• Home
  • Search
  • Comparison of Greedy Algorithms for Decision Tree Optimization
  • Cite Icon5
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30341-8_3Copy DOI Icon

Comparison of Greedy Algorithms for Decision Tree Optimization

  • Jan 1, 2013
  • Abdulaziz Alkhalid +2 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the study of 16 types of greedy algorithms for decision tree construction. The dynamic programming approach is used for construction of optimal decision trees. Optimization is performed relative to minimal values of average depth, depth, number of nodes, number of terminal nodes, and number of nonterminal nodes of decision trees. We compare average depth, depth, number of nodes, number of terminal nodes and number of nonterminal nodes of constructed trees with minimum values of the considered parameters obtained based on a dynamic programming approach. We report experiments performed on data sets from UCI ML Repository and randomly generated binary decision tables. As a result, for depth, average depth, and number of nodes we propose a number of good heuristics.

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter

Round-Message Trade-Off in Distributed Steiner Tree Construction in the CONGEST Model

  • Dec 09, 2019
  • Parikshit Saikia +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

A Classification Prediction Analysis of Flight Cancellation Based on Spark

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Yu Yanying +2
  • Book Chapter

Algorithms for Decision Tree Construction

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Igor Chikalov
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Construction of Near-Optimal Axis-Parallel Decision Trees Using a Differential-Evolution-Based Approach

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • IEEE Access
  • Rafael Rivera-Lopez +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Total Path Length and Number of Terminal Nodes for Decision Trees

  • Jan 01, 2014
  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Shahid Hussain
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Improved distributed approximation for Steiner tree in the CONGEST model

  • Sep 08, 2021
  • Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • Parikshit Saikia +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations55

Feature‐selection ability of the decision‐tree algorithm and the impact of feature‐selection/extraction on decision‐tree results based on hyperspectral data

  • Apr 29, 2008
  • International Journal of Remote Sensing
  • Y Y Wang +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations27

The First Fully Polynomial Stabilizing Algorithm for BFS Tree Construction

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Alain Cournier +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

Hierarchical Path-Finding Based on Decision Tree

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Yan Li +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations112

Approximation Algorithms for Multicommodity-Type Problems with Guarantees Independent of the Graph Size

  • Oct 01, 2009
  • Ankur Moitra
  • Research Article
  • Citations57

An efficient algorithm for optimal pruning of decision trees

  • Jun 01, 1996
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Hussein Almuallim
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Autonomous hidden node determination using dynamic expansion and contraction approach

  • Apr 13, 1994
  • D Young +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Stock Classification Prediction Based on Spark

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Jiang Xianya +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Fast Analysis of Optimal IOR Switch Time Using a Two-Factor Production Model and Least-Squares Monte Carlo Algorithm

  • Apr 18, 2018
  • Aojie Hong +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations19

Survey of routing base congestion control techniques under MANET

  • Mar 01, 2013
  • H Gupta +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.