• Home
  • Search
  • Choosing a Metamodel of a Simulation Model for Uncertainty Quantification.
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon9
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x211016307Copy DOI Icon

Choosing a Metamodel of a Simulation Model for Uncertainty Quantification.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Metamodeling may substantially reduce the computational expense of individual-level state transition simulation models (IL-STM) for calibration, uncertainty quantification, and health policy evaluation. However, because of the lack of guidance and readily available computer code, metamodels are still not widely used in health economics and public health. In this study, we provide guidance on how to choose a metamodel for uncertainty quantification. We built a simulation study to evaluate the prediction accuracy and computational expense of metamodels for uncertainty quantification using life-years gained (LYG) by treatment as the IL-STM outcome. We analyzed how metamodel accuracy changes with the characteristics of the simulation model using a linear model (LM), Gaussian process regression (GP), generalized additive models (GAMs), and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Finally, we tested these metamodels in a case study consisting of a probabilistic analysis of a lung cancer IL-STM. In a scenario with low uncertainty in model parameters (i.e., small confidence interval), sufficient numbers of simulated life histories, and simulation model runs, commonly used metamodels (LM, ANNs, GAMs, and GP) have similar, good accuracy, with errors smaller than 1% for predicting LYG. With a higher level of uncertainty in model parameters, the prediction accuracy of GP and ANN is superior to LM. In the case study, we found that in the worst case, the best metamodel had an error of about 2.1%. To obtain good prediction accuracy, in an efficient way, we recommend starting with LM, and if the resulting accuracy is insufficient, we recommend trying ANNs and eventually also GP regression.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations44

A Comparative Assessment of Six Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Bending Force in Hot Strip Rolling Process

  • May 22, 2020
  • Metals
  • Xu Li +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

A Gaussian Process Regression Model for Forecasting Stock Exchange of Thailand

  • Mar 03, 2022
  • Trends in Sciences
  • Kamonrat Suphawan +2
  • Research Article

مقایسه مدل های رگرسیونی و شبکه های عصبی مصنوعی در پیش بینی عملکرد تولیدی مرغان تخمگذار

  • May 23, 2015
  • SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
  • جواد ایزی +1
  • Research Article

Comparing artificial and convolutional neural networks with traditional models for Genomic prediction in wheat.

  • Sep 01, 2025
  • Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement
  • Wei Zhao +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Machine learning techniques for predictive modelling and uncertainty quantification of the mechanical properties of woven carbon fibre composites

  • Jul 03, 2024
  • Materials Today Communications
  • Nisal Ariyasinghe +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Hybrid Fuzzy Jordan Network for Robust and Efficient Intrusion Detection System

  • Dec 31, 2015
  • Indian Journal of Science and Technology
  • A Dhivya +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations56

Improvement in artificial neural network-based estimation of grid connected photovoltaic power output

  • Jun 23, 2016
  • Renewable Energy
  • Chao Huang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Uncertainty quantification in modeling of microfluidic T-sensor based diffusion immunoassay.

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Biomicrofluidics
  • Aman Kumar Jha +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

The Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Children’s Giftedness

  • Jun 10, 2016
  • Suvremena psihologija
  • Nina Pavlin-Bernardić +2
  • Research Article

An Artificial Neural Network with Bayes' Theorem (Hybrid) for Automated Bearing Faults Diagnosis

  • Oct 13, 2024
  • The Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing in Transportation
  • Yeo Siang Chuan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Prediction of environmental indicators in land leveling using artificial intelligence techniques

  • Apr 11, 2018
  • Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
  • Isham Alzoubi +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

Modelling roach (Rutilus rutilus) microhabitat using linear and nonlinear techniques

  • Jul 01, 2000
  • Freshwater Biology
  • Sebastien Brosse +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Machine learning based prediction for bulk porosity and static elastic modulus of Yungang Grottoes sandstone

  • Oct 15, 2024
  • Heritage Science
  • Ruoyu Zhang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Modelling and Predicting Backstroke Start Performance Using Non-Linear and Linear Models

  • Mar 23, 2018
  • Journal of Human Kinetics
  • Karla De Jesus +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

A comparison of predictive methods in modelling the distribution of periglacial landforms in Finnish Lapland

  • Nov 26, 2008
  • Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
  • Mathieu Marmion +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.