Complexity analysis of a unifying algorithm for model checking interval temporal logic

In this paper, we investigate the model checking (MC) problem for Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic HS. In the last years, interval temporal logic MC has received an increasing attention as a viable alternative to the traditional (point-based) temporal logic MC, which can be recovered as a special case. Most results have been obtained under the homogeneity assumption, that constrains a proposition letter to hold over an interval if and only if it holds over each component state. Recently, Lomuscio and Michaliszyn proposed a way to relax such an assumption by exploiting regular expressions to define the behaviour of proposition letters over intervals in terms of their component states. When homogeneity is assumed, the exact complexity of MC is a difficult open question for full HS and for its two syntactically maximal fragments AA'BB'E' and AA'EB'E'. In this paper, we provide an asymptotically optimal bound to the complexity of these two fragments under the more expressive semantic variant based on regular expressions by showing that their MC problem is AEXP_pol-complete, where AEXP_pol denotes the complexity class of problems decided by exponential-time bounded alternating Turing Machines making a polynomially bounded number of alternations.

Decidability and complexity of the fragments of the modal logic of Allen's relations over the rationals

Model checking for Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic HS has been recently investigated in a systematic way, and it is known to be decidable under three distinct semantics. Here, we focus on the trace-based semantics, where the infinite execution paths (traces) of the given (finite) Kripke structure are the main semantic entities. In this setting, each finite infix of a trace is interpreted as an interval, and a proposition holds over an interval if and only if it holds over each component state (homogeneity assumption). In this paper, we introduce a quantitative extension of HS over traces, called parametric HS (PHS). The novel logic allows to express parametric timing constraints on the duration (length) of the intervals. We show that checking the existence of a parameter valuation for which a Kripke structure satisfies a PHS formula (model checking), or a PHS formula admits a trace as a model under the homogeneity assumption (satisfiability) is decidable. Moreover, we identify a fragment of PHS which subsumes parametric LTL and for which model checking and satisfiability are shown to be EXPSPACE-complete.

In the last years, the model checking (MC) problem for interval temporal logic (ITL) has received an increasing attention as a viable alternative to the traditional (point-based) temporal logic MC, which can be recovered as a special case. Most results have been obtained by imposing suitable restrictions on interval labeling. In this paper, we overcome such limitations by using regular expressions to define the behavior of proposition letters over intervals in terms of the component states. We first prove that MC for Halpern and Shoham’s ITL (HS), extended with regular expressions, is decidable. Then, we show that formulas of a large class of HS fragments, namely, all fragments featuring (a subset of) HS modalities for Allen’s relations meets, met-by, starts, and started-by, can be model checked in polynomial working space (MC for all these fragments turns out to be PSPACE-complete).

As an important complex problem, the temporal logic model checking problem is still far from being fully resolved under the circumstance of DNA computing, especially Computation Tree Logic (CTL), Interval Temporal Logic (ITL), and Projection Temporal Logic (PTL), because there is still a lack of approaches for DNA model checking. To address this challenge, a model checking method is proposed for checking the basic formulas in the above three temporal logic types with DNA molecules. First, one-type single-stranded DNA molecules are employed to encode the Finite State Automaton (FSA) model of the given basic formula so that a sticker automaton is obtained. On the other hand, other single-stranded DNA molecules are employed to encode the given system model so that the input strings of the sticker automaton are obtained. Next, a series of biochemical reactions are conducted between the above two types of single-stranded DNA molecules. It can then be decided whether the system satisfies the formula or not. As a result, we have developed a DNA-based approach for checking all the basic formulas of CTL, ITL, and PTL. The simulated results demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method.

Courcelle's famous theorem from 1990 states that any property of graphs definable in monadic second-order logic (MSO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> ) can be decided in linear time on any class of graphs of bounded tree-width, or in other words, MSO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> is fixed-parameter tractable in linear time on any such class of graphs. From a logical perspective, Courcelle's theorem establishes a sufficient condition, or an upper bound, for tractability of MSO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> -model checking. Whereas such upper bounds on the complexity of logics have received significant attention in the literature, almost nothing is known about corresponding lower bounds. In this paper we establish a strong lower bound for the complexity of monadic second-order logic. In particular, we show that if C is any class of graphs which is closed under taking sub-graphs and whose tree-width is not bounded by a poly-logarithmic function (in fact, log <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">c</sup> n for some small c suffices) then MSO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> -model checking is intractable on C (under a suitable assumption from complexity theory).

It is well known that (timed) ω-regular properties such as 'p holds at every even position' and 'p occurs at least three times within the next 10 time units' cannot be expressed in Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) and Event Clock Logic (ECL). A standard remedy to this deficiency is to extend these with modalities defined in terms of automata. In this paper, we show that the logics EMITL0, ∞ (adding non-deterministic finite automata modalities into the fragment of MITL with only lower- and upper-bound constraints) and EECL (adding automata modalities into ECL) are already as expressive as EMITL (full MITL with automata modalities). In particular, the satisfiability and model-checking problems for EMITL0, ∞ and EECL are PSPACE-complete, whereas the same problems for EMITL are EXPSPACE-complete. We also provide a simple translation from EMITL0, ∞ to diagonal-free timed automata, which enables practical satisfiability and model checking based on off-the-shelf tools.

In temporal-logic model checking, we verify the correctness of a program with respect to a desired behavior by checking whether a structure that models the program satisfies a temporal-logic formula that specifies the behavior. The model-checking problem for the branching-time temporal logic CTL can be solved in linear running time, and model-checking tools for CTL are used successfully in industrial applications. The development of programs that must meet rigid real-time constraints has brought with it a need for real-time temporal logics that enable quantitative reference to time. Early research on real-time temporal logics uses the discrete domain of the integers to model time. Present research on real-time temporal logics focuses on continuous time and uses the dense domain of the reals to model time. There, model checking becomes significantly more complicated. For example, the model-checking problem for TCTL, a continuous-time extension of the logic CTL, is PSPACE-complete.In this paper we suggest a reduction from TCTL model checking to CTL model checking. The contribution of such a reduction is twofold. Theoretically, while it has long been known that model-checking methods for untimed temporal logics can be extended quite easily to handle discrete time, it was not clear whether and how untimed methods can handle the reset quantifier of TCTL, which resets a realvalued clock. Practically, our reduction enables anyone who has a tool for CTL model checking to use it for TCTL model checking. The TCTL model-checking algorithm that follows from our reduction is in PSPACE, matching the known bound for this problem. In addition, it enjoys the wide distribution of CTL model-checking tools and the extensive and fruitful research efforts and heuristics that have been put into these tools.KeywordsModel CheckTemporal LogicAtomic PropositionKripke StructureTemporal ReasoningThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

A well-known result by Frick and Grohe shows that deciding FO logic on trees involves a parameter dependence that is a tower of exponentials. Though this lower bound is tight for Courcelle’s theorem, it has been evaded by a series of recent meta-theorems for other graph classes. Here we provide some additional non-elementary lower bound results, which are in some senses stronger. Our goal is to explain common traits in these recent meta-theorems and identify barriers to further progress.More specifically, first, we show that on the class of threshold graphs, and therefore also on any union and complement-closed class, there is no model-checking algorithm with elementary parameter dependence even for FO logic. Second, we show that there is no model-checking algorithm with elementary parameter dependence for MSO logic even restricted to paths (or equivalently to unary strings), unless EXP=NEXP. As a corollary, we resolve an open problem on the complexity of MSO model-checking on graphs of bounded max-leaf number. Finally, we look at MSO on the class of colored trees of depth d. We show that, assuming the ETH, for every fixed d ≥ 1 at least d + 1 levels of exponentiation are necessary for this problem, thus showing that the (d + 1)-fold exponential algorithm recently given by Gajarský and Hliněnỳ is essentially optimal.

Parameterized model checking is the problem of deciding if a given formula holds irrespective of the number of participating processes. A standard approach for solving the parameterized model checking problem is to reduce it to model checking finitely many finite-state systems. This work considers the theoretical power and limitations of this technique. We focus on concurrent systems in which processes communicate via pairwise rendezvous, as well as the special cases of disjunctive guards and token passing; specifications are expressed in indexed temporal logic without the next operator; and the underlying network topologies are generated by suitable formulas and graph operations. First, we settle the exact computational complexity of the parameterized model checking problem for some of our concurrent systems, and establish new decidability results for others. Second, we consider the cases where model checking the parameterized system can be reduced to model checking some fixed number of processes, the number is known as a cutoff. We provide many cases for when such cutoffs can be computed, establish lower bounds on the size of such cutoffs, and identify cases where no cutoff exists. Third, we consider cases for which the parameterized system is equivalent to a single finite-state system (more precisely a Büchi word automaton), and establish tight bounds on the sizes of such automata.

A model checker is an automatic tool that traverses a specific structure (normally a Kripke structure referred as the modelM) to check the satisfaction of some (temporal) logical propertyf. This is formally stated asM⊧f. For some formal notations, the modelMof a specificationS(written in a formal languageL) can be described as a labelled transition system (LTS). Specifically, it is not clear in general how usual tools such as SPIN, FDR, PAT, etc., create the LTS representation from a given process. Although one expects the coherence of the LTS generation with the semantics ofL, it is completely hidden inside the model checker itself. In this paper we show how to create a model checker forL, using a development approach based on its operational semantics. We use a systematic semantics embedding and the formal modeling using logic programming and analysis (FORMULA) framework to this end. We illustrate our strategy considering the formal language COMPASS modelling language (CML)—a new language that was based on CSP, VDM and the refinement calculus proposed for modelling and analysis of systems of systems. As FORMULA is based on satisfiability modulo theories solving, our model checker can handle communications and predicates involving data with infinite domains by building and manipulating a symbolic LTS. This goes beyond the capabilities of traditional CSP model checkers such as FDR and PAT. Moreover, we show how to reduce time and space complexities by simple semantic modifications in the embedding. This allows a more semantics-preserving tuning. Finally, we show a real implementation of our model checker in an integrated development platform for CML and its practical use on an industrial case study.

During the last decade, Model Checking has proven its efficacy and power in circuit design, network protocol analysis and bug hunting. Recent research on automatic verification has shown that no single model-checking technique has the edge over all others in all application areas. So, it is very difficult to determine which technique is the most suitable for a given model. It is thus sensible to apply different techniques to the same model. However, this is a very tedious and time-consuming task, for each algorithm uses its own description language. Applying Model Checking in software design and verification has been proved very difficult. Software architectures (SA) are engineering artifacts that provide high-level and abstract descriptions of complex software systems. In this paper a Direct Model Checking (DMC) method based on Kripke Structure and Matrix Algorithm is provided. Combined and integrated with domain specific software architecture description languages (ADLs), DMC can be used for computing consistency and other critical properties.

Based on the Kripke structure, linear temporal logic and generalized possibility measure, this article studies the model checking problems of generalized possibilistic fuzzy linear temporal logic (GPoFTL). The generalized possibilistic Kripke structure is introduced to describe the system model. The syntax of GPoFTL, which includes fuzzy temporal operators such as ``soon'', ``presently'', ``gradually'', ``within'', ``last'', ``nearly always'', ``almost alwayss'', ``in the long distant future'', ``in the middle of'', ``nearly until'' and ``almost until'', and its language semantics and path semantics under generalized possibility measure are given. Next, we explain the semantics of fuzzy temporal operators through some examples and prove that GPoFTL is an extension of generalized possibilistic linear temporal logic in fuzzy time temporal logic. Furthermore, the GPoFTL model checking algorithm is given by explicit calculation formulas one by one for any GPoFTL formula involving fuzzy temporal operators using fuzzy matrix operations. Last, the algorithm of necessary threshold model checking of GPoFTL is studied using automata theory and its time complexity is discussed.

Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Tight running times for minimum ℓq-norm load balancing: beyond exponential dependencies on 1/∊Lin Chen, Liangde Tao, and José VerschaeLin Chen, Liangde Tao, and José Verschaepp.275 - 315Chapter DOI:https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.14PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAboutAbstract We consider a classical scheduling problem on m identical machines. For an arbitrary constant q > 1, the aim is to assign jobs to machines such that is minimized, where Ci is the total processing time of jobs assigned to machine i. It is well known that this problem is strongly NP-hard. Under mild assumptions, the running time of an (1 + ∊)-approximation algorithm for a strongly NP-hard problem cannot be polynomial on 1/∊, unless P = NP. For most problems in the literature, this translates into algorithms with running time at least as large as 2Ω(1/∊) + nO(1). For the natural scheduling problem above, we establish the existence of an algorithm which violates this threshold. More precisely, we design a PTAS that runs in time. This result is in sharp contrast to the closely related minimum makespan variant, where an exponential lower bound is known under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). We complement our result with an essentially matching lower bound on the running time, showing that our algorithm is best-possible under ETH. The lower bound proof exploits new number-theoretical constructions for variants of progression-free sets, which might be of independent interest. Furthermore, we provide a fine-grained characterization on the running time of a PTAS for this problem depending on the relation between ∊ and the number of machines m. More precisely, our lower bound only holds when . Better algorithms, that go beyond the lower bound, exist for other values of m. In particular, there even exists an algorithm with running time polynomial in 1/∊ if we restrict ourselves to instances with m = Ω(1/∊ log2 1/∊). Previous chapter Next chapter RelatedDetails Published:2022eISBN:978-1-61197-707-3 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073Book Series Name:ProceedingsBook Code:PRDA22Book Pages:xvii + 3771

M AX -C UT , E DGE D OMINATING S ET , G RAPH C OLORING , and H AMILTONIAN C YCLE on graphs of bounded clique-width have received significant attention as they can be formulated in MSO 2 (and, therefore, have linear-time algorithms on bounded treewidth graphs by the celebrated Courcelle’s theorem), but cannot be formulated in MSO 1 (which would have yielded linear-time algorithms on bounded clique-width graphs by a well-known theorem of Courcelle, Makowsky, and Rotics). Each of these problems can be solved in time g ( k ) n f ( k ) on graphs of clique-width k . Fomin et al. (2010) showed that the running times cannot be improved to g ( k ) n O (1) assuming W[1]≠FPT. However, this does not rule out non-trivial improvements to the exponent f ( k ) in the running times. In a follow-up paper, Fomin et al. (2014) improved the running times for E DGE D OMINATING S ET and M AX -C UT to n O ( k ) , and proved that these problems cannot be solved in time g ( k ) n o ( k ) unless ETH fails. Thus, prior to this work, E DGE D OMINATING S ET and M AX -C UT were known to have tight n Θ ( k ) algorithmic upper and lower bounds. In this article, we provide lower bounds for H AMILTONIAN C YCLE and G RAPH C OLORING . For H AMILTONIAN C YCLE , our lower bound g ( k ) n o ( k ) matches asymptotically the recent upper bound n O ( k ) due to Bergougnoux, Kanté, and Kwon (2017). As opposed to the asymptotically tight n Θ( k ) bounds for E DGE D OMINATING S ET , M AX -C UT , and H AMILTONIAN C YCLE , the G RAPH C OLORING problem has an upper bound of n O (2 k ) and a lower bound of merely n o (√ [4] k ) (implicit from the W[1]-hardness proof). In this article, we close the gap for G RAPH C OLORING by proving a lower bound of n 2 o ( k ) . This shows that G RAPH C OLORING behaves qualitatively different from the other three problems. To the best of our knowledge, G RAPH C OLORING is the first natural problem known to require exponential dependence on the parameter in the exponent of n .