLFOX or FOLFIRI with targeted agents at the 1st line with information of the BRAF status. Primary outcome was hazard ratio (HR) for PFS and 95% confidence interval (CI); secondary – HR for OS and odds ratio (OD) for ORR. Fixed effects were used for analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted by Review Manager Ver. 5.3.Results. We identified 6 trials (CHARTA, STEAM, TRIBE, TRIBE2, VISNU, METHEP2), which included 158 pts with mBRAF (FOLFOXIRI – 82 (52%) and doublets – 76 (48%). According to results of the meta-analysis there was a tendency for higher ORR in pts with FOLFOXIRI (OR 2.07, 95% CI 0.61–7.06; p = 0.24; I2 = 27%, p for heterogeneity 0.26; 3 trials). However we didn’t find any significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.64–1.23; p = 0.48; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity 0.63; 5 trials) or OS (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.37–1.19; p = 0.048; I2 = 71%, p for heterogeneity 0.06; 2 trials) in the group of triplet.Conclusions. FOLFOXIRI with targeted therapy did not show significant improvement in the PFS and OS in pts with mBRAF compared with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI with targeted antibodies. A prospective randomized trial is needed to determine the optimal chemotherapy regimen at the 1st line for pts with mBRAF mCRC.

466P FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI with targeted therapy in patients with mutant BRAF metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis