Community College

Recently Published Dissertations on Community and Junior Colleges

This study aims to promote the development of vocational education in our country energetically. The analysis is followed by introducing the course of development on vocational and technical education in Britain and summarizing the successful experience of vocation in our country with strengthening the funding and legislation for the state of vocational education as well as putting forward suggestions for reform and innovation of education to improve the system of certificates.

FreeComparative and International Education: A Bibliography (2009)PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreAdult, Rural, Literacy, Vocational, Nonformal, Lifelong, and Popular EducationÅberg‐Bengtsson, Lisbeth. 2009. “The Smaller the Better? A Review of Research on Small Rural Schools in Sweden.” International Journal of Educational Research 48, no. 2 (June): 100–108.Alexopoulos, George, Alex Koutsouris, and Irene Tzouramani. 2009. “The Financing of Extension Services: A Survey among Rural Youth in Greece.” Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 15, no. 2 (June): 177–90.Bhola, H. S. 2009. “Reconstructing Literacy as an Innovation for Sustainable Development: A Policy Advocacy for Bangladesh.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 3 (May): 371–82.Boshier, Roger, and Yan Huang. 2009. “Madame Li Li: Communist Revolutionary, Adult Educator, Lifelong Learner.” Studies in Continuing Education 31, no. 1 (March): 45–59.Brock, Andy. 2009. “Moving Mountains Stone by Stone: Reforming Rural Education in China.” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 5 (September): 454–62.Cornford, Ian R. 2009. “Mere Platitudes or Realistically Achievable? An Evaluation of Current Lifelong Learning Policy in Australia.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 1 (February): 19–40.Dausien, Bettina, and Dorothee Schwendowius. 2009. “Professionalisation in General Adult Education in Germany—an Attempt to Cut a Path through a Jungle.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 182–203.Dowling, Jennie. 2009. “Changes and Challenges: Key Issues for Scottish Rural Schools and Communities.” International Journal of Educational Research 48, no. 2 (June): 129–39.FitzSimons, Gail. 2009. “Perspectives on Adult Education in Portugal.” Studies in Continuing Education 31, no. 1 (March): 91–96.Foley, Ellen E. 2009. “The Anti‐politics of Health Reform: Household Power Relations and Child Health in Rural Senegal.” Anthropology and Medicine 16, no. 1 (January): 61–71.Gross, Marin. 2009. “The Professionalisation of Adult Educators in the Baltic States.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 221–42.Guimarães, Paula. 2009. “Reflections on the Professionalisation of Adult Educators in the Framework of Public Policies in Portugal.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 205–19.Gur’lanova, M. P. 2009. “Problems and Prospects of the Development of the Rural School in Russia.” Russian Education and Society 51, no. 7 (July): 3–12.Handa, Sudhanshu, Heiling Pineda, Yannete Esquivel, Blancadilia Lopez, Nidia Veronica Gurdian, and Ferdinado Regalia. 2009. “Non‐formal Basic Education as a Development Priority: Evidence from Nicaragua.” Economics of Education Review 28, no. 4 (August): 512–22.Hargreaves, Linda M. 2009. “Respect and Responsibility: Review of Research on Small Rural Schools in England.” International Journal of Educational Research 48, no. 2 (June): 117–28.Hargreaves, Linda, Rune Kvalsund, and Maurice Galton. 2009. “Reviews of Research on Rural Schools and Their Communities in British and Nordic Countries: Analytical Perspectives and Cultural Meaning.” International Journal of Educational Research 48, no. 2 (June): 80–88.Hillier, Yvonne. 2009. “The Changing Faces of Adult Literacy, Language, and Numeracy: Literacy Policy and Implementation in the UK.” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 4 (August): 531–46.Ireland, Timothy D. 2009. “Literacy in Brazil: From Rights to Reality.” International Review of Education 54, nos. 5–6 (December): 713–32.Kalaoja, Esko, and Janne Pietarinen. 2009. “Small Rural Primary Schools in Finland: A Pedagogically Valuable Part of the School Network.” International Journal of Educational Research 48, no. 2 (June): 109–16.Liu, Mingxing, Rachel Murphy, Ran Tao, and Xuehui An. 2009. “Education Management and Performance after Rural Education Finance Reform: Evidence from Western China.” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 5 (September): 463–73.Liu, Ning Rong. 2009. “Decentralisation and Marketisation of Adult and Continuing Education: A Chinese Case Study.” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 3 (May): 212–18.Lloyd, Cynthia B., Cem Mete, and Monica J. Grant. 2009. “The Implications of Changing Educational and Family Circumstances for Children’s Grade Progression in Rural Pakistan.” Economics of Education Review 28, no. 1 (February): 1997–2004.Luo, Renfu, Yaojiang Shi, Linxiu Zhang, Chengfang Liu, Scott Rozelle, and Brian Sharbono. 2009. “Malnutrition in China’s Rural Boarding Schools: The Case of Primary Schools in Shaanxi Province.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 29, no. 4 (December): 481–501.Macpherson, Ian. 2009. “The Rights‐Based Approach to Adult Education: Implications for NGO‐Government Partnerships in Southern Tanzania.” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 2 (March): 263–79.Marshall, Jeffery H. 2009. “School Quality and Learning Gains in Rural Guatemala.” Economics of Education Review 28, no. 2 (April): 207–16.Maruatona, Tonic. 2009. “Reflections on Policies for Mass Literacy Education in Sub‐Saharan Africa.” International Review of Education 54, nos. 5–6 (December): 745–54.Mazurkiewicz, Grzegorz. 2009. “Adult Educators: An Example of the New Approach to Lifelong Learning in Poland.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 243–55.Moffat, Shaye, and Cynthia Vincent. 2009. “Emergent Literacy and Childhood Literacy‐Promoting Activities for Children in the Ontario Child Welfare System.” Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies: International Interdisciplinary Journal for Research, Policy, and Care 4, no. 2 (August): 135–41.Ogawa, Akihiro. 2009. “Japan’s New Lifelong Learning Policy: Exploring Lessons from the European Knowledge Economy.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 5 (September): 601–14.Osborne, Michael, and Kate Sankey. 2009. “Non‐vocational Adult Education and Its Professionals in the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 271–89.Papastamatis, Adamantios, and Eugenia Panitsidou. 2009. “The Aspect of ‘Accessibility’ in the Light of European Lifelong Learning Strategies: Adult Education Centres—a Case Study.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 3 (May): 335–51.Pitman, Tim, and Susan Broomhall. 2009. “Australian Universities, Generic Skills, and Lifelong Learning.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 4 (September): 439–58.Preece, Julia. 2009. “Lifelong Learning and Development: A Perspective from the ‘South.’” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 5 (September): 585–99.Probyn, Margie. 2009. “‘Smuggling the Vernacular into the Classroom’: Conflicts and Tensions in Classroom Codeswitching in Township/Rural Schools in South Africa.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 12, no. 2 (April): 123–36.Reprintseva, G. I. 2009. “Relations between Parents and Children in a Rural Family.” Russian Education and Society 51, no. 9 (September): 85–93.Reprintseva, G. I. 2009. “A Social‐Pedagogical Analysis of Relations between Parents and Children in the Rural Family.” Russian Education and Society 51, no. 10 (October): 3–17.Riddell, Sheila, Linda Ahlgren, and Elisabet Weedon. 2009. “Equity and Lifelong Learning: Lessons from Workplace Learning in Scottish SMEs.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 6 (December): 777–95.Sayilan, Feyziye, and Ahmet Yildiz. 2009. “The Historical and Political Context of Adult Literacy in Turkey.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 6 (December): 735–49.Shiel, Gerry, and Eemer Eivers. 2009. “International Comparisons of Reading Literacy: What Can They Tell Us?” Cambridge Journal of Education 39, no. 3 (August): 345–60.Shiohtat, Mariko. 2009. “Exploring Literacy and Growth: An Analysis of Three Communities of Readers in Urban Senegal.” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 1 (February): 65–72.Smit, Hemmo, Den Oudendammer, Kats Frowine, and Jaap Van Lakerveld. 2009. “Lifelong Learning on Either Side of the Border: The Effects of Government Policy on Adult Education in the Netherlands and Belgium.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 257–70.Strathdee, Rob. 2009. “Tertiary Education Reform and Legitimation in New Zealand: The Case of Adult and Community Education as a ‘Local State of Emergency.’” Research in Sociology of Education 30, no. 1 (February): 303–16.Suwanpitak, Sombat. 2009. “Thailand’s Path to Literacy.” International Review of Education 54, nos. 5–6 (December): 763–71.Timperley, Helen S., and Judy M. Parr. 2009. “Chain of Influence from Policy to Practice in the New Zealand Literacy Strategy.” Research Papers in Education 24, no. 2 (June): 135–54.Usman, Lantana M. 2009. “Rural Adult Education and the Health Transformation of Pastoral Women of Northern Nigeria.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 5 (September): 631–47.Van den Dungen, Marja. 2009. “Lifelong Learning within HE in the Netherlands.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 3 (September): 339–50.Weyer, Frédérique. 2009. “Non‐formal Education, out‐of‐School Learning Needs, and Employment Opportunities: Evidence from Mali.” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 2 (March): 249–62.Whitescarver, Keith, and Judith Kalman. 2009. “Extending Traditional Explanations of Illiteracy: Historical and Cross‐Cultural Perspectives.” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 4 (August): 497–511.Zarifis, George. 2009. “Decisions, Provisions, and Disillusionment for Non‐vocational Adult Learning (NVAL) Staff in South‐Eastern Europe: A Comparative Appraisal of Some Policy Developments with Diminishing Returns.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 163–82.Zepke, Nick. 2009. “A Future for Adult Lifelong Education in Aotearoa New Zealand: Neoliberal or Cosmopolitan?” International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 6 (December): 751–61.Child, Citizenship, and Human RightsAraújo, Ulisses, and Valéria Arantes. 2009. “The Ethics and Citizenship Program: A Brazilian Experience in Moral Education.” Journal of Moral Education 38, no. 4 (December): 489–511.Bromley, R. D. F., and P. K. Mackie. 2009. “Child Experiences as Street Traders in Peru: Contributing to a Reappraisal for Working Children.” Children’s Geographies 7, no. 2 (June): 141–58.Castellino, Joshua. 2009. “The MDGs and International Human Rights Law: A View from the Perspective of Minorities and Vulnerable Groups.” International Journal of Human Rights 13, no. 1 (February): 10–28.Christie, Pam. 2009. “The Complexity of Human Rights in Global Times: The Case of the Right to Education in South Africa.” International Journal of Educational Development 30, no. 1 (January): 3–11.Cowan, Elaine M., and David C. McMurty. 2009. “The Implementation of ‘Education for Citizenship’ in Schools in Scotland: A Research Report.” Curriculum Journal 20, no. 1 (March): 61–72.Devaney, John, and Trevor Spratt. 2009. “Child Abuse as a Complex and Wicked Problem: Reflecting on Policy Developments in the United Kingdom in Working with Children and Families with Multiple Problems.” Children and Youth Services Review 31, no. 6 (June): 635–41.Evans, Carly Anne. 2009. “Ethical Implications of Child Welfare Policies in England and Wales on Child Participation Rights.” Ethics and Social Welfare 3, no. 1 (April): 95–103.Freeman, Mark. 2009. “Education and Citizenship in Modern Scotland.” History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society 38, no. 3 (May): 327–32.Ghosh, Biswajit. 2009. “Trafficking in Women and Children in India: Nature, Dimensions, and Strategies for Prevention.” International Journal of Human Rights 13, no. 5 (December): 716–38.Golmohamad, Muna. 2009. “Education for World Citizenship: Beyond National Allegiance.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 41, no. 4 (August): 466–86.Hand, Michael, and Joanne Pearce. “Patriotism in British Schools: Principles, Practices, and Press Hysteria.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 41, no. 4 (August): 453–65.Haynes, Bruce. 2009. “History Teaching for Patriotic Citizenship in Australia.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 41, no. 4 (August): 424–40.Herrera, Elsa, Gareth A. Jones, and Sarah Thomas de Benítez. 2009. “Bodies on the Line: Identity Markers among Mexican Street Youth.” Children’s Geographies 7, no. 1 (March): 67–81.Jaramillo, Rosario, and José A. Mesa. 2009. “Citizenship Education as a Response to Colombia’s Social and Political Context.” Journal of Moral Education 38, no. 4 (December): 467–87.Kanako, Ide. 2009. “The Debate on Patriotic Education in Post–World War II Japan.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 41, no. 4 (August): 441–52.Keating, Avril. 2009. “Educating Europe’s Citizens: Moving from National to Post‐national Models of Educating for European Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 13, no. 2 (May): 135–51.Keating, Avril, Hinderliter Deborah Ortloff, and Stavroula Philippou. 2009. “Citizenship Education Curricula: The Changes and Challenges Presented by Global and European Integration.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 41, no. 2 (April): 145–58.Khong, Lana Yiu Lan. 2009. “Runaway Youths in Singapore: Exploring Demographics, Motivations, and Environments.” Children and Youth Services Review 31, no. 1 (January): 125–39.Kim, Chae‐Young. 2009. “Is Combining Child Labour and School Education the Right Approach? Investigating the Cambodian Case.” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 1 (February): 30–38.Li, Jun. 2009. “Fostering Citizenship in China’s Move from Elite to Mass Higher Education: An Analysis of Students’ Political Socialization and Civic Participation.” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 4 (July): 382–98.Macdonald, Catriona M. M. 2009. “‘To Form Citizens’: Scottish Students, Governance and Politics, 1884–1948.” History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society 38, no. 3 (May): 383–402.Macintyre, Stuart, and Noel Simpson. 2009. “Consensus and Division in Australian Citizenship Education.” Citizenship Studies 13, no. 2 (May): 121–34.Magendzo, Abraham, and Maria Isabel Toledo. 2009. “Moral Dilemmas in Teaching Recent History Related to the Violation of Human Rights in Chile.” Journal of Moral Education 38, no. 4 (December): 445–65.Mathur, Meena, Prachi Rathore, and Monika Mathur. 2009. “Incidence, Type, and Intensity of Abuse in Street Children in India.” Child Abuse and Neglect 33, no. 12 (December): 907–13.McLelland, Mark, and Katsuhiko Suganuma. 2009. “Sexual Minorities and Human Rights in Japan: An Historical Perspective.” International Journal of Human Rights 13, nos. 2–3 (July): 329–43.Milana, Marcella, and Tore Bernt Sørensen. 2009. “Promoting Democratic Citizenship through Non‐formal Adult Education: The Case of Denmark.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53, no. 4 (July): 347–62.Mirkova, Anna M. 2009. “Citizenship Formation in Bulgaria: Protected Minority or National Citizens?” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 29, no. 4 (December): 469–82.Munn, Pamela, and Margaret Arnott. 2009. “Citizenship in Scottish Schools: The Evolution of Education for Citizenship from the Late Twentieth Century to the Present.” History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society 38, no. 3 (May): 437–54.Nalkur, Priya G. 2009. “Achievement Orientations and Strategies: A Cultural Comparison of Tanzanian Street Children, Former Street Children, and School‐Going Children.” Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology 40, no. 6 (December): 1012–27.Ovens, Michelle. 2009. “A Criminological Perspective on the Prenatal Abuse of Substances during Pregnancy and the Link to Child Abuse in South Africa.” Early Child Development and Care 179, no. 4 (April): 503–16.Patiño‐González, Susana. 2009. “Promoting Ethical Competencies: Education for Democratic Citizenship in a Mexican Institution of Higher Education.” Journal of Moral Education 38, no. 4 (December): 533–51.Shalhoub‐Kevorkian, Nadera, and Sana Khsheiboun. 2009. “Palestinian Women’s Voices Challenging Human Rights Activism.” Women’s Studies International Forum 32, no. 5 (September–October): 354–62.Sim, Jasmine B.‐Y., and Murray Print. 2009. “Citizenship Education in Singapore: Controlling or Empowering Teacher Understanding and Practice?” Oxford Review of Education 35, no. 6 (December): 705–23.Sklair, Leslie. 2009. “The Globalization of Human Rights.” Journal of Global Ethics 5, no. 2 (September): 81–96.Suárez, David F., Francisco O. Ramirez, and Jeong‐Woo Koo. 2009. “UNESCO and the Associated Schools Project: Symbolic Affirmation of World Community, International Understanding, and Human Rights.” Sociology of Education 82, no. 3 (September): 197–216.Turner, Robert. 2009. “Workers’ Educational Association Tutorial Classes and Citizenship in Scotland, 1907–1939.” History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society 38, no. 3 (May): 367–81.Vakaoti, Patrick. 2009. “Researching Street‐Frequenting Young People in Suva: Ethical Considerations and Their Impacts.” Children’s Geographies 7, no. 4 (December): 435–50.Williams, Christopher. 2009. “The Rehabilitation Paradox: Street‐Working Children in Afghanistan.” Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 3, no. 1 (February): 4–20.Community Colleges; Further Education; Occupational, Technical, and Vocational EducationAkoojee, Salim. 2009. “Scarce Skills and Public Technical and Vocational Education and Training in South Africa: Twin Challenges or Two Sides of the Same Coin?” Southern African Review of Education 15, no. 4 (September): 117–338.Alexandrou, Alex. 2009. “Development through Partnership: How Learning Representatives Are Helping to Meet the Challenge of Upskilling Scottish FE Lecturers.” Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 3 (August): 233–49.Avis, James. 2009. “Further Education in England: The New Localism, Systems Theory and Governance.” Journal of Education Policy 24, no. 5 (September): 633–48.Barabasch, Antje, Sui Huang, and Robert Lawson. 2009. “Planned Policy Transfer: The Impact of the German Model on Chinese Vocational Education.” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 1 (February): 5–20.Bathmaker, Ann‐Marie, and Will Thomas. 2009. “Positioning Themselves: An Exploration of the Nature and Meaning of Transitions in the Context of Dual Sector FE/HE Institutions in England.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 33, no. 2 (June): 119–30.Bell, Jacqueline, and James Donnelly. 2009. “Applied Science in the English School Curriculum: The Meaning and Significance of ‘Vocationalization.’” Journal of Curriculum Studies 41, no. 1 (February): 25–47.Best, Shaun. 2009. “‘Who Am I?’ and ‘Who Are We?’: Audit Consciousness and the Further Education Funding Council in the 1990s.” Education, Knowledge, and Economy 3, no. 3 (December): 163–76.Blaardingerbroek, Barent, Neil Taylor, and Tom Haig. 2009. “Student Transition to Vocational Education from Middle Secondary School in Australia and Lebanon: An Exploratory Study.” Mediterranean Journal of Education Studies 14, no. 1 (February): 91–107.Blair, Erik. 2009. “A Further Education College as a Heterotopia.” Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 1 (March): 93–101.Böckerman, Petri, Ulla Hämäläinen, and Roope Uusitalo. 2009. “Labour Market Effects of the Polytechnic Education Reform: The Finnish Experience.” Economics of Education Review 28, no. 6 (December): 672–81.Bouzakis, Siphis, and Gerasimos Koustourakis. 2009. “Historicity as a Legitimising Argument in the Case of the Greek Educational Reforms of 1985 and 1997–1998 in General and Technical‐Vocational Education.” History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society 38, no. 2 (May): 283–302.Brockmann, Michaela, Linda Clarke, and Christopher Winch. 2009. “Difficulties in Recognising Vocational Skills and Qualifications across Europe.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice 16, no. 1 (April): 97–109.Buiskool, Bert‐Jan, Jaap Van Lakerveld, and Simon Broek. 2009. “Educators at Work in Two Sectors of Adult and Vocational Education: An Overview of Two European Research Projects.” European Journal of Education 44, no. 2 (June): 145–62.Child, Sue. 2009. “Differing Relationships to Research in Higher and Further Education in the UK: A Reflective Account from a Practitioner Perspective.” Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 3 (August): 333–43.Comyn, Paul. 2009. “Vocational Qualification Frameworks in Asia‐Pacific: A Cresting Wave of Educational Reform?” Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 3 (August): 251–68.Darmanin, Mary. 2009. “Further and Higher Education Markets’ Cushions: Portability of Policy and Potential to Pay.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 19, nos. 3–4 (December): and 2009. “A College as a for in the A Case of the College of and Affairs 15, no. 1 (February): Robert A. 2009. An Case Study.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 33, no. 12 (December): 2009. in Education and Globalization and Education 7, no. 2 (June): and 2009. “Lifelong Learning and Vocational Training in Northern and International Journal of Lifelong Education 28, no. 5 (September): 2009. the Transition from Education to Work as Vocational Lessons from the and Cultural British Educational Research Journal 35, no. 5 (October): and 2009. between Vocational and Education: Experiences and from Current in European Journal of Education 44, no. 3 (September): 2009. Further Education Teacher A Policy Communities and Policy Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and 35, no. 2 (June): 2009. for and in English Further Education Oxford Review of Education 35, no. 1 (February): and 2009. “Further Education of Their Teaching and Teacher Education no. 7 (October): and 2009. a Quality and of Education in Finnish Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53, no. 1 (March): 2009. the in the on in Teaching and Teacher Education no. 7 (October): and 2009. and of and in China.” Journal of Teaching in and nos. (February): P. and 2009. “The Development of National for Working in the UK.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 4 (December): 2009. Development and Exploration and Their in A of Youths Adult Education in Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies: International Interdisciplinary Journal for Research, Policy, and Care 4, no. 4 (December): and 2009. “Vocational Education and Training for in South Africa: The of Public and International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 2 (March): 2009. and Development: The between Policy and Practice in the English Further Education Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 4 (December): Robert. 2009. the National Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 1 (March): and 2009. of Skills in a Post‐compulsory Vocational Teacher Education in Western Australia.” Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 2 (June): 2009. or to an South African Students’ Vocational International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 4 (July): and 2009. from the An into of and the Work of for in Further Education.” British Educational Research Journal 35, no. 1 (February): 2009. “A and Analysis of Learning in Further and Higher Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 33, no. 1 (March): E. de M. and P. A. 2009. in Vocational Education: The of Knowledge through and Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 4 (December): and 2009. “The Challenges of Learning in the Changing Context of the European Higher Education European Journal of Education 44, no. 3 (September): 2009. “The Development of Adult and Community Education Policy in New Zealand: from Journal of Education Policy 24, no. 6 (December): and 2009. “The of Educational in Evidence from and Economics of Education Review 28, no. 1 (February): and 2009. Progression for in Further Education in England.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 4 (December): Irene and Lan. 2009. Vocational Qualifications in Care to the of Social Work Education: International Journal 28, no. 1 (January): Michael, and Robert 2009. “The of in Further Education Teacher Training in England.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 4 (December): 2009. and Participation in Further Education: Evidence from the Youth of England and British Journal of Sociology of Education 30, no. 1 (February): and 2009. The of HE in FE Working in a College in England.” Research in Post‐compulsory Education 14, no. 4 (December): Lantana M. 2009. Street and Vocational Training in Northern Nigeria.” Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 3, no. 2 (June): 2009. of and Future in Higher Vocational Education in China.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 1 (March): P. 2009. “The of at German Studies in Higher Education no. (December): and 2009. Are Vocational Training Analysis of Vocational Training in Vocational Education from a Learning Perspective.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 3 (October): and David 2009. a for China’s Vocational Education English Journal of Vocational Education and Training no. 3 (October): and 2009. and and Technical in Australian and New Zealand Education Economics no. 1 (March): 2009. from Two Sides of the Women’s in and the United States.” International Perspectives on Education and Society no. 1 (October): and 2009. “The to and the New of Elite Schools in and England.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 19, nos. 3–4 (December): 2009. of the from and Journal of 32, no. 5 (October): and 2009. Civic Education in Africa: Experience in and the International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 6 (December): 2009. in Countries: and African Perspectives.” Compare: Journal of Comparative and International Education 39, no. 2 (March): 2009. Higher Education in Nordic Studies of in and Sweden.” Studies in Continuing Education 31, no. 1 (March): B., and 2009.

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on a study conducted for the purpose of learning more about the mindfulness experiences of college students and their teachers. To assist in developing a more inclusive approach to the teaching of mindfulness tailored to the individual needs of more vulnerable students and to inform teacher training and curriculum development.Design/methodology/approachThis three-phase phenomenological study involved face-to-face and online contact with community college students and teachers involved in courses that incorporated mindfulness meditation. The findings from interviews with students in phase 1 were shared with teachers in phase 2 along with suggestions for safeguarding in phase 3 but initial results are promising as a number of safeguards have already been put into place.FindingsThis study found that mindfulness meditation is not necessarily a positive experience for vulnerable college students and their teachers and that there was a need for more teacher training, knowledge and ongoing support about the effects of some mindfulness meditations on some vulnerable students and how to adjust their intensity.Research limitations/implicationsWhile this is a small qualitative study, the majority of students interviewed reported unusual experiences. This this is not well known in the literature on mindfulness in higher education, and a search of the clinical literature supports the findings that significant safeguards and adjustments are needed for mindfulness meditation for vulnerable students in educational, non-clinical settings. Further research is needed.Practical implicationsAn implication of this study is that mindfulness meditation in its current form is likely to be unsuitable for vulnerable students. Practical recommendations for safeguarding mindfulness in higher education are already being trialed, as mentioned in this paper and will be the subject of more extensive exploration in another paper.Social implicationsThere are significant implications in these findings that the potential harmful effects of mindfulness may be overlooked and may be more commonly experienced than is currently realized especially for individuals with a history of trauma, with addictions, mental health difficulties or self-harm.Originality/valueAn innovation in this study is its methodology which drew out students’ and teachers’ own experience of mindfulness meditation in their own words when most mindfulness studies are quantitative and tend to focus on outcomes before understanding. In addition, the findings were presented directly to teachers making it possible to see how little they knew about their students’ experiences. This created an opening and a willingness to adopt safeguarding recommendations.

Community colleges have become among the most popular public higher education institutions in the nation to provide transfer, technical, developmental, business and industry, and community service education. Once considered the junior partner in the higher education enterprise (and on average receiving less state aid per student than their four-year counterparts), public community colleges now provide education to more than one-half of all citizens enrolled in postsecondary education. In the last decade, they have also become the core workforce development institutions of our nation. In many ways, these institutions have seen their role and mission evolve to the point that they now have goals that in many respects resemble those defined for land grant universities, established by the Morrill Act during the nineteenth century (Cohen & Brawer, 1996). Public community college leaders often lament that their institutions are low on the food chain when it comes to their state's funding priorities. This may be due partially to the lack of attention paid to cost-and-benefit analyses in funding requests. Policymakers around the nation will likely find themselves spending increasing amounts of time validating fair and equitable funding allocation criteria (Burke & Serban, 1998). As the squeeze on available state aid becomes increasingly oppressive, comparing costs outlays to the investment returns gained by states were they to invest more in community college education will become a higher priority for community college leaders. Yet barriers exist to promoting this position (Goodchild, Lovell, Hines, & Gill, 1997), among which include the following: (a) a noticeable inability of college leaders to demonstrate that community colleges are underfunded, especially in the context of their sizable contributions to life in America, (b) the lack of consensus among policymakers regarding efficient and equitable policy options that a state's higher education systems might choose in making resource requests and allocation decisions, (c) a dearth of consistent and timely research that explores, tests, and develops functional theories of state funding, and (d) the absence of ongoing examinations of how existing funding model practices affect postsecondary education institutions and the broader society they seek to serve. Literature Review As the new millennium begins, a variety of methods exist for requesting and allocating state funds to support the operation of public community colleges (Breneman & Taylor, 1996). Practitioners and scholars with an understanding of the theories, practices, and nuances in the finance and funding strategies employed by community college systems recognize that one approach to state aid does not fit all. Indeed, a plethora of forces unique to each state environment shape how funding requests and distributions are made. The rationales and methods that state policymakers use to allocate financial support for higher education can be nearly as important as the amount of that support (Richardson, Bracco, Callan, & Finney, 1999). More pointedly, an acceptable sense of fair play must exist in any funding allocation model. Moreover, the methods selected for allocating state funds typically must be viewed as affordable as well as politically acceptable to those approving and those receiving state financial support. Funding can be complex, highly politicized, and not prone to easy solutions (Kane, 1999). Although seldom discussed in a scholarly framework, politicizing of funding practices can be potent: The history of political parties in power and the relative pecking order of the various sectors consuming public funds, including higher education, play a major role in funding allocation decisions (McKeown & Alexander, 1986). Currently, in many states, the responsibility for establishing state funding allocations to public institutions of postsecondary education lies directly with each state's legislative bodies. …

This paper sets out to explore the case for higher education engagement with workforce development with reference to media studies in the light of recent government policy initiatives including the trilogy of White Papers, 14–19 Years, The Skills Strategy, and The Future of Higher Education. It focuses on the problems and potential solutions to establishing an accredited work-based learning route supported by further and higher education as a major contribution to the knowledge economy. It is inevitable in any analysis of higher education and workforce development that consideration has to be given the nature of the qualification framework and the current schizophrenia between the national qualification framework led by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education framework. Until this unconnected and disjointed approach to a national qualification framework is resolved it will not be possible to establish coherent credit accumulation and transfer schemes all encouraging extensive use of accreditation of prior learning and experience in the workplace. Higher education, particularly subject disciplines with a direct interest in occupational sectors such as media have no choice but to engage in workforce development. However, this highlights the difficulties of providing a relevant education with the demands of employers often articulated through sector skills councils such as Skillset. The University Vocational Awards Council which is a consortium of 74 higher education institutions and the largest of the further education colleges devoted to higher level vocational education and training, sets out the general arguments for engagement with workforce development, sketches a way forward and indicates a potential role for the Association of Media Practitioners in Education.

The competitive environment for educational institutions is changing. In this environment, community colleges and private universities may be ill equipped to achieve their respective missions. This article introduces a concept from for-profit business strategy to higher education planners. The changing competitive environment of higher education has created an opportunity for the development of strategic alliances among organizations that have previously been competitors. Strategic alliances based on cooperation between individual institutions of higher education can allow these institutions to be more successful in a highly profitable market in which neither institution could compete separately. This article reviews the relevant literature on community colleges and private universities, and applies principles of strategic management to the current college and university environment. The student body in higher education institutions is markedly different today than 30 years ago. Students today are as likely to have a career, a home, and a family as a fraternity and a dorm room. The expanding number of nontraditional students has created a demand for higher education that is geared toward nontraditional needs. A competition response alliance between a community college and a nearby private university can solve the problems of the incomplete education that is currently available to the nontraditional student. Private universities have the flexibility to offer a specialized program of study at a premium price, while community colleges are better able to offer low-cost services to a large group of students. Pursuing such an alliance is highly beneficial for both the community college and the private university. Competition response alliances can allow community colleges and private universities to attract higher education consumers that would otherwise be forced to choose between adversely altering their lives and forgoing the pursuit of a bachelor s degree. This cooperation would allow both types of institution to achieve many of their goals and better serve society.

St. Vincent and the Grenadines has a systematic education system starting with the early childhood education to primary, secondary and tertiary education. The government has always sought to provide higher education to the people since the early twentieth century. This quest for higher education made the government to forge links with the University of the West Indies which was established to serve the region. The University College of the West Indies (UCWI) was established in 1948 and in 1962 it became a full fledged university, awarding its own degrees. By 2009, the university has expanded greatly with five campuses at Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and has an open campus. In the Caribbean, the development of Community Colleges began in 1968 with the Barbados Community College. Since then, similar Colleges have developed in at least eleven other countries in the region as policy makers in the region have sought for innovative ways to address the increased social demand for post secondary/tertiary level education as well as reach non-traditional groups in the community. Community Colleges are seen as a means of increasing access to many sectors of Caribbean society that may not normally be able to pursue higher education. In St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the Community College was conceived prior to 1997 and developed as an amalgamation of four different institutions: The School of Nursing, The Technical College, The Teachers’ College and the Advanced Level College. The St. Vincent Community College Act 2005 formalised the process and in January 2009, the Community College Board of Governors took administrative control of the College. The School of Nursing has become the Division of Nursing Education; the Technical College has become the Division of Technical and Vocational Education; The Teachers’ College has become the Division of Teacher Education; and the Advanced Level College has become the Division of Arts, Sciences and General Studies. This paper looks at a brief history of the Divisions and the amalgamation process. Some of the challenges faced by the new entity as well as the future directions are also discussed. Amidst the challenges of globalization, the College hopes to develop its programmes to include a wider range of Associate and Bachelor’s Degrees, distance and outreach education. Issues of ICT use, programme quality and accreditation will also continue to be in the forefront of its development.

Democracy’s colleges. Originally referring to land-grant institutions and then claimed by community colleges as well (Ronan 2012), “democracy’s colleges” highlight what may be a primary tension facing many institutions of higher education today: how to fulfill—and perhaps integrate—the dual purposes of “doing the work of democracy” (i.e., preparation of students for civic life) and “equalizing opportunity” (i.e., widespread provision of the college education that is a gateway to employment and economic security) (Ronan 2012, 31). This tension may be particularly overt within community colleges, which educate approximately one half of the undergraduates in the United States (including a significant proportion of nonmajority and historically underserved undergraduates) and have a long history of providing widespread access to higher education and vocational training (American Association of Community Colleges n.d., “Community College Trends and Statistics”; Cohen, Brawer, and Kisker 2014). Therefore, both the potential for generating creative and effective approaches to navigating this tension and the stakes of doing so are high within the community college system. This book on service-learning in community colleges is an important step in the ongoing work to leverage service-learning as a strategy for deepening partnerships, nurturing healthy communities, enriching the civic work of faculty, cocreating high-quality civic learning and leadership opportunities with students, and transforming institutions. We provide an overview of service-learning in this context, examining its key role in institutional endeavors to hold fast to their civic mission—within community colleges in particular and higher education more generally—with an eye to what can be learned from community colleges as they use this pedagogy to advance and integrate these dimensions of their identity as democracy’s colleges.KeywordsCommunity CollegeCommunity EngagementCivic EngagementService LearnCivic EducationThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Reviewed by: International Reform Efforts and Challenges in Community Colleges. New Directions in Community Colleges, No. 138 Patricia Somers, Associate Professor Edward J. Valeau and Rosalind Latiner Raby (Eds.). International Reform Efforts and Challenges in Community Colleges. New Directions in Community Colleges, No. 138. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007. 112 pp. Paper: $29.00. ISBN: 978-0-470-17688-7. This monograph provides a basic overview of the issues, challenges, and models involved in internationalizing community college education. The editors wrote this book to fill the post-September 11 void about information on international education reform for community colleges. However, 9/11 was a double turning point: Americans understood the need to be more globally connected yet monies were diverted to national safety and security programs rather than educational activities. Eleven chapters form the monograph, with three common threads: (a) the role of new community college leaders in providing leadership for international programs, (b) how some community colleges have embraced globalization, and (c) how international education can become a catalyst for educational revitalization in community colleges (pp. 2–3). The book is aimed at relatively novice practitioners. The first three chapters have a good, but at times redundant, general overview of internationalization in community colleges. Two interesting chapters deal with the globalization of workforce development and technical/occupational programs. Six chapters review specific details of how to internationalize. Two of these chapters discuss consortial efforts. Consortia provide key support for international programs, particularly study-abroad efforts, which need a critical mass of students to be financially viable. Other chapters present examples of on- and off-campus programs and profile international faculty in community colleges. The most useful part of the monograph is two case studies. The first is a cautionary tale about how international education programs can become politicized, especially in a localized setting such as a community college. This case included charges of "pork barrel" trips by administrators for recruiting students and administrators who are junketing on "inspection visits" to colleges abroad. The final chapter is a case study of the successful Asia-Pacific Emphasis at Kapi'olani Community College in Hawai'i. While this volume seeks to help practitioners, it also contains useful research. For example, a study of 700 community college students found that they acknowledged financial barriers to study abroad, yet family and job considerations were even more important in their decision not to study abroad. Further, one of the consortia did a pre- and post-study of intercultural sensitivity, with mixed results depending on the program location. The monograph could be very helpful to community colleges just beginning an international effort. There are some omissions, however. A more detailed description of visa issues for international students and faculty would provide a realistic understanding of the effort involved in bringing international scholars to campus. Additional case studies would be useful. One author mentions that a community college has successfully used local immigrant communities to help develop its international program; a description of this program would be interesting. Further, a case study of a successful program at a "border" college (U.S/Mexico or U.S./Canada) would provide another model for globalizing the community college. On the whole, Valeau, Raby, and associates provide good basic information on internalizing the community college. The addition of a few more case studies would make the volume outstanding. [End Page 521] Patricia Somers, Associate Professor Higher Education and Women's/Gender Studies, University of Texas at Austin, and Fulbright New Century Scholar Copyright © 2008 Association for the Study of Higher Education

Agility and Assessment in the Age of COVID‐19: How Fast Can a Community College Dance?

Steven Yelton, PE, AS, BSEE, is a professor in the Electrical Engineering Technologies Department at Cincinnati State Technical and Community College in Cincinnati, OH. Email: steven.yelton@ cincinnatistate.edu Over time, the healthcare technology management (HTM) field has seen an expansion in the education credentials for certain positions. However, getting a college degree can be challenging for many professionals, even with extensive experience in the field and a previous college degree. One problem is that accreditation mismatches may exist between institutions, which often is a surprise for employees and employers. A thorough understanding of institutional accreditation is critical for successful career development. To begin, here is an important fact: Every one of the thousands of colleges and universities in this country is accredited (with a tiny number of exceptions, mainly religious schools). Accreditation is designed to ensure academic quality, ensure public confidence, and most importantly, serve as a gatekeeper for federal financial aid (Title IV funds). Because many students use financial support to pay for college, institutions need accreditation for enrollment to start to happen. An accreditation credential granted to institutions is associated with one of two bodies: the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) or the U.S. Department of Education (USDE). CHEA is a nongovernmental organization that recognizes five regional groups (Accrediting Commission of Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges, Middle States Commission on Higher Education, Higher Learning Commission, New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Institutions of Higher Education, and the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges) surveying about 3,000 schools. Colleges or universities with this accreditation type are deemed “regionally accredited.” Academic credits earned at one of the schools are transferrable to another regionally accredited school. (Of note, while regional accreditation ensures the transfer of courses between institutions, it does not guarantee that courses will meet the specific degree requirements.) The transfer of courses between institutions is a complicated and challenging process that also involves program accreditation (discussed later). A database of regionally accredited schools is accessible at www.chea.org. Approximately 85% of colleges have regional accreditation, including all public (state or federally supported) institutions. The other accreditation credential option comes from one of about 52 private agencies. The USDE has provided “deemed status” to this diverse group to accredit colleges and universities, many of which are faith-based (e.g., Association of Advanced Rabbinical and Talmudic Schools) or focused on specialty training (e.g., Accreditation Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine). Institutions accredited by one of these We Hear You! Our Complete Standards Collection Is Now Digital. Includes the current version of every standard and guidance document

In his 2009 State of Union Address, President Obama challenged every American to commit to attending at least one year of college as means to global The President even offered to support individuals to complete college and meet a new goal: By 2020, America will once again have highest proportion of college graduates in world. The President backed that up with a series of speeches and, in fall 2010, White House held its first Summit on Community Colleges. The summit brought together community colleges, businesses, philanthropies, federal and state policy leaders, and students to discuss how community colleges can meet job training and education needs of nation's evolving workforce. At summit, President announced new initiatives to help community colleges, as well as partnerships with such organizations as Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Aspen Institute, Joyce and Lumina foundations, and charitable foundations of Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase. These messages and initiatives heartened many in education community, signaling importance of higher education and making clear that a college education is not only possible, but imperative for an individual's economic well - being and for nation's global competitiveness. The latest entry into this debate came earlier this spring with publication of Path - ways to Prosperity (Harvard Graduate School of Education, 2011) by Robert Schwartz, who criticizes move to have all high school students participate in a college preparatory curriculum. Schwartz argues that United States is the only developed nation that depends so exclusively on its higher education system as sole institutional vehicle to help young people transition from secondary school to careers, and from adolescence to adult - hood. Schwartz identifies recommendations that revolve around giving students opportunities to choose a career education path. College for all isn't working for most students, says report. Young people need alternative paths to adulthood, including better counseling, high - quality career education, apprenticeships and job training based at community colleges. Those who lack academic skill or motivation to earn a bachelor's degree should know about 'middle - skill jobs' that pay middle - class wages. Pathways specifically recommends providing multiple pathways during and beyond high school, including rigorous career and technical training, career counseling, apprenticeship programs, work - based learning, and smoother routes to community college. While I understand Schwartz' point, we know that academic rigor is greatest predictor of college success. For this reason alone, we need to offer a core curriculum for all students. We have to remember that comprehensive high school, as designed by James Conant, was intended to provide educational opportunity to all while ensuring that such schools also identified and supported finite talented students. So, high school was created to have a tiered system providing college for some while most students would end their education after receiving a high school diploma. Since this iconic institution was designed with that principle in mind, tracking became part of its foundation. …

Reflexion theorique sur Achimota, symbole du transfert pedagogique effectue entre les Etats-Unis, l'education industrielle des africains americains et le continent africain. Les auteurs reflechissent a la raison de ce transfert et aussi au mode d'implementation et de realisation du transfert en fonction des contextes economiques, geographiques et historiques.

Since the 1980s, the Chilean Higher Education System has been characterized by continuous government policies for marketization (somewhat nuanced after the return to democracy in the 1990s) and a marked, unchallenged hierarchal relationship between vocational and academic qualifications and institutions. Vocational Education and Training (VET), in particular, has relied heavily on human capital theory as its conceptual foundation with a clear focus on preparing students to participate in the labour market by providing them with skills demanded by employers. However, during the 2014–2018 presidential cycle, major reforms were implemented by the government in both K-12 and post-secondary education, intending to establish a system based on quality, equality and free access to education. For VET, this meant the enactment of a series of public policies that attempted to shift its theoretical approach from human capital approach to a rights-based one, aiming to support both educational and labour trajectories of VET students. These efforts reached its tipping point in early 2018 with the enactment of a new Law on Higher Education which formally recognized Vocational Higher Education (Educación Superior Técnico-Profesional) as a distinct subsector of the higher education system, suggesting an epistemological differentiation from universities that contrasted the previous hierarchical distinctions. Hence, previous hierarchical differentiations in Chile’s higher education system (where VET is positioned in the lower stages of vertical structure) coexist with a more horizontal epistemological approach (which focuses on the distinction between VET’s applied knowledge and universities’ academic knowledge). This chapter discusses the implications of recent changes in Chilean educational policies for the relationship between Vocational Higher Education Institutions and universities. In doing so, it uses a theoretical background based on the distinction of different approaches to theoretical foundations of VET (human capital, rights-based education and human capabilities), VET identities (hierarchical, epistemological, teleological and pragmatic) and higher education systems typologies (vertical and horizontal). The analysis is based on a review of public policies for Vocational Higher Education in Chile, identifying major social and political phenomena affecting its development, including an analysis of the implications of various soft and hard laws enacted during the 2014–2018 presidential period and the paradoxes that appear at contrasting them with previous Higher Vocational Education policies (especially with those which are still in force). As a conclusion, it argues that major regulatory changes are needed to reinforce the shift from a hierarchical to an epistemological differentiation between the two sectors of Chilean higher education.