Chapter 2 Satisfiability Solvers

Encoding combinatorial problems in terms of propositional satisfiability (SAT) enables utilization of highly efficient SAT solvers for combinatorial search. Local search preprocessing accelerates the SAT solver's search by providing high-quality starting points, a technique implemented in several modern SAT solvers. However, existing preprocessing methods employ generic strategies that fail to exploit the structural patterns inherent in problem encodings. This position paper proposes a novel paradigm wherein Large Language Models (LLMs) analyze problem encoding implementations to synthesize specialized preprocessing algorithms. The LLMs examine Python-based code to identify structural patterns, enabling the automatic generation of encoding-specific local search procedures. These procedures operate across all instances sharing the same encoding scheme rather than requiring instance-specific customization. Our preliminary empirical evaluation demonstrates effective automated algorithm synthesis for structure-aware SAT preprocessing, serving as a foundation for similar approaches across multiple domains of combinatorial optimization.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT), the first problem proven to be NP-complete, is intractable on digital computers based on the von Neumann architecture. An efficient SAT solver can benefit many applications such as artificial intelligence, circuit design, and functional verification. Recently, a SAT solver approach based on a deterministic, continuous-time dynamical system (CTDS) was introduced [1]. This approach shows polynomial analog time-complexity on even the hardest k-SAT (k ≥ 3) problem instances, but at an energy cost dependent on exponentially growing auxiliary variables. This paper reports a novel analog hardware SAT solver, AC-SAT, implementing the CTDS via incorporating novel, analog circuit design ideas. AC-SAT is intended to be used as a co-processor and is programmable for handling different problem specifications. Furthermore, with its modular design, AC-SAT can be readily extended to solve larger size problems. SPICE simulation results show that AC-SAT can indeed solve the SAT problems, and it has speedup factors of ~10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4</sup> on even the hardest 3-SAT problems, when compared with a state-of-the-art SAT solver on digital computers.

Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers are at the core of efficient approaches for solving a vast multitude of practical problems. Moreover, albeit targeting an NP-complete problem, SAT solvers are increasingly used for tackling problems beyond NP. Despite the success of SAT in practice, modeling with SAT and more importantly implementing SAT-based problem solving solutions is often a difficult and error-prone task. This paper proposes the PySAT toolkit, which enables fast Python-based prototyping using SAT oracles and SAT-related technology. PySAT provides a simple API for working with a few state-of-the-art SAT oracles and also integrates a number of cardinality constraint encodings, all aiming at simplifying the prototyping process. Experimental results presented in the paper show that PySAT-based implementations can be as efficient as those written in a low-level language.

Modern satisfiability (SAT) solvers provide an efficient implementation of classical propositional logic. Their input language, however, is based on the conjunctive normal form (CNF) of propositional formulas. To use SAT solver technology in practice, a user must create the input clauses in one way or another. A typical approach is to write a procedural program that generates formulas on the basis of some input data relevant for the problem domain and translates them into CNF. In this paper, we propose a declarative approach where the intended clauses are specified in terms of rules in analogy to answer set programming (ASP). This allows the user to write first-order specifications for intended clauses in a schematic way by exploiting term variables. We develop a formal framework required to define the semantics of such specifications. Moreover, we provide an implementation harnessing state-of-the-art ASP grounders to accomplish the grounding step of clauses. As a result, we obtain a general-purpose clause-level grounding approach for SAT solvers. Finally, we illustrate the capabilities of our specification methodology in terms of combinatorial and application problems.

Query-answering (QA) problems have attracted wider interest recently, owing partly to emerging applications involving integration between rules and ontologies in the Semantic Web's layered architecture. Success of using satisfiability (SAT) solvers as low-level solvers for dealing with several kinds of problems motivates us to apply SAT solvers to a class of QA problems. To find all elements of an answer set, a variant of a usual SAT solver, called an all-solution satisfiability (All-SAT) solver, is used for determining all models of a given input set of propositional clauses. Using an All-SAT solver, we propose a procedure for solving QA problems. The procedure generates input for an All-SAT solver from a high-level description of a given QA problem by problem transformation in a clause space that includes set-bounded variables. Based on the equivalent transformation principle, the correctness of the proposed procedure is shown.

In recent years backtrack search algorithms for propositional satisfiability (SAT) have been the subject of dramatic improvements. These improvements allowed SAT solvers to successfully solve instances with thousands or tens of thousands of variables. However, many new challenging problem instances are still too hard for current SAT solvers. As a result, further improvements to SAT technology are expected to have key consequences in solving hard real-world instances. This paper introduces a new idea: choosing the backtrack variable using a heuristic approach with the goal of diversifying the regions of the space that are explored during the search. The proposed heuristics are inspired by the heuristics proposed in recent years for the decision branching step of SAT solvers, namely, VSIDS and its improvements. Completeness conditions are established, which guarantee completeness for the new algorithm, as well as for any other incomplete backtracking algorithm. Experimental results on hundreds of instances derived from real-world problems show that the new technique is able to speed SAT solvers, while aborting fewer instances. These results clearly motivate the integration of heuristic backtracking in SAT solvers.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers are popular engines used throughout the verification world. Bounded sequential problems such as bounded model checking and bounded sequential equivalence checking rely on fast and robust SAT solvers. In this work, we introduce a technique that improves the performance of the underlying SAT solver for bounded sequential problems by taking advantage of a design's don't care states. We develop cost effective methods of filtering, replicating and applying the don't care states to the original problem thus reducing the search space. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on ISCAS'89 benchmarks.

Maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT), employing propositional logic as the declarative language of choice, has turned into a viable approach to solving NP-hard optimization problems arising from artificial intelligence and other real-world settings. A key contributing factor to the success of MaxSAT is the rise of increasingly effective exact solvers that are based on iterative calls to a Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solver. The three types of SAT-based MaxSAT solving approaches, each with its distinguishing features, implemented in current state-of-the-art MaxSAT solvers are the core-guided, the implicit hitting set (IHS), and the objective-bounding approaches. The objective-bounding approach is based on directly searching over the objective function range by iteratively querying a SAT solver if the MaxSAT instance at hand has a solution under different bounds on the objective. In contrast, both core-guided and IHS are so-called unsatisfiability-based approaches that employ a SAT solver as an unsatisfiable core extractor to determine sources of inconsistencies, but critically differ in how the found unsatisfiable cores are made use of towards finding a provably optimal solution. Furthermore, a variety of different algorithmic variants of the core-guided approach in particular have been proposed and implemented in solvers. It is well-acknowledged that each of the three approaches has its advantages and disadvantages, which is also witnessed by instance and problem-domain specific runtime performance differences (and at times similarities) of MaxSAT solvers implementing variants of the approaches. However, the questions of to what extent the approaches are fundamentally different and how the benefits of the individual methods could be combined in a single algorithmic approach are currently not fully understood. In this work, we approach these questions by developing UniMaxSAT, a general unifying algorithmic framework. Based on the recent notion of abstract cores, UniMaxSAT captures in general core-guided, IHS and objective-bounding computations. The framework offers a unified way of establishing quite generally the correctness of the current approaches. We illustrate this by formally showing that UniMaxSAT can simulate the computations of various algorithmic instantiations of the three types of MaxSAT solving approaches. Furthermore, UniMaxSAT can be instantiated in novel ways giving rise to new algorithmic variants of the approaches. We illustrate this aspect by developing a prototype implementation of an algorithmic variant for MaxSAT based on the framework.

The problem of finding the minimum three-dimensional Kochen–Specker (KS) vector system, an important problem in quantum foundations, has remained open for over 55 years. We present a new method to address this problem based on a combination of a Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solver and a computer algebra system (CAS). Our approach improved the lower bound on the size of a KS system from 22 to 24. More importantly, we provide the first computer-verifiable proof certificate of a lower bound to the KS problem with a proof size of 41.6 TiB for order 23. The efficiency is due to the powerful combination of SAT solvers and CAS-based orderly generation.

Automatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration

Multiway Decision Graph (MDG) is a canonical representation of a subset of many-sorted first-order logic. It generalizes the logic of equality with abstract types and uninterpreted function symbols. The area of Satisfiability (SAT) ha s been the subject of intensive research in recent years, with significant theoretical and practical contributions. From a practical perspective, a large number of very effective SAT solvers have recently been proposed, most of which based on improvements made to the original Davis-Putnam algorithm. Local search algorithms have allowed solving extremely large satisfiable instances of SAT. The combination between various verification methodologies will enhance the capabilities of each and overcome their limitations. In this paper, we introduce a model checking methodology for MDG based models using MDG tool and SAT solver. We use SAT solver searching for feasible paths of reachable states satisfying the property under certain encoding constraints. Finally, we provide a case study showing the correctness and the efficiency of our approach.

Many formal verification tools today are based on Boolean proof techniques. The two most powerful approaches in this context are binary decision diagrams (BDDs) and methods based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT). Recent studies have shown that BDDs and SAT are orthogonal, i.e. there exist problems where BDDs work well, while SAT solvers fail and vice versa. Beside this, the techniques are very different in general. E.g. SAT solvers try to find a single solution and BDDs represent all solutions in parallel. In this paper the first integrated approach is presented that combines BDDs and SAT within a single data structure. This hybrid approach combines the advantages of the two techniques, i.e. multiple solutions can be computed while the memory requirement remains small. First experimental results demonstrate the quality of the approach in comparison to BDDs and SAT solvers.

Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is a fundamental problem of immense practical importance. While SAT is NP-complete when clauses can contain 3 literals or more, the problem can be solved in linear time when the given formula contains only binary clauses (2SAT). Many complete search algorithms for SAT solving have taken advantage of 2SAT information that occurs in the statement of the problem in order to simplify the solving process, only one that we are aware of uses 2SAT information that arises in the process of the search, as clauses are simplified. There are a number of possibilities for making use of 2SAT information to improve the SAT solving process: maintaining 2SAT satisfiability during search, detecting unit consequences of the 2SAT clauses, and Krom subsumption using 2SAT clauses. In this paper we investigate the tradeoffs of increasing complex 2SAT handling versus the search space reduction and execution time. We give experimental results illustrating that the SAT solver resulting from the best tradeoff is competitive with state of the art Davis-Putnam methods, on hard problems involving a substantial 2SAT component.

Automatic Test Pattern Generation (ATPG) based on Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is a robust alternative to classical structural ATPG. Due to the powerful reasoning engines of modern SAT solvers, SAT-based algorithms typically provide a high test coverage because of the ability to reliably classify hard-to-detect faults. However, a drawback of SAT-based ATPG is the test compaction ability. In this paper, we propose an enhanced dynamic test compaction approach which leverages the high implicative power of modern SAT solvers. Fault detection constraints are encoded into the SAT instance and a formal optimization procedure is applied to increase the detection ability of the generated tests. Experiments show that the proposed approach is able to achieve high compaction - for certain benchmarks even smaller test sets than the currently best known results are obtained.

Learning is a general concept, playing an important role in many Artificial intelligence domains. In this paper, we address the learning paradigm used to explain failures or conflicts encountered during search. This explanation, derived by conflict analysis, and generally expressed as a new constraint, is usually used to dynamically avoid future occurrences of similar situations. Before focusing on clause learning in Boolean satisfiability (SAT), we first overview some important works on this powerful reasoning tool in other domains such as constraint satisfaction and truth maintenance systems. Then, we present a comprehensive survey of the most important works having led to what is called today—conflict driven clause learning—which is one of the key components of modern SAT solvers. We also overview some of the original extensions or variants of clauses learning. In theory, current SAT solvers with clause learning are as powerful as general resolution proof systems. In practice, real-world SAT instances with millions of variables and clauses are now in the scope of this solving paradigm.