• https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190015607343Copy DOI Icon

Comments on

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

We would like to respond to the article entitled ‘‘Validity and reliability of a systematic database search strategy to identify publications resulting from pharmacy residency research projects.’’ We agree with the authors’ novel approach to confirm publication via a survey and to identify resident publications via a systematic approach to validate the utility of the database. The authors suggest that this approach can be used to compare publication success between residency programs. Additionally, this information can be used for marketing purposes for the individual residency program. One limitation noted by the authors was the use of only PubMed and EMBASE as the search engines to identify resident publications in the study and suggest other search engines, such as International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) and Google Scholar, may be used as alternatives. We aim to describe the methods and results of our project in which we assessed the utility of 5 different search engines to identify resident publications. Briefly, we identified the publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2003 (n 1⁄4 171), 2005 (n 1⁄4 221), and 2007 (n 1⁄4 273) Great Lakes Pharmacy Resident Conference (GLPRC) was 11.4% (n 1⁄4 76). We used a similar search strategy in Kwak et al to identify resident publication using the search engines (1) Scopus, (2) IPA, and (3) MEDLINE (PubMed). For this project, we used information from the abstracts that were previously confirmed for publications (n 1⁄4 76) to identify the proportion of these publications found in each of the following search engines: (1) Scopus, (2) IPA, (3) MEDLINE (PubMed), (4) EMBASE, and (5) Google Scholar. Two investigators (SMV and PMS) identified published research projects, and any disagreement between investigators was reviewed for consensus. A kappa statistic was calculated to determine interrater reliability for each search engine. The proportion of the published research was compared for each of the 5 search engines. Additionally, all pairs of search engines were assessed to determine the proportion published using combinations of searches. The proportions of published works were identified in the following search engines: Scopus (90.8%), IPA (75%), MEDLINE (PubMed; 80.3%), EMBASE (88.2%), and Google Scholar (90.8%; Table 1). Additionally, a higher proportion of nonpharmacy journals were identified using the search strategy compared to pharmacy journals (Table 1) in each individual search engine. After assessing various combinations, only Scopus plus IPA or Google Scholar plus IPA identified all 76 publications (Table 2). Based on our results, no single search engine was able to identify all publications. All 9 potential pairs were assessed. Only the combination use of either Scopus and IPA or Google Scholar and IPA resulted in identifying all 76 publications. The use of MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE resulted in the poorest combination of search engines, as it only identified 88.2% (n 1⁄4 67) of publications. Kwak et al used the combination of MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE with great success; however, the utility of this combination may differ in a general population of residency programs. Residents of certain geographic areas may submit to journals indexed to different search engines which may have contributed to the differences between our study and Kwak et al, as we assessed abstracts from the Great Lakes region. Additionally, confirmed publications in our previous search strategy used Scopus, IPA, and MEDLINE (PubMed) and not a validated measure which may have influenced our results. In conclusion, we affirm that a validated measure approach, as used by Kwak et al, is the gold standard for confirming the utility of various search engines; however, it may be difficult to replicate in a larger, generalized population of residents. The use of a single search engine is likely not adequate to identify all published residents’ studies. Regional differences may exist in the use of search engines, as the combination of MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE resulted in a high sensitivity in Kwak

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Googling for Health Information

  • Jun 21, 2012
  • Journal of Pediatric Health Care
  • Jennifer P D'Auria
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

On Credibility, Clarity, and Compliance

  • Jul 01, 2015
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • Al Burlingame +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Large Scale Phosphoproteome Profiles Comprehensive Features of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

  • Dec 13, 2010
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • Qing-Run Li +12
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

The impact of search engine data sharing on competition and consumer welfare

  • Feb 14, 2024
  • European Competition Journal
  • Bertin Martens
  • Research Article
  • Citations176

N- and O-Glycosylation in the Murine Synaptosome

  • Dec 01, 2013
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • Jonathan C Trinidad +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Perceptions and Competence in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Survey of the American Urological Association Membership

  • Dec 16, 2008
  • Journal of Urology
  • Philipp Dahm +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Examining bias perpetuation in academic search engines: An algorithm audit of Google and Semantic Scholar

  • Nov 03, 2024
  • First Monday
  • Celina Kacperski +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Search engines and their search strategies: the effective use by Indian academics

  • Sep 23, 2013
  • Program
  • B.T Sampath Kumar +1
  • Research Article

SEARCH ENGINES, ACCESSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES AND ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES AMONG COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE STUDENTS, UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI, BORNO STATE

  • Sep 20, 2025
  • FUGUS International Journal of Library and Information Science
  • Dr Ibrahim Wada +2
  • Discussion
  • Citations6

AAIM Recommendations to Promote Equity in the Clerkship Clinical Learning Environment

  • Apr 30, 2022
  • The American Journal of Medicine
  • Amber T Pincavage +6
  • Research Article

КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬДЫ ҚАТЕРЛІ ІСІКПЕН АУЫРАТЫН НАУҚАСТАРДЫҢ ӨМІР СҮРУ САПАСЫН БАҒАЛАЙТЫН ӘР ТҮРЛІ ҚҰРАЛДАРДЫ ҚОЛДАНУ: ӘДЕБИ ШОЛУ

  • Feb 28, 2023
  • Наука и здравоохранение
  • Толеутаева Д.М +7
  • Front Matter
  • Citations3

Further studies are needed to assess the competing therapies for neck pain

  • Oct 01, 2003
  • The Journal of Pain
  • Paul M Peloso +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Priority claims for surgical techniques

  • Feb 01, 2006
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • Daniel Mark Siegel +1
  • Front Matter
  • Citations1

Social Media Posts and Search Engine Queries as the Canary in the Coal Mine for Public Health Surveillance

  • Sep 01, 2018
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Joseph G Murphy +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations56

Charting a Professional Course: A Review of Mentorship in Medicine

  • Feb 01, 2011
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology
  • Ann Marie Mckenna +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.