Combining linear logic and size types for implicit complexity

On the expressivity of elementary linear logic: Characterizing Ptime and an exponential time hierarchy

Quasi-interpretations are an useful tool to control resources usage of term rewriting systems, either time or space. They not only combine well with path orderings and provide characterizations of usual complexity classes but also give hints in order to optimize the program. Moreover, the existence of a quasi-interpretation is decidable.In this paper, we present some more characterizations of complexity classes using quasi-interpretations. We mainly focus on small space-bounded complexity classes. On one hand, by restricting quasi-interpretations to sums (that is allowing only affine quasi-interpretations), we obtain a characterization of LinSpace. On the other hand, a strong tiering discipline on programs together with quasi-interpretations yield a characterization of LogSpace.Lastly, we give two new characterizations of Pspace: in the first, the quasi-interpretation has to be strictly decreasing on each rule and in the second, some linearity constraints are added to the system but no assumption concerning the termination proof is made.KeywordsTuring MachineFunction SymbolTransitive ClosurePolynomial SpaceCovering GraphThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This paper is the fourth of a series exposing a systematic combinatorial approach to Girard's Geometry of Interaction (GoI) program. The GoI program aims at obtaining particular realisability models for linear logic that accounts for the dynamics of cut-elimination. This fourth paper tackles the complex issue of defining exponential connectives in this framework. For that purpose, we use the notion of \emph{graphings}, a generalisation of graphs which was defined in earlier work. We explain how to define a GoI for Elementary Linear Logic (ELL) with second-order quantification, a sub-system of linear logic that captures the class of elementary time computable functions.

We describe a type system with mixed linear and non-linear recursive types called LNL-FPC (the linear/non-linear fixpoint calculus). The type system supports linear typing which enhances the safety properties of programs, but also supports non-linear typing as well which makes the type system more convenient for programming. Just like in FPC, we show that LNL-FPC supports type-level recursion which in turn induces term-level recursion. We also provide sound and computationally adequate categorical models for LNL-FPC which describe the categorical structure of the substructural operations of Intuitionistic Linear Logic at all non-linear types, including the recursive ones. In order to do so, we describe a new technique for solving recursive domain equations within the category CPO by constructing the solutions over pre-embeddings. The type system also enjoys implicit weakening and contraction rules which we are able to model by identifying the canonical comonoid structure of all non-linear types. We also show that the requirements of our abstract model are reasonable by constructing a large class of concrete models that have found applications not only in classical functional programming, but also in emerging programming paradigms that incorporate linear types, such as quantum programming and circuit description programming languages.

Substructural type systems are growing in popularity because they allow for a resourceful interpretation of data which can be used to rule out various software bugs. Indeed, substructurality is finally taking hold in modern programming; Haskell now has linear types roughly based on Girard’s linear logic but integrated via graded function arrows, Clean has uniqueness types designed to ensure that values have at most a single reference to them, and Rust has an intricate ownership system for guaranteeing memory safety. But despite this broad range of resourceful type systems, there is comparatively little understanding of their relative strengths and weaknesses or whether their underlying frameworks can be unified. There is often confusion about whether linearity and uniqueness are essentially the same, or are instead ‘dual’ to one another, or somewhere in between. This paper formalises the relationship between these two well-studied but rarely contrasted ideas, building on two distinct bodies of literature, showing that it is possible and advantageous to have both linear and unique types in the same type system. We study the guarantees of the resulting system and provide a practical implementation in the graded modal setting of the Granule language, adding a third kind of modality alongside coeffect and effect modalities. We then demonstrate via a benchmark that our implementation benefits from expected efficiency gains enabled by adding uniqueness to a language that already has a linear basis.

Information flow control type systems statically restrict the propagation of sensitive data to ensure end-to-end confidentiality. The property to be shown is noninterference, asserting that an attacker cannot infer any secrets from made observations. Session types delimit the kinds of observations that can be made along a communication channel by imposing a protocol of message exchange. These protocols govern the exchange along a single channel and leave unconstrained the propagation along adjacent channels. This paper contributes an information flow control type system for linear session types. The type system stands in close correspondence with intuitionistic linear logic. Intuitionistic linear logic typing ensures that process configurations form a tree such that client processes are parent nodes and provider processes child nodes. To control the propagation of secret messages, the type system is enriched with secrecy levels and arranges these levels to be aligned with the configuration tree. Two levels are associated with every process: the maximal secrecy denoting the process' security clearance and the running secrecy denoting the highest level of secret information obtained so far. The computational semantics naturally stratifies process configurations such that higher-secrecy processes are parents of lower-secrecy ones, an invariant enforced by typing. Noninterference is stated in terms of a logical relation that is indexed by the secrecy-level-enriched session types. The logical relation contributes a novel development of logical relations for session typed languages as it considers open configurations, allowing for a more nuanced equivalence statement.

In this paper, we would like to describe two logical systems — Tichy's transparent intensional logic and Girard's linear logic. Transparent intensional logic is a method of logical analysis of natural language, which represents expressive system, independent of chosen source language. Our research vision is to connect this method with linear logic. In future research, this connection would allow us to apply Ludics theory principles (which is the extension of the linear logic) to natural language sentences, which puts them in a logical time and space.

We study a theory of asynchronous session types ensuring that well-typed processes terminate under a suitable fairness assumption. Fair termination entails starvation freedom and orphan message freedom namely that all messages, including those that are produced early taking advantage of asynchrony, are eventually consumed. The theory is based on a novel fair asynchronous subtyping relation for session types that is coarser than the existing ones. The type system is also the first of its kind that is firmly rooted in linear logic: fair asynchronous subtyping is incorporated as a natural generalization of the cut and axiom rules of linear logic and asynchronous communication is modeled through a suitable set of commuting conversions and of deep cut reductions in linear logic proofs.

Modalities for model checking: branching time logic strikes back

Deadlock freedom is a crucial property for message-passing programs. Over the years, several different type systems for concurrent processes that ensure deadlock freedom have been proposed; this diversity raises the question of how they compare. We address this question, considering two type systems not covered in prior work: Kokke etal's HCP, a type system based on a linear logic with hypersequents, and Padovani's priority-based type system for asynchronous processes, dubbed P. Their distinctive features make formal comparisons relevant and challenging. Our findings are two-fold: (1) the hypersequent setting does not drastically change the class of deadlock-free processes induced by linear logic, and (2) we relate the classes of deadlock-free processes induced by HCP and P. We prove that our results hold under both synchronous and asynchronous communication. Our results provide new insights into the essential mechanisms involved in statically avoiding deadlocks in concurrency.

Girard's linear logic [Gir87] is an extension of propositional logic with new connectives providing a logical treatment of resource control. As a first hint, consider the linear λ-terms, which are the λ-terms defined with the following restriction: when an abstraction λ x.M is formed, then x occurs exactly once in M . Linear λ-terms are normalized in linear time, that is, the number of reduction steps to their normal form is proportional to their size: a linear β-redex (λ x.M ) N involves no duplication of the argument N . Thus all the complexity of normalization comes from non-linearity. Linear logic pushes the limits of constructivity much beyond intuitionistic logic. A proper proof theoretical introduction to linear logic is beyond the scope of this book. In this chapter, we content ourselves with a semantic introduction. By doing so, we actually follow the historical thread: the connectives of linear logic arose from the consideration of (a particularly simple version of) the stable model. In section 13.1, we examine stable functions between coherence spaces, and discover two decompositions. First the function space E → E ′ is isomorphic to a space (! E )⊸ E ′, where ⊸ constructs the space of linear functions, and where! is a constructor which allows reuse of data. Intuitively, linear functions, like linear terms, can use their input only once. On the other hand, the explicit declaration of reusability,!, allows us to recover all functions and terms.

In this article, we develop a new and somewhat unexpected connection between higher-order model-checking and linear logic. Our starting point is the observation that once embedded in the relational semantics of linear logic, the Church encoding of any higher-order recursion scheme (HORS) comes together with a dual Church encoding of an alternating tree automata (ATA) of the same signature. Moreover, the interaction between the relational interpretations of the HORS and of the ATA identifies the set of accepting states of the tree automaton against the infinite tree generated by the recursion scheme. We show how to extend this result to alternating parity automata (APT) by introducing a parametric version of the exponential modality of linear logic, capturing the formal properties of colors (or priorities) in higher-order model-checking. We show in particular how to reunderstand in this way the type-theoretic approach to higher-order model-checking developed by Kobayashi and Ong. We briefly explain in the end of the paper how this analysis driven by linear logic results in a new and purely semantic proof of decidability of the formulas of the monadic second-order logic for higher-order recursion schemes.

We present the linear type theory λ Π⊸&⊤ as the formal basis for LLF , a conservative extension of the logical framework LF . LLF combines the expressive power of dependent types with linear logic to permit the natural and concise representation of a whole new class of deductive systems, namely those dealing with state. As an example we encode a version of Mini-ML with mutable references including its type system and its operational semantics and describe how to take practical advantage of the representation of its computations.

On the unity of duality

Syntactic Control of Interference Revisited