• Home
  • Search
  • Classical-quantum approach to image classification: Autoencoders and quantum SVMs
  • Cite Icon11
  • https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0261885Copy DOI Icon

Classical-quantum approach to image classification: Autoencoders and quantum SVMs

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In order to leverage quantum computers for machine learning tasks such as image classification, consideration is required. Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers have limitations that include noise, scalability, read-in and read-out times, and gate operation times. Therefore, strategies should be devised to mitigate the impact complex datasets that can have on the overall efficiency of a quantum machine learning pipeline. This may otherwise lead to excessive resource demands or noise. We apply a classical feature extraction using a ResNet10-inspired convolutional autoencoder to reduce dataset dimensionality and extract abstract, meaningful features before feeding them into a quantum layer. The chosen quantum layer is a quantum-enhanced support vector machine (QSVM), as SVMs typically do not require large sample sizes to identify patterns in data and have short-depth quantum circuits, which limits the impact of noise. The autoencoder is trained to extract meaningful features through image reconstruction, aiming to minimize the mean squared error across a training set of images. We use three datasets to illustrate the pipeline: HTRU-1, MNIST, and CIFAR-10. We include a quantum-enhanced one-class support vector machine (QOCSVM) for the highly unbalanced HTRU-1 set, with classical machine learning results for comparison. HTRU-2 is also included to serve as a benchmark for a dataset with meaningful features. The autoencoder achieved near-perfect reconstruction and high accuracy for MNIST, while CIFAR-10 showed poorer performance due to image complexity, and HTRU-1 struggled due to the imbalance in the dataset. The varying performance across datasets highlights the need to balance dimensionality reduction and prediction performance using quantum methods.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations9

Test Data-Driven Machine Learning Models for Reliable Quantum Circuit Output

  • May 24, 2021
  • Vedika Saravanan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Domain-specific compilers for dynamic simulations of quantum materials on quantum computers

  • Dec 23, 2020
  • Quantum Science & Technology
  • Lindsay Bassman Oftelie +9
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Machine Learning for Quantum Hardware Performance Assessment

  • Oct 01, 2022
  • Vedika Saravanan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Molecular-excited-state calculations with the qubit-excitation-based adaptive variational quantum eigensolver protocol

  • Sep 29, 2022
  • Physical Review A
  • Yordan S Yordanov +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations40

SQUARE: Strategic Quantum Ancilla Reuse for Modular Quantum Programs via Cost-Effective Uncomputation

  • May 01, 2020
  • Yongshan Ding +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations46

Advances in Quantum Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Image Classification: A Survey

  • Sep 28, 2023
  • Neurocomputing
  • Ruba Kharsa +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations82

Systematic Crosstalk Mitigation for Superconducting Qubits via Frequency-Aware Compilation

  • Oct 01, 2020
  • Yongshan Ding +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Preparing valence-bond-solid states on noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers

  • Mar 20, 2023
  • Physical Review Research
  • Bruno Murta +2
  • Conference Article

Design of a Superposition-Based Approximate QRAM for Noise-Tolerant Quantum Machine Learning

  • Jan 09, 2026
  • Sohrab Sajadimanesh +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations90

Quantum computing for near-term applications in generative chemistry and drug discovery

  • Jun 16, 2023
  • Drug Discovery Today
  • Alexey Pyrkov +7
  • Conference Article
  • Citations46

MUQUT: Multi-Constraint Quantum Circuit Mapping on NISQ Computers: Invited Paper

  • Nov 01, 2019
  • Debjyoti Bhattacharjee +4
  • PDF
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Mechanizing Quantum Error Correction Through Entangled Quantum Machine Learning Techniques

  • Dec 05, 2023
  • Theresa Melvin
  • Conference Article
  • Citations171

QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuits

  • Apr 01, 2022
  • Hanrui Wang +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Parameterised Quantum SVM with Data-Driven Entanglement for Zero-Day Exploit Detection

  • Aug 15, 2025
  • Computers
  • Steven Jabulani Nhlapo +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Bayesian Quantum Neural Networks

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • IEEE Access
  • Nam Nguyen +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.