• Home
  • Search
  • Comparing human-labeled and AI-labeled speech datasets for TTS
  • https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.5.1.3030Copy DOI Icon

Comparing human-labeled and AI-labeled speech datasets for TTS

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

As the output quality of neural networks in the fields of automatic speech recognition (ASR) and text-to-speech (TTS) continues to improve, new opportunities are becoming available to train models in a weakly supervised fashion, thus minimizing the manual effort required to annotate new audio data for supervised training. While weak supervision has recently shown very promising results in the domain of ASR, speech synthesis has not yet been thoroughly investigated regarding this technique despite requiring the equivalent training dataset structure of aligned audio-transcript pairs. In this work, we compare the performance of TTS models trained using a well-curated and manually labeled training dataset to others trained on the same audio data with text labels generated using both grapheme- and phoneme-based ASR models. Phoneme-based approaches seem especially promising, since even for wrongly predicted phonemes, the resulting word is more likely to sound similar to the originally spoken word than for grapheme-based predictions. For evaluation and ranking, we generate synthesized audio outputs from all previously trained models using input texts sourced from a selection of speech recognition datasets covering a wide range of application domains. These synthesized outputs are subsequently fed into multiple state-of-the-art ASR models with their output text predictions being compared to the initial TTS model input texts. This comparison enables an objective assessment of the intelligibility of the audio outputs from all TTS models, by utilizing metrics like word error rate and character error rate. Our results not only show that models trained on data generated with weak supervision achieve comparable quality to models trained on manually labeled datasets, but can outperform the latter, even for small, well-curated speech datasets. These findings suggest that the future creation of labeled datasets for supervised training of TTS models may not require any manual annotation but can be fully automated.

Similar Papers
  • Preprint Article

Quality of Automatic Speech Recognition -- Polish Language case study -- from Wav2Vec to Scribe ElevenLabs

  • Feb 25, 2026
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Pietroń, Marcin +8
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Lost in Transcription, Found in Distribution Shift: Demystifying Hallucination in Speech Foundation Models

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Hanin Atwany +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

UCorrect: An Unsupervised Framework for Automatic Speech Recognition Error Correction

  • Jun 04, 2023
  • Jiaxin Guo +11
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

End-to-end automated speech recognition using a character based small scale transformer architecture

  • May 01, 2024
  • Expert Systems With Applications
  • Alexander Loubser +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Bangla-Wave: Improving Bangla Automatic Speech Recognition Utilizing N-gram Language Models

  • Feb 23, 2023
  • Mohammed Rakib +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Enhancements in automatic Kannada speech recognition system by background noise elimination and alternate acoustic modelling

  • Jan 22, 2020
  • International Journal of Speech Technology
  • G Thimmaraja Yadava +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations9

Fine Tuning and Comparing Tacotron 2, Deep Voice 3, and FastSpeech 2 TTS Models in a Low Resource Environment

  • Jul 29, 2022
  • T Gopalakrishnan +2
  • Research Article

An ASR Transformer-Based Model for Kannada Speech-to-Text Transcription

  • Feb 03, 2026
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology
  • Chandrika Prasad +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations39

A customized residual neural network and bi-directional gated recurrent unit-based automatic speech recognition model

  • Nov 18, 2022
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Selim Reza +3
  • Research Article

Post-ASR Correction for Low-Resource Rajasthani Language

  • Feb 27, 2026
  • ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
  • Abhishek Bhandari +1
  • Book Chapter

An Enhanced Real-Time Automatic Speech Recognition System for Tamil Language Using Wav2Vec2 Model

  • Mar 29, 2024
  • J Sangeetha +3
  • Research Article

HiACC: Hinglish adult & children code-switched corpus

  • Jul 17, 2025
  • Data in Brief
  • Shruti Singh +2
  • Conference Article

Human-like Bangla Text-to-Speech Synthesis using the Orpheus TTS Model Fine-tuning

  • Jan 29, 2026
  • Utshob Sutradhar +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

Predicting Word Error Rate for Reverberant Speech

  • May 01, 2020
  • Hannes Gamper +3
  • Research Article

Enhancing Armenian Automatic Speech Recognition Performance: A Comprehensive Strategy for Speed, Accuracy, and Linguistic Refinement

  • Jan 01, 2024
  • International Journal Of Scientific Advances
  • Varuzhan H. Baghdasaryan
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.