• Home
  • Search
  • Comparative analysis of compression algorithms for four-dimensional light fields
  • https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316x-2022-10-4-7-17Copy DOI Icon

Comparative analysis of compression algorithms for four-dimensional light fields

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Objectives. The widespread use of systems for capturing light fields is due to the high quality of the reproduced image. This type of capture, although qualitatively superior to traditional methods to capturing volumetric images, generates a huge amount of data needed to reconstruct the original captured 4D light field. The purpose of the work is to consider traditional and extended to four-dimensional image compression algorithms, to perform a comparative analysis and determine the most suitable.Methods. Mathematical methods of signal processing and methods of statistical analysis are used.Results. Algorithms are compared and analyzed in relation to the compression of four-dimensional light fields using the PSNR metric. The selected evaluation criterion is affected not only by the dimension of the compression algorithm, but also by the distance of the baseline of the capture setting, since the difference between images increases with the distance between the optical centers of each camera matrix. Thus, for installations consisting of an array of machine vision cameras located on racks and placed in a room, the obvious choice would be to use conventional image compression methods. Furthermore, based on the assessment of the arbitrariness of video compression methods, it should be noted that the XVC algorithm remains undervalued, although its results are higher. Algorithm AV1 can be considered the next in order of importance. It has been established that the latest compression algorithms show higher performance if compared to their predecessors. It has also been shown that with a small distance between the optical centers of the captured images, the use of video compression algorithms is preferable to the use of image compression algorithms, since they show better results in both three-dimensional and four-dimensional versions.Conclusions. A comparison of the results obtained shows the need to use algorithms from the video compression family (XVC, AV1) on installations with a long baseline (mounted on camera stands). When working with integrated light field cameras (Lytro) and setting the capture with a short baseline, it is recommended to use image compression algorithms (JPEG). In general, video compression algorithms are recommended, in particular XVC, since on average it shows an acceptable level of PSNR in both the case of a short and long installation baseline.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Evaluation of video compression methods for cone‐beam computerized tomography

  • May 09, 2019
  • Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
  • Hui Yan +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

A Unified Framework for Compression and Compressed Sensing of Light Fields and Light Field Videos

  • May 17, 2019
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • Ehsan Miandji +2
  • Dissertation

Light Field compression and manipulation via residual convolutional neural network

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • Eisa Hedayati
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Exploration of Distributed Image Compression and Transmission Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Jan 17, 2019
  • International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE)
  • Fangzhou He
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

The Efficient and Robust Error Resilient Entropy Coding of Compressed Image for Wireless Communications

  • Jun 01, 2005
  • IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
  • J.-S Kim
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Application of K-means Algorithm in Image Compression

  • Jul 01, 2019
  • IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
  • Xing Wan
  • Research Article
  • Citations166

Foveated video quality assessment

  • Mar 01, 2002
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • Sanghoon Lee +2
  • Research Article

ОЦІНКА ЯКОСТІ НОВОГО АЛГОРИТМУ СТИСНЕННЯ ДАНИХ У СУЧАСНИХ СИСТЕМАХ ВІДЕОСПОСТЕРЕДЖЕННЯ НА БОРТУ БПЛА

  • Feb 10, 2025
  • Open Information and Computer Integrated Technologies
  • Л О Краснов +1
  • Research Article

Gabor 코사인과 사인 변환의 기저함수 절단 효과

  • Jun 01, 2004
  • The KIPS Transactions:PartB
  • Juck Sik Lee
  • Research Article

An investigation of machine learning-based video compression techniques

  • Mar 15, 2024
  • Applied and Computational Engineering
  • Ye Zhu
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

<title>Zero-tree-based video coding on MIMD architectures</title>

  • Mar 29, 2001
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Rade Kutil
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Design of Image Compression Storage System and Key Algorithm for Mars Rover

  • Oct 31, 2020
  • 深空探测学报(中英文)
  • Yong Xu +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Review on Fractal Video and Image Compression Techniques

  • Mar 30, 2023
  • Iraqi Journal of Computer, Communication, Control and System Engineering
  • Baydaa Z Sh +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Study on 5-D light field compression using multi-focus images

  • May 01, 2022
  • Shuho Umebayashi +2
  • Conference Article

Hardware realization of video enhancement and compression algorithms

  • Aug 05, 2021
  • Harish Reddy Kolanu +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.