• Home
  • Search
  • Communicating about Carbon Capture and Storage
  • Cite Icon5
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.444Copy DOI Icon

Communicating about Carbon Capture and Storage

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has emerged as a potential strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It involves the capture of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from large point source emitters, such as coal-fired power plants. The CO2 is transported to a storage location, where it is isolated from the atmosphere in stable underground reservoirs. CCS technology has been particularly intriguing to countries that utilize fossil fuels for energy production and are seeking ways to reduce their GHG emissions. While there has been an increase in technological development and research in CCS, some members of the public, industry, and policymakers regard the technology as controversial. Some proponents see CCS as a climate change mitigation technology that will be essential to reducing CO2 emissions. Others view CCS as an environmentally risky, complex, and expensive technology that is resource-intensive, promotes the continued extraction of fossil fuels, and competes with renewable energy investments. Effective communication about CCS begins with understanding the perceptions of the general public and individuals living in the communities where CCS projects are sited or proposed. Most people may never live near a CCS site, but may be concerned about risks, such as the cost of development, environmental impacts, and competition with renewable energy sources. Those who live near proposed or operational projects are likely to have a strong impact on the development and deployment of CCS. Individuals in locally affected communities may be more concerned about disruptions to sense of place, impact on jobs or economy, or effect on local health and environment. Effective communication about the risks and benefits of CCS has been recognized as a critical factor in the deployment of this technology.

Similar Papers
  • Single Report
  • Citations29

Report of the Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage

  • Aug 01, 2010
  • Doefe (Usdoe Office Of Fossil Energy (Fe) (United States))
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Regional Review for Large-Scale Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in the Middle East

  • Oct 20, 2024
  • Nihal Darraj +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Development of Educational Tools in Russia to Accumulate Knowledge about Sequestration Technologies

  • Jan 08, 2021
  • Administrative Consulting
  • Yu N Vasilev +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in the U.S.: A Review of Market Challenges and Policy Recommendations

  • Jan 01, 2024
  • International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation.
  • Omobolanle Omowunmi Dosumu +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Facilitating Carbon Capture and Storage in Louisiana: The Implications of Environmental Protection Agency's Final Rule Granting Primacy for Class VI Wells

  • Sep 20, 2024
  • Philip Wartman +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

The socio-political context for deploying carbon capture and storage in China and the U.S

  • Mar 26, 2011
  • Global Environmental Change
  • Elizabeth Wilson +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Network Planning Based on Cost Analysis Using Superstructure Method in Indonesian Central Region

  • Feb 01, 2021
  • IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
  • Mochamad Irfan Dwiputro +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Financing carbon capture and storage projects the results of two expert meetings

  • Feb 01, 2009
  • Energy Procedia
  • John Kessels +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Overview of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Facilities Globally

  • Apr 17, 2019
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Hanming Liu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations61

Policy Stakeholders' Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage: A Comparison of Four U.S. States

  • Feb 13, 2013
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Rumika Chaudhry +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

From CO2 sources to sinks: Regulatory challenges for trans-boundary trade, shipment and storage

  • Nov 20, 2021
  • Resources, Conservation and Recycling
  • Swati Gola +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

The Evolution of European CCS Policy

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Energy Procedia
  • Matthew Billson +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

탄소 포집 및 저장(CCS) 기술의 국제법적 규제

  • Jun 30, 2024
  • Korea International Law Review
  • Hyewon Jang
  • Research Article
  • Citations47

CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia

  • May 10, 2014
  • Energy
  • Alfredo Višković +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Best Practice for Transitioning from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR to CO2 Storage

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Energy Procedia
  • Ken Allinson +8
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.