• Home
  • Search
  • Consensus ranking for multi-objective interventions in multiplex networks
  • Cite Icon22
  • https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab14b3Copy DOI Icon

Consensus ranking for multi-objective interventions in multiplex networks

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

High-centrality nodes have disproportionate influence on the behavior of a network; therefore controlling such nodes can efficiently steer the system to a desired state. Existing multiplex centrality measures typically rank nodes assuming the layers are qualitatively similar. Many real systems, however, are comprised of networks heterogeneous in nature, for example, social networks may have both agnostic and affiliative layers. Here, we use rank aggregation methods to identify intervention targets in multiplex networks when the structure, the dynamics, and our intervention goals are qualitatively different for each layer. Our approach is to rank the nodes separately in each layer considering their different function and desired outcome, and then we use Borda count or Kemeny aggregation to identify a consensus ranking—top nodes in the consensus ranking are expected to effectively balance the competing goals simultaneously among all layers. To demonstrate the effectiveness of consensus ranking, we apply our method to a degree-based node removal procedure such that we aim to destroy the largest component in some layers, while maintaining large-scale connectivity in others. For any multi-objective intervention, optimal targets only exist in the Pareto-sense; we, therefore, use a weighted generalization of consensus ranking to investigate the trade-off between the competing objectives. We use a collection of model and real networks to systematically investigate how this trade-off is affected by multiplex network structure. We use the copula representation of the multiplex centrality distributions to generate model multiplex networks with given rank correlations. This allows us to separately manipulate the marginal centrality distribution of each layer and the interdependence between the layers, and to investigate the role of the two using both analytical and numerical methods.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations172

Congestion Induced by the Structure of Multiplex Networks

  • Mar 10, 2016
  • Physical Review Letters
  • Albert Solé-Ribalta +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Cohort and Rhyme Priming Emerge from the Multiplex Network Structure of the Mental Lexicon

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Complexity
  • Massimo Stella
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Examination of the similarity between a new Sigmoid function-based consensus ranking method and four commonly-used algorithms

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • International Journal of Operational Research
  • Madjid Tavana +2
  • Book Chapter

Learning Advisor-Advisee Relationship from Multiplex Network Structure

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Xiangchong Cui +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Multiplex network community detection algorithm based on motif awareness

  • Nov 23, 2022
  • Knowledge-Based Systems
  • Chunying Li +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

Correlations between weights and overlap in ensembles of weighted multiplex networks.

  • Dec 31, 2014
  • Physical Review E
  • Giulia Menichetti +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Graphlets in Multiplex Networks

  • Feb 05, 2020
  • Scientific Reports
  • Tamarа Dimitrova +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Who influences whom and how in river-basin governance?A participatory stakeholder and social network analysis in Zayandeh-Rud basin, Iran

  • Oct 12, 2021
  • Environmental Development
  • Mohammad Naser Reyhani +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Interlayer Link Prediction in Multiplex Social Networks Based on Multiple Types of Consistency Between Embedding Vectors.

  • Apr 01, 2023
  • IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • Rui Tang +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Creating context for social influence processes in multiplex networks

  • Feb 01, 2017
  • Network Science
  • J Antonio Rivero Ostoic
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Ashkin-Teller model and diverse opinion phase transitions on multiplex networks.

  • Aug 07, 2015
  • Physical Review E
  • S Jang +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Layer-Edge Patterns Exploration and Presentation in Multiplex Networks: From Detail to Overview via Selections and Aggregations

  • Mar 30, 2019
  • Electronics
  • Xitao Zhang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Smart flattening cuckoo search algorithm for community detection in multiplex networks

  • Apr 13, 2025
  • Social Network Analysis and Mining
  • Randa Boukabene +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

The Multiplex Efficiency Index: unveiling the Brazilian air transportation multiplex network\u2014BATMN

  • Aug 07, 2020
  • Scientific Reports
  • Izabela M Oliveira +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Effect of externality in multiplex networks on one-layer synchronization

  • Jun 01, 2015
  • Journal of the Korean Physical Society
  • Xin Jiang +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.