Closed‐Form Formulae for Variance and Volatility Swaps Under Stochastic Volatility With Stochastic Liquidity Risks

Variance and volatility swaps valuations with the stochastic liquidity risk

Pricing variance and volatility swaps with stochastic volatility, stochastic interest rate and regime switching

Analytically pricing variance and volatility swaps with stochastic volatility, stochastic equilibrium level and regime switching

In this paper, we consider volatility swap and variance swap when the underlying asset is described by a process with multiple stochastic volatility models. The model considered in this paper is the multi-factor Heston stochastic volatility model. We obtain pricing formulas for the weighted variance swap and approximate expressions for the weighted volatility swap. The bounds of the arbitrage-free variance swap price are also found. The proposed pricing formulas are easy to compute in real time and can be applied efficiently for practical applications. We study the problem of hedging volatility swap with variance swap. We also determined the optimal amount of the underlying asset that has to be held for minimizing the hedging error by taking positions in options and weighted variance swap. From the numerical analysis, a couple of important features of the usefulness of the multi-factor Heston stochastic volatility model are discussed.

Variance and Volatility Swaps in Energy Markets

This paper presents a robust methodology for the valuation of options on variance swaps and volatility swaps. While existing literature has often focused on the pricing of the swaps themselves under stochastic volatility models, the valuation of options on these second-order derivative products remains a challenge, particularly within a framework that captures empirical market properties such as volatility clustering and long memory. Our approach addresses this problem by relying on the precise calculation of the optimal exercise prices (or strike rates) for variance and volatility swaps. To achieve this, we introduce and utilize a multifractional extension of the classic SABR model. This enhanced version of the model incorporates a deterministic and time-varying Hurst function, h(t), which allows for the modeling of a richer and more flexible volatility dynamics, capable of replicating the varying persistence phenomena observed in real markets. The proposed methodology is detailed comprehensively. We derive the theoretical formulas for the swap prices, which form the basis for calculating the optimal exercise prices. The valuation of options (call and put) on these swaps is then performed by employing advanced numerical techniques, adapted to the complexity of the multifractional process.

In this paper, the pricing problem of variance and volatility swaps is discussed under a two-factor stochastic volatility model. This model can be treated as a two-factor Heston model with one factor following the CIR process and another characterized by a Markov chain, with the motivation originating from the popularity of the Heston model and the strong evidence of the existence of regime switching in real markets. Based on the derived forward characteristic function of the underlying price, analytical pricing formulae for variance and volatility swaps are presented, and numerical experiments are also conducted to compare swap prices calculated through our formulae and those obtained under the Heston model to show whether the introduction of the regime switching factor would lead to any significant difference.

This article discusses the valuation and hedging of volatility swaps within the frame of a GARCH(1,1) stochastic volatility model. First we use a general and flexible partial differential equation (PDE) approach to determine the first two moments of the realized variance in a continuous or discrete context. Next, and also the main contribution of the paper, is a closed-form approximate solution for the so-called convexity correction, when the risk-neutral process for the instantaneous variance is a continuous time limit of a GARCH (1,1) model. Following this, we provide a numerical example using S&P 500 data.

The valuation of financial derivatives often assumes risk neutrality with respect to the risk-neutral martingale measure, which prevents arbitrage opportunities. However, casual traders may still incur substantial losses when trading at this risk-neutral price, especially when the price has to be paid now and the payoff is only realized in the future. This study proposes a new valuation framework that provides risk-sensitive investors with an additional safeguard. The proposed framework embraces a worst-case perspective while exploiting the underlier’s stochastic process, representing a combination of robust optimization and stochastic programming. Notably, it aims to mitigate losses in the likelier scenarios of the underlying asset’s prices. When the underlier’s returns are independent and lognormally but not necessarily identically distributed, our approach for pricing variance and volatility swaps could be greatly simplified, benefit from parallel computing, and be solved by a two-dimensional grid search. We further derive a closed-form solution in some special stationary cases and provide experimental results to highlight the effect of risk aversion on fending off sizable trading losses.

Analytically pricing volatility options and capped/floored volatility swaps with nonlinear payoffs in discrete observation case under the Merton jump-diffusion model driven by a nonhomogeneous Poisson process

Moment Methods for Exotic Volatility Derivatives

Are There Critical Levels of Stochastic Volatility for Early Option Exercise?

An evaluator of warrant models is essential for enhancing the current procedures used in the country's stock market and economy. This would provide additional insight for investors to make informed investment decisions and help to better understand the dynamics of warrant pricing in Malaysia. It has been established that the conventional process for valuing equity warrants using call option pricing models, like the Black-Scholes model, has numerous flaws, including the presumption of constant volatility and interest rates. As a matter of fact, existing alternative models were more concerned with providing techniques for pricing than with conducting empirical tests of warrant pricing models. Consequently, it is crucial to have a mathematical model that takes into account stochastic volatility and stochastic interest rates when pricing and analyzing equity warrants. Recent research by Roslan, Ibrahim, Jameel, and Ibrahim (2020) and Roslan, Ibrahim, Karim (2020) examined the pricing of hybrid equity warrants in the presence of stochastic factors. There was no comparative analysis conducted in these studies to ascertain the relative efficacy of the two methods used. This study's main goal is to empirically investigate how well equity warrant pricing models perform in the Malaysian market. This evaluation will take into account the impact of stochastic interest rates, using the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) stochastic interest rate model, and stochastic volatility, using the Heston stochastic volatility model. To perform the analysis, the study will make use of a number of mathematical techniques, such as partial differential equations, Fourier transform approaches, and the change of measure method. The research methodology is divided into three main phases. It is anticipated that the research's findings will provide new perspectives that go beyond the domain of warrant pricing, creating chances for more widespread applications in fields like foreign exchange, insurance, and mortgage contracts.

In this study, we extend the multiscale stochastic volatility model of [Fouque J‐P, Lorig MJ, SIAM J Financial Math. 2011;2(1):221‐254] by incorporating a slow varying factor of volatility. The resulting model can be viewed as a multifactor extension of the Heston model with two additional factors driving the volatility levels. An asymptotic analysis consisting of singular and regular perturbation expansions is developed to obtain an approximation to European option prices. We also find explicit expressions for some essential functions that are available only in integral formulas in the work of [Fouque J‐P, Lorig MJ, SIAM J Financial Math. 2011;2(1):221‐254]. This finding basically leads to considerable reduction in computational time for numerical calculation as well as calibration problems. An accuracy result of the asymptotic approximation is also provided. For numerical illustration, the multifactor Heston model is calibrated to index options on the market, and we find that the resulting implied volatility surfaces fit the market data better than those produced by the multiscale stochastic volatility model of [Fouque J‐P, Lorig MJ, SIAM J Financial Math. 2011;2(1):221‐254], particularly for long‐maturity call options.

We consider a class of stochastic path-dependent volatility models where the stochastic volatility, whose square follows the Cox--Ingersoll--Ross model, is multiplied by a (leverage) function of th...