• Home
  • Search
  • Comparative Study of Various Pattern Recognition Techniques for Identifying Seismo-Tectonically Susceptible Areas
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35510-3_53Copy DOI Icon

Comparative Study of Various Pattern Recognition Techniques for Identifying Seismo-Tectonically Susceptible Areas

  • Jan 1, 2023
  • Mridula +1 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

One of the most destructive natural hazard is an earthquake. Both the built environment and significant lives are lost. Due to presence of subduction zone and continuous continent to continent collision, major earthquakes in India are concentrated along the seismo-tectonically active Himalayan arc. Seismicity along the Alpine Himalayan Belt varies in well-defined patterns which are based on different parameters such as distance from tectonic source, presence of other historic earthquakes, intersections of tectonic features (in numbers), river length, presence of water body, meandering of rivers, soil conditions. An earthquake catalogue consisting of 540 earthquakes from year 1552 to 2020 is prepared for the consideration of data set. 117 tectonic features are considered for the study. For extracting feature a buffer of radius 25 km is considered along each earthquake of the catalogue. Four features namely distance from nearest tectonic feature, magnitude of earthquake, number of earthquakes within the buffer zone and presence of rivers (length) is extracted. A combination of these features allows identifying patterns based on training and classification of the entire data set. This paper is an attempt to compare four classification algorithms namely Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machines (SVM), K nearest neighbors (KNN) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and present an integrated predictive model for identifying seismically susceptible zones (SSZ) around the Kangra Region. The seismicity in the study area is divided into two classes: class A and Class B based on the magnitude of earthquakes and are called as training data set for the classification algorithms. The training data set provides a basis for classifying a set of data into class A and Class B based on the extracted features. After classification the study area is the classified into two classes: Class A: Significant seismically susceptible area, Class B: less Susceptible zone. A comparative analysis is done in terms of accuracy of classifying an earthquake into the correct class as per training data set. Of the four classification methodologies, ANN showed the best performance by reducing the error in misclassifying the epicenters from either class. The errors accuracy of classifying an earthquake in the correct group were found to be 24.74%, 6.45%, 7.78%, 2.9% for LDA, SVM, KNN and ANN respectively.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Detection of Diabetics Using Support Vector Machine Algorithm in Comparison With K Nearest Neighbour Algorithm to Measure Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity

  • Nov 12, 2022
  • Shaik Fayaz Aashiq +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Case Study in Huong Khe District, Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam

  • Jul 31, 2023
  • International Journal of Geoinformatics
  • Nguyễn Đình Lâm +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Predicting toxic action mechanisms of phenols using AdaBoost Learner

  • Dec 07, 2008
  • Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
  • Bing Niu +3
  • Research Article

Air Pollution Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms

  • Nov 01, 2025
  • CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water
  • Yusuf Alparslan Argun +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations185

Effect of classifier selection, reference sample size, reference class distribution and scene heterogeneity in per-pixel classification accuracy using 26 Landsat sites

  • Oct 06, 2017
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Shahriar S Heydari +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations25

An Analysis of Computational Complexity and Accuracy of Two Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms—K-Nearest Neighbor and Support Vector Machine

  • Aug 19, 2020
  • Susmita Ray
  • Research Article
  • Citations161

Generating high-resolution daily soil moisture by using spatial downscaling techniques: a comparison of six machine learning algorithms

  • May 20, 2020
  • Advances in Water Resources
  • Yangxiaoyue Liu +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

The Use of Artificial Neural Networks Optimized with Fire Fly Algorithm in Cancer Diagnosis

  • Sep 01, 2019
  • Gazi University Journal of Science
  • Mehmet Bilen +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations24

The use of Multispectral Radio-Meter (MSR5) data for wheat crop genotypes identification using machine learning models

  • Nov 14, 2023
  • Scientific Reports
  • Mutiullah Jamil +12
  • Conference Article

Predicting Crop Yield Based on Bagging Ensemble Model in Machine Learning

  • Nov 20, 2025
  • K Umamaheswari +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations83

Classification of coffee bean species using image processing, artificial neural network and K nearest neighbors

  • May 01, 2018
  • Edwin R Arboleda +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

Insights on phase formation from thermodynamic calculations and machine learning of 2436 experimentally measured high entropy alloys

  • Sep 01, 2022
  • Journal of Alloys and Compounds
  • Chuangye Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Using Machine Learning Methods to Assess Lymphovascular Invasion and Survival in Breast Cancer: Performance of Combining Preoperative Clinical and MRI Characteristics.

  • Feb 16, 2023
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Zeyan Xu +12
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations111

Comparison of Two Classifiers; K-Nearest Neighbor and Artificial Neural Network, for Fault Diagnosis on a Main Engine Journal-Bearing

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Shock and Vibration
  • A Moosavian +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations41

Prediction of Hepatitis Disease Using Machine Learning Technique

  • Dec 01, 2019
  • Vedha Krishna Yarasuri +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.