Component-level selection and qualification for the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) laser altimeter transmitter

The impact of geolocation uncertainty on GEDI tropical forest canopy height estimation and change monitoring

Forests are widely recognized as critical to combating climate change due to their ability to sequester and store carbon in the form of biomass. In recent years, the combined use of data from ground-based forest inventories and remotely sensed data from light detection and ranging (lidar) has proven useful for large-scale assessment of forest biomass, but airborne lidar is expensive and data acquisition is infeasible for many countries. By contrast, the spaceborne Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar instrument has collected freely available data for most of the world’s temperate and tropical forests since 2019. GEDI’s biomass products rely on models calibrated with a global network of field plots paired with GEDI waveforms simulated from airborne lidar to predict biomass. While this calibration strategy minimizes spatial and temporal offsets between field measurements and corresponding lidar returns, calibration data are sparse in many regions. Paraguay’s forests are known to be poorly represented in GEDI’s current calibration dataset, and here we demonstrate that local models calibrated opportunistically with on-orbit GEDI data and field surveys from Paraguay’s national forest inventory can be used with GEDI’s statistical estimators of aboveground biomass density (AGBD). We specify a protocol for opportunistically matching GEDI observations with field plots to calibrate a field-to-GEDI biomass model for use in GEDI’s hybrid statistical framework. Country-specific calibration using on-orbit data resulted in relatively accurate and unbiased predictions of footprint-level biomass, and importantly, supported the assumption underlying model-based inference that the model must ‘apply’ to the area of interest. Using a locally calibrated biomass model, we estimate that the mean AGBD in Paraguay is 65.55 Mg ha−1, which coincides well with the design-based approach employed by the national forest inventory. The GEDI estimates for individual forest strata range from 52.34 Mg ha−1 to 103.88 Mg ha−1. On average, the standard errors are 47% lower for estimates based on GEDI than the forest inventory, representing a significant gain in precision. Our research demonstrates that GEDI can be used by national forest inventories in countries that seek reliable estimates of AGBD, and that local calibration using existing field plots may be more appropriate in some applications than using GEDI global models, especially in regions where those models are sparsely calibrated.

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), a new spaceborne LiDAR system of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has the potential to revolutionize global measurements of vertical vegetation structure. However, GEDI performance among different forest types and factors influencing GEDI performance needs to be evaluated against similar measurements from existing airborne LiDAR platforms. Ideally, comparisons across diverse forest types will inform future work quantifying biomass or mapping species habitats. Thus, we compared the second version of GEDI L2A product (GEDI V2) with Airborne Observation Platform (AOP) leaf-on LiDAR data across 33 National Ecological Observation Network (NEON) sites. Comparisons were made for ground elevation and relative height (RH) of GEDI with simulated airborne laser scanning (ALS) waveforms from discrete point cloud LiDAR. Results indicated that GEDI V2 obtained high accuracy on ground elevation and RH100 estimations (3σ) with RMSEs of 1.38 m and 2.62 m, respectively. GEDI produced forest height estimations (RH100) for all 12 forest types with a %RMSE below 25%. GEDI RHs were sensitive to ground finding accuracy, and GEDI performance of RH estimation varied from forest profiles of different forest types. For factors influencing GEDI performance, greater than 21% of GEDI RH95 and 33% of ground elevation variations can be explained by land surface attributes, observing sensor system characteristics, and the collection time differences between GEDI and NEON LiDAR. Furthermore, geolocation error remains an essential factor affecting GEDI performance, which varies among forest and land cover types, especially for canopy height estimation. The findings reported here can provide insights to guide and enhance future GEDI-based global forest structure mapping and applications.

NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission offers data for temperate and pan-tropical estimates of aboveground forest biomass (AGB). The spaceborne, full-waveform LiDAR from GEDI provides sample footprints of canopy structure, expected to cover about 4% of the land area following two years of operation. Several options are available for estimating AGB at different geographical scales. Using GEDI sample data alone, gridded biomass predictions are based on hybrid inference which correctly propagates errors due to the modeling and accounts for sampling variability, but this method requires at least two GEDI tracks in the area of interest. However, there are significant gaps in GEDI coverage and in some areas of interest GEDI data may need to be combined with other wall-to-wall remotely sensed (RS) data, such as those from multispectral or SAR sensors. In these cases, we may employ hierarchical model-based (HMB) inference that correctly considers the additional model errors that result from relating GEDI data to the wall-to-wall data. Where predictions are possible from both hybrid and HMB inference the question arises which framework to choose, and under what circumstances? In this paper, we make progress towards answering these questions by comparing the performance of the two prediction frameworks under conditions relevant for the GEDI mission. Conventional model-based (MB) inference with wall-to-wall TanDEM-X data was applied as a baseline prediction framework, which does not involve GEDI data at all.An important feature of the study was the comparison of AGB predictors in terms of both standard deviation (SD: the square root of variance) and root mean square error (RMSE: the square root of mean square error – MSE). Since, in model-based inference, the true AGB in an area of interest is a random variable, comparisons of the performance of prediction frameworks should preferably be made in terms of their RMSEs. However, in practice only the SD can be estimated based on empirical survey data, and thus it is important also to study whether or not the difference between the two uncertainty measures is small or large under conditions relevant for the GEDI mission.Our main findings were that: (i) hybrid and HMB prediction typically resulted in smaller RMSEs than conventional MB prediction although the difference between the three frameworks in terms of SD often was small; (ii) in most cases the difference between hybrid and HMB inference was small in terms of both RMSE and SD; (iii) the RMSEs for all frameworks was substantially larger than the SDs in small study areas whereas the two uncertainty measures were similar in large study areas, and; (iv) spatial autocorrelation of model residual errors had a large effect on the RMSEs of AGB predictors, especially in small study areas. We conclude that hybrid inference is suitable in most GEDI applications for AGB assessment, due to its simplicity compared to HMB inference. However, where GEDI data are sparse HMB inference should be preferred.

Savannas have complex, discontinuous woody vegetation structures that vary greatly in vertical and spatial arrangement and change due to climatic, ecological and management impacts. While airborne laser scanning (ALS) data have provided detailed information on vertical vegetation structure and is widely used in ecological studies, it is lacking in availability and repeat frequency. Although the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) waveform Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor and algorithms were optimized for measuring dense forests, it was anticipated that GEDI metrics could provide useful characterization of lower stature, sparse savannas structures. This study provided the first baseline validation of Version 2 GEDI (L2A) relative height 98 (RH98) by comparing the on-orbit GEDI-RH98orb to the simulated GEDI-RH98sim derived from ALS data across diverse savanna vegetation. It furthermore determined the influence of various factors on error, e.g. algorithm setting group (SGs), beam type, day vs. night, beam sensitivity, and vegetation phenology. After applying quality flags, 22,813 GEDI footprints were analyzed across 11 sites. SGs 4–6 that are aimed at dense forests had much larger errors than SGs 1–3. The phenological conditions at the time of GEDI data acquisition had a very large influence on the error of RH98orb. During leaf-on conditions for savanna vegetation with RH98sim < 15 m, RH98orb was very accurate with R2 = 0.61, mean bias = −0.55 m, %bias = −11.1%, RMSE = 1.64 m and %RMSE = 29.8%. In leaf-off conditions where RH98sim < 15 m, RH98orb was less accurate with R2 = 0.43, mean bias = −1.47 m, %bias = −26.5%, RMSE = 2.03 m and %RMSE = 40.9%. During leaf-off conditions, the GEDI LiDAR signal at the start of the waveform may be weaker as it interacts with denuded branches and may be truncated as noise, leading to a large negative height bias. Therefore, assessments of deciduous vegetation structures should be conducted during leaf-on periods. In leaf-on conditions, GEDI's RH98orb was very accurate between canopy heights of 3 and 7 m, with a mean bias of −0.79 m (−10%). The bias of RH98orb was not influenced by canopy cover. Due to the GEDI LiDAR pulse width of 15.6 ns, the GEDI-RH98 data product cannot reliably estimate canopy heights of shrubs below 2.34 m and will require more complex deconvolution of the waveform. GEDI's RH98 accurately estimates the canopy height of trees between 3 and 15 m allowing assessment of canopy heights over vast savanna areas.

Spaceborne LiDAR altimetry has been demonstrated to be an essential source of data for the estimation and monitoring of inland water level variations. In this study, water level estimates from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) were validated against in situ gauge station records over Lake Geneva for the period between April 2019 and September 2020. The performances of the first and second releases (V1 and V2, respectively) of the GEDI data products were compared, and the effects on the accuracy of the instrumental and environmental factors were analyzed in order to discern the most accurate GEDI acquisitions. The respective influences of five parameters were analyzed in this study: (1) the signal-over-noise ratio (SNR); (2) the width of the water surface peak within the waveform (gwidth); (3) the amplitude of the water surface peak within the waveform (A); (4) the viewing angle of GEDI (VA); and (5) the acquiring beam. Results indicated that all these factors, except the acquiring beam, had an effect on the accuracy of GEDI elevations. Nonetheless, using VA as a filtering criterion was demonstrated to be the best compromise between retained shot count and water level estimation accuracy. Indeed, by choosing the shots with a VA ≤ 3.5°, 74.6% of the shots (after an initial filter) were retained with accuracies similar to choosing A &gt; 400 (46.2% retained shots), SNR &gt; 15 dB (63.3% retained shots), or gwidth &lt; 10 bins (46.5% of retained shots). Finally, the comparison between V1 and V2 elevations showed that V2, overall, provided elevations with a more constant, but higher, bias and fewer deviations to the in situ data than V1. Indeed, by choosing GEDI shots with VA ≤ 3.5°, the unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE) of GEDI elevations was 27.1 cm with V2 (r = 0.66) and 42.8 cm with V1 (r = 0.34). Results also show that the accuracy of GEDI (ubRMSE) does not seem to depend on the beam number and GEDI acquisition dates for the most accurate GEDI acquisitions (VA ≤ 3.5°). Regarding the bias, a higher value was observed with V2, but with lower variability (54 cm) in comparison to V1 (35 cm). Finally, the bias showed a slight dependence on beam GEDI number and strong dependence on GEDI dates.

This paper demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale, reliable monitoring of inland water surface levels through the analysis of the data collected by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) altimeter. In particular, we propose an automated and worldwide operational workflow, implemented within Google Earth Engine (GEE), benefiting from the availability of the whole GEDI time series in this geospatial cloud platform. Leveraging the massive computational capabilities of GEE, we were able to analyze millions of GEDI footprints and assess the potential of the sensor – in terms of precision and accuracy – to serve as an efficient and reliable remote hydrometer. The workflow is based on a rigorous spatio-temporal outlier rejection procedure and a spatial aggregation of the remaining high-quality footprints, for the robust estimation of a per-epoch median water level and its precision for the considered lake surface. A comprehensive precision and accuracy assessment was performed by comparing the GEDI retrieved water-level time series with in situ gauge data for 11 lakes of variable extent (from tens to several thousand km2) located in three continents. A rather homogeneous precision of GEDI water levels across the lakes was found, with a mean value of 14 cm. Additionally, a good agreement with the reference gauge stations was observed, showing an overall accuracy of 35 cm, a slight overestimation bias (6 cm), and a correlation of 0.76. It is important to note that these results are affected by the uncertainties of the transformation among GEDI reference frame and gauge stations reference frames. The proposed workflow can be easily applied to provide reliable inland water-level time series for all those lakes for which GEDI data is available, offering a generally higher temporal resolution than other altimeters. This approach lays the foundations for integrating GEDI within the set of remote-sensing instruments for water cycle monitoring on a large scale, enhancing our understanding of water storage dynamics in lakes, particularly in remote areas where it is not possible to install and maintain hydrometric gauges.

Continuous large-scale mapping of forest canopy height is crucial for estimating and reporting forest carbon content, analyzing forest degradation and restoration, or to model ecosystem variables such as aboveground biomass. Over the last years, the spaceborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor specifically designed to acquire forest structure information, Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), has been used to extract forest canopy height information over large areas. Yet, GEDI has no spatial coverage for most forested areas in Canada and other high latitude regions. On the other hand, the spaceborne LiDAR called Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) provides a global coverage but was not specially developed to study forested ecosystems. Nonetheless, both spaceborne LiDAR sensors obtain point-based information, making spatially continuous forest canopy height estimation very challenging. This study compared the performance of both spaceborne LiDAR, GEDI and ICESat-2, combined with ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 and Sentinel-1 and -2 data to produce continuous canopy height maps in Canada for the year 2020. A set-aside dataset and airborne LiDAR (ALS) from a national LiDAR campaign were used for accuracy assessment. Both maps overestimated canopy height in relation to ALS data, but GEDI had a better performance than ICESat-2 with a mean difference (MD) of 0.9 m and 2.9 m, and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.2 m and 5.2 m, respectively. However, as both GEDI and ALS have no coverage in most of the hemi-boreal forests, ICESat-2 captures the tall canopy heights expected for these forests better than GEDI. PALSAR-2 HV polarization was the most important covariate to predict canopy height, showing the great potential of L-band in comparison to C-band from Sentinel-1 or optical data from Sentinel-2. The approach proposed here can be used operationally to produce annual canopy height maps for areas that lack GEDI and ICESat-2 coverage.

Impact of fire severity on forest structure and biomass stocks using NASA GEDI data. Insights from the 2020 and 2021 wildfire season in Spain and Portugal

More of the Amazon rainforest is disturbed each year than completely deforested, but the impact of these disturbances on the carbon cycle remains poorly understood. Recent algorithmic advances using optical and radar remote sensing have improved detection of disturbances at fine spatiotemporal resolution, but quantifying changes in forest structure and biomass associated with these detected disturbances has proven challenging. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), a spaceborne lidar mission collecting data from 2019 to 2023, provides an opportunity to address this problem. GEDI captured billions of measurements of forest height, plant area, and understory structure within ∼25-m diameter footprints scattered across the tropics. Though the instrument had no guaranteed repeat cycle, it sometimes sampled nearby locations twice; some of these spatially near-coincident footprints happened to measure forest structure before and after a detected disturbance, providing information on how disturbance affected aboveground biomass. In this study, we developed an efficient general-purpose open-source pipeline for identifying spatially coincident footprints, which is a computationally complex task, and used the pipeline to find over 13,700 footprint pairs with intervening disturbance events across the Amazon biome. We also identified a set of ∼65,000 spatially near-coincident footprint pairs that lacked an intervening disturbance but came from regions with similar disturbance threat; these provided a control dataset to evaluate the effectiveness of estimating forest structure and biomass changes with nearby footprints. Analysis of this Amazon-wide dataset demonstrated that GEDI was able to measure statistically significant canopy height and biomass deficits following non-stand-replacing disturbances as small as 900 m2 (30 m × 30 m). GEDI's unique three-dimensional view of forest structure also reflected the effects of different intensities of fire disturbance, including 20% of burned areas where the upper canopy retained most of its height, but the understory suffered substantial foliage losses. Finally, we modeled the relationship between Landsat and Sentinel-1 disturbance detection parameters and GEDI-estimated percent biomass loss, showing that certain satellite-derived intensity metrics are correlated with increasing biomass loss and identifying temporal trends in biomass loss and recovery following disturbance. This work represents an important step towards the development of a pan-tropical, spatially explicit system for tracking carbon losses and structural changes arising from forest disturbance.

Information about forest structures is becoming crucial to earth's global carbon cycle, forest habitats, and biodiversity. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provides 25-m diameter footprints of the surface for 3-D structure measurements. The main goal of this study is to compare 12 031 footprints of GEDI data with other airborne and spaceborne digital elevation models (DEMs) for Southwest Spain. Ground elevation differences [elevation of the lowest mode (ELM)] are analyzed by comparing GEDI measurements with airborne laser scanning (ALS) LiDAR- and TanDEM-X-derived DEMs. The vertical structure (RH100) is compared to the ALS LiDAR measurement. Ten zones are analyzed, considering different degrees of coverage and slopes. We achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 6.13 m for the ELM when comparing GEDI and LiDAR data and an RMSE of 7.14 m when comparing GEDI and TanDEM-X data. For some of the studied areas, these values were considerably smaller, with RMSE values even lower than 1 m. For the RH100 metric, an RMSE of 3.56 m was achieved when comparing GEDI and LiDAR data, but again with a minimum value of 2.09 m for one zone. The results show a clear relation to coverage and slope, especially for the latter. This work also evaluates the positional uncertainty of GEDI footprints, shifting them ±10 and ±5 m along and across the track of the satellite orbit and their intermediate angular positions. The outcomes reveal a strong tendency to obtain better results in the ELM when setting the footprint to 270° and displacing it within 10 m of its positional uncertainty in comparison with the LiDAR and TanDEM-X data.

Monitoring forest structural properties is critical for a range of applications because structure is key to understanding and quantifying forest biophysical functioning, including stand dynamics, evapotranspiration, habitat, and recovery from disturbances. Monitoring of forest structural properties at desirable frequencies and cost globally is enabled by space-borne LiDAR missions such as the global ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) mission. This study assessed the accuracy of GEDI estimates for canopy height, total plant area index (PAI), and vertical profile of plant area volume density (PAVD) and elevation over a gradient of canopy height and terrain slope, compared to estimates derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS) across two forest age-classes in the Central Highlands region of south-eastern Australia. ALS was used as a reference dataset for validation of GEDI (Version 2) dataset. Canopy height and total PAI analyses were carried out at the landscape level to understand the influence of beam-type, height of the canopy, and terrain slope. An assessment of GEDI’s terrain elevation accuracy was also carried out at the landscape level. The PAVD profile evaluation was carried out using footprints grouped into two forest age-classes, based on the areas of mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forest burnt in the Central Highlands during the 1939 and 2009 wildfires. The results indicate that although GEDI is found to significantly under-estimate the total PAI and slightly over-estimate the canopy height, the GEDI estimates of canopy height and the vertical PAVD profile (above 25 m) show a good level of accuracy. Both beam-types had comparable accuracies, with increasing slope having a slightly detrimental effect on accuracy. The elevation accuracy of GEDI found the RMSE to be 10.58 m and bias to be 1.28 m, with an R2 of 1.00. The results showed GEDI is suitable for canopy densities and height in complex forests of south-eastern Australia.

Spatially-explicit information on canopy fuel parameters is key for wildfire propagation modelling, emission estimations and risk assessment. This work aims to develop easily-replicable methods to estimate critical fuel canopy parameters from spaceborne LiDAR observations acquired by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) sensor onboard the International Space Station. GEDI-like pseudowaveforms were modelled from discrete Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data and used to select the best GEDI predictor metrics to derive European wall-to-wall forest height and canopy cover maps. Then, GEDI spaceborne footprints were used to generate continental maps of canopy parameters through a two-steps approach: 1) Spatial interpolation of GEDI footprints inside homogeneous forest fuel type polygons, and 2) Modelling machine learning algorithms for the forest fuel type polygons without GEDI footprints inside, using auxiliary multispectral and RADAR imagery and biophysical variables. Our results show the capabilities of remote sensing and GEDI to estimate and map the spatial patterns of critical forest canopy fuel parameters in fire risk prevention and contribute to generating the necessary tools to develop an integrated risk-wise strategy that reduces fire vulnerability of ecosystems across Europe.

&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Deforestation and degradation are two major threats to the global forest that jeopardize their functions to store carbon and mitigate climate change. Forest degradation undermines the health and functions of the forest to perform ecosystem services and is a stepping stone to deforestation. However, forest degradation has not been sufficiently monitored and quantified due to the varying intensity of disturbance and usually inconsistent spectral signals reflected in optical remote sensing. Drivers of forest degradation can be natural and/or human-related, and charcoal production is a key driver of forest degradation in sub-Saharan Africa due to the high demands for charcoal for energy consumption and the increasing rate of population growth and urbanization. In this study, we focus on charcoal production-driven forest degradation that occurred at the Mabalane district in Southern Mozambique from 2008 to 2018. We intend to demonstrate the potential of combining Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data and Landsat time stacks for inspecting the changes in forest structure and aboveground biomass (AGB). To do so, we categorize the degraded forest by the year of disturbance based on a disturbance map produced for the study area for 2008-2018 by Sedano et al. (2019) and analyze the first year of publicly-released GEDI data to characterize forest structure and AGB at different disturbance classes. We also compare the GEDI L4A biomass with three other global and continental AGB products to understand the pre-disturbance biomass storage and the degradation patterns. Lastly, we build an empirical model between GEDI biomass and Landsat spectral bands and vegetation indices to quantify the biomass removal and regrowth from 10-year charcoal production. Uncertainties from the GEDI-Landsat models are estimated using Monte Carlo Simulations to propagate errors. The study improves the current understanding of forest degradation and carbon dynamics associated with it in tropical dry forests of sub-Saharan Africa. It also demonstrates the potential of combining spaceborne lidar missions and Landsat archives to facilitate accurate mapping of forest structural and AGB change in the degraded forest at a local scale.&amp;amp;#160;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;

The spectrophotometer method is costly, time-consuming, laborious, and destructive to the plant. Samples will be lost during the transportation process, and the method can only obtain sample point data. This poses a challenge to the estimation of chlorophyll content at the regional level. In this study, in order to improve the estimation accuracy, a new method of collaborative inversion of chlorophyll using Landsat 8 and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is proposed. Specifically, the chlorophyll content data set is combined with the preprocessed two remote-sensing (RS) factors to construct three regression models using a support vector machine (SVM), BP neural network (BP) and random forest (RF), and the better model is selected for inversion. In addition, the ordinary Kriging (OK) method is used to interpolate the GEDI point attribute data into the surface attribute data for modeling. The results showed the following: (1) The chlorophyll model of a single plant was y = 0.1373x1.7654. (2) The optimal semi-variance function models of pai, pgap_theta and pgap_theta_a3 are exponential models. (3) The top three correlations between the two RS data and the chlorophyll content were B2_3_SM, B2_3_HO, B2_5_EN and pai, pgap_theta, pgap_theta_a3. (4) The combination of the Landsat 8 imagery and GEDI resulted in the highest modeling accuracy, and RF had the best performance, with R2, RMSE and P values of 0.94, 0.18 g/m2 and 83.32%, respectively. This study shows that it is reliable to use Landsat 8 images and GEDI to retrieve the chlorophyll content of Dendrocalamus giganteus (D. giganteus), revealing the potential of multi-source RS data in the inversion of forest ecological parameters.