Coarse Geometry of Topological Groups

We establish a general framework for representability of a metric group on a (well-behaved) class of Banach spaces. More precisely, let G \mathcal {G} be a topological group, and A \mathcal {A} a unital symmetric C ∗ C^* -subalgebra of U C ( G ) \mathrm {UC}(\mathcal {G}) , the algebra of bounded uniformly continuous functions on G \mathcal {G} . Generalizing the notion of a stable metric, we study A \mathcal {A} -metrics δ \delta , i.e., the function δ ( e , ⋅ ) \delta (e, \cdot ) belongs to A \mathcal {A} ; the case A = W A P ( G ) \mathcal {A}=W\hskip -0.7mm A\hskip -0.2mm P(\mathcal {G}) , the algebra of weakly almost periodic functions on G \mathcal {G} , recovers stability. If the topology of G G is induced by a left invariant metric d d , we prove that A \mathcal {A} determines the topology of G \mathcal {G} if and only if d d is uniformly equivalent to a left invariant A \mathcal {A} -metric. As an application, we show that the additive group of C [ 0 , 1 ] C[0,1] is not reflexively representable; this is a new proof of Megrelishvili [ Topological transformation groups: selected topics , Elsevier, 2007, Question 6.7] (the problem was already solved by Ferri and Galindo [Studia Math. 193 (2009), pp. 99–108] with different methods and later the results were generalized by Yaacov, Berenstein, and Ferri [Math. Z. 267 (2011), pp.129–138]). Let now G \mathcal {G} be a metric group, and assume A ⊆ L U C ( G ) \mathcal {A}\subseteq \mathrm {LUC}(\mathcal {G}) , the algebra of bounded left uniformly continuous functions on G \mathcal {G} , is a unital C ∗ C^* -algebra which is the uniform closure of coefficients of representations of G \mathcal {G} on members of F \mathscr {F} , where F \mathscr {F} is a class of Banach spaces closed under ℓ 2 \ell _2 -direct sums. We prove that A \mathcal {A} determines the topology of G \mathcal {G} if and only if G \mathcal {G} embeds into the isometry group of a member of F \mathscr {F} , equipped with the weak operator topology. As applications, we obtain characterizations of unitary and reflexive representability.

1. Let (X, T, 7r) be a topological transformation group, where X is a nontrivial Hausdorff space and T is a topological group which leaves an end point e of X fixed. In [3], Wallace proved that if T is cyclic and X is a locally connected continuum, T has a fixed point other than e. Then in [4], Wallace asked the following question: If X is a peano continuum and T is compact or abelian, then does T have a fixed point other than e? In [5] Wang showed that if T is compact, and X is arcwise connected, then T has a fixed point other than e. Then Chu [1 ] showed that T has infinitely many fixed points. Chu began the study of the abelian case in [2]. In this paper we show by example that X may be a peano continuum and T may be a countably generated abelian group which has e for its only fixed point, ?2. Thus in general the answer to Wallace's question in the abelian case is no. However, if T is a generative group, and X is compact and arcwise connected, then T has a fixed point other than e, ?3. We also show by example that T may be a finitely generated nonabelian group which has e for its only fixed point, ?4.

The topological properties of "weak mixing" and "strong mixing" for topological transformation groups have been introduced and investigated and many analogous results have been derived. Let us adopt the following definitions and notations. We will restrict our attention to topological transformation groups (X, T) with compact metrizable phase space X. We call a topological transformation group ergodic if the only closed proper invariant subset is nowhere dense or, equivalently, there exists a point in X the orbit-closure of which is the whole space X. Such a point is called a transitive point. We call a topological transformation group weakly mixing if (X, T)x (X, T) is ergodic and strongly mixing if for any two open sets U and V, there is a compact subset K of T such that t ~ T ~ K implies Ut n V # ;J. Let ~'(X) be the set of all bounded complex-valued functions on X which are continuous on a co-meager set. (We identify functions which coincide on a co-meager set.) Let us define a cascade to be a topological transformation group with the discrete additive group of integers as phase group. In this situation, it is also denoted by (X, ~b), with ~b a homeomorphism of X. If Y is an invariant subset of X, then (Y, ~b) is also a cascade and we say that (Y, ~b) is a subcascade of (X, ~b). Let us consider the following properties of a topological transformation group (X, T):

The topological fundamental group and free topological groups

We prove that the additive group (E*, τ k (E)) of an $${\mathcal {L}_\infty}$$ -Banach space E, with the topology τ k (E) of uniform convergence on compact subsets of E, is topologically isomorphic to a subgroup of the unitary group of some Hilbert space (is unitarily representable). This is the same as proving that the topological group (E*, τ k (E)) is uniformly homeomorphic to a subset of $${\ell_2^\kappa}$$ for some κ. As an immediate consequence, preduals of commutative von Neumann algebras or duals of commutative C*-algebras are unitarily representable in the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets. The unitary representability of free locally convex spaces (and thus of free Abelian topological groups) on compact spaces, follows as well. The above facts cannot be extended to noncommutative von Neumann algebras or general Schwartz spaces.

1. In view of the recent work on topological groups it is natural to consider the situation which arises when such groups act as transformation groups on various types of spaces. Such a study is begun here from the point of view of almost periodic transformation groups, the definition of which is suggested by von Neumann's paper on almost periodic functions in a group.t Compact topological transformation groups are a special case of almost periodic transformation groups, at least for a rather wide class of spaces. The paper concerns itself chiefly with the nature of the minimal closed invariant sets of such groups. There are some results for general spaces but the main results are for Euclidean spaces and more particularly for threedimensional Euclidean spaces. One of the most interesting theorems states that if a compact one-dimensional group acts on three-space in such a way that its orbits are uniformly bounded in diameter, then every point of the space is fixed under the group, so that if such a group is to act in a nontrivial manner the diameters of its orbits must be unbounded. Under some restrictions a similar theorem is proved for one-parameter almost periodic groups. Furthermore it is shown that for this latter class of groups, many of the orbits must actually be simple closed curves if they have one-dimensional closures. 2. The group considered here will be denoted by G. It will be subjected to various conditions as the occasion demands but it will always be Abelian. In case it is the group of real numbers, it will be spoken of as a one-parameter group; in case it is the real numbers reduced modulo one, it will be spoken of as the circle group. The space on which the group acts will be denoted by R. It will be specialized in various ways, but in any case it will always be a locally compact metric space. If x and y are two points of R, the distance between them will be denoted by d(x, y).

Introduction. This article is based upon a principle which is so standard that it is almost a cliche: The first step to understanding a nonlinear phenomenon is to define and study a suitable linear approximation. To be more specific, we shall describe some applications of this to the symmetry questions of topological transformation groups. Given a topological space X, let Homeo(^) denote the set of self-homeomorphisms of X. This is a group under composition of mappings. If G is an arbitrary group, then a group action of G on I is a homomorphism Homeo( X). Frequently we wish to impose some weak assumptions on <p. For example, if G is a topological group, then we might want cp to have suitable continuity properties. The usual assumption is that the map

Some aspects of dimension theory for topological groups

A class of abelian topological groups was previously defined to be a variety of topological groups with coproducts if it is closed under forming subgroups, quotients, products and coproducts in the category of all abelian topological groups and continuous homomorphisms. This extended research on varieties of topological groups initiated by the second author. The key to describing varieties of topological groups generated by various classes was proving that all topological groups in the variety are a quotient of a subgroup of a product of groups in the generating class. This paper analyses generating varieties of topological groups with coproducts. It focuses on the interplay between forming products and coproducts. It is proved that the variety of topological groups with coproducts generated by all discrete groups contains topological groups which cannot be expressed as a quotient of a subgroup of a product of a coproduct of discrete groups. It is proved that the variety of topological groups with coproducts generated by any infinite-dimensional Hilbert space contains all infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, answering an open question. This contrasts with the result that a variety of topological groups generated by a topological group does not contain any infinite-dimensional Hilbert space of greater cardinality.

Let /" be a group of finite homological type, X a finite dimensional, free /'-complex such that H.(X, Z) is finitely generated.We proved that H,(X//', Z)is finitely generated, and x(X//')-X(1-')" 2: (X), where Z (/') is the Euler characteristic of a group Key words: Topological transformation groups; Euler characteristics of groups.

Totally Lindelöf and totally ω-narrow paratopological groups

1. Introduction.Let S be a locally compact semigroup with a dense maximal subgroup G.We ask the following question: When is G a topological group under the induced topology?It was proved recently by P. S. Mostert [8] that in general G is not a topological group.However, there are several good reasons motivating the study of such a problem.First, for an arbitrary locally compact semigroup, the closure of the maximal subgroup containing an idempotent forms a locally compact semigroup.If we know this maximal subgroup is a topological group, then it is a locally compact topological group.(This fact will be proved in the following paragraph.)By our rather good knowledge of locally compact topological groups, we can obtain information about the structure of this locally compact semigroup.Second, if we look at this problem from the point of view of transformation groups, we have a group G acting on a locally compact topological space.Naturally, we would like this group to be topologized so that it is a topological group.It is known that the weakest topology for G to be a topological group is the g-topology [1].It is somewhat harder to deal with the g-topology than with the fc-topology, but under some conditions the ^-topology will coincide with the fe-topology.Among the known conditions, the local compactness of the group seems most interesting.If one tries to generalize such a condition, it is rather natural to ask the following : If G is a group of homeomorphisms of X onto X, and the closure of G is locally compact in the fc-topology, does the induced topology of G coincide with the g-topology?Third, in the past few years there have been several papers about such questions : What is the relationship between the algebraic structure and the topological structure?When can one strengthen the topological structure so that even under weak conditions the algebraic operations will be continuous in a certain sense?For instance, in topological groups, if the group space is locally compact, and if the multiplication is separately continuous with respect to the topology of the space, then the group is a topological group.We are able to prove the same theorem when the space is second countable and second category without the assumption of local compactness [9].Now, our present problem arises quite

Covering group theory for topological groups

We show that the topological groups Diff 1 + (I) and Diff 1 + (S 1 ) of orientation-preserving C 1 -diffeomorphisms of the interval and the circle, respectively, admit finitely generated dense subgroups.We also investigate the question of genericity (in the sense of Baire category) of such finite topological generating sets in related groups.We show that the generic pair of elements in the homeomorphism group Homeo + (I) generate a dense subgroup of Homeo + (I).By contrast, if M is any compact connected manifold with boundary other than the interval, we observe that an open dense set of pairs from the associated boundary-fixing homeomorphism group Homeo 0 (M, ∂M ) will generate a discrete subgroup.We make similar observations for homeomorphism groups of manifolds without boundary including S 1 .

Long colimits of topological groups I: Continuous maps and homeomorphisms