• Home
  • Search
  • Comparison of Deep Learning and Deterministic Algorithms for Control Modeling
  • Cite Icon44
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176362Copy DOI Icon

Comparison of Deep Learning and Deterministic Algorithms for Control Modeling

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Controlling nonlinear dynamics arises in various engineering fields. We present efforts to model the forced van der Pol system control using physics-informed neural networks (PINN) compared to benchmark methods, including idealized nonlinear feedforward (FF) control, linearized feedback control (FB), and feedforward-plus-feedback combined (C). The aim is to implement circular trajectories in the state space of the van der Pol system. A designed benchmark problem is used for testing the behavioral differences of the disparate controllers and then investigating controlled schemes and systems of various extents of nonlinearities. All methods exhibit a short initialization accompanying arbitrary initialization points. The feedforward control successfully converges to the desired trajectory, and PINN executes good controls with higher stochasticity observed for higher-order terms based on the phase portraits. In contrast, linearized feedback control and combined feed-forward plus feedback failed. Varying trajectory amplitudes revealed that feed-forward, linearized feedback control, and combined feed-forward plus feedback control all fail for unity nonlinear damping gain. Traditional control methods display a robust fluctuation for higher-order terms. For some various nonlinearities, PINN failed to implement the desired trajectory instead of becoming “trapped” in the phase of small radius, yet idealized nonlinear feedforward successfully implemented controls. PINN generally exhibits lower relative errors for varying targeted trajectories. However, PINN also shows evidently higher computational burden compared with traditional control theory methods, with at least more than 30 times longer control time compared with benchmark idealized nonlinear feed-forward control. This manuscript proposes a comprehensive comparative study for future controller employment considering deterministic and machine learning approaches.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Predicting positon solutions of a family of nonlinear Schrödinger equations through deep learning algorithm

  • May 06, 2024
  • Physics Letters A
  • K Thulasidharan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations40

Surrogate modeling of parameterized multi-dimensional premixed combustion with physics-informed neural networks for rapid exploration of design space

  • Sep 29, 2023
  • Combustion and Flame
  • Kai Liu +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Physics-informed neural networks for solving the Helmholtz equation

  • Nov 05, 2023
  • INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings
  • Johannes Schmid
  • Research Article

Physics-informed neural networks for geoid modeling

  • Jan 01, 2026
  • Journal of Geodesy
  • Tao Jiang +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Deep-CRM: A New Deep Learning Approach for Capacitance Resistive Models

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • ECMOR XVII
  • A Yewgat +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Nonlinear feedforward control of bioreactors with input multiplicities

  • Sep 01, 2001
  • Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
  • Jyothi S.N +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Physics based data driven method for the crashworthiness design of origami composite tubes

  • Oct 16, 2023
  • International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
  • Alberto Ciampaglia +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

MT-PINNs: multi-term physics-informed neural networks for solving initial boundary value problems of 2D and 3D nonlinear telegraph equations

  • Sep 30, 2025
  • Boundary Value Problems
  • Alemayehu Tamirie Deresse +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Structural Dynamic Response Analysis: Theoretical and Numerical Verification

  • May 21, 2025
  • International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
  • Jing Qi +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations133

A nonlocal physics-informed deep learning framework using the peridynamic differential operator

  • Jul 21, 2021
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Ehsan Haghighat +3
  • Research Article

Boosting Speed and Accuracy in Precision Motion Control

  • Sep 01, 2018
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Keval S Ramani +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Nonlinear feedforward control of chemical reactors

  • Jan 01, 1968
  • AIChE Journal
  • William L Luyben
  • Research Article
  • Citations134

Impaired Feedforward Control and Enhanced Feedback Control of Speech in Patients with Cerebellar Degeneration.

  • Aug 23, 2017
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Benjamin Parrell +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Estimating feedforward vs. feedback control of speech production through kinematic analyses of unperturbed articulatory movements

  • Nov 11, 2014
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Kwang S Kim +1
  • Research Article

Self-induced stochastic resonance: A physics-informed machine learning approach

  • Feb 02, 2026
  • Chaos Solitons & Fractals
  • Divyesh Savaliya +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.