• Home
  • Search
  • Coherent probability from incoherent judgment.
  • Cite Icon11
  • https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.7.1.3Copy DOI Icon

Coherent probability from incoherent judgment.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

People often have knowledge about the chances of events but are unable to express their knowledge in the form of coherent probabilities. This study proposed to correct incoherent judgment via an optimization procedure that seeks the (coherent) probability distribution nearest to a judge's estimates of chance. This method was applied to the chances of simple and complex meteorological events, as estimated by college undergraduates. No judge responded coherently, but the optimization method found close (coherent) approximations to their estimates. Moreover, the approximations were reliably more accurate than the original estimates, as measured by the quadratic scoring rule. Methods for correcting incoherence facilitate the analysis of expected utility and allow human judgment to be more easily exploited in the construction of expert systems.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Knowledge Engineering for Industrial Expert Systems

  • Sep 01, 1989
  • IFAC Proceedings Volumes
  • G Johannsen +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations164

Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule

  • Jun 01, 1998
  • Experimental Economics
  • Reinhard Selten
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

The Rationale and Approach of the Legal Expert System Construction

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Beijing Law Review
  • Caixia Zou +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Building Expert Systems: A Structured Bibliography

  • Jan 01, 1989
  • Studies in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
  • Giovanni Guida +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Verification of Event-Driven Process Chain with Timed Automata and Time Petri Nets

  • May 01, 2017
  • Anam Amjad +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations3

The Psychology of Expertise and Knowledge Acquisition: Comments on the Chapters in This Volume

  • Jan 01, 1992
  • Stephen Regoczei
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective beliefs

  • May 01, 2010
  • Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
  • Amit Kothiyal +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Knowledge‐base construction of a garment manufacturing expert system

  • Dec 01, 1996
  • International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology
  • Chang Kyu Park +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

A source of Bayesian priors

  • Sep 01, 1995
  • Cognitive Science
  • Daniel Osherson
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Building expert systems by training with automatic neural network generating ability

  • Mar 02, 1992
  • Hahn-Ming Lee +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations13

Legal interpretation in expert systems

  • Jan 01, 1993
  • Daniel Poulin +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Creating Input Sets For Inductive Learning From Simple Events

  • Mar 29, 1988
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Brian Tillotson +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations43

Strategies and biases in human decision-making and their implications for expert systems

  • Apr 01, 1986
  • Behaviour & Information Technology
  • Varghese S Jacob +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Importance-weighted conditional adversarial network for unsupervised domain adaptation

  • Apr 04, 2020
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Peng Liu +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

МЕТОДИ ПОПЕРЕДНЬОЇ ОБРОБКИ ТОМОГРАФІЧНИХ ЗОБРАЖЕНЬ ОЧНОГО ДНА

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Information Technology and Computer Engineering
  • S V Pavlov +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.