Circulatory Support with Venoarterial ECMO Unsuccessful in Aiding Endogenous Diltiazem Clearance after Overdose

The Challenges of Venoarterial ECMO for Postcardiotomy Shock

Research evaluating outcomes in critically ill patients with acute respiratory and cardiac failure supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has increased significantly. The objective was to identify a core set of outcomes that are essential to include in all clinical research evaluating the use of either venoarterial or venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill patients, particularly regarding safety and adverse events. A three-round modified Delphi process. Patients, caregivers, multidisciplinary clinicians, researchers, industry partners, and research funders were included. Participants represented key extracorporeal membrane oxygenation organizations, including the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, the International Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Network, clinicians from high volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation researchers or former extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients from five continents. We used recommended standards for the development of a core outcome set. Outcome measures identified from systematic reviews of the literature and from qualitative studies of survivors were mapped to the domains identified by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative separately for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Participant response rates were 40 of 47 (85%), 35 of 37 (95%), and 64 of 69 (93%) for survey rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with participants representing 10 different countries on five continents. After the third round survey, 8 outcome measures met consensus for both venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This study identified core outcomes to assess in all research evaluating the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including adverse events specific to this intervention, permitting standardization of outcome reporting for the first time. Identifying appropriate measurement instruments to evaluate these outcomes is an important next step to enable synthesis of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation research.

Ambulatory simultaneous venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplantation

Context. Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used in many patients following its introduction in 1972, most hospitals had abandoned this experimental treatment for adult patients. Recently, improvements in the ECMO circuitry rendered it more biocompatible. The surprisingly low mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated with ECMO in the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic of 2009 resurrected interest in ECMO in many intensive care units around the world. Objectives. This article reviews the different techniques of ECMO, the indications, contraindications and complications of its use, its role in poisoned patients and the ethics of its use. Methods. We searched Pubmed, Toxnet, Cochrane database and Embase from 1966 to September 2012 using the search terms (‘‘extracorporeal membrane oxygenation’’, ‘extracorporeal life support’, ‘ECMO’, ‘ECLS’, ‘assist-device’, and ‘intox*’ or ‘poison*’). These searches identified 242 papers of which 116 described ECMO in conditions other than intoxications or were reviews. In total 46 publications selected for this manuscript were case reports or case series involving poisoned patients. ECMO techniques. Two types of ECMO are used: veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) or veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO). VV-ECMO is used for patients with severe ARDS to secure adequate oxygenation of the organs while protecting the lungs from harmful ventilation pressures or prolonged inspiratory fraction of oxygen. VA-ECMO can be used whenever the patient remains in shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation and is refractory to administration of inotropes and vasopressors. Indications. The organ support that can be applied with ECMO makes it especially useful in patients with severe poisoning as the clinical impact of the intoxication is often temporary; ECMO can be used as a ‘bridge to recovery’. Contraindications. Absolute contraindications are uncontrolled coagulopathy and severe intracranial bleeding, which precludes the use of anticoagulation therapy. Relative contraindications to ECMO include advanced age, severe irreversible brain injury, untreatable metastatic cancer, severe organ dysfunction (some suggest a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score > 15), and high pressure positive pressure ventilation for more than 7 days. Complications. The most common complication of ECMO is either bleeding at the cannulation site (in VV-ECMO) or bleeding at the surgical entry site (in VA-ECMO). Overall bleeding complications currently occur in 10–36% patients, and intracranial haemorrhage is seen in up to 6% of patients. ECMO should be reserved, therefore, for the most severely ill poisoned patients with a high risk of death. ECMO in poisoned patients. There are no randomised trials of ECMO in poisoned patients with refractory shock or who have ARDS caused by an intoxication. VV-ECMO can be considered in patients with type l and ll respiratory failure. In patients with life-threatening haemodynamic instability, VA-ECMO can be considered when shock persists despite volume administration, inotropes and vasoconstrictors, and (sometimes) intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Typical examples include poisoning due to calcium channel antagonists, beta-blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, chloroquine and colchicine. Ethics of ECMO use. It is only ethical to use such a costly intervention (£19,252 and US$ 31,000 per quality-adjusted life year) if the treatment has a real purpose such as a ‘bridge to recovery’, a ‘bridge to transplant’, or a ‘bridge to permanent assist device’ (in the case of persistent cardiac failure). Conclusions. In the last decade, ECMO equipment has improved considerably, rendering it more biocompatible, and it has been used more frequently as an assist device for patients needing oxygenation as well as circulatory support. ECMO is considered a good salvage therapy for patients who are severely poisoned with ARDS or refractory circulatory shock.

Peripartum use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in a Patient Suffering from COVID-19 Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): A Case Report

Introduction: The increasing indications and prevalence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are evident by the exponential increase in ECMO in the last decade. In recent literature, ECMO use has sustained patients who have intentionally or unintentionally overdosed on cardiac medications. Specifically, calcium channel blocker overdose (CCBOD) can lead to significant cardiopulmonary dysfunction and has increased in recent years. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) block L-type voltage gated calcium channels throughout the body, and overdose results in cardiac depression, vasoplegia, and hyperglycemia. Expert consensus and poison control centers both recommend treatment with calcium, high dose insulin, inotropes, and vasopressors. Our systematic review evaluated when to initiate ECMO in the CCBOD population and the mortality rate with ECMO use. Methods: An electronic literature review was conducted to identify all relevant studies for CCB use and ECMO. PRISMA guidelines for systematic review were followed. Rayyan was used as a screening tool for blinding the authors from each other, and abstracts and full texts were reviewed by three independent authors. Inclusion criteria were strictly limited to CCB ingestion without polypharmacy. A data collection tool was devised and data was independently collected by two authors prior to statistical analysis. Data points included demographics, a list of currently recommended medical treatments for CCBOD, ECMO cannulation type, and survival to hospital discharge. Results: After exclusion of duplicates, 314 abstracts were reviewed; of these 25 papers were included from 6 different countries, with the median year of the study publication 2019. From the 25 papers, 26 patients were studied with an average patient age of 32.7 years with 42% male and 58% female. Between male and female there was no significant difference in age, type of CCB taken, or days on ECMO. Average time on ECMO was 4.3 days. Venoarterial and venovenous ECMO use were 92.3% and 7.7%, respectively. Survival to hospital discharge was 84.6%. Prior to ECMO cannulation, patients received up to six medical treatments for CCBOD, with the majority receiving four to five treatments (53.8%). There was no correlation between number of therapies and days on ECMO (r=0.092, P=0.684). Conclusion: Our systematic review demonstrates that ECMO is a newly used and possibly valuable therapy for CCBOD when medical treatment fails. Most patients received aggressive medical therapies and still were unstable enough to require ECMO. Survival to discharge after ECMO for CCBOD is substantially higher than standard VV or VA ECMO uses. While medical management is still the main therapy for CCBOD, our results show that a persistently unstable patient may benefit from prompt evaluation at an ECMO center for treatment.

CATASTROPHIC PULMONARY EMBOLISM SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary graft dysfunction after heart transplant

BackgroundChildren with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) are particularly susceptible to infections such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) due to the immunosuppressive effects of chemotherapy, which can progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and respiratory failure. The use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) to manage hypoxemia secondary to PJP in LCH presents unique challenges, including the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections associated with arterial and venous access. This study explores a case wherein ECMO was crucial in treating severe PJP-induced respiratory failure in a pediatric patient with LCH.Case presentationA 3-year-old female with a history of LCH, undergoing long-term chemotherapy and corticosteroid treatment, was admitted with fever, dyspnea, and lethargy. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid confirmed Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ). Despite aggressive management with invasive high-frequency ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide, and prone positioning, the patient’s oxygenation remained critically low, with severe hypercapnia and resultant severe respiratory acidosis, necessitating vasopressor support for hemodynamic stability and venoarterial (VA) ECMO intervention. Early initiation of VA ECMO facilitated ultraprotective lung ventilation and circulatory support, effectively preventing hemodynamic collapse. The patient was successfully decannulated after 13 days of ECMO support.ConclusionWhile PJP is a rare and extremely serious opportunistic infection, the VA ECMO support in this pediatric case effectively managed severe PJP without ECMO-related complications. This highlights ECMO as a potentially viable, relatively effective, and safe adjunctive therapy in the management of severe PJP infections in children.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Opportunities for Expanding Nurses' Roles.

Currently, there is scarcity of data on whether differences exist in clinical characteristics and outcomes of bloodstream infection (BSI) between venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and whether they differ between Candida BSI and bacteremia in adult ECMO patients. We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who required ECMO for > 48 h and had BSIs while receiving ECMO between January 2015 and June 2020. Cases with a positive blood culture result within 24 h of ECMO implantation were excluded. We identified 94 (from 64 of 194 patients) and 38 (from 17 of 56 patients) BSI episodes under VA and VV ECMO, respectively. Fifty nine BSIs of VA ECMO (59/94, 62.8%) occurred in the first 2 weeks after ECMO implantation, whereas 24 BSIs of VV ECMO (24/38, 63.2%) occurred after 3 weeks of ECMO implantation. Gram-negative bacteremia (39/59, 66.1%) and gram-positive bacteremia (10/24, 41.7%) were the most commonly identified BSI types in the first 2 weeks after VA ECMO implantation and after 3 weeks of VV implantation, respectively. Timing of Candida BSI was early (6/11, 54.5% during the first 2 weeks) in VA ECMO and late (6/9, 66.7% after 3 weeks of initiation) in VV ECMO. Compared with bacteremia, Candida BSI showed no differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes during VA and VV ECMO, except the significant association with prior exposure to carbapenem in VA ECMO (vs. gram-negative bacteremia [P = 0.006], vs. gram-positive bacteremia [P = 0.03]). Our results suggest that ECMO modes may affect BSI clinical features and timing. In particular, Candida BSI occurrence during the early course of VA ECMO is not uncommon, especially in patients with prior carbapenem exposure; however, it usually occurs during the prolonged course of VV ECMO. Consequently, routine blood culture surveillance and empiric antifungal therapy might be warranted in targeted populations of adult ECMO patients, regardless of levels of inflammatory markers and severity scores.

Nutritional practices and adequacy in children supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION: A HOPE FOR THE SICKEST PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

The Emerging Role of Bivalirudin for Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Is It Time to Change the Routine Practice?

IntroductionECMO has become an essential tool in the management of complex cardiorespiratory failure where other interventions faded to work. Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) also known as extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is available for circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock in many institutions worldwide and the utilization has been increasing annually.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to examine survival prognostic and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) application outcomes at our tertiary care centerMaterials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the experience of our hospital from august 2022 September 2024. Baseline characteristics of patients, ECMO indication, scoring systems, time to initiation, Hospital days, ICU days, ECMO duration, successful weaning and survival rate were assessed.ResultsOn reviewing 22 cases of ECMO were done in patients with varied indications majority being VA ECMO(15/22;68%) secondary to Acute Myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock SCAI D->E(9/15;60%). Mean age of the patient was 49.4 ± 14.24 years with male preponderance (11/15,73.3%). eCPR was done in two patients out of which one patient survived to discharge. All cannulations were percutaneous (90.9%), done in Cath lab except for 2 where one had morbid obesity and second had high bifurcation. Mean duration of ECMO was 4.73± 2.84 days. mean ICU Length of stay was 9.27±7.12 and hospital length of stay was 11.93±8.33. Most common cause of death in VA ECMO was poor neurological performance1. 53.3% were successfully weaned and decannulated(8/15), however only 7/15 were discharged home. Scoring systems used to prognosticate were SAVE and PREDICT -VA. The most frequently observed complication was deep vein thrombosis2 (28.57%).ConclusionsThe study on veno-arterial ECMO outcomes reveals a 53.3% successful weaning rate among patients, primarily used for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. While early intervention is crucial, complications, particularly deep vein thrombosis, were common. Only 7 out of 15 patients were discharged home, emphasizing the importance of careful patient selection and post-ECMO care. Overall, despite its vital role in critical cardiac cases, further research is needed to improve outcomes and reduce complications associated with VA-ECMO.